T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
820.1 | USS and them them them them...... | JAWS::COTE | The Voice Of Reason | Fri May 29 1987 11:36 | 7 |
| One of our more prolific contributors has his JX-10 stuffed into
a Ultimate Support Systems stand. (JX-10 be big!)
I think a 3 tier USS runs ~175 - 200 and is well worth it. Their
solid as a rock!
Edd
|
820.2 | Gotta do something with 'em.... | JAWS::COTE | The Voice Of Reason | Fri May 29 1987 11:38 | 5 |
| Oh, by the way, I think a Rhodes piano makes a great keyboard stand.
(Better stand than piano)
Edd
|
820.3 | Get long supports | DYO780::SCHAFER | Is it soup yet? | Fri May 29 1987 12:06 | 12 |
| I have a 3 tier USS stand and use it for an OB-Xa, which weighs in
somewhere around 50-60 lbs. Have had no trouble with the strength of
the stand. HOWEVER ...
Make darn sure that you get the extra long swing-out supports for it if
the D-50 is very deep front to back, like my Xa. Short ones just don't
cut it.
And, with all due respect to Mr. Cote, don't use a Rhodes for a
stand. Moving the stand will break your back.
8^)_who_uses_his_Rhodes_to_support_an_ESQ1 (or WUHRTSAE)
|
820.4 | No, I will not build any more stands! | AKOV68::EATOND | Reeking with profundity | Fri May 29 1987 12:15 | 22 |
| While Ultimate Support Systems is probably the ultimate in support
systems (boo! Hiss!), there are many alternatives. In the lower end of
stands prices, you can generally find a 3 tier keyboard stand for around
$110 or so. These are most likely limited in the ways one can set them up
(i.e. they may have pre-set tier heights, etc...). But they are a good deal.
Invisible Stands are a bit more expensive (around the same price for only 2
tiers), but they can be added onto quite nicely. They even support standard
rack configurations.
For the longest time, stands and cases for keyboards were the biggest
rippoffs in the industry. You *had* to have 'em, and not too many people were
makin' 'em. But more companies have gotten in the market, so competition is
bringing the price down - at least in the stands market.
I have built all my own cases and stands. But while I have volunteered
to build cases for anyone (see one of the later replies to note 194), I find
building a good stand with three tiers to be a lot of hassle for very little
savings. Since, as I've said, you can get a brandy new stand for around $100
(fewer levels for even less) it's worth it to go out and buy new. Or watch
the WantAds...
Dan
|
820.5 | How about an invisable stand? | NIMBUS::DAVIS | | Fri May 29 1987 12:19 | 20 |
|
You should probably check out the Invisable stands for comparison.
A bit different design than what you normally see. The frame is
constructed out of relatively thin black metal, making them very
inconspicuous, almost "invisable" onstage.
advantages
- a bit cheaper than the USS stands, ~ $125 I think.
- very portable, they break down and setup easily and fit into a
nylon carrying bag. (about 2x3 but only a couple of inches deep)
- very "cool" looking
disadvantages
- limited (although not bad) amount of height and setup adjustments.
only two tiers possible.
- the brackets will tend to "bounce" or give just a little bit
with larger keyboards. They actually are very sturdy and can
handle big keyboards, but the bounce may bother some players.
Rob
|
820.6 | Invisible | 10011::BARTH | | Fri May 29 1987 12:30 | 29 |
| Will you be mainly putting keyboards on this stand in your home
studio or using it to play out live?
When I changed my live set-up from Rhodes-Juno60 to DX7-Juno60,
obviously I needed a stand, since I would no longer be carting around
the Rhodes. I checked out a few, and really studied and put alot
of thought into chosing one (most dealers said "a stand is a stand
-- what's the big deal?"). Well, after a short stint using an
Ultimate, I went with the Invisible two-keyboard stand -- and love
it.
I think it makes the stage set-up look alot neater, the band can
set up in a smaller area as it takes very little room (it is positioned
under the keyboards rather than outside), I think the buttons on
each synth are much more accessible, it is more sturdy than the
Ultimates (I found the Ultimate the wiggle when the keyboard wass
played with any aggressiveness), etc., etc.
