T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1192.1 | Elephants, Butterflys and Zebras? | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | | Mon Feb 08 1988 16:46 | 31 |
|
In my studio, the only instruments making any acoustical sounds
are the drums and the voices. These are seperated by a partition
of plexiglass, so you can look thru and see the person drumming
and vice versa. Electric guitars and basses are *silent* acoustically.
(Not only does this help with the neighbors...it helps with the
ears too. I'm so spoiled I almost *cant* practice at live volume
levels)
I mix with headphones. All the musicians monitor with headphones.
We *try* to get a consistant brand of 'phone for each player, but
it just never works out. The best pair we have are these Beyer Dynamic
jobs. Somehow, when I get a good sound and EQ with them, it sounds
just as good thru my Polk HiFi spkrs "upstairs".
The "mix" is the same as the monitor - in stereo, no favorites.
Sometimes, I cant hear my bass *above* the rest, but I find that the
level is just fine on a later playback. Takes getting used to...
Ideally, each musician would have a personal mix in their monitor,
at their personal loudness level. Such is as yet beyond my
capabilities. Hmmmm, I could use the monitor circuit for these guys,
or maybe split the stereo signal between the monitor channel and
a mono version of the mix, etc etc et al.
In the studio is *in* the studio. Feedbacks are kinda tough for
the guitarists to do without an amp going...believe it or not, I've
seen 'em do it...yep, thru the headphones!!!
Joe Jas
|
1192.2 | Me and my Pro 4A's | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Exit left to Funway | Mon Feb 08 1988 17:06 | 17 |
| I've settled on one particular set of headphones and I
mix/EQ/hack the sound to sound good through them. They're not perfect
but I know what they do sound like.
We rarely use monitors at "performance levels". Sometimes we do
everything via the headphones except shout at each other, and the
monitors just provide background (at 60 dB or so).
Once you get used to trusting your ears_and_headphones combo, it really
works quite well. It helps to have a ONE set of headphones that
you've settled on as a standard (if only as a psychological crutch,
if nothing else).
And yes, I did mix one show listening ONLY through the headphones!
It worked nicely (reason for this foolish stunt: the speakers near
the board had some blown drivers and sounded terrible. I cut them
off and used the 'phones. )
|
1192.3 | Mic Turtle ??? | COUGAR::JACQUES | | Tue Feb 09 1988 13:21 | 11 |
| Re. .0 Dave, have you seen the gizmo's they use in music stores
to demo mics. They use something (I think it is called a turtle)
which will hold 4-6 mikes on a disk. One balanced mic cable connects
to it. You press this unlock button and the disk spins so that you
can AB test mics. I bet you could buy one if you want to be able
to switch mics on the fly.
Just a thought !!!
Mark Jacques
|
1192.4 | Made Possible by a Grant from Exxon? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Feb 09 1988 15:07 | 17 |
| Pretty much like Joe Jas, I go direct. After all, my studio is
on the fourth floor of an apartment building. Not a whole lot of
live instruments are acceptable to the neighbors and management.
About the only thing I ever need to mic is vocals. I got myself
one of those Tascam 4 headphone amps in a box that I drive off my
monitor mix. Since I just about never trade anything in, I enjoy
the luxury of a separate 16 channel powered board for monitoring
purposes, and I can mixdown through either of my boards. I can
send different mixes to the headphone distribution box and the room
monitors. So if I need to mic anything, I kill the room mix, everybody
dons their phones, and off we go.
Works pretty good for me.
len.
|
1192.5 | For the man who has everything... | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Tue Feb 09 1988 15:59 | 6 |
| re: .3
Sounds like a new gift idea for Daddy's or EU's: "For the home studio
enthusiast who has everything..."
db
|
1192.6 | 2 cents from up north | FROST::HARRIMAN | with real glycerine vibraphone | Thu Feb 11 1988 08:43 | 32 |
|
re: .*
My studio is in an office building...since nobody is around there
after 5:00 we get it for the second shift. We don't have a control
room either, and we do a fair amount of live miking (drums, guitar
amp(s), vocal stuff).
