T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
968.1 | Studio-8 | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri Oct 02 1987 09:27 | 6 |
| Anybody know anything more about the Tascam Studio-8? I think it is in that
price range, has a built in mixer, has DBX, and uses 1/4" tape. That's
about all I know about it...
Todd.
|
968.2 | More info | FROST::HARRIMAN | Pesky Moose Twice | Fri Oct 02 1987 09:56 | 16 |
|
Tascam Studio 8:
List price about 3000.
Has a 12 channel mixer, two extra effects/aux buss
1/4" tape, 7-1/2" reels only.
Uses DBX, track 8 is inhibitable for tape synch
Has an on-board "autolocator" but it sucks
Has an optional autolocator that really works
Does SMPTE if you buy the option
Has meters! Nice ones, too.
I have used one, I was thinking about buying it. Nice machine, if
you like the transport and mixer in one package.
/pjh
|
968.3 | *Maybe* Fostex? | EMERLD::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-4373 | Fri Oct 02 1987 10:47 | 15 |
| Fostex makes a decent 8-track machine that uses quarter inch
tape. Back when I only had a 4-track, I went into another studio
to do some recording - they used a Fostex 8-track and other
low-end effects and we got a very nice quality tape out of the
deal. No idea about cost, though. Call Daddy's if you want to
find out the worst possible price for it. ;-)
Of course, if you can afford to get Tascam, do it. I believe the
Tascam 38 is around $2800 (at least, that was last year's price.)
It uses half-inch tape.
Or, you could save for another year, take out a second mortgage
on the home, and get an Otari!
|
968.4 | | SALSA::MOELLER | It's my turn to be uncool! | Fri Oct 02 1987 13:53 | 12 |
| I own a very lightly used Fostex A8LR, 1/4" tape, 15ips only,
Dolby 'C', switchable. $900. The latest 1/4" 8track from Fostex
has all kinds of microprocessor controls for syncing to another
deck, etc.. overkill.
I'm very happy with the performance. As it gets light duty I'm not
sure about maintenance, etc. It DOES require a multibus mixer -
it only monitors either tape or incoming signal, NOT both. So you'd
have to get at least an 8track multibus mixer.. but I'd recommend
at least 12.
karl moeller
|
968.5 | thanks... | ADVAX::T_ROBERT | | Sat Oct 03 1987 14:55 | 6 |
|
Thanks for the info. I think I *might* be able to sqeeze
up enough to get the Tascam. I'll have to look into it.
-Tom
|
968.6 | latest price... | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Mon Oct 05 1987 10:23 | 9 |
|
I checked out a Tascam 38 at Wurlitzers last week. They gave me
a price of $2100. Or you could check the Want Advertiser. There's
usually one in there.
Ralph
|
968.7 | .. I think you'd better check it again .. | SALSA::MOELLER | It's my turn to be uncool! | Mon Oct 05 1987 12:20 | 9 |
| ... OR you could check around and get a lightly-used FOSTEX for
less than 1/2 of that, and use the rest for a fancy mixer, which
you WILL need whichever deck you choose.
.. I defy anyone to tell the difference in quality of recording..
also consider that with the 38 there is NO noise reduction.. more
cost.. also 1/2" tapes are much more expensive than 1/4".
karl moeller
|
968.8 | | BARNUM::RHODES | | Tue Oct 06 1987 10:20 | 9 |
| > ... OR you could check around and get a lightly-used FOSTEX for
> less than 1/2 of that, and use the rest for a fancy mixer, which
> you WILL need whichever deck you choose.
Not true. Reread the earlier replies on the Studio-8. Built in mixer,
built in noise reduction. Maybe you can even find one used.
Todd.
|
968.9 | here comes the fire | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Tue Oct 06 1987 11:16 | 27 |
|
Karl,
You can't compare the A8 with any other 8 track machine, especially
when it comes to price. For your *needs*, it may be just what you
*want*. But it's just not in the same class as the 38 and better
machines like the 5050SD.
