T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
963.1 | How about Keyboard mag. | PILOU::MULELID | Nicely out of tune. | Wed Sep 30 1987 07:00 | 11 |
| First you should float the room, dig it down under ground and
....
(Just joking)
However I seemed to remember reading a small piece about soundproofing
in one of the last Keyboard magazine issues, you might check it out.
I dont have any knowledge myself. Good luck
Svein.
|
963.2 | 20 miles of air makes good insulation... | JAWS::COTE | This is Not, my beautiful mouse. | Wed Sep 30 1987 09:14 | 3 |
| Get your wife a job working nights.
Edd
|
963.3 | Give it up. | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 30 1987 09:22 | 12 |
|
Sorry, only distance (ala "foot" or "yard") will diminish SPL.
I learned that one early, when the (*^($# in the adjacent dorm room
to mine insisted on playing his &*%%$#^ Banjo late at night. Those
cinder block walls were like "not even there". Since the Ear responds
to SPL in a log fashion, just to get a perceptable *change*...takes
a lot!
Try encasing the room in 1" plate steel. She'll still hear you.
Joe Jas
|
963.4 | be fire safe | PLDVAX::JANZEN | | Wed Sep 30 1987 09:23 | 3 |
| Don't use styrofoam unless the manufacturer says it's fire-retardant
impregnated and permitted by local fire codes. Ask the fire chief.
the stuff burns like gasoline.
|
963.5 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Wed Sep 30 1987 09:52 | 24 |
|
Assuming there's noplace else you can move the studio to, you really
don't have too many alternatives. One thing to try would be to deaden
the bedroom, the less live the room is the less susceptible it will
be to picking up stray sounds (Edd leave this one alone 8^)
You could blow insulation into the studio walls. How effective blown
in insulation is on sound reduction, I'm not sure.
You might entertain the idea of building a subwall in your studio.
This would involve insulating the existing wall, and building another
wall external to the existing wall with staggered studs. This new
wall would also be insulated. A subfloor could be done the same
way.
However, low frequencies are going to get through, to some degree,
any way you do it.
To the guy who mentioned concrete blocks, *unpainted* concrete is
very effective in absorbing low frequencies, but doesn't do anything
special with mid or high frequencies, like that banjo.
CdH
|
963.6 | I wouldn't touch it, Chris.... | JAWS::COTE | Bb followed me home. Can I keep it? | Wed Sep 30 1987 10:15 | 6 |
| What about a white noise generator in the bedroom????
Seriously, some people get so used to them they can't sleep without
'em!!
Edd
|
963.7 | For your good marriage and your good music, Karl! | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Sure... blame the *computer* | Wed Sep 30 1987 10:31 | 65 |
| The following is copied from KEYBOARD's special issue entitled
"The Art of Recording" from June of 1986 without permission. A
back issue can be ordered from Keyboard. This is from the article
entitled "Setting Up a Home Studio" by Ted Greenwald and is found
on page 50 of the issue...
"There are lots of reasons to keep the various sounds emanating
from your studio contained - not the least of which is the neighbor
who, inevitably, is trying to sleep whenever the muse taps you on
the shoulder. Unfortunately, there's no effective way of stopping
low frequencies, short of turning the room into a bomb shelter.
Unless you're ready to make a serious investment in isolating your
studio, or you have survivalist leanings, it's most effective to
sign a peace treaty with the folks next door.
While sheer bulk is the only way to curb the bass, high frequencies
can be absorbed or diffused. This minimizes the effects of sound
waves bouncing around within the studio's walls. The less
reverberation there is in your listening environment, the more you'll
hear the sounds you're actually producing. Ditto for recording
with a microphone. Unless you want to record room ambience, it's
best for the microphone to pick up as much direct sound from the
instrument as possible. You can add artificial reverberation in
a controlled fashion later.
Materials made specifically for absorbing and diffusing sound, such
as Sonex, are available, but generally they carry a hefty price
tag. Fortunately, many common materials will do the job, including
some that you may already have in your home. Drapes, rugs, and
padded furniture are useful, though imprecise. You can hang carpet,
or some other cloth material, across the ceiling for additional
absorption. Acoustic instruments can be isolated by partitioning
them within within an inclosure of curtains, or by surrounding them
with baffles - absorbent vertical panels which can be moved around
the room - that you can build yourself. Sound-absorbent panels
can also be constructed to hang from the walls, so that they can
be removed to liven up the room for recording ambience. The books
listed in the For Further Reading on page 126 are full of tips for
improving your home studio's sonic environment."