Our "isolation" consists of baffles which I constructed out of
wood, burlap and insulation. These structures may be moved about
the room and by my measurements provide a best case -20db attenuation
of ambient noise (which actually helps in most cases). I use those
PZM mikes wrapped in DEC packing foam to mic drums now - I use less
mikes and it sounds better.
We monitor thru headphones, unless someone is recording a band,
in which case we turn on the P.A. monitors. We make a lot of noise
occasionally.
For less noisy applications like vocal track dubs and my keyboards,
I just use headphones or play thru the monitors. I usually try to
use headphones for vocal tracks but sometimes I wonder if it's worth
it, I mean if I use a directional mike and put the monitored sound
out the speakers, not the phones, I can't really tell the difference
on the mix. The 707 always ends up through the monitors now.
We also deadend the room acoustics with some judicious use of
DEC part 99-18214-01 (which was being thrown out a lot here),
description "logic module foam carton". Cut in half, it beats egg
crates hands down. Too bad we don't scrap foam anymore.
/pjh
|
1192.7 | 2 approaches | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 11 1988 10:15 | 46 |
|
From my experience, there are two approaches to recording a
band. One is, to record them as a whole, the other is to isolate
each instrument and mix on a console. I've had "success" with both
approaches.
When using the "whole band" approach, it's important to consider
the spatial arrangement of the players relative to the (2) microphones.
Also, it's pretty much up to the musicians to keep relative volume
levels in check and within reason. You're pretty much limited to
"what you hear is what you get", still, excellent results can be
obtained in soundstage appearance. An acoustically "dead" environment
is best.
Isolation is the name of the game when using the "mix" approach.
It took me a couple of years to figure out that the drums *have*
to be in a space of their own. Within this space, I have 5 microphones
covering the drumset; kick, snare, toms and 2 general L-R stereo
for the spatial information. These are judiciously panned and EQ'd,
so that the frequency and phase information carried by any one is not
cancelled by one of the others. The result is an excellent soundstage
for the drums. The bass input, as well as inputs for the guitars
are direct. It took me a couple of years to figure out that the
acoustic output of live amplification would *always* find it's way
into the drums mix. Each guitarist gets his own speaker in the
stereo soundstage, while the bass is dead center. Our vocalist uses
a Rockman chorus, which has a stereo output with the "wide" function,
which gives a beautiful "double track" sound. My vocal mike is dead
center, so that when we sing together, the soundstage is filled.
Reverb effects for vocal and guitar are currently centered, although
with board mods and another DDL, I could have slightly different
delay times for each channel, furthering the spatial illusion.
Microphones for the vocals are in a different space than where the
drums are set, to isolate these channels. Care is taken when setting
the drummer's vocal mike gain and panning so as not to corrupt the
stereo image of the drumset.
The whole is compressed with a DBX 118, background noise is
stripped out with an autocorrelator and then the sound is equalized
with a stereo 10 band graphic before being shipped to the tape decks.
The sheer number of controllable factors approaches 100 and it's
damn easy to lose a particular sound, as certain functions have
a greater impact than others; they're highly sensitive. I have been
marking control positions lately, so this doesnt happen.
Joe Jas
|
1192.8 | make shift recording booths | FSBIC1::DDREHER | | Thu Feb 11 1988 10:35 | 17 |
| I had this same problem (recording live in same room as the tape
deck, mixer and monitor speakers), especially with drums.
My studio is in a finished basement which has a few rooms. So I
used an old 12 channel snake from my gigging days and ran it from
the board through the wall and into the laundry room. I then
convert the snake returns into headphone jacks for talent to
monitor when recordsing. This is were I record everything that
uses microphones. The 'control room' is not perfectly isolated
from the 'recording booth' but it works *lots* better than
recording in the same room.
I'm now going to see if I can convert one of the mic sends on
the snake into a midi line so I can record hybrid drummers using
live cymbals and midi data from drum pads.