There's no way a 1/4" machine is going to equal a 1/2" machine,
in any performance catagory, at the same tape speed. The only reason
the A8 became a functional product was because of the Dolby C. Without
it, the crosstalk would be unreal. Dolby's compression circuitry
helps the situation. However, you're stuck with it. Your tape can
only be used with another A8, whereas a tape made on the 38 can
be played back on any 1/2" deck. The frquency response on the A8
is 40-18KHz, no mention of deviations, whereas a 38 for example
can go out to 22KHz.
I guess it comes down to what you want to spend and what you really
need. If you want 8 tracks as cheap as possible then the A8 is fine,
but for one who wants a real 8 track machine the 38 is the starting
point, and you go upwards from there.
I've never done an A/B test, and would love to do one.
CdH
|
968.10 | Is it me? | JAWS::COTE | BddddttttYEEeeoowww! (C. Hynde) | Tue Oct 06 1987 11:31 | 9 |
| Chris....
How does Dolby C (or assumably B or dbx) eliminate or repress
crosstalk?? I thought crosstalk was the 'bleed' between adjacent
tracks and Dolby was used to repress residual tape hiss.
I'm missing the connection.
Edd
|
968.11 | | SALSA::MOELLER | | Tue Oct 06 1987 13:16 | 20 |
| o ..finding a used Studio-8. Good luck. they've been out what,
a year ?
o the 'crosstalk' issue. How is the Studio-8 (15ips,1/4") superior
to the Fostex in this area ? Noise reduction method has nada
to do with crosstalk. Also, regarding crosstalk problems, one
can guarantee stereo separation by staggering stereo pairs of
tracks.. not adjacent, in other words. Of course a 1/2" tape
will be superior ! However I decided to put my money
in instruments, not the tape deck, as the Fostex is as clean
as I could wish.
o 'real' 8tracks vs. 'imitation' (I guess) 8tracks.. I don't know
about you, but I have no contract requiring me to cut CDs right now.
I was ecstatic to find that I could get into REAL 8tracking
for under $1000. If you have lots'o disposable income, go for
it. Just remember me every time you spend $25-$40 for a reel
of 1/2" tape.
karl
|
968.13 | If you can wait a couple weeks... | JAWS::COTE | Isn't that spatial? | Tue Oct 06 1987 16:50 | 21 |
| I'll be selling my 3M 32-track digital recorder and mixer soon
in order to upgrade... Price will be reasonable. (<$4K)
Edd
What? This isn't FANTASY.NOTE?????????
|
968.14 | | SALSA::MOELLER | | Tue Oct 06 1987 16:56 | 34 |
| < Note 968.12 by AQUA::ROST "Fast and bulbous, tight also" >
>I think that the reason the A8 has Dolby C is to guarantee good noise
>performance;
I think so too; in fact, I'd bet that that's why "noise reduction
systems" were invented.
> remember eight tracks on 1/4" tape is just like
> four tracks on 1/8" tape, the good old (noisy) cassette. Even at
> 15 ips, the narrow track width limits noise and frequency response
> performance.
Yep, noisy and scratchy, like an old 78 RPM record. Who are you
kidding ? Musician friends couldn't tell the difference between
one of my original Nakamichi Dolby B CASSETTE mixdowns and the
same piece mixed via PCM to VCR. And, as a person who HAS done
sessions on both Tascam 38 and the Fostex, I tell you, short of
cutting a session for CD, the Fostex is a ... far...better...buy.
>Maybe Fostex is deliberately setting maximum recorded level abnormally
>low to reduce crosstalk, then adding the Dolby to improve the impaired
>noise performance due to not recording at the MOL of the tape.
.. Maybe Tascam is using EIA bass rolloff curves to prevent tape
saturation, due to the inherent limitations of analog magnetic
tape recording.
.. Maybe ALL recording mediums require some kind of compromises.