If you've seen their ads in Keyboard, it says "Keyboard players
should be seen AND heard", or something to that effect. I agree.
I've seen too many band where the keyboard player sits behind a
huge gaudy structure supporting five keyboards with a Yamaha CP70
underneath. I like to be in the front row with the guitar and lead
singer -- I like to be seen!
Anyway, it is a more performance-type stand, and I think it's great;
but go with your needs.
Ron
|
820.7 | Slight correction | AKOV68::EATOND | Reeking with profundity | Fri May 29 1987 12:30 | 11 |
| RE < Note 820.5 by NIMBUS::DAVIS >
> disadvantages
> - limited (although not bad) amount of height and setup adjustments.
> only two tiers possible.
Just a slight correction, Rob. I have the catalogs from Invisible
Stands (made right here in Mass). They *can* support three tiers. May not
be the best arrangement, but the pictures show 3.
Dan
|
820.8 | Consultancy required | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Fri May 29 1987 13:35 | 8 |
| re .-1:
For those of us who don't live close enough to nag you
into building us a case, would you consider publishing
a plan for flightcase-building? And maybe some ideas on what's the
best materials to use?
Richard.
|
820.9 | Webbles wobble but do Invisible stands, too? | FDCV01::ARVIDSON | Leggo my ego! | Fri May 29 1987 14:00 | 13 |
| THANKS for the input so far. To better clarify my needs it would be in
home only, in a small footprint. By the sounds of the replies thus far
it would appear that the Invisible stand would be the way to go. I would
only need one tier for now
The only concerns I have are:
- How wobbly they are?
- How does the keyboard get mounted to the stand?
- If I get a one-tier, can a second be added? ...or is are the
one-tier and two-tier two different models?
Thanks again,
Dan
|
820.10 | I don't see no wobbles ... | NIMBUS::DAVIS | | Fri May 29 1987 14:38 | 29 |
| RE .9
- They are not really wobbly at all. There tends to be a little bounce
if you hit the keyboard hard. More noticable for players who are
used to pounding on a real piano as opposed to an organ or DX type
keyboard.
- The keyboard sits on brackets that attach to either side of the
basic stand. The brackets may be put in a couple of different postions
and the overall height of the stand can be adjusted.
- The basic model comes with (I think) three sets of brackets, 2 long
and 1 short, so you can put either 1 or 2 sets on as you like. A
previous note mentioned that they had seen a *three* tier stand, but
I don't know how you would attach a third set of brackets to the
basic stand that I've seen. Maybe there's a different model, or
perhaps some sort of add-on that holds a third keyboard? Anybody
else know how that works? A sideview of the one I have looks something
like this:
keys1
-----|keys2
|-----
|
|
/|\
/ | \
/ | \
-------
|
820.11 | go directly to Note 567, do not pass go... | AKOV68::EATOND | Reeking with profundity | Fri May 29 1987 14:41 | 17 |
| RE < Note 820.8 by MARVIN::MACHIN >
> For those of us who don't live close enough to nag you
> into building us a case, would you consider publishing
> a plan for flightcase-building? And maybe some ideas on what's the
> best materials to use?
Richard,
Don't you live in southern New Hampshire? That's not too far away!
Anyway, let's move the discussion of cases to a more appropriate note
like 567. I doubt I'd be able to supply plans with the limited graphics
available in notes.
Dan
|
820.12 | and you can see over them. | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Fri May 29 1987 14:45 | 23 |
|
I have both a double and triple Invisible stand.
There is a conversion kit for going from 2 to 3 tiers.
I dont think they make a single.But you can just NOT put
in the second rack hardware. Get 2, you'll use it....
even if its used as a shelf for manuals and beers &*}
The black is easier to 'fix' if you scratch it...than the chrome
plate, which can flake off and lodge in your hand. Yes, it hurts.
Its 'more' invisible too.
