| Title: | * * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * * |
| Notice: | Conference has been write-locked. Use new version. |
| Moderator: | DYPSS1::SCHAFER |
| Created: | Thu Feb 20 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Aug 29 1994 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2852 |
| Total number of notes: | 33157 |
Hi-
I'm interested in getting into some recording using one
of the small cassette/mixer boxes. The other night at
Daddy's I saw Yamaha's MT2X version listed at $650.
How is Yamaha's reputation in this area? Is this a good
price (how much better can one do)? Has anybody used
one? etc...
--Bill Wake
Basics specs: 6 inputs + stereo aux return, 4 tracks
dbx (appear to be individually selectable), hi and low
speeds. (More follows...)
MT2X 4-track cassette/mixer deck
6 inputs, each with hi/lo eq faders and aux send level
(2 inputs accept mike-level signals)
Input source is either front panel jack or tape output
Inputs can be panned L/R or sent directly to tape
Mono effects send and stereo effects return,
with faders for them
LED meters either monitor tracks 1-4 or stereo mix
Monitor mix of tracks 1-4
Headphones monitor stereo mix, monitor mix,
or a combination
Track 4 can be reserved for sync purposes
(sync in and out jacks are on the back)
Tape has pitch control (+/- 10%), hi/lo speeds,
switchable zero-stop, switchable dbx
Punch-in footswitch and MIDI sync box interface
available (MIDI box YMC2 bolts right on)
Inputs 1-6, headphones, and punch-switch have jacks on
the front panel
Back panel has: sync box interface, power cord,
power switch; sync out, sync in, tape out (1-4),
stereo out L/R, aux send, and aux return L/R jacks
Specs:
EQ: +/- 10 dB @ 10 kHz, +/- 10 dB @ 100 Hz
Freq response:
20 Hz - 18 kHz +/- 3 dB @ 9.5 cm/sec (hi speed)
40 Hz - 12.5 kHz +/- 3 dB @ 4.8 cm/sec (lo speed)
S/N: 85 dB with dbx (??? without)
Channel separation: >55 dB @1kHz
Erasure ratio: >70 dB @ 1kHz
Tape type: Chrome (70 microsec. EQ)
Wow & Flutter: < 0.05% WRMS
Fast wind: 100 sec for C-60
Input impedance: 10 k-ohms
:
:
Output impedance: 1 k-ohms
Rated output level: -10 dB into 50 k-ohms
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 974.1 | AKOV76::EATOND | Shut mah mouth wide open! | Mon Oct 12 1987 08:37 | 6 | |
Don't know anything about the unit itself, but I can tell you a better price (if you don't mind mail/phone order). Sam Ash MT2X $557.00 Dan | |||||
| 974.2 | Lots of Linear knobs | DFLAT::DICKSON | Network Design tools | Mon Jan 18 1988 14:31 | 10 |
The MT2X uses slider pots for just about everything. The "other guys" use rotary pots for effect sends, eq, and so on. Now, in a pro board the linear faders are actually built using rotary potentiometrs, connect by a clever mechanical artrangement to the sliding knob. Do cheap units use something else? I think they must, as the mechanical thing is kind of bulky. I am concerned about dust getting in through the slot and making the pot noisy. | |||||
| 974.3 | MPGS::DEHAHN | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:51 | 21 | ||
Re: mechanical linear faders
That's pretty old tech. Slide pots, linear faders, sliders or whatever
you want to call them are made just like rotary pots but in a linear
fashion. The big manufacturers are Allen and Bradley, Alps, and
Penny and Giles. The two major types, for pro use, are carbon and
conductive plastic. Each has their good points and bad points. Carbon
pots are generally less expensive, easily cleaned, and stay smooth
throughout their life. They do wear out, and are prone to dropouts.
Conductive plastic generally last longer than carbon, and the better
ones are smoother. They have to be cleaned specially, are more
expensive, and as they wear they tend to get jumpy.
Good sliders have flap seals to guard against contamination. However,
even the best can't keep out liquids completely. You need to use
sealed rotary pots for that. Replacing faders is a pretty normal
fact of life for a mixing board.
CdH
| |||||
| 974.4 | Mixer elixir | DFLAT::DICKSON | Network Design tools | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:45 | 5 |
So can anyone who actually has an MT2X report on the quality of those tiny sliders? Do they have flap seals? I wonder if underneath they are all soldered into place so they can't be easily replaced. Sounds like dust covers would be a good investment, and a can of Cramolin. | |||||
| 974.5 | Somebody out there has one of these, right? | PANGLS::BAILEY | Tue Jul 19 1988 18:11 | 5 | |
Can anyone give me subjective views about the MT2X. How does it
sound? Is there anything particularly annoying about it?
Thanks,
Steph
| |||||