[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference napalm::commusic_v1

Title:* * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * *
Notice:Conference has been write-locked. Use new version.
Moderator:DYPSS1::SCHAFER
Created:Thu Feb 20 1986
Last Modified:Mon Aug 29 1994
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2852
Total number of notes:33157

1017.0. "Roland Juno Series in Rackmount?" by SHPLOG::SPEED (Worksystems: at the bleeding edge...) Wed Nov 18 1987 21:26

    This question might seem brain-damaged, but I'll ask anyway.
    
    In preparation for income tax refunds (never to early to start
    planning, you know?), I am rethinking my keyboard set-up.
    
    I currently have a Juno-106 which I love and have several sounds
    which I don't want to part with, but I plan on getting some type
    of controller (either a REAL controller or an RD300 piano) and feel
    that carrying the Juno-106 is a waste of effort since Roland makes
    a rack mount version of the Alpha Juno.  Note that my primary use
    is as an actively gigging rock musician.
    
    So, questions:
    
    1.) What is the rack mount version of the Alpha Juno called?
    
    2.) Any idea how much it is going for these days?
    
    3.) How compatible are the voice parameters?  For example, could
    I upload my current Juno-106 voices to a Juno librarian and then
    download them to the rack mount Alpha Juno, or would I need to
    reprogram from scratch?
    
    If anyone has any other ideas, let me know.  $$$ are at a premium since
    I will be spending at least $1500-$2000 on a piano set-up (RD300 or
    controller/MKS20) and road cases. 
            
    If there are other notes which address this issue, please let me
    know.  I searched under the ALPHA_JUNO-2 and JUNO-106 keywords and
    didn't find any answers.
    

    		Thanks gang,
    		Derek
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1017.1I'll look up the promo sheet, tooAKOV68::EATONDThu Nov 19 1987 08:4826
>    1.) What is the rack mount version of the Alpha Juno called?

	The MKS-50.
    
>    2.) Any idea how much it is going for these days?

	I don't know the new price, but I've seen them for no lower than $595
in the Want-ads.  My guess would be they are around $700-$800 new.
    
>    3.) How compatible are the voice parameters?  

	While many of the parameters are the same, I believe there is a whole
new technology involved in the alpha line.  Didn't someone around here say 
they're using SAS technology on these as well as on the digital pianos?  I'm
not sure how that would be done, since the alpha junos have a definate 'analog' 
sound, but...
	Some of the differences I have noticed: There are different wave-forms
available, not just the standard saw, pulse...  The envelopes are also more
advanced.  I believe they add a few stages on these.

	So, to answer the question, no, you couldn't dump a juno librarion to 
the MKS-50.  It appears to me that they tried to make them look simliar, but
they are definately not identical.  You'll have to start from scratch, using
your 106's patches only as guides.

	Dan
1017.2Just found it...AKOV68::EATONDThu Nov 19 1987 09:0417
	I just found the sheet on the Alpha Junos (couldn't find anything on the
MKS).  I see no mention of SAS, but they mention LSI (whatever that means) which
enables these to produce 14 different waveforms.  The chart on the page actually
divides the waveforms into 3 categories 1) Sawtooth-type waveforms, 2) pulse-
type waveforms, and 3) sub-oscilator waveforms (which, like the 106, are square
waves).  These 3 categories and the 14 type waveforms are combined into 5 
possible combinations to choose from.

	The envelope adds, as I said before, one extra stage.  This seems to be
becoming a common practice (Korg, ESQ-1, ...).  This step allows for either 
another 'angle' by which the decay can change to, or can be used to cause a
repeat attack or simulate a slap-back or echo.

	The Alphas also support velocity sensitivity and after-touch, which the
106, of course, doesn't.  It's not clear how flexible these may be routed.

	Dan
1017.3Large Scale IntegrationGCLEF::COHENRichard CohenThu Nov 19 1987 09:157
    LSI usually means "Large Scale Integration", which is when they
    pack what used to take many chips into a few custom chips. Maybe
    the Juno-106 used more discrete ICs and now they have reduced it
    to a few LSI chips.
    
    	- Rick
    
1017.4Thanks...CLULES::SPEEDWorksystems: at the bleeding edge...Thu Nov 19 1987 09:247
    Dan,
    
    Thanks for your diligent efforts.  Looks like I'm relatively hosed.
    
    Oh well...
    
    		Derek
1017.5Boy, what resignation.MAY20::BAILEYSteph BaileyThu Nov 19 1987 13:5739
    Relax, mon.
    
    I have an MKS-50.  I got it for $470.  (I'm sure that was rock bottom).
    It is a SINGLE height rack-mount unit (its size is one of its best
    features) with stereo outs.
    
    The voice parameters are very similar (almost identical) to those
    of the Juno-106.  They are identical to those of the alphas.  The
    differences are usually superset: an extra envelope parameter,
    parameters for velocity and pressure sensitivity, fully variable
    chorus time (instead of two preset values), etc..
    
    With only minor approximation you should be able to use your 106
    voices (but you will have to ``type them in'' as opposed to dumping
    them across MIDI).
    
    The box is solid and useful enough, but personally I wouldn't recommend
    it.  The voicing architecture isn't really very flexible, with a
    single envelope, and a single oscillator (albeit you can mix ``sub
    osc'' ``pulse'' and ``square'' wave-forms), and a single sinusoidal
    LFO.  In other words, most of the bright (timbrally) patches sound
    the same.
    
    But if you have a 106, I'm sure you know all about this already.
    
    I would suggest a Matrix 6R for flexibility.  But the 6R should
    be a bit more expensive, and it is a honkin' triple high rack mount.
    You could probably adapt your ``essential voices'' to the 6R
    architecture without too much difficulty (this subtractative stuff
    is all the same).
    
    I would suggest calling Sam Ash to get a current competative price
    on either of these units.
    
    If you want to play with an MKS-50 (and you are in the greater Maynard
    area), give me a call, or a write.
    
    Steph