T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1170.1 | you can't tuna fish | LEDS::ORIN | Ensoniq, is EPS a Mirage? | Sat Jan 23 1988 02:48 | 32 |
| I am also interested in speakers. I didn't get any response to my speaker review
note, but I think they are critical to live performing and studio mixdown
monitoring. The goal of that note was not to say "my speakers are better and
cost more than yours", but to compare sound quality (subjective) vs. price and
make us more aware of the variety available. Stores like E.U. Wurly tend to
get locked in to one brand/vendor and you don't really get a side-by-side
comparison in the store. If you go to a home stereo shop, they have walls full
of different sizes and brands and you can switch during a song to compare. It
might be hard to compare in a notes file though. Some bands bi-amp or tri-amp.
Some use stacks, others use stands. You need a large van and many strong young
bodies to haul this stuff around. I am interested in what makes good speakers
sound good, and how to carry as few as possible.
Without getting into the math, here are some factors I think might pertain..
1. Internal cross-over filter quality
2. Speaker cabinet design
3. Room acoustics
4. Speaker positioning, they sound better to me up on stands
5. Volume level, some speakers don't get going until they are driven hard
6. speaker design, this includes cone material, windings in voice coil, etc.
7. impedance matching, 8 ohm, 4 ohm, 2 ohm should be matched to power amp
8. horns vs. tweeters
9. phase relationships, this relates to room dimensions and speaker positioning
The volume of air moved is only a small part of this complex issue. It's more
a question of how accurately and efficiently the speaker transduces the
electrical signal into air waves which move our ear drums.
Let's hear from the speaker design hackers.
Dave
|
1170.2 | base reflexes intact, thanks | CANYON::MOELLER | Back in the Y-life again | Mon Jan 25 1988 12:12 | 20 |
| I think the reason the 15"-18" 'bin' bass boxes sound better is
primarily due to the box design and attention paid to crossover
points. Generally smaller, 8" class speakers are in hermetically
sealed boxes, or have marginal porting.
Boxes made specifically for bass have an internal volume matching
the resonant frequency of the speaker (as nearly as possible),
plus a port area equal to that of the speakers' surface area..
the column of air leading from the back of the speaker to the port
is of a length so that when the vibration emerges from the port
it is in phase, reinforcing the air movement off the front of the
speaker cone. Can you say 'bass reflex' ? I knew you could.
So as apparent volume is a function of air moved, I will say that
a box with multiple 8" speakers, correctly designed and with the
appropriate crossover points, would give bottom end volume equal
to another bass bin with larger speakers, given approx. equal
speaker area.
karl
|
1170.3 | | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Tue Jan 26 1988 09:30 | 27 |
|
It is true that multiple smaller drivers will "push as much air"
as a single larger driver, and their resonant frequencies will interact
and sum together to assimilate a larger driver, but not in a
predictable linear fashion. The 'esteemed' doctor will admit this
himself because they sell an active equalizer with the 801 to add
more bottom electronically. That to me is a kludge.
The problem is, there is no single driver made by anyone that will
have extended bass response and high efficiency. So cabs that go
way down, and have that fat bottom, just won't pump up the volume
as loud as one that doesn't, assuming the same number of drivers
per cab. You have to make a tradeoff. Horn loaded bins have very
high efficiency, but don't have the extended low end of a ported
cab.
Thiel-Small small signal parameters are the design guidelines that
are used to closely match the driver to the cabinet. When you have
achieved this match, the cabinet is known to be "optimally tuned".
The parameters of the drivers are sometimes printed in the lit with
the driver, but they can be measured with the proper equipment.
This is a great topic.
CdH
|
1170.4 | Maj7, m7, You Know What I Mean | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Jan 26 1988 09:55 | 7 |
| I know I'm gonna get yelled at for saying this, but you don't want
a lot of small drivers to "assimilate" (i.e., absorb) a large driver,
you want them to "simulate" (i.e., behave the same way as) the large
driver.
len.
|
1170.5 | | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Tue Jan 26 1988 10:00 | 10 |
|
Len,
I knew that. I wanted to see if you'd catch that. 8^) 8^) 8^)
Thanks for the English lesson 8^) 8^)
CdH_who_only_got_B's_in_English
|
1170.7 | quick base reflexes | SALSA::MOELLER | Hear me now or hear me later | Tue Jan 26 1988 14:04 | 33 |
| < Note 1170.3 by TWIN4::DEHAHN >
> It is true that multiple smaller drivers will "push as much air"
> as a single larger driver, and their resonant frequencies will interact
> and sum together to assimilate a larger driver, but not in a
> predictable linear fashion. The 'esteemed' doctor will admit this
> himself because they sell an active equalizer with the 801 to add
> more bottom electronically. That to me is a kludge.
Sorry, Chris. the Bose 801/901s need active bass EQ because the
box is a) sealed (no port/bass reflex effect, b) TINY, only about
2 cubic feet. For ANY speaker to respond well below 100 cycles it
needs correct port area and phasing and at LEAST 7 cubic feet.
> The problem is, there is no single driver made by anyone that will
> have extended bass response and high efficiency. So cabs that go
> way down, and have that fat bottom, just won't pump up the volume
> as loud as one that doesn't, assuming the same number of drivers
> per cab. You have to make a tradeoff. Horn loaded bins have very
> high efficiency, but don't have the extended low end of a ported
> cab.
