T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
828.1 | Buy her a new B&O.... | DARTS::COTE | Oh, to be Jong and in love... | Tue Jun 02 1987 15:30 | 6 |
| Sure, plug it in, but watch your levels. Chances are your D-50
will subject the speakers to more than they're used to.
I used a stereo amp for a year before I bought my (powered) board.
Edd
|
828.2 | what buzz, man? Im ok. ssssssssssssssssssssss | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Tue Jun 02 1987 19:32 | 10 |
|
Seems stereo amps are fine.
Its the speakers that take a lickin and stop tickin.
At low levels you will sound great with no danger.
Just *try* and resist crankin it up and rokkin....
rr.
|
828.3 | I'd never use my EPIs though... | JAWS::COTE | Oh, to be Jong and in love... | Wed Jun 03 1987 10:28 | 7 |
| I don't necessarily recommend this but, FWIW....
My 'studio' speakers are loaded with Radio Trash 8" full range
speakers. I regularly run them at ear-shattering volumes. They
break-up and distort but they *don't* fry...
Edd
|
828.4 | Good Place to Start, But Be Careful | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Thu Jun 04 1987 12:07 | 7 |
| A stereo system is almost ideal for keyboards (broad, flat frequency
response), but understand the possibility of extremely high levels
and extremely high bass content. This is an unprocessed (specifically,
no compression or limiting like on records or over the radio) source.
len.
|
828.5 | | REGENT::SCHMIEDER | | Thu Jun 04 1987 17:23 | 11 |
| Due to the advent of CD technology, I imagine that most recent high-end
equipment could handle moderate practicing (certainly not gigging or serious
partying on the instrument, though). From what I understand, CD's are not
compressed, and my equipment is all very high current which is necessary for
handling transients. I don't plan to use my system for my instruments,
though. It's not worth the risk. There is a low filter on my preamp, and
that's a fairly common feature from what I undrestand, so maybe no harm
would be done if you had a high-end or "CD-ready" stereo system.
Mark
|
828.6 | hardly 'CD' ready here, but sounding fine | SALSA::MOELLER | Surf Arizona | Thu Jun 04 1987 17:36 | 9 |
| I fail to understand the concerns here. Certainly a Radio Shuck
15 watt per channel setup with 4" woofers won't make it, but that
wouldn't make it for demanding 'consumer' listening anyhow.
I have a 10-year old Marantz 75 wpch stereo amp, and some homemade
speakers with Dynaudio components.. this was enough to fill the
U of Az Planetarium at less than 1/2 volume..
And I don't even PLAN to purchase a Compact Disk player.
|
828.7 | Another caveat... | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Thu Jun 04 1987 17:52 | 14 |
| When I first set up my studio I used a 60 watt per Phillips
reciever and the afore-mentioned RS loaded speakers.
I soon learned that the stereo was to be the *LAST* item to be
powered up and in any event *ALWAYS ABSOLUTELY POSITIVLY AFTER*
the drum machine.
As the drum machine powered up it would drive the speaker protection
circuitry on the Phillips wacky, tripping the relays like there's
no tomorrow.
I don't know why.
Edd
|
828.8 | Rockers beware | NEXUS::DICKERSON | | Thu Jun 04 1987 18:54 | 19 |
| It's not the bass energy you need to worry about. Your amp will
most likely run out of gas before you can damage the voice coil
of a bass driver. It's the tweeters that are at risk. Most tweeters
will fry at very low RMS levels ( as low as a fraction of a watt
with a sinusoidal waveform ) and a synth can certainly provide a
sine wave as an input to your preamp! This makes a synth much
different from almost any other "music" source you are likely to
connect to your system. It will be a function of the robustness
of your speaker's tweeters, the level you choose to play the synth
and whether or not your amp clips the signals going to the speakers.
If you send a high level sine wave or a clipped waveform to your
speakers you can melt a voice coil in a heartbeat. Fusing the
speakers is of possible help for the clipped signals but any
reasonable-value fuse will happily pass a sine wave that will
cook your tweeters.
Regards
Doug Dickerson
|
828.9 | Uh, I spoketh to soon... | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Mon Jun 08 1987 10:21 | 101 |
|
Re: 828.3 by JAWS::COTE
> My 'studio' speakers are loaded with Radio Trash 8" full range
> speakers. I regularly run them at ear-shattering volumes. They
> break-up and distort but they *don't* fry...
>
> Edd
Well Edd, it seems you put a pox upon yourself.
Friday night *both* speakers literally went up in smoke. Oh no,
not just a little wisp like from a cigarette! We're talking clear
the room and run for your life!!
The story...
I'm currently using a Peavey XR1200 powered mixer in my studio.