Maybe I should just drop this and leave you to your expensive
opinions.
karl
|
968.15 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | Not so famous rock star | Wed Oct 07 1987 09:55 | 13 |
| A friend of mine has an A8, he likes it alot with some reservations.
They have had serious trouble with the tape transport mechanism.
When they called Fostex the problem was well known. Fostex however,
was of very little help to them, it was a design problem. I assume
it has been fixed in the newer models. When they began planning
to upgrade their studio Fostex was not considered.
The fostex does not perform as well as the 38 if the 38 has the
dbx noise reduction unit in my humble, expensive opinion. The
difference in noise was noticeable, but actual mileage may vary according
to your recording habits.
dave
|
968.16 | My Experience with the Tascam 38 | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Oct 07 1987 16:42 | 26 |
| A Tascam 38 with dbx has incredible s/n - like 94 db. The only
noise you will hear went on the tape with the source signal. It
also has a lot of headroom as a consequence. If you shop around,
you can get a new 38 w/dbx for around $2600. The Tascam dbx unit is
nice because it switches mode as a function of what you're telling
the deck to do (e.g., if you tell the deck "record on tracks 3 and
4", it tells the dbx "decode on 1 and 2, encode on 3 and 4, decode
on 5 through 8". This may sound like a luxury until you've screwed
up an important master in the wee hours of the morning. But then
again, maybe you never make any mistakes.
I would not expect a un-noise-reduced Fostex to compete with a dbx-ed
38 anymore than I would a un-dbx-ed 38. That's just not a fair
comparison.
A 38's capstan bearing will die if you run it a lot (ask Dave Dreher).
I've used mine a lot, but I got into the habit of slacking the reels
so the capstan motor shuts down when I'm not actually moving tape.
I've never regretted putting up the bucks for a 38. But it is
an expensive proposition for a 38, 8 channels of dbx and a 16 channel
board to feed it. I maintain it myself (clean and demag) at
essentially no cost. Tape *is* expensive, but reusable.
len.
|
968.17 | FOSTEX M-80 | LEDS::ORIN | | Wed Oct 07 1987 18:01 | 41 |
| I purchased the new Fostex M-80 8 track machine at Daddy's in Nashua last
month.
price: $1995.00 (no tax)
warranty: factory 1 yr. parts/labor, Daddy's additional 6 mos.
options: remote control $65.00 remote punch-in pedal $45.00
two 10' 8-line snakes, $35.00
tape: Ampex 7 inch reel 1/4" tapes, 1200ft. 1.5 mil
(recommended by Fostex) $8 each
This unit will not take larger reels. I got the tapes at reduced price
since I bought the M-80 there. Normally they are $9.95, but could be had
by mail order for about $7.
features:
LED VUs (very fast and accurate, great for recording drums)
8 input jacks, 8 output jacks (this is nice, no access required to rear)
optional SMPTE and sync to tape
magnetic shield over recording head
15 ips recording speed
built-in Dolby-C
I have not had any problems with inter-track cross talk. I usually lay out
the tracks (just to be on the safe side) as follows:
Track Instrument
----- ----------
1 Drum Machine (LEFT)
2 Drum Machine (RIGHT)
3 Bass
4 Special Effects, Keyboards (LEFT), Guitar (LEFT), other
5 Keyboards (RIGHT), other
6 Guitar (RIGHT)
7 Background vocals
8 Lead Vocals
I have a number of friends who have the older Fostex M8, and they have had
no problems with transport mech., heads, cross-talk, etc. This machine is
great! Cleaning and demagnetizing are standard do-it-yourself.
