| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1009.1 | Which way was that? | MAY20::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Tue Nov 10 1987 13:57 | 6 |
| Do you want to control the ``after touch modulation'' with the volume
controller, or do you want to use key pressure (aftertouch) to control
the volume?
Steph
|
| 1009.2 | Aftertouch controls volume | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Wed Nov 11 1987 04:05 | 4 |
| I want the note to get louder as I increase pressure on the key.
RIchaRD.
|
| 1009.3 | I find the DX hard to control in this way, but... | MAY14::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Thu Nov 12 1987 10:06 | 22 |
| Fortunately, this is (relatively) easy.
Set the amplitude modulation sensitivities of each of the carrier
ops to a non-zero value (3 is max). Set the EG BIAS bit of the
Aftertouch function to ON, and set the modulation depth of the
Aftertouch function to something non-zero.
With everything maxed out (AM=3, After depth = 99), you will get
full-scale control over the volume.
Did you know that the actual resolution of the modulation depths
is only 0-15? That 0-99 stuff is hogwash.
Note that this only works if you aren't using the LFO to modulate
amplitudes, otherwise you will ``cross wires'' but I'm sure you
can figure that out.
Steph
|
| 1009.4 | Hogwash? Please Clarify | NYMPH::ZACHWIEJA | One step from sanity. | Thu Nov 12 1987 14:05 | 7 |
| > Did you know that the actual resolution of the modulation depths
> is only 0-15? That 0-99 stuff is hogwash.
Do you mean that 0=0 and 15=99, or do you mean that 0=0, 15=15,
and 16-99 is wasted ?
Zach
|
| 1009.5 | The resolution is wasted. | ACORN::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Fri Nov 13 1987 12:54 | 6 |
| Actual value := (15/99) * Input Value
(That is, the former).
Steph
|