Now, from page 126:
KEYBOARD "Articles
'Home Recording, A Beginners Guide,' by Jim Aikin, July '82
'Home Recording,' by Craig Anderton, May '84
Books on Recording
Anderton, Craig, HOME RECORDING FOR MUSICIANS, Music Sales.
Everest, F. Alton, ACOUSTIC TECHNIQUES FOR HOME AND STUDIO, Tab
Books (Blue Ridge Summit, PA), 1978.
Woram, John, THE RECORDING STUDIO HANDBOOK, Elar Publishing Co.
(New York, NY), 1982."
There's more in the references, but these look most promising.
Hope this helps!
Steve
|
963.8 | Y' kinda handy too Karl ? | MENTOR::REG | | Wed Sep 30 1987 11:46 | 28 |
|
It depends how far you are willing to go and how much you are
willing to spend. At the low end just softening up the room by
adding thicker rugs, drapes, etc will help. If you're considering
construction then at least build partition walls with staggered studs,
i.e. use a 6 inch (OK, 5 1/2) top and bottom plate with 4 inch studs
(yeah, 3 1/2) nailed alternately toward the inside/outside edges
of them
Sheet rock V Outside
============================================================
I I I I
I I I I
============================================================
Sheet rock ^ Inside
There is a duct work material now from (I think) Owings Corning
that gets away from the sheet_metal_pipe_organ problem, it is all
in one duct and insulation made in large sheets that you cut and
tape together.
There's a very good article in Fine Homebuilding magazine, about
a year ago, specifically on music room design (from the construction
viewpoint). I'll try to dig it out.
Reg
|
963.9 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Wed Sep 30 1987 12:41 | 9 |
|
Edd...great idea, the white noise generator! Cheap and very effective
for masking the low level sounds.
How much land ya got, Karl? I've seen some pretty neat studios built
in small outbuildings. Solves all your problems.
CdH
|
963.10 | | MENTOR::REG | | Wed Sep 30 1987 14:45 | 2 |
| re .9 I've seen music rooms like that up north.
|
963.11 | Soundproofing 101 | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | depleted uranium speaker cabinets? | Wed Sep 30 1987 15:18 | 25 |
| Staggered studs works pretty well; if you can put a layer of lead
foil (called shealead, forget who makes the stuff) in a zigzag you
do a lot better.
Take out the heating duct to the music room; that is, physically
remove it! Any truly dedicated musician will not notice the minor
chill resulting! :-)
Weatherstrip the door of the music room- and do a good job.
If you get the sheet lead, crinkle it a bit and staple it to the
inside surface of the door along the edges.
The general name of the game here is to provide the greatest number
of impedance MISmatches for sound to go from the music room to the
bedroom. An impedance mismatch happens any time the vibrations
have to go from a medium of one density into a medium of another
density. The effective density of a medium decreases as the medium
is stressed; a thin, taut sheet of steel will transmit sound from side
A to side B more effectively than a crinkled and limp sheet of the
same steel.
So whatever you use, clump it, crinkle it, bunch it, drape it, and
don't clamp or stretch it.
|
963.12 | Soundproofing 101a | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | depleted uranium speaker cabinets? | Wed Sep 30 1987 15:22 | 9 |
| Two other things; plug the hole where you took out the
heating duct, and hang the speakers from the ceiling on pieces
of old inner tube. Not having any old inner tube, get a couple
of milk crates and some cheap pillows from Sears, put the milk
crates on the rug (you *do* have rug, right?), put the pillows
on the milk crates, and put the speakers on the pillows.
Make sure the speakers are a foot or so from the walls, too.
|
963.13 | | SALSA::MOELLER | It's my turn to be uncool! | Wed Sep 30 1987 15:29 | 26 |
| well ! others have been down this cul-de-sac as well...
thanks, Steve, for typing that stuff from Keyboard in. I'll check
it out.
Chris re land.. I have a very large back yard, LOTS of room for
another structure. It is an Arizona tradition to have a one-room
'guest house' in back. However, as we just recently moved in, the
budget requires I situate the studio in the back bedroom.