Dave
|
968.18 | us low-end guys gotta stick together.. | SALSA::MOELLER | | Wed Oct 07 1987 18:57 | 24 |
| > the tracks (just to be on the safe side) as follows:
>Track Instrument
>----- ----------
>1 Drum Machine (LEFT)
>2 Drum Machine (RIGHT)
>3 Bass
>4 Special Effects, Keyboards (LEFT), Guitar (LEFT), other
>5 Keyboards (RIGHT), other
>6 Guitar (RIGHT)
>7 Background vocals
>8 Lead Vocals
.. Dave, consider the following for MAX STEREO pair separation:
1 >1 Drum Machine (LEFT)
2 >3 Bass
3 >2 Drum Machine (RIGHT)
4 >4 Special Effects, Keyboards (LEFT), Guitar (LEFT), other
5 >7 Background vocals
6 >5 Keyboards (RIGHT), other
7 >8 Lead Vocals
8 >6 Guitar (RIGHT)
.. karl
|
968.19 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Thu Oct 08 1987 11:47 | 15 |
|
Dolby is a companding system. It compresses the mid and high
frequencies (Dolby C, B is just the highs) during recording to reduce
the noise level. The signal itself is expanded during playback to
restore frequency balance. dbx is similar except it works across
the whole spectrum.
This compression of the highs during recording is what helps the
narrow format multitrack decks like the A8 reduce the crosstalk
between tracks in that frequency band. Less energy, less bleed between
tracks. Of course, it won't do a thing for keeping the kick drum
out of your vocals.
CdH
|
968.20 | Psst, got any good tape, man? | RSTS32::HAYES | | Thu Oct 08 1987 18:40 | 11 |
| re: < Note 968.17 by LEDS::ORIN >
>tape: Ampex 7 inch reel 1/4" tapes, 1200ft. 1.5 mil
> Normally they are $9.95, but could be had by mail order for about $7.
I assume this is Ampex 456. I've been meaning to look for a mail order
tape dealer. Anbody know where I can get this tape? Sam Ash, etc.?
Thanks,
John
|
968.21 | bulk tape cheap | CNTROL::GEORGE | | Fri Oct 09 1987 11:56 | 14 |
| re .20
There's a shop in Boston near Berkley with bulk tapes of various
flavors and widths. Ampex 456 was @$6.00/roll last spring (1800ft?).
The shop is on the side street west from Mass Ave and 1/2 block south
of Boylston, about 50yds from the corner, tan building, south side of
street. Entrance on the side and a small or nonexistent sign.
I believe they are only open weekdays.
They also have beaucoup (>>100) cassette decks for 1 to 1 duping.
Dave
|
968.22 | BACK TO 244 | PRSTRA::CHAMPOLLION | Teenage Kicks | Mon Oct 12 1987 05:33 | 58 |
| CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING :
I first purchased the Portastudio 144-Dolby B : well...
Then used the 244 : Outstanding !
Then a porta-One : practical is all there is to say about it.
I now own a 38 with M216 16x4x2 mixer : ah ah.
The 38 is a very good machine, maintenance is close to nil (boards
all over the place) tape is a bit expensive but what do you expect ?
Two basic problems : category and time.
1. CATEGORY : Now that you have an 8-track machine and a good desk,
you want to get better effects, digital delay and reverb, noise
gates, dBX and what-not (MIKES !). See what I mean ? You have
entered a brand new category in which everything is more expensive
and you'll want to buy those things to take full advantage of
the capabilities of your machine, similar to buying a Compaq Deskpro
and running a true Word Processor and not a cheap text editor.
Think about it : your budget becomes an ever-increasing monster.
And the room ? If you're lucky to have a room reserved for your
pleasure, you'll want to upgrade it to get better quality. And
the monitors, and, and...
With a 244, you pay for the thing and there isn't much else you
need to buy, a $2000 budget for the whole setup will do. With a
38, you'll have to invest at least $5000 to make it worthwile.
2. TIME : How long does it take you to record a simple pop song
on a cassette 4-track ? One day ? How long on an 8-track ? One
week at least ! Because you have more effects, more tracks to mix down,
you take more care in recording, etc, etc.
I DECIDED TO SELL MY 8-TRACK STUDIO AND RETURN TO A 244 or equivalent.
WHAT DO YOU DO WITH THE 38 ? HOPEFULLY (?) BETTER QUALITY RECORDINGS,
BUT WHAT FOR, AND WHO FOR ? Just you ? Do you make money ?