Dave
|
1192.9 | And what does the foam do? | HPSTEK::RHODES | | Fri Feb 12 1988 10:29 | 9 |
| > of ambient noise (which actually helps in most cases). I use those
> PZM mikes wrapped in DEC packing foam to mic drums now - I use less
> mikes and it sounds better.
Can you elaborate on this setup? How many PZMs and where are they placed?
Thanks,
Todd.
|
1192.10 | Attenuation of super highs, etc. | FROST::HARRIMAN | with real glycerine vibraphone | Mon Feb 15 1988 08:59 | 49 |
|
sure.
First a small academic discussion of PZMs and their ability to
deal with drum kits:
PZMs are supposed to be good for about 120 db without switching
to a higher voltage battery. It actually turns out that they're
only good for about 110 db before you need to go with the higher
voltages. And that ain't worth it (>$10 worth /battery in the
higher-voltage case)
But they sound pretty neat, being condensers and all. So basically
what we decided to do was first to attenuate (not too worried about
the high-frequency muffling, cymbals are too damn splashy anyway
and the muffling isn't particularly bad) by wrapping the PZM in
about 1/2"-3/4" foam and placing it strategically in front and above
the drum kit, about 2' away from where the rack toms would want
to be. Since the "drum booth" in our case is actually a bunch of
stand-up baffles and a wall with foam all over it, it just ends
up on the wall. Normally just one is enough for your basic four-track
live recording attempt. For more elaborate recording (four track,
this means up to three tracks with a bounce), place two PZMs on
either side at about 60 degree angles from the front (adapt according
to the kit) and a directional condenser on a low stand for the
snare/hihat.
About 90% of the live drum miking that gets done in my studio
is when there are other people playing too. Drummers, to my experience,
tend to play about 110-115 db when in a small room on a large set
playing rock. So it's noisy enough in the drum corner to get away
with a single PZM most of the time (unless you have enough tracks
to do a stereo mix... I don't, usually)
Sure, it's kinda unorthodox... but since PZMs are such hot mikes
anyway, you find that an open PZM picks up all sorts of nasty noises
from cymbals, other people, etc. And besides, they're relatively
cheap. I have two, and they work quite nicely.
If you're going to try this method yourself (i.e. you don't have
7 mikes to place all over the drum kit, and you haven't got 7 channels
to devote to a drum mix), try to get ahold of some 3/4" packing
foam, and isolate your drummer from as much other noise as possible.
You can get a very nice mono mix from this method, it's clean and
(for me anyway) distortion free. And cheap.
/paul
|
1192.11 | | HPSTEK::RHODES | | Tue Feb 16 1988 08:48 | 16 |
| Thanks for the info Paul.
> this means up to three tracks with a bounce), place two PZMs on
> either side at about 60 degree angles from the front (adapt according
> to the kit) and a directional condenser on a low stand for the
> snare/hihat.
Interesting. No mic on the bass drum. Does the PZM really pick up the
lows of the bass drum? I currently have one SM57, and if I were to add
a PZM (I'm seriously thinking about it), I think I'd stick the SM57 in
the bass drum rather than use it to mic the snare/hihat.
Has anyone used a 8" (or larger) woofer speaker as a bass drum mic?
I wonder what it would sound like...
Todd.
|
1192.12 | ringy | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Tue Feb 16 1988 14:23 | 3 |
|
CdH
|
1192.13 | it works for me | FROST::HARRIMAN | with real glycerine vibraphone | Thu Feb 18 1988 08:15 | 15 |
|
re: lack of bass drum miking
No, we don't bother miking the bass drum. It's loud enough. It's
a 24" rock drum anyway, the damn thing shakes the walls. Before
we put up the 99-class stuff on the walls, I was constantly hearing
it coming from *behind* me instead of in front of me. Drove me nutz,
it was just late enough to throw my timing.
Don't even think of using speakers as mikes if you want decent
sound. Condenser mikes are ever so much clearer, even with foam
over them.
/pjh
|