T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1082.1 | because it sounds good? | FROST::HARRIMAN | How do I work this? | Mon Dec 21 1987 08:54 | 1 |
|
|
1082.2 | On a thoughtful note... | SKIVT::HEARN | Timeshare - Life's a BATCH anyway | Mon Dec 21 1987 09:07 | 10 |
|
EVERYONE want to be able to express themselves - with music,
there is no "right" or "wrong" - only as many ways as there are
people who play.
I may not like everything I hear, but can I (or anyone) really
say it's "not right"?
Rich
|
1082.3 | Am I In the MUSIC Conference? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Dec 21 1987 10:16 | 6 |
| Uhm, this is another topic which has been discussed to death in
MUSIC. Is there any specific resoan why we need to rehash this
in the COMMUSIC context?
len (who likes music because it sounds nice).
|
1082.4 | appologies | LEDS::ORIN | Raucous Roland Renegades | Tue Dec 22 1987 11:19 | 12 |
| > Uhm, this is another topic which has been discussed to death in
> MUSIC. Is there any specific resoan why we need to rehash this
> in the COMMUSIC context?
Sorry, Len. I don't get a chance to read both conferences, so did not
realize that they had been covered in MUSIC. Is there any way for the
moderator of COMMUSIC to move these topics and replys to MUSIC? What
happens to the replies if I delete the base notes?
Dave
ps. Thanks for the MIX catalogue. I looks very interesting.
|
1082.5 | | SALEM::SAWYER | i don't listen, i argue | Wed Dec 23 1987 14:43 | 15 |
|
remember, next time you are at a party...
and someone brings up any topic at all...
you just say "listen, this has been discussed to death at
other parties and we need not discuss it again!"
after all, you couldn't possibly have a variation on opinions
that might cause people to realize they missed something...
could you?
so from now on, only new topics that have never been discussed
before may be discussed anywhere anytime.....
|
1082.6 | Yeah, Right. | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Dec 28 1987 15:47 | 11 |
| Sorry, Rik, but that's not apropos. That's certainly not my intention,
either.
How about we talk about my recipe for Danish pastry here. I know
there's a conference on cooking somewhere, but I like Scandinavian
music too, so it's not that unrelated.
You're right, you don't listen, you argue.
len, who's now sorry he was dumb enough to mention it.
|
1082.7 | is this what you meant? | ANGORA::JANZEN | Tom LMO2/O23 DTN296-5421 | Mon Dec 28 1987 16:24 | 2 |
| I like music because it's musical and I like musical stuff.
Tom
|
1082.8 | None Necessary | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Dec 28 1987 16:27 | 12 |
| Yeah, Tom, I couldn't have said it better myself. I knew we agreed
about something!
I like music too, I guess because it sounds nice.
I'll talk to AG about it tonight and see if he's got anything
insightful to add.
Anyone wanna hear about my danish pastry recipe?
len.
|
1082.9 | RKNRON:: is up, so to speak | JON::ROSS | we is wockin'.... | Tue Dec 29 1987 15:06 | 14 |
| no thanks len.
I hate music because it never comes out the way I
"hear" it, and its too much of a challenge for the
same reason, that I fall short and get really disgruntled
and pissed and keep trying to improve,
for some reason....
er, ya know?
ron
|
1082.10 | Music is for masochists | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Wed Dec 30 1987 09:50 | 14 |
| Oh, so true Ron, so true.
I don't know why I put up with this crap. It's a form of self torture.
I think only once in my life have I done something perfectly in
music. There's this little thing in "Heartbreaker" (Benatar, not
LZ) where the guitar does a one note bend and hammer-on, (at the
end of the intro) and, well, not that I wanna be immodest or anything,
well.. I nailed that sucker at Falljam 87.
The whole rest of the tape makes me cringe like nails on a chalkboard.
db - who is lucky enough to have that brief moment of musical
exaltation on videotape.
|
1082.11 | no imagination, see hardware catalog | LEDS::ORIN | Raucous Roland Renegades | Thu Dec 31 1987 16:05 | 25 |
| < Note 1082.0 by >
-< Why musicians love music >-
Well, there were a lot of replies, considering this isn't considered a
COMMUSIC topic. My original question, "Why do musicians love music?",
was intended to stimulate your imaginations. It didn't work. That
question implies all kinds of interesting (to me at least) questions
about living creatures and how music affects them, i.e.
Why are there so many "types" of music i.e. rock, jazz, pop, classical etc.?
What effect does the music have on emotions, mood, etc.
Why do musicians like to make music? What's the purpose? Why is it entertaining?
Why do musicians prefer certain sounds to others? What makes a great patch?
How does the brain "create" ideas for new songs, new sounds, etc.?
Perhaps this topic does belong in MUSIC. I don't know, and don't have time
to read both conferences. As you can see, I am interested in much more than
the latest hardware review and how to rack mega-midi-devices for under $100.