200 watts per side output. I was driving a pair of homemade monitors
loaded with RS drivers. This set up was served me well for some
months now.
Friday morning the whole she-bang was working fine. Friday night
I went into the studio to do some work. The first item to come up
in my power-up sequence has always been the board. With both mains
turned all the way down I powered it up. As soon as I hit the switch,
I heard 'HHMMMMMMMMMM....'. Assuming a polarity problem, I powered
down and threw the switch into the other 'on' position. 'HHHMMMMMM...'.
Now, I've had hum before and just figured I'd find the cause after
I had everything up, so I walked to the other side of the room to
bring the synths up. Within 5 seconds I realized this was not the
wisest of decisions, as the smoke starts to POUR out of one of the
monitors. ROCK 'N ROLL!!! I rush back to the board, shut it down,
unplug it and leave th eroom to silence the smoke alarm in the hallway.
A few minutes later I return, unplug the offending (offended?) speaker
lead from the board and power up. No hum, and the remaining channel
is working just fine. (My comment about "they don't fry" is now
ringing in my ears.)
Mistake #2. Assuming I had a case of SMDS (Sudden Monitor Death
Syndrome) I move the good speaker lead to the output jack the fried
speaker *used* to occupy. You see vhat I'm getting at, darlinks?
Dopey me. This time however, I shut down at the first sign of smoke
from the remaining good speaker....
"A-ha!!! Board problem!!" I announce. (No shit, Sherlock.) Grabbing
my trusty DVM, I measure across the 2 speaker leads connected to
the bad channel. "What's this? 35 volts DC right to the speaker?"
Argh....
Saturday I make some frantic phone calls to anyone who may know
anything about power amps. No luck.
Argh...
With nothing left to loose, I open up the board. (This is easy;
remember February's Dr. Pepper story?) Luckily for me, when I
purchased the board I got a complete print set. Unfortunately,
I can't read a schematic to save my life.
Anyhow, with the board opened up, I start to identify the various
modules. Gut feeling tells me the problem lies in one of the 2
power amps so I hunt those down first. Got 'em!! Each power amp
is divided into 2 boards. One contains the 8 output transistors
and some minor amount of related circuitry. This is mounted directly
to a large heat sink. The second circuit board is refered to as
a 'driver' and is attached to the previously mentioned board.
Following the output leads back I identified the 'bad side' and
look for obvious signs of damage, burnt or melted parts. Nadia.
Being an old FS engineer I quickly realize that the only thing to
do is start swapping stuff out. (???) Not wanting to sacrifice my
one remaining good channel I ponder which way to swap. Good side
driver to bad side outputs or bad side driver to good side outputs???
I opt for the later and move the board. Guess what!! The problem
moved with it!!!! Feeling somewhat more confident now, I put the
good driver on the 'bad' outputs and power up. The previously bad
side now works, telling me I've isolated the problem to the board
level.
OK fine. If I had a spare driver board I'd be in business, but I
don't so now we're stuck going down to the component level. I start
testing all 43 resistors. The first 42 I find all seem within
tolerance. Number 43 however, a big 1k 5w sucker, is dead open.
Infinite resistance. I check on the schematic and discover that
this component is the first thing on the +59V rail. All the outputs
are 'down-stream' from here...
Could this be the problem? Off to radio shock. Naturally, this is
the one resistor they don't stock, so today we travel to Active
Electronics and U-Blew-It looking for a replacement. Also included
in the search is an op-amp. (At least I think it's an op-amp. It's
got 8 legs so could be a spider...) This unit took the brunt of
the Dr. Pepper violation and could be suspect. As long as I'm doing
surgery...
We'll keep everyone posted through this adventure. Copies of the
schematic are available to anyone who wants to try trouble-shooting
over the net.
Edd
|
828.10 | Wot ? No output transformers ? | EUREKA::REG_B | My personal name has expired ? | Mon Jun 08 1987 10:38 | 6 |
| re .9 Well, ain't that the trouble with these nu fangled
semiconductive amplificaters ?
Reg
|
828.11 | Mono-amp conversion in progress... | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Things get curioser and curioser... | Mon Jun 08 1987 12:46 | 10 |
| Did the resistor have scorch markes on it? My suspicion is you
had an emitter-collector short on an output transistor or some other
failure that causes an output transistor in a complementary pair
to be permanently on. So, when you install your new resistor, you'll
fry it as well as maybe some other parts. If it is an output
transistor from a complementary pair at fault, be sure to replace BOTH
transistors. Sometimes you have to replace a matched set, or the
other may have gone out of spec as a result of stress.