There is a hallway between the rooms, no common wall, and I've
determined that it's the heating duct and the cardboard doors doing
most of the sound conducting. Yesterday I went to a foam supplier
(thanks for the foam combustibility tip, TJ) and intend to get a
2inch thick pad slightly larger than the studio door, which opens
inward. I will somehow affix the pad to the door and then attend
to the (removable) covering over the airduct.
There already is carpeting on the floor, and on the back wall facing
the speakers.. so it's reasonably acoustically dead. I do little
(or none) recording with a microphone, and I certainly am aware of
the advantages of close-miking and later adding digital ambience.
thank you for your kind input !
karl
|
963.14 | I Mean, Isn't That Why Electrons Were Invented? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Sep 30 1987 17:07 | 7 |
| Uh, you could just wear headphones (instead of sunglasses) at night,
and confine your speaker-blasting to the daylight hours when she's
not around. I know it's not as much fun, but it's a lot cheaper
and easier. My 8 track studio is in an apartment!
len.
|
963.15 | ``Heating'' DUCTS? | MAY20::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Wed Sep 30 1987 17:12 | 13 |
| I thought that down in the land of Agua Caliente they didn't have
heating ducts?
Cooling, on the other hand is something that most musicians can't
do with out, just by merit of the fact that they can't stand to
hear their equipment sweat. Of course if everything in your studio
is digital (this means no motors, of any sort are allowed), including
the musician, you can bear the 115 but its a dry thud. :-).
Don't negect the summer (I'm sure you probably wouldn't).
Steph
|
963.16 | How about a complete vacuum? | HYEND::GLORIOSO | | Wed Sep 30 1987 22:37 | 12 |
|
Did you try removing the air from the studio...or better yet, get
your wife a scuba tank and mask and suck those annoying molecules
out of the bedroom.
Just A Thought....
|
963.17 | %*) | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Thu Oct 01 1987 11:48 | 11 |
|
re -1
A more reasonable approach would be to remove the air from the hallway
in between the studio and the bedroom. That way, at least he could
hear what he was recording, and his wife could still breath! :*)
ralph
|
963.18 | take my fellow noters, please | SALSA::MOELLER | It's my turn to be uncool! | Thu Oct 01 1987 13:02 | 4 |
|
..comedians..
|
963.19 | mask it! | BARNUM::RHODES | | Thu Oct 01 1987 14:23 | 10 |
| My experiences are more based on Edd's white noise generator idea. In the
warm part of the year we put one of those three speed utility fans in the
bedroom window. The sound of this will tend to mask the late night diddlings
emanating from the studio. In the winter, we have put a humidifier in the
bedroom. This, of course, has the same masking effect and does wonders
for my dry skin.
These two electrical appliances tend to keep me out of a lot of hot water...
Todd.
|
963.20 | can I come visit??? | JON::ROSS | Micro-11: The VAX RISC | Thu Oct 01 1987 15:46 | 9 |
|
....and she's cozily involved with a torrid romance novel,
her breath quickenning and small drops of perspiration
starting to form....and....
....and he's heavily involved with a torrid midi novelty,
his breath quickenning and......
ah, such music.....
|
963.21 | More info on its way, more copies available... | MENTOR::REG | | Fri Oct 02 1987 13:50 | 28 |
|
I dug out the article from Fine Homebuilding magazine. It is
entitled, "Soundproofing a Music Studio, Some practical solutions
to noise polution" (Original, huh ?), by Gene De Smidt, from Oakland
California, describes himself as a builder by day and a
singer/songwriter by night. It was in the October/November (bi
monthly mag) 1986 issue, pages 60 - 63. This is an "all the way"
article, floating floors, isolation between floors and walls, double
and triple sheetrock, staggered studs, the whole bit. I have made
a few copies, unfortunately I couldn't get colour copies, but they're
good enough. Anyone who wants a copy can send me a mail request,
if you *HAVE TO* see the colour versions, well just go to a local
library. Karl, I assume you want a copy so I'll mail it out
today.
Someone said "lead" (as in Pb, not lead guitar or lead sheet
or lead line). Anyway, I have heard about it from another source,
it is used in some music schools and recording studios. There is
a company somewhere in Mass that applies it to sheet rock for exactly
this purpose (Oh, and radiography rooms in hospitals too) and sells the
sandwich panels. I think it comes out to about $60 a 8' x 4' sheet.