Perhaps I should switch to MUSIC conference and see if I can find someone
interested in the "whys" and "hows" of making "better" sounds. I thought
that COMMUSIC was about making sounds, be they "music" or "effects", and how
/why certain types of equipment make more pleasureable sounds than others.
bye
|
1082.12 | not on this network | ANGORA::JANZEN | to cogitate and to solve | Thu Dec 31 1987 16:19 | 6 |
| < Note 1082.11 by LEDS::ORIN "Raucous Roland Renegades" >
-< no imagination, see hardware catalog >-
>Perhaps I should switch to MUSIC conference and see if I can find someone
>interested in the "whys" and "hows" of making "better" sounds. I thought
no, they only talk about ROCK.
Tom
|
1082.13 | How perceptive. | MAY14::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Mon Jan 04 1988 12:44 | 3 |
| I thought all we ever talked about was Madonna...
Steph
|
1082.14 | Let's All of Us Have A Secret Conversation | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Jan 04 1988 13:37 | 19 |
| Well, you might get a slightly different perspective on this issue
over in MUSIC, as it wouldn't be limited only to us
techno-weenie-dweebs who get our jollies making wierd sounds.
The enjoyment of music is clearly not limited to its making,
especially the technology thereof. And despite Tom's assertions,
the discussions over there do occasionally address topics other
than rock.
Also, reading whatever replies you might receive there will not
take any longer than reading them here - you don't *have* to read
all that other stuff that gets posted there. Just keep track of
the note number of this one note that you're interested in.
I find it ironic that I'm accused of shutting off the discussion
when in fact what I was trying to do was make it possible for more
people to contribute to it...
len.
|
1082.15 | music has no useful purpose | PLDVAX::JANZEN | to cogitate and to solve | Mon Jan 04 1988 14:08 | 29 |
| Robert Schumann used to write aphorisms for his students.
Once he speculated on the reasons musicians go into music.
I read it once 15 years ago, here's what I remember:
To become famous.
To become rich (!)
To please one's friends (I figure, to do what you think your friends
expect you to do, one dead end lots of people follow)
etc. etc.
I think musicians like music because it was drummed into them during
childhood by cruel parents who couldn't appreciate beer and football.
I think musicians like music because their early friends (8-18 years
old) raised them to like it.
I think musicians like music because the part of their brain that
heats up when they listen to music (I'm not making this up, there
are published scientific photos) is bigger than in non-musicians.
I think musicians like music because they have friends that tell
them they like their music (witness my change into a performance
artist, having realized that my music is worthless crap and that
I have no talent (I learned this from Moeller, he wouldn't lie,
would he?)).
I think musicians like music until they get famous and the producer
and manager start telling them what to play where for whom when.
Then it's work and not playing music, it's working music, and it's
not fun anymore so they quit as soon as they can afford it(see, whatever
happened to... note in MUSIC).
Not depending on music for a living, not being BIG successful, makes
you free. Money enslaves.
Tom
|
1082.16 | It's a bizarre complaint isn't it? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Dave | Mon Jan 04 1988 14:34 | 15 |
| > No, they only talk about ROCK (in the MUSIC conference).
Let me avoid any potential confusion and say that the MUSIC conference
is for ALL kinds of MUSIC, not just rock.
The reason why there aren't more notes about non-rock topics is
largely because people make complaints like "there aren't enough
non-rock topics" instead of WRITING non-rock topics.
MUSIC is a forum, not a magazine. You can't expect to see articles
on your favorite topics the way you would in a magazine. You have
to WRITE THEM.
Dave Blickstein
MUSIC Moderator
|
1082.17 | what's 180 degrees from everything else? | SALSA::MOELLER | IBM Farts,Industry Genuflects.Film@11 | Mon Jan 04 1988 16:16 | 14 |
| >(witness my change into a performance artist, having realized that
>my music is worthless crap and that I have no talent (I learned this
>from Moeller, he wouldn't lie, would he?)).
.. and you would never deliberately misquote anyone, would you?
Actually, Tom, I do have a high regard for your keyboard skills,
especially hand independence.. it shines through the atrocious
'throwaways' (not a misquote) you let us all hear. I do think you
are talented, (more than you would ever grant ME) but off in a
direction 180 degrees from anything I'd care to spend time with.
karl
|
1082.18 | Viscious reply | ANGORA::JANZEN | to cogitate and to solve | Mon Jan 04 1988 16:53 | 51 |
| >< Note 1082.17 by SALSA::MOELLER "IBM Farts,Industry Genuflects.Film@11" >
> -< what's 180 degrees from everything else? >-
>
>>(witness my change into a performance artist, having realized that
>>my music is worthless crap and that I have no talent (I learned this
>>from Moeller, he wouldn't lie, would he?)).
>
> .. and you would never deliberately misquote anyone, would you?