This is ONE item you cant go wrong with ordering mail order.
Howard Goldman 716 833 6111 tween 1 and 7...maybe others.
oh, they are very sturdy. Dont wobble much. Designed like a
suspension bridge with cross braces....or some such marketting hype...
rr
|
820.13 | It'd go like this... | AKOV68::EATOND | Reeking with profundity | Fri May 29 1987 14:47 | 16 |
| < Note 820.10 by NIMBUS::DAVIS >
keys1
-----|keys2
|-----
| keys3
|---------
|
|
/|\
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
/ | \
-----------
|
820.14 | One more Invisible lover | CLULES::SPEED | Derek Speed, Worksystems | Tue Jun 02 1987 14:10 | 18 |
| As the owner of both an Ultimate Stand (now in use in home studio)
and an Invisible Stand (in use while gigging and in rehearsal with
band), I would second the recommendation of the Invisible Stand.
The one advantage I think the USS stand has in studio use is that it is
possible to put more than 3 tiers on it, especially if the synths will
be MIDIed and access to the keyboards themselves is not terribly
important. Also, the little cross braces for holding more than 1
device per tier are also helpful, but you can get similar gadgets for
the Invisible stands.
As a general rule, I find the Invisible stand to be excellent for
live performance, as the amount of space your keyboards take on
stage is greatly reduced over the USS set-up. Especially important
for those clubs with small stages. Can you say "Cramped quarters?"
I knew you could...
Derek
|
820.15 | WARNING: Weebles wobble more after a few beers! | FDCV01::ARVIDSON | Leggo my ego! | Tue Jun 02 1987 15:17 | 6 |
| Thank you all for the input, I have decided on the Invisible Two-Tier,
I like the Keyboard on one tier with beer and manuals on the other tier
idea! :-)
Thanks again,
Dan
|
820.16 | I like the Rok-Steady. | THUNDR::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Sun Jun 21 1987 18:03 | 45 |
| I guess I should put in my two-cents worth about my stand, so people
don't think the world is is Invisible, Ultimate and custom.
I have a Rok-Steady, 3 tier, and I think it is awesome. I can't
really remember what an Invisible looks like, but I think this is
basically similar, only the supports are beefier. Heavy-gage square
steel tubing all around. Also, all three tiers are all hung from the
rear like this:
\\///
/ * * \
+---- \ --- /
| +-+-+
+------ /|
| `__/ | (Note: Person's head
+--+--+-- + not to scale)
| | |
| | |
-----+--+-- ---+
The legs are a scissor arrangement, so the overall height of the thing
can be adjusted from a bottom tier height of 31" up to around 45".
This is low enough for sitting, but only y if you have a tall stool,
and tall enough for a 7 footer to play standing (I think. I'm not that
tall). Each tier is angled succesively more downward.
You can get it with 1, 2 or 3 tiers, and upgrade extras as needed.
Also you can buy a mike boom, a shelf which goes below the
lowest tier (for one or two rack mount devices, or whatever), and
a drink-holder and ashtray gizmo.
It will hold a great deal of weight, any one of the tiers will take
an 88 key board, and it is very steady. I think it would sway a bit if
you put a Midiboard or an RD1000 on the top tier, (actually, I think
that the welds might break if you left one of those ~100 pound deals on
the top shelf for a few month), but it seems to do the trick for most
``rational'' configurations.
Also, it comes apart in about 25-seconds, with all the hardware still
attached (no bolts or nuts to carry around/lose in a bag) and is about
3.5' x 2' x 4" when folded. List price is $200 for a three tier.
All in all, it sounds like it offers many of the same features as
the Invisible, but is probably better if your configurations masses
more than around 100 kilos.
|
820.17 | | PRANCR::AIKALA | Imaginary Lamborghini Owner | Wed Jun 24 1987 08:32 | 6 |
| re: .16
I agree. Rok-Steady 3 tier is awsome enough without the
keyboards!