WHAT I WANT TO SAY IS :
8 track is folly unless you're sure to make money with it.
If you only wanna make demos, you don't need that, a producer or
talent scout does not 8 tracks to form his opinion. If he tells
you so, he's either a moron or a 0-). It's his job to provide studio
facilities for you to record. Never pay for something you shouldn't
pay for !
Do I sound bitter ? I've a little experience of the music business
and my conclusion is :
ALWAYS DO WHAT YOU WANNA !
NEVER PAY !
NO COMPROMISE !
Long live the 244 !
Johnny French
|
968.23 | TAPE COMPLEX | CYBORG::ROLLA | | Tue Oct 13 1987 13:46 | 17 |
| TAPE:
The TAPE COMPLEX
4 HAVILAND ST
BOSTON, MA 02115
TEL 437-9449
You can have them mail it to you, but no COD. They want a money
order.
I just bought 2 Ampex 456 1/2" format for $40.64/tape (this includes
shipping) I recieved the tapes in one week.
No complaints
Mike
|
968.24 | 1/4" tape | BARNUM::RHODES | | Tue Oct 13 1987 14:16 | 8 |
| Just what is the best 1/4" tape?
I've been using Maxell XLI (1800', I think).
Can I do better?
Todd.
|
968.25 | Cheaper by the Dozen | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Oct 14 1987 09:51 | 7 |
| There's a place in NJ that sells Ampex 456 10.5" reels of 1/2" tape
for about $23 a reel in lots of 10 or 12. I can provide details
if anyone's interested. This is by far the best price I have ever
seen for 456 in this format, but you have to buy a lot of it.
len.
|
968.26 | details... details... | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Wed Oct 14 1987 10:02 | 10 |
|
Len, can you give more details? Is this a mail order outfit?
Address, etc. Would anybody be interested in going in on a
lot together? I don't think I could shell out $230+ for tape
right now, but 3 or 4 reels would be easier to swallow.
Ralph
|
968.27 | more details | CYBORG::ROLLA | | Wed Oct 14 1987 12:37 | 6 |
|
Len, does the tape come with a Metal reel ?
$23 Wow thats cheap.
Mike
|
968.28 | OK, OK, OK | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Thu Oct 15 1987 14:58 | 5 |
| I thought there might be some interest. I'll get the details and
post them tomorrow.
len.
|
968.29 | THANKS, THANKS, THANKS | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Thu Oct 15 1987 15:49 | 3 |
|
|
968.30 | They Sell Lots of Other Stuff Too | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Fri Oct 16 1987 14:11 | 31 |
| OK, here it is, not quite as wonderful as I supposed, but still
pretty good.
The outfit is American Musical Supply
235 Franklin Ave.
Ridgewood, NJ 07450-3295
Ampex Grand Master 456 tape, 1/2" x 2500' x 10 1/2"
Part number 45612251; 7 reels per carton; per reel - $37.00;
per carton - $230.00
Shipping weight per reel - 4 lbs.
per carton - 35 lbs.
Shipping charges: east of Mississippi River west of Mississippi River
4 lbs - $2.60 $2.60
35 lbs - $6.85 $15.00
Call (612) 796-2088 to order by phone.
East of the Mississippi, that's a tad less than $33.83 per reel
by the carton including shipping. The $23/reel price was based
on my misrecollection that there were 10 reels per carton. Still,
$34/reel is pretty good, $10 less than the local single reel price.
Incidentally, 2500' at 15 ips is 33 minutes.
len.
|
968.31 | Fostex A OK | MINDER::KENT | | Mon Oct 19 1987 09:48 | 15 |
|
Well I bought the Fostex M80 about 2 months ago and have found it O.K.
so far.
Apart from the excellent sound and the number of tracks (which I
am still geting to grips with ) the best feature is the autoreplay
mode which allows you to set 2 points on the track and have the
machine shuttle between the 2 so that you can get 20 goes at that
harmony part without hitting a button. Great for the one man studio.
