T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
877.1 | me. | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Fri Jul 17 1987 13:43 | 5 |
|
me me me!
see if its better than mine. I built one when I was 10.
|
877.2 | me.. | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Mon Jul 20 1987 18:04 | 8 |
| me too ! Uploading to my uVAX would beat the hell out of saving
to cassettes. All that non-real-time stuff should be simple to
implement too. Have you looked at the ESQ's midi implementation
? You can emulate pressing any button on the the synth, among
other things. Neat.
-Jeff
|
877.3 | Me also... | AKRON::RATASKI | Tom Rataski | Thu Jul 23 1987 23:21 | 10 |
| I'm definitely interested. Lets see if how it compares to what I've
put down on paper, but haven't had time to build.
BTW - I'd appreciate if you would drop it inter-office mail since
I'm a almost 700 miles from where a good deal of you folks reside.
Location code is AOO
Thanks in advance........
-TomR-
|
877.4 | mailstop | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Fri Jul 24 1987 14:30 | 1 |
| My interoffice mail address is LKG1-2/A19 Thanx.
|
877.5 | Does this mean I need a Mirage ? | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Tue Jul 28 1987 20:09 | 16 |
| Thanks. I got the article from transoniq hacker (TS)
If I understand it correctly, this circuit depends on the ability
of the Ensoniq Mirage (don't got one) to change the speed of the
Midi interface to something lower (the magic "parameter 73") than
the midi standard, under the control of the "Mini Monitor" from
Upward Concepts.
So this pretty obviously puts us non-mirage owners (for now) out
in the cold. Can anyone (please) poke holes in my analysis ?
Are there any "tur(n)key" RS232 to Midi converters available on
the market ? What I have in mind for an application is a simple
voice/sequence librarian for the ESQ-1. I don't expect to ever
implement any real-time functions this way, since I'll be using
a timesharing system on the RS232 side.
|
877.6 | "get a computer" | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Jul 29 1987 08:31 | 9 |
| If you're trying to send data over long-distance telephone lines
you will need some kind of error checking. To do error checking
and recovery you will need a significant amount of intelligence
at each end of the link, for example Kermit. Kermit on the VAX
is no problem, but putting Kermit into an RS232 to MIDI converter
would be quite expensive. For about the same price you could get
a home computer with a MIDI interface, a modem, and the ability
to run Kermit.
John Sauter
|
877.7 | that's not the problem | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Wed Jul 29 1987 14:21 | 9 |
| I have a VS-I with DZV-11 in my bedroom. That's not the problem.
Someday I will get a computer with a midi interface, but for now I
would like to see if there is such a thing as a RS232 to MIDI
converter. It appears there is not. Since the Midi speed is
higher than 9600 baud (Right ?), such a box would have to have a
good sized buffer so it could store large amounts of data like system
exclusive dumps. Does anyone know of such a beast ?
|
877.8 | need lots of buffering | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Jul 29 1987 17:21 | 17 |
| Right: MIDI speed is 31,250 bits per second, considerably faster
than the 9600 bits per second on your DZV-11. You will need to
enable the alternate typeahead buffer to get VMS to handle long
input messages at that rate.
The longest message I know about is about 4096 bytes, for the DX7's
system exclusive 32-patch dump. I expect that samplers will have
more data, but they may use smaller messages. However, a sampler
with smaller messages will wait for "Ack" or "Nak" after each message,
and if it gets nothing it will assume "Ack" and send the next message.
If you can't empty your buffer fast enough you will need lots of
buffering.
Don't try to use this kind of speed convertor for real-time sequencing.
Some people feel 31,250 bps is too slow--your system is more than
a factor of 3 slower.
John Sauter
|
877.9 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Jul 30 1987 09:56 | 7 |
| You could always buy a DZQ11 or when they come available a DHQ11..
then you get 38.4K baud...all you need then is the RS-232 to MIDI
converter. I know someone makes them I just can't remember who.
dave
|
877.10 | persistant ba$t@rd, ain't he ? | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Thu Jul 30 1987 16:31 | 18 |
| Yeah, I know I really need a faster interface.
But....
Back in notes 162.* (particulary replies 8 and 11) people are
talking about commercially available Midi-to-RS232 converters
with extensive buffering capabilities that adapt to lower
speed (9600) RS232 inferfaces. Several brand names were mentioned.
It's been almost 2 years since those notes were entered, and I know
that the midi industry has been evolving *away* from such things,
but I would like to know if anyone has any experience with the devices
mentioned in 162.* or if anyone knows of any new developments in
this area.
Thanx in advance,
-Jeff
|
877.11 | MIDIATOR Rs-232--->MIDI Interface | AQUA::ROST | Bad imitation of Jerry Jemmott | Thu May 03 1990 09:54 | 22 |
|
Caught this on USENET....for those who still want RS-232 to MIDI:
From: [email protected] (timothy.j.thompson)
Subject: Re: MIDI <-> RS-232 Adapter
Date: 3 May 90 04:11:08 GMT
From article <[email protected]>, by [email protected] (Steve Robiner):
> Does anyone out there know if a device to convert 38400 baud RS-232
> into the stardard MIDI exists?
KEY Electronics Inc, 9112 Hwy 80 W. Suite 221, Fort Worth, TX 76116
1-800-533-MIDI or 1-817-560-1912.
They have a new product called the MIDIATOR MS-114, which appears to be
exactly what you want. A serial port that runs at 300 to 38400 baud,
connected to a MIDI interface. "Limited buffering on input. 38400 baud
required for continuous input without data loss." Suggested Retail $229.95
I have no experience with it, I'm just reading the glossy. Anyone
tried one?
...Tim...
|
877.12 | I tried the early one | DUGGAN::RICH | | Thu May 03 1990 13:38 | 8 |
| I have their "first" midiator, runs up to 9600 baud I think. It worked
fine - I never tried swamp it. The software was fine and they sent free
updates.
I eventually bought a much more powerfull CLONE so I don't use it
anymore.
Neil
|