Sherm
|
820.18 | Rok Steady they are! | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Mon Jun 29 1987 15:41 | 10 |
| re 16,17 : I just saw a Rok Steady at Acton Music. I was very impressed
by how quickly it can be setup and taken down, by the Mic boom
attachment, and especially by the fact that, when pounded upon,
it had absolutely NO BOUNCE!! I got a price of $195 for three-tier
with mic boom attachment and drink/ashtray attchment. Is that good,
or can I do better elsewhere?
Mike D
|
820.19 | You can probably do better. | THUNDR::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Mon Jun 29 1987 19:16 | 11 |
| I imagine that you can do better elsewhere. I got mine at Acton, but
it was a present. (Presents are great, because all the receiver cares
about is the absolute satisfaction, and all the givers care is that the
reciever is satisfied, so you don't have to agonize over whether your
money was better spent on something else, or over getting a better
deal, so the whole team is happy).
But Acton isn't known for their bottom drawer prices (but some of
their stuff IS well priced). I suspect you could get up to $50
off of it if you shopped around.
|
820.20 | who sells them?? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Wed Jul 01 1987 11:59 | 14 |
| re .19
Maybe I could get a better price....if I could find somebody who
sells them!! Daddy's doesn't. LaSalle's doesn't. Wurlitzer's doesn't
(although they said they could get it for me--but if they order
just one unit they won't be able to do a good price I suspect).
Hampshire Music doesn't. Sam Ash couldn't give me a price over the
phone yet (told me to call them back at the end of the week). Music
Workshop (Salem NH) doesn't carry them either. I might be forced
to bite the bullet and pay a little more at Acton Music, unless
anyone has suggestions on who else to try. I need it *yesterday*,
if you catch my drift.
Mike D
|
820.21 | so take your time | SALSA::MOELLER | 111�F, but it's a DRY heat... | Wed Jul 01 1987 14:04 | 5 |
| Yeah, well, when I was chasing a stand for my KX88 I needed it
'yesterday', too. And ended up with a 2-tier A-frame Ultimate Support
stand that cost a lot, looks good but bounces like a bitch.
karl moeller
|
820.22 | Is there a wide variant? | THUNDR::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Wed Jul 01 1987 17:24 | 5 |
| I thought you couldn't fit 88 keys in a USS (or any of those A-frames)
Are there several varieties?
Steph
|
820.23 | Consider your set up. | THUNDR::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Wed Jul 01 1987 17:38 | 13 |
| I should add a simple (but not necessarily obvious) point about
the Rok-Steady. What makes it less than Rok-Steady is the amount
of weight on the upper tiers. The heavier the bottom unit is,
the more stable it is (only to a point, I'm sure), so think about
your configuration. Also, you need a certain amount of weight to
make it sit right on a flat (non-carpeted) floor. Three points
determines a plane, and you have to force the fourth one down.
The critical weight is somewhere between that of a DX7 and that
of a RD-200 on my stand.
Anyhow, if you get the drink stand and the mike boom for the $195
price, then that is better than list. Them Acton boys are really
dealin' now...
|
820.24 | Better price at Union on Rok-Steady | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Thu Jul 02 1987 11:35 | 11 |
|
re: Rok-Steady stands
Taking some advice from KMII, I shopped around, and got a price
of $190 from Union in Worcester AND this included the mic/boom
attachment, the drink/ashtray holder AND the extra shelf (that holds
two rackmount devices)!!! That is LESS money than Acton Music for
an extra toy! I'm calling Wurlitzer today to see if they can do
better (I doubt it, but you never know).
Mike D
|
820.25 | got it! | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Wed Jul 15 1987 11:12 | 14 |
| RE .24 Wurlitzer couldn't even quote me a price over the phone, so
I went with Union. Received my stand a week later. I am very pleased
with it! With the mic/boom attachment, etc., it makes my setup a lot easier
and more convenient.
When I was at Union I got talking with the salesman (Jeff) about
a Mirage. He said he couldn't discount it off the list price, and
that no music stores were discounting any of Ensoniq's products.