Steve
|
828.12 | schematics??? oh yes please! | TWOMCH::IBBETT | B/OIS Performance Group | Mon Jun 08 1987 13:02 | 9 |
| Re .9
Edd, I'd love a copy of the schematics. My Peavey 1200 has an
intermitent chanel B monitor circuit problem (the PFL & meter stuff,
not the 'mon' bus).
Jimi. ( MKO2-2/D17 )
p.s. while I'm in there i'm gonna fix the noisy reverb tank too!
|
828.13 | another + for Shack. | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Mon Jun 08 1987 13:44 | 17 |
| yo Edd. Reiterating that the resistor may be a symptom
like the speakers....get a couple of em.
Put one in and quick measure the DC volts INTO the
power amp section. Cant say more without schematics.
Either 1 or more transistors went and the remaining
circuit pulls your big dc volts across the terminals
OR, if the amp is "DC Coupled" (or an isolation capacitor
has shorted!) , the preamp can be the problem as its
putting out some DC offset which is faithfully amplified
to big volts.
Enjoy. Hey, at least they were RS speakers and not JBL's!
rr
|
828.14 | Wheres my battery powered 4->2 ????? | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Mon Jun 08 1987 14:20 | 62 |
| re: .12 I'll get you a full set of prints in the mail tomorrow.
re: others..
Here's what we know so far....
1. Side A is dead.
2. Side B isn't.
3. Moving the side A driver board onto the side B outputs
causes side B to behave like the bad side A.
4. Moving the side B driver board onto the side A outputs
causes side A to work. (At least it worked for 2 or
3 minutes, I saw no indication of failure when I
powered down.)
5. Side A driver board has a bad 1K-5W resistor.
6. There was no indication of impending doom during the
previous session 8 hours before. (No hiss, pops, etc.)
7. The failure was noticed *immediately* on power-up.
8. I moved the cabling from side A to side B and connected
a speaker to the *jack* labled A. (Note that jack
A is now driven by side B circuitry.) Everything was
fine.
9. I didn't move the side B cabling to side A.
I tend to agree with the concensus, that an output went sour.
However, the outputs (8 per channel) are located on a separate
board. My thinking suggests that (a) since the failure was
immediate and (b) the driver board from the good side did not
fail when placed on the bad side that (hence) the output trans-
istors are OK.
Mind you, this thinking may be wrong!
Driver Board Driver Board
----------------------- ----------------------
| Output | | Output |
---------------------------- ---------------------------------
| | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Heat Sink | | |
Output transistors (Big T03-type monsters) are mounted on the bottom
side of the heat sink with legs extending through heatsink and onto
output board.
I just got back from Active Electronics in Westbboro where I bought
4 1K-5W resistors. Admittedly, it's probably not the source of the
problem but it will have to be replaced eventualy.
Keep those suggestions coming. Everyone who responds will recieve,
FREE OF CHARGE, a schematic of the circuit so we can all talk about
the same thing.
Thanks!
Edd
|
828.15 | Success!! | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Tue Jun 09 1987 09:45 | 6 |
| Installed resistor.
Board works.
I'm in Bedford with slow link.
More Later.
Edd
|
828.16 | Edd gets nominated for smokin sounds! | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Tue Jun 09 1987 11:32 | 16 |
| amazing.
Mount it so that its OFF of the board.
Do both channels resistors get equally hot?
Hope so, otherwise....
Good thing you bought some extras to use while
you find out the REAL problem that blew the resistor....
But what of the brand new speakers? Active has some special
ultra-fast blow fuses....
rr
|
828.17 | Smell that smoke? That's my JBLs! | CLULES::SPEED | Derek Speed, Worksystems | Wed Jun 10 1987 13:50 | 9 |
| Re: .13
Yes, Edd, be glad they were not JBLs! Back in my younger days,
I blew the mid-range driver on our L100 Century loudspeakers by
putting an unfiltered SQUARE wave through our stereo from my recently
purchased synthesizer. Square waves are more dangerous than sine
waves because of their high frequency harmonic content.
Derek_who_now_knows_better
|
828.18 | Check for shorting on C12 and C14 | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Things get curioser and curioser... | Wed Jun 10 1987 15:32 | 10 |
| Got the schematics, Edd. Have you tried putting the new resistor
in? (Hope not, but thought I'd ask.) As I recall, you said you
saw DC on your speaker out and didn't see any other fried parts
besides the resistor. Looks like something on the load side of the
resistor (to the right on the drawing) probably shorted to ground,
which caused the resistor to blow. I would check C12 and C14, which
may both be electrolytic capacitors that have shorted over the years
(assuming this thing is old).
Steve
|
828.19 | Ray Pelkey was impressed.... | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Wed Jun 10 1987 16:29 | 29 |
| OK, I'm back from the land of incredibly slow links.....
Monday night I installed the resistor (R18 for those with schematics).