They use 1/64" thick lead, it isn't *THAT* heavy, about 1lb per sq ft
if I didn't screw up the mental arithmetic too bad. [ sp gr ~ 11.9; 1
cu ft water 62.5 lbs; 1 sq ft lead 1" thick ~ 62lbs; 1 sq ft lead 1/64
thick ~ 1 lb, QED]
Reg
|
963.22 | | SALSA::MOELLER | It's my turn to be uncool! | Fri Oct 02 1987 13:58 | 5 |
| re .21..
thanks Mr. burgess !!
karl moeller (you still have my address, yes?)
|
963.23 | Internal dec mail OK ? | MENTOR::REG | | Fri Oct 02 1987 15:04 | 8 |
| re .22 Address ?, I think I still have your old home address.
I thought your note implied a change of home address; sooooo, I
used TU0. If you have recently posted a change of home address
to this conference then I missed it, if not then I suggest you do
so, for all (y)our benefits.
Reg
|
963.24 | GOOD MONITORS | PRSTRA::CHAMPOLLION | Teenage Kicks | Thu Oct 15 1987 09:48 | 6 |
| A word about monitors :
You should get (if not already done) high quality speakers which
give you good dynamics at low level. Some speakers need to be pushed
up in order to hear anything ! With JBL's Control One monitors you'll
be able to hear everything at a reasonably low level. It sure helps.
|
963.25 | followup | SALSA::MOELLER | Sardonic ? Moi ? | Thu Oct 29 1987 13:13 | 17 |
| What I've done:
I measured the door and purchased some 3" thick hidensity foam just
about 2" larger than the studio door, and attached it with several
clever plastic hook/eye thingies.. no holes in the door or glue.
The heating/cooling vent was only slightly worse, I got some velcro
strips and glued the hook side (does Velcro have gender??) all around
the vent and the loop side to a slab of foam.. also I glued a small
hookpatch to the wall next to the vent so it can stay up and out
of the way when not in use. Lowtech, huh?
thanks, Reg, I did indeed receive the article on studio soundproofing..
but 'floating' the walls/ceiling seemed a bit much.
thanks, all/karl
|
963.26 | Safety vs. Noise | ANGORA::JANZEN | Tom 296-5421 DTN LMO2/023 | Thu Oct 29 1987 14:25 | 3 |
| When you're running the heater, let's hope a stray spark or superheated
dust doesn't ignite the vent cover.
Tom
|
963.27 | | DISSRV::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Tue Mar 01 1988 15:41 | 14 |
|
This looks about as good a topic as any for my request....
Does anybody know where I can find a supplier of Sonex in
the Boston area? So far, all I've found was convoluted foam
(the stuff they line boxes for magtapes with) at Wurlitzers, and
they want an exhorbitant amount. I figure if its gonna cost, it
might as well be the real thing.
Ralph
|
963.28 | not Boston, but... | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Fri Mar 11 1988 09:17 | 6 |
|
You CAN order direct from the manufacturer, but if you want to pick
it up yourself, try Kessli and Morse, in Worcester. 752-1901.
CdH
|
963.29 | | FIDDLE::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Fri Mar 11 1988 11:29 | 7 |
|
Thanks Chris...the only place I found so far was in Chicago.
Worcester would be a much easier ride! :^)
Ralph
|
963.30 | | TWIN4::DEHAHN | | Fri Mar 11 1988 16:07 | 9 |
|
Ralph....
If you're buying mass quantities and you can't fit it into your
S-10 then give me a call and we'll make a run in the Barge II.
CdH_have_barge_will_travel
|
963.31 | $? | GIBSON::DICKENS | �-� | Thu Mar 17 1988 10:54 | 2 |
| sonex buyers: How much does that stuff cost ?
|
963.32 | | FIDDLE::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Thu Mar 17 1988 12:42 | 15 |
|
I got some literature in the mail last week from Illbruck Corp.
in Minnisota...they're the manufacturers of Sonex. To order
from them, its $2.25 sq/ft. Thats for the thinnest stuff.
Add money for thicker backing, colors other than silver (really
more of a grey/white) or Super Sonex (their top of the line design)
At those prices, I think I'll search out some of that convoluted
foam. Last price I had was $.41 sq/ft...but then who knows what
the exact coefficients are for that stuff. With the Sonex, everything
is published.
Ralph
|