I found this rather hard to believe. What say you? I realize this
strays from the subject, and if I should discuss this in a more
appropriate note (one on Union Music, or one on Ensoniq, or Mirage)
please tell me, and I will defer my question there.
|
820.26 | Debouncing ultimates, new Ultimate stand | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | VAXstation Repo Man | Mon Aug 17 1987 12:04 | 45 |
| How to make an Ultimate not bounce:
The default (as-it-comes-out-of-the-box) Ultimate stands come in
two flavors- old and new. The old ones have holes drilled in the
horizontal tubes, the new ones have lexan clamps. Debouncing
is slightly different depending on the type...
The general principle for either is to get the center of gravity
of the keyboard right over the tube. This involves using that little
allen wrench and possibly a philips-head screwdriver and open-end
wrench to move the flat aluminum pieces fore and aft. My ESQ bounced
like crazy until I moved the aluminums one full notch away from
me. Now it works fine. (hint- flipping the orientation of the
Lexan clamp from front to back moves the aluminum about 2/3 of the
distance that changing screwholes does. Those of you with drilled
tubes do not have this option).
BTW, I have a 3-tier Ultimate, and the top tier is used as a stand
to hold the sheet music (which I regularly fail to read correctly
:-) ).
It seems the new-style Ultimates (with clamped horizontal tubes,
rather than drilled horizontal tubes) have less bounce to start
with.
Invisible stands have another problem- I have a DX-100 as well as
the ESQ-1, and the DX just falls through between the girders of
an Invisible stand!
------------------------------------------
Ultimate just came out with an entirely new style of "small stand"-
it's like a prop from a science fiction movie. There is a single
triangular vertical (actually, it slopes back and away), with the
keyboards cantilevered from the front and the legs flat on the floor
to the back. It folds up into a single module. It's fairly steady,
but hard to sit at, and the highest you can put a kb is only about
3 1/2 feet up- which effectively limits you to two tiers for standing
use.
Cost is about the same as a three-tier USS A-frame stand. ($190)
They had them at Only Guitar Shop near Albany, NY.
At least it would look less ugly than a USS A-frame in your formal
living room....
|
820.27 | Apex columns? | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Tue Nov 24 1987 15:14 | 5 |
| Has anybody used one of those Apex column keyboard stands?
It looks kinda cool. Wonder if it's sturdy?
Mike D
|
820.28 | As long as you don't use your feet. | MAY20::BAILEY | Steph Bailey | Wed Nov 25 1987 12:52 | 20 |
| I played with one for about an hour. It had a KX88 and a DX27 on
it.
Nicely a portable, of course.
It seemed reasonably sturdy with respect to pounding on the sucker.
Didn't rock or sway too much.
It was, however, HIGHLY suceptible to hits on the ends of the kbd
in directions other than down or back.
That is, if your shirt or your pin-headed lead singer's spandex tights
get caught on the end of your KX88 as you (she?) walks around it, it
appeared to me that you were in for a major spill (repair job?).
Also there is no good place to put the @#&$^@$*@&# pedals.
The niftiness of the stand might be worth the extra care required,
though. Except for the pedal problem.
Steph
|
820.29 | KX76 too long for USS | DYO780::SCHAFER | Walk between the lines | Mon Apr 11 1988 16:54 | 8 |
| I just picked up a KX76 ... and found that it WON'T fit on my 3-tier
USS stand (the board is too long). I'm also concerned about the amount
of bounce, since this keyboard is considerably heavier than my other
boards. As it stands, my OB bounces like crazy if you play very hard.
Any suggestions as to what to do?
-b
|
820.30 | | AKOV88::EATOND | | Mon Apr 11 1988 17:00 | 6 |
| RE .29
In many cases, I believe you can get replacement tier bars of
longer length.
Are you saying the KX is heavier than the OB?!
|
820.31 | | SALSA::MOELLER | Expedience is permanent | Mon Apr 11 1988 17:45 | 9 |
| My KX88 fits on a two-tier USS stand.. the front bar supports the
KX88, the rear bar, even with the top of the KX88, allows me to
support two mixers and a Nak cassette deck, rears on the rear bar,
fronts on the KX88.