Voila! The board came up and worked like brand new! I ran the unit
for about an hour before putting the skins back on, all the while
testing the temperature of R18 against R16 and against the same
resistors on the other channel. They all get real warm (hot?) but
all are within the same range (as best as you can tell with a finger
anyhow!)
Since then, I've put 3-4 hours on the board with no ill effects.
Re: .18 Is it 'normal' to expect an electrolytic cap to fail after
n hours of use or y years in general? I've got no qualms pulling
the board apart again for PM, but wonder if I should avoid fixing
what's not broke.
Also, (just a thought) is it possible the speaker could have failed
and took the board out? Purely academic, I realize...
Total cost to repair board ................................... $0.69
Now all I have to do is finish reloading the drivers (3 way system)
in the cabs and I'm back in business!!!
Thanks to all for the help. (Don't throw those prints away!!! One
never knows....)
Edd
|
828.20 | you already knew this, but... | SHR001::DEHAHN | | Wed Jun 10 1987 16:42 | 17 |
|
Power resistors DO wear out sometimes, especially ones that are
passing a good amount of current at all times during their life.
They fail by opening up. Think of it this way, they're like a light
bulb. There's a resistive wire inside the ceramic insulator. After
a while the ceramic cracks from the repeated hot/cold cycling of
use. When oxygen gets to the wire, it eventually burns out. If your
headlight on your car gets hit by a stone, it will burn out real
quick for the same reason.
You did do right by checking to see if each resistor was at the
same temp, though, because there might have been a semiconductor
failure as well.
Chris
|
828.21 | | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Wed Jun 10 1987 17:23 | 3 |
| Precisely how it failed. Open. Infinite resistance.
Edd
|
828.22 | 69� lesson | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Things get curioser and curioser... | Wed Jun 10 1987 22:06 | 18 |
| re: .19 Ayup. Electrolytics can fail over time. Their values
are often considered to be -20%/+100% what their markings are.
Often, you'll find they tend to fail in equipment that sits on the
shelf for a while. They rely on an electrolyte that forms a very
thin layer of high impedance just along the face of one of the wads of
foil inside. After a while, especially when reverse biased or not
charged up much, the electrolyte can break down and cause the thing
to short. Reverse biasing can cause the thing to literally blow
its top, though there is such thing as an electrolytic that is not
polarized. One more thing, if you should ever have to replace one,
make sure you replace it with one that has about the same voltage
rating. A 100�F cap rated at 15V will NOT act the same as a 100�F cap
rated at 100V. For your circuit, I'd leave the board alone if things
look cool. If it is a bad cap, the problem won't go away and could
cause the resistor to have a shorter life. But, 69�....
Steve
|
828.23 | Just to put your mind at rest Edd.... | EUREKA::REG_B | N_ew E_ngland C_onservatory makes disks ?, no way ! | Thu Jun 11 1987 12:59 | 12 |
| re .19 Electrolytics have a bad reputation within dec. As
a service guy just check a few of our products to see which way
the can is pointing in anticipation of whats going to come out of
it when the electrolyte boils. We don't seem to point the open
end of big electrolytics at logic boards any more, though we used
to.
re .22 I think they also blow from age and latent defects,
not just reverse biasing.
Reg
|
828.24 | Time bomb??? | JAWS::COTE | What's wrong with this picture? | Thu Jun 11 1987 13:36 | 9 |
| Re: .23
Oh thanks, I feel so much better now. :^(
Should I bullet proof the studio? :^)
Edd
|
828.25 | component stress | BARNUM::RENE | string | Thu Jun 11 1987 13:44 | 8 |
| Ed,
If it was a 1 watt resistor that failed due to over stress(or
rated stress for a long time); then if you can fit it, why not replace
the 1 watt resistor with a 2 watt resistor of the same value. You'll
cut your stress ratio in half. How bout it you reliability folks??
Frank
|
828.26 | Uses for fuses... | EUREKA::REG_B | N_ew E_ngland C_onservatory makes disks ?, no way ! | Thu Jun 11 1987 14:30 | 8 |
| re .23 and .24 I know of an upcoming product for which dec
is considering adding fuses to some electrolytics, they are big
ones. Its a trade off between slightly earlier fuse failure vs
slightly later exploded boiling acidic slime, not an easy choice
the way decisions sometimes get made around here, eh ?
Reg
|
828.27 | LET IT BURN! :} | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Things get curioser and curioser... | Thu Jun 11 1987 15:00 | 5 |
| re .25 Umm. I'd rather replace a 69� resistor than a maybe
$2.00-if-I-can-find-a-replacement transistor. So, I'd vote for
leaving the resistor in and let it burn out every once in a while.
Steve
|