Uh, many of the Voice of the Theatre boxes are BOTH horn loaded
AND have an in-phase port (bass reflex to me). The bigger the
box/horn/port, the less amplifier power is required. My father
worked for Conn Organ in the early 1950s. They used to make bass
enclosures for amphitheaters and stadiums. He tells me of one
enclosure that held two 15" Jensen drivers, 25 cubic feet internal
bass reflex, with a folded front horn that was 12 FEET SQUARE at
the mouth. They hadda ship it on a flatcar. When installed, it
literally cracked the foundations of the auditorium (I forget where).
The amplifier ? A 50-watt Marantz tube amp.
karl
|
1170.8 | | JAWS::COTE | Help!! Personal_name Brain Cramp!! | Tue Jan 26 1988 15:44 | 9 |
| >When installed, it
>literally cracked the foundations of the auditorium (I forget where).
>The amplifier ? A 50-watt Marantz tube amp.
Just from the weight, no doubt.
>karl
Edd
|
1170.9 | Is clarity an issue? | FROST::HARRIMAN | with real glycerine vibraphone | Tue Jan 26 1988 17:24 | 19 |
|
> The bigger the box/horn/port, the less amplifier power is required.
Sure, but don't you then introduce slewing problems and therefore
harmonic distortion?
Those big old Voice of the Sewer speakers weren't known for fidelity.
For bass players, it's may not be much of a problem (?). I personally
like kick drums and floor toms to have some definition to them (Thump!
instead of flump!).
Why not use large tuned ports? I have an old article describing
an 11' chamber in a relatively small box. Requires more power (no
front horn) but it has a clearer sound.
Not that I have anything against horns.
/pjh
|
1170.10 | | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Thu Jan 28 1988 09:02 | 21 |
|
I guess I better check up onmy 801 lit when I get home. I could
swear those two round ports in the front of an 801 are for cabinet
tuning.
I also beg to differ about your 7 cubic foot minimum for bass response
under 100Hz. The subwoofers I designed, built, and use in my 2500
watt system are 6 cf and are flat to 40Hz and have a -3db point
at 23Hz. All it takes is the proper driver, and proper tuning of
the enclosure. I used straight forward Theil-Small.
When I was comparing horn loaded cabs to ported, I was comparing
just that. Combination cabs like the VOT have their own set of
problems.
Those mega-sized VOT speakers are still in production. The biggest
ones are about 15 feet by 6 feet with the extensions, and use two
15" drivers. They are ported as well as horn loaded (obviously).
CdH
|
1170.11 | How is a Bose 801 like a Russian Missle? | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | Exit left to Funway | Thu Jan 28 1988 09:48 | 16 |
| > The subwoofers I designed, built, and use in my 2500 watt...
2.5 KILOWATT !?!?!?!
You can't draw that much on a wall socket- it requires a 30 ampere
service at 110V, or 15 amps at 220V. Does your amp have an electric-
range wallplug?
:-)
I take it you sacrificed efficiency for a low roll-off point?
:-) :-)
Yes, Bose 801's have a pair of very small ports, with tuning plugs.
Kind of like Soviet rocket boosters (semi-plugged nozzles).
|
1170.12 | cube | SRFSUP::MORRIS | Decapitate Tipper Gore | Thu Jan 28 1988 11:42 | 13 |
|
Has anyone seen the EV's with 4 18"s aimed up, down, and at both
sides, and the sound comes out the front???
I heard them, and they are loud and powerful.
I was thinking about making a portable bass amp cabinet with 6 10"s,
aimed up, down, and at every side, like a cube. since bass is
allegedly non-directional, this should work, right??
Tell me why it won't.
Ashley
|
1170.13 | Why? | JAWS::COTE | Action-verbs? | Thu Jan 28 1988 11:49 | 10 |
| I don't know if it will work or not, but....
Since bass frequencies exhibit lots of non-directional tendencies,
what do you feel you have to gain by pointing the speakers towards
every which way?
It also seems to me that you'd want to isolate each speaker in the
cabinet to keep them from cancelling each other out.
Edd
|
1170.14 | | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Thu Jan 28 1988 16:53 | 25 |
|
The EV system is the MT-4 and uses what they call "maniofold
technology". Each driver is loaded into a plenum which exits in
a port. The rear of each driver is open. The plenum is designed
so that the sound exiting the port is in phase with the sound leaving
the rear of the driver. It's capable of *** 138 db ** from 40Hz
to 400Hz or so. The matching upper cabinet is 3way with a 'manifold
loaded' low mid and horns for highs and tweeters. I think it was
designed for flown arrays, not floor standing.
Re: 2.5KW
Somewhere in here is a short description of my big system, but it's
a 4-way 2.5KW (actually 2.4KW at present) custom designed system
using Altec Lansing components exclusively. Response is from 23Hz
to 22Khz +/- 3db and has a maximum output somewhere around 124db,
although that's the limit of my meter. Big, heavy, old-tech, but
loud. BGW and Crown amps, mostly Rane electronics. At full tilt
it will draw 60 amps, but you power engineers should know that it's
not steady state, so a 30 amp breaker does just fine. There's also
a lot of amplifier headroom built in.
CdH
|