Since I moved the support cross bars (4 on the KX88), no shake..
and that thing weighs ~80lb.
karl
|
820.32 | Rok-Steady | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The height of MIDIocrity | Tue Apr 12 1988 10:18 | 18 |
| I have a Rok-Steady. It's only one tier. That's all I need. The only
keyboards I have are my RD-300 (88 keys, wide and heavy) and my ESQ-1.
Everything else is in my rack.
The ESQ-1 sits on top of the RD. Using the ESQ-1 as a MIDI system
controller, I haven't found any need to add another keyboard.
The stand cost me something like $50 and I like it. It's height is
adjustable and allows me to use it both sitting on a stool as well
as standing up. Even with my wide/heavy RD, I find it to be very
stabile. I get absolutely no bounce playing at my hardest velocity.
It's very light, and sets up and breaks down in less than 20 seconds.
It's one of the few areas where I've been able to save a few bucks and
end up with something that doesn't involve any compromise.
db
|
820.33 | | NYMPH::ZACHWIEJA | Only 185 days left | Tue Apr 12 1988 10:28 | 14 |
|
The USS stands come in lengths of 48", 54" and 60". They may
come longer but I'm not sure.
As it turns out, all of the lengths end up being about an inch
to short for keyboards in that size range. For example a DX-7
is just about 48" exactly and scrapes the edges of a 48" stand
when the bar flexes. The Roland RD-300 is about 55" long and
won't fit on a 54" tier.
For the most part though, the 60" stand is more than enough
for the 88 key instruments.
_sjz
|
820.34 | You can tune your stand, but you can't tune a fish | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | A wizard is someone who's been doing something for a week longer | Tue Apr 12 1988 13:38 | 27 |
| The trick in nulling out "bounce" on a USS stand is to shift some
of the weight of the keyboard toward the back of the stand, so that
the keystrike impacts are closer to the crossbar.
I had a bounce problem with my ESQ... until I moved it back 2 inches.
Now the crossbar is about 1" CLOSER to me than the furthest edge
of the keyboard, and there's essentially no rotational bounce.
Likewise, you may have to slide the crossbars up and down slightly;
you want especially to avoid having the crossbar at "small rational
fractions" of the vertical bar lengths. For example, don't put
the horizontal at exactly 1/2 the height; put it a few inches up,
say at 11/19'ths the height.
Finally, don't have the spreading bar exactly horizontal. Tip it
some, so that the front and rear vertical lengths are slightly
different.
----------------
You can do these same sort of tricks with most other keyboard stands,
such as Invisibles (varying the tension of the turnbuckles shifts
the resonant frequency; having the two sides slightly different
prevents runaway oscillation).
-Bill
|
820.35 | New Hardware Time | DYO780::SCHAFER | Walk between the lines | Tue Apr 12 1988 16:30 | 8 |
| RE: last few
Sounds like I need to get some 54" or 60" cross members. Will measure
the 76 and see what the deal is.
Thanks for the tips on stand adjustment, too.
-b
|
820.36 | Where there's a will ... | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - DTN 433-2408 | Mon Jul 11 1988 16:39 | 33 |
| I found a way to make the KX76 fit on a 48" USS stand (finally) without
being forced to buy new hardware (even though I already have).
The KX is wider than 48", but only the top half of it. It looks like
this:
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| |
+--+ +--+
| <-- 48" --> |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
from the front. The indented portion is just a skosh less than 48", so
I mounted it on the top bar of the USS. It fit, but the plastic mount
knobs (that you twist to keep the support bar from spinning) kept the
thing from sitting down on the supports. SO ...
I swapped the sides they were on and turned them 180�, so that the
knobs faced toward the back, like so:
/\
/ |= <--- reversed twist knob
/ \
/ =|
/ \
/ =| <--- twist knobs
It's really up in the air, but if you stand when you play, it doesn't
matter that much. The only drawback I can see (other than accessing
the twists from the backside) it is that one of the footswitch holes is
not usable without a right L plug.
