Title: | * * Computer Music, MIDI, and Related Topics * * |
Notice: | Conference has been write-locked. Use new version. |
Moderator: | DYPSS1::SCHAFER |
Created: | Thu Feb 20 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon Aug 29 1994 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2852 |
Total number of notes: | 33157 |
Hi- I'm interested in getting into some recording using one of the small cassette/mixer boxes. The other night at Daddy's I saw Yamaha's MT2X version listed at $650. How is Yamaha's reputation in this area? Is this a good price (how much better can one do)? Has anybody used one? etc... --Bill Wake Basics specs: 6 inputs + stereo aux return, 4 tracks dbx (appear to be individually selectable), hi and low speeds. (More follows...) MT2X 4-track cassette/mixer deck 6 inputs, each with hi/lo eq faders and aux send level (2 inputs accept mike-level signals) Input source is either front panel jack or tape output Inputs can be panned L/R or sent directly to tape Mono effects send and stereo effects return, with faders for them LED meters either monitor tracks 1-4 or stereo mix Monitor mix of tracks 1-4 Headphones monitor stereo mix, monitor mix, or a combination Track 4 can be reserved for sync purposes (sync in and out jacks are on the back) Tape has pitch control (+/- 10%), hi/lo speeds, switchable zero-stop, switchable dbx Punch-in footswitch and MIDI sync box interface available (MIDI box YMC2 bolts right on) Inputs 1-6, headphones, and punch-switch have jacks on the front panel Back panel has: sync box interface, power cord, power switch; sync out, sync in, tape out (1-4), stereo out L/R, aux send, and aux return L/R jacks Specs: EQ: +/- 10 dB @ 10 kHz, +/- 10 dB @ 100 Hz Freq response: 20 Hz - 18 kHz +/- 3 dB @ 9.5 cm/sec (hi speed) 40 Hz - 12.5 kHz +/- 3 dB @ 4.8 cm/sec (lo speed) S/N: 85 dB with dbx (??? without) Channel separation: >55 dB @1kHz Erasure ratio: >70 dB @ 1kHz Tape type: Chrome (70 microsec. EQ) Wow & Flutter: < 0.05% WRMS Fast wind: 100 sec for C-60 Input impedance: 10 k-ohms : : Output impedance: 1 k-ohms Rated output level: -10 dB into 50 k-ohms
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
974.1 | AKOV76::EATOND | Shut mah mouth wide open! | Mon Oct 12 1987 09:37 | 6 | |
Don't know anything about the unit itself, but I can tell you a better price (if you don't mind mail/phone order). Sam Ash MT2X $557.00 Dan | |||||
974.2 | Lots of Linear knobs | DFLAT::DICKSON | Network Design tools | Mon Jan 18 1988 14:31 | 10 |
The MT2X uses slider pots for just about everything. The "other guys" use rotary pots for effect sends, eq, and so on. Now, in a pro board the linear faders are actually built using rotary potentiometrs, connect by a clever mechanical artrangement to the sliding knob. Do cheap units use something else? I think they must, as the mechanical thing is kind of bulky. I am concerned about dust getting in through the slot and making the pot noisy. | |||||
974.3 | MPGS::DEHAHN | Thu Jan 21 1988 08:51 | 21 | ||
Re: mechanical linear faders That's pretty old tech. Slide pots, linear faders, sliders or whatever you want to call them are made just like rotary pots but in a linear fashion. The big manufacturers are Allen and Bradley, Alps, and Penny and Giles. The two major types, for pro use, are carbon and conductive plastic. Each has their good points and bad points. Carbon pots are generally less expensive, easily cleaned, and stay smooth throughout their life. They do wear out, and are prone to dropouts. Conductive plastic generally last longer than carbon, and the better ones are smoother. They have to be cleaned specially, are more expensive, and as they wear they tend to get jumpy. Good sliders have flap seals to guard against contamination. However, even the best can't keep out liquids completely. You need to use sealed rotary pots for that. Replacing faders is a pretty normal fact of life for a mixing board. CdH | |||||
974.4 | Mixer elixir | DFLAT::DICKSON | Network Design tools | Thu Jan 21 1988 09:45 | 5 |
So can anyone who actually has an MT2X report on the quality of those tiny sliders? Do they have flap seals? I wonder if underneath they are all soldered into place so they can't be easily replaced. Sounds like dust covers would be a good investment, and a can of Cramolin. | |||||
974.5 | Somebody out there has one of these, right? | PANGLS::BAILEY | Tue Jul 19 1988 19:11 | 5 | |
Can anyone give me subjective views about the MT2X. How does it sound? Is there anything particularly annoying about it? Thanks, Steph |