>
> Actually, Tom, I do have a high regard for your keyboard skills,
> especially hand independence.. it shines through the atrocious
> 'throwaways' (not a misquote) you let us all hear. I do think you
> are talented, (more than you would ever grant ME) but off in a
> direction 180 degrees from anything I'd care to spend time with.
>
>> karl
Well, actually, I admit an envy of your success in distributing tapes
to local record shops, and enjoying appropation in music, something
that has eluded me. I crave applause, but was always playing
for heterogenous audiences rather than one primed for modern stuff.
I really did used to improvise similarly to you, but apprehension
of being heard by the neighbours and complained about (almost no neighbour
has ever said they heard me (in apartments)) has kept me from
just doodling for 7 years. I wish I had at least a kx88 and mks20
so I could do what I wanted. I'm contemplating pf85, but the price
has got to follow the yen/dollar soon, so I'd better not hesitate.
Anyway, one has to admire the loyalty of a wife willing to not tolerate
but work for your musical career.
your music isn't really so awfully distant from something I
can appreciate on a pianist-doodling level, therefore, and the fun
I had doodling.
that involvement with choreography is interesting; a dance teacher
once used a piece of mine in class, but I couldn't find the little
hall they performed in, so missed it. But she didn't use my other
music professionally
because the attractions of tap dance took her away from her
work in modern dance. I improvised for some of her students once,
too. But beware; dancers don't like music that distracts audiences
from the dancing. I don't like dancing that distracts audiences
from my music. Read Ivonne Rainer (library maybe) on Moosick and
why she hates it.
Have you tried to cut a deal with local cable access for a show
of you playing? At least YOU could take your setup minus big amp
into the studio. 8-)
Well of course I have regard for talent that transcends shortages
in theoretical knowledge to acomplish what you have, but study form,
and soon.
I'm warning you , if you say anything else nice about me, I'm afraid
I'll have to respond in kind.
|
1082.19 | Oh No, Not Again | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Tue Jan 05 1988 09:05 | 14 |
| Could you guys take this discussion to mail? We innocent bystanders
have seen enough of this sort of exchange before that we really
don't need a replay.
Tom, shame on you for bating Karl. Karl, shame on you for letting
him succeed at it.
Besides, I did that when I was 11.
;^)
len (who wishes he could play keyboards half as well as either of
you).
|
1082.20 | True confessions | COUGAR::JANZEN | to cogitate and to solve | Tue Jan 05 1988 09:46 | 13 |
| re -.1
len, why do you think I was baiting Karl. I wrote the nicest
reply I could muster. Heck I'll admit something right now I've
never told anybody, to show what respect I have for karl.
He sent me one of his tapes. After listening to it, I
broke it up with a hammer. A few weeks later, I went to
Radio Shack, bought a cassette repair kit and put it back
together, because I knew that in 50 years I would want to
remember the people I met, the only other heavy performing
keyboardist I met on the network.
I'm an artist, I don't make this stuff up, I really do stuff like
that.
Tom
|
1082.21 | what else is there to do ?? | CANYON::MOELLER | Back in the Y-life again | Tue Jan 05 1988 12:16 | 18 |
| I'd like to say that I see no 'baiting' going on. Also, no battling.
Rather I sense 'Detente' .. as in 'uneasy truce'.
I've been giving more thought to why musicians love music. As we
'mature', there are fewer and fewer socially acceptable ways for
(nonathletic) adults to play.
Music allows me an environment where I can indulge in role-play,
fantasy, and adventure.. today I'm gonna be.. a Salsa band.. or
a classical composer.. or an 80's funkster.. or do a Sitar raga..
or be a Windham Hill/ECM artist.. or be Albert Ammons/Meade'Lux'
Lewis and play '30s boogie-woogie..
No WONDER I love music !
karl
boogie
|
1082.22 | A beautiful reflection of an ugly world. | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | How about a 40 watt plasma rifle? | Thu Jan 07 1988 14:06 | 27 |
| I like music because it is a beautiful reflection of an ugly world.
Example: Imagine this scene: The time is sometime in the 1800's,
the place somewhere in Germany, a large concert hall, full of patrons.
The old composer/conductor mounts the podium, surveys the orchestra,
and opens the score. His graying hair is wild and uncombed. He taps
the baton, and begins.
Sixty-eight minutes later, the crowd rises in a tremendous standing
ovation, but the conductor stands motionless, does not even turn to
bow, to acknowledge the applause. A first violin realizes the
situation, runs to the podium, and forcibly turns the aging composer to
the cheers.
The composer can see the cheers now, but he does not hear them. He has
been losing his hearing for years. He has been totally deaf for over a
year. The work is the work of pure intellect, a triumph of the mind
over a failing body.
Over a hundred years later, Beethoven's Ninth Symphony _still_ brings
the crowds to packed theatres, and to their feet in applause.
|