Paul.
|
968.32 | | TOPDOC::DUBE | Dan Dube 264-0506 | Wed Oct 21 1987 13:35 | 10 |
| re: .30
Steve's Quality Instruments in Danvers advertises the same tape for
$30 a reel, and you don't even have to mail order it.
I've never bought there, but I've seen the ads in local publications
like the Beat.
-Dan
|
968.33 | Is an A8 at $1k a good buy? | POSSUM::NEWHOUSE | | Fri Dec 04 1987 12:42 | 20 |
| I have a question about the Fostex A8. I have read these notes
and a few folks have said that A8 is alright. I have seen used
A8s for around $1k. My question, is this a good buy or not?
I have little $ and want an 8 track, from what I have seen this
is about my only option. I can't really go over this price.
1. Is there anything missing in this machine that will become a
real drag in the future? Is it something I can live with?
2. How do I keep from getting burned when buying a used deck?
3. Are there any other options for decks in this price range?
4. Is the noise reduction defeatable - should I care in this case?
Thanks for any help at all,
Tim
- Oops, I guess I had more than one question...
|
968.34 | | SALSA::MOELLER | | Fri Dec 04 1987 15:33 | 31 |
| As the most vociferous advocate of Fostex 8 tracks...
>1. Is there anything missing in this machine that will become a
>real drag in the future? Is it something I can live with?
There are two versions of the A8.. the original A8 with 4 inputs/
two busses, and the A8LR, 8 discrete inputs. One pain I suffer
is that you can't monitor both already-recorded trax and the
new signal unless you're in record mode with the tape rolling..
requires (although I've gotten around it) a multibus mixer
- each mixer channel selectable between tape out and instrument
in.
>2. How do I keep from getting burned when buying a used deck?
CHECK THE HEAD for wear.. also run a tape normal speed, listen for
bearing noise.. fast fwd/reverse, stop, see how it stops (brakes!)
jerky will stretch or break a tape. These machines have been around
a while, so service should not be an issue. There *is* sometimes
an issue around a plastic drive gear, easily replaced.
>3. Are there any other options for decks in this price range?
I've not seen ANY 8track machines in this price range used.
>4. Is the noise reduction defeatable - should I care in this case?
Yes, you can switch the Dolby 'C' off for all tracks.. I wouldn't.
Bottom line, I got an A8LR last January for about $1k. NO regrets.
karl moeller
|
968.35 | In out in out: the story of my life! | MINDER::KENT | But there's no hole in the middle | Mon Dec 07 1987 04:14 | 18 |
|
I would agree wholeheartedly with Karl. I am just not quite as vociferous
as he is. I have now had my Fostsx(M80) for abour 4 months now and
did in fact buy it after reading through past topics in this file.
Without wanting to sound jingoistic I would put in a recomendation
for the M80 over the A8 but for one reason only. The Autolcator
shuttle unit. This allows you to set up 2 points on the tune you
are recording and shuttle the transport between the two without
touching a button. This for the single person studio is invaluable
and had improved my vocal tracks (relatively of course) significantly.
The second hand value of an M80 over here in the U.K. does not differ
other than by the odd 200 pounds from the A8. I would consider it
200 pounds well spent just for the shuttle transport.
Paul.
|
968.36 | Scotch vs. Ampex | AITG::ARNOLD | John E. Arnold | DLB5-2/B10 | 291-8011 | Thu Dec 31 1987 16:25 | 15 |
| About those notes a few back regarding Ampex 1/2" tape from American
Musical Supply...
I get their catalog and am considering ordering some. The question
I always run into is "Is there a noticable difference between the
Scotch xxxx (can't remember the number but it's also in the AMS
catalog) and the Ampex tape?"
I've always bought the Scotch brand but not out of any loyalty.
It's what has always been available when I've been in a store with
a "spare" $45 and a desperate need for another reel of tape.
Any opinions of Scotch vs. Ampex 1/2" tape?
- John -
|