-b
|
820.37 | IS MAGIC!!! | JAWS::COTE | yawn... | Mon Jul 11 1988 16:51 | 6 |
| I spun all my hardware around on my USS same as Brad. It just seemed
to make a better place to hang headphones, breath controllers and
miscellaneous stuff of that nature and ilk. So much neater with
everything inside the A-frame...
Edd
|
820.38 | screw 'em | IAMOK::CROWLEY | ere lies David St. 'ubbins, and why not! | Mon Jul 11 1988 17:16 | 11 |
|
I just took the knobs off my USS and replaced them with a few
extra allen-type screws that I got when I bought an extra
tier. Admittedly, its not as easy to break down for live
situations, but right now the stand is just used in the studio
so it works out great.
Ralph
|
820.39 | | HAMER::COCCOLI | blinded by science | Fri Feb 03 1989 20:27 | 4 |
| I just picked up a rock-steady for $50. Three tier no less!.
Takes up a lot less space than the USS.
Now I need another keyboard so I can fill it up!
|
820.40 | looking for good reliable mail order company | MOSAIC::HOULE | OS/2 - Catch the wave | Thu Jul 13 1989 10:57 | 5 |
| Anyone know of a good, reliable mail order company that sells stands
at a good price?
Thanks,
Paul
|
820.41 | Caruso's | SUBSYS::ORIN | Got a bad case of VFX | Thu Jul 13 1989 11:30 | 11 |
| <<< Note 820.40 by MOSAIC::HOULE "OS/2 - Catch the wave" >>>
-< looking for good reliable mail order company >-
Paul,
I would highly recommend Caruso's Music in Conn. 203-442-9600.
Ask for Larry or Richard Caruso. These guys are great; fast service,
correct order, overnight delivery, nononsense prices.
dave
|
820.42 | Invisible 'Workstation' Stand | AQUA::ROST | Bikini Girls With Machine Guns | Tue Mar 20 1990 09:16 | 23 |
|
Just picked up an Invisible MS-3000 stand. This is their "workstation"
stand, three tiers with two shelves (which I needed to hold all my
non-rack-mountable junk).
One shelf is solid, the other has a large hole for routing cables
through and two smaller holes of no immediately identifiable purpose.
This shelf also has an "extension", a metal tray which can be extended
(however, it doesn't slide out, you either have it stowed away or
sticking out) for supporting a computer keyboard or anything else you
would like to be suspended over your main keyboard.
It can be used as a three tier stand without the shelves as well. The
shelves are *not* fastened down, although they weigh enough that you'd
really have to bang them to make them move, particularly if loaded down
with heavy stuff.
Overall, very sturdy. I gotta say I'm fascinated by the physics behind
this design. Loosen one turnbuckle and the thing wants to fall into a
half dozen pieces. Tighten it up and it's like a rock. Way cool.
Brian
|
820.43 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Tue Mar 20 1990 10:29 | 8 |
| I used to have one. I think the two little holes you refer to are
optional mounting spots for the shelf. Wobbles some with all the gear
on the shelves, but that's no big deal if you're at home. Be sure not
to try to correct the wobbling by overtightening the adjustment nut.
I bought a third shelf and put that on the back to hold stuff like
an amp, cassette deck, disks and such. Helped keep it balanced.
Steve
|
820.44 | USS's new STEALTH stand | HPSTEK::RENE | Babylon sisters, Shake It!! | Tue Mar 20 1990 11:05 | 7 |
| ..speaking of stands, has anyone seen the new "STEALTH" keyboard
stand from USS??? I thought it was a joke until I saw one advertised
in Keyboard. Looks like it holds one keyboard, and is not adjustable.
Anyone seen one in the flesh?
Frank
|
820.45 | | DOPEY::DICKENS | What are you pretending not to know ? | Tue Mar 20 1990 12:47 | 6 |
| yeah, looks like they stole my idea...
I built a stand that looks very much like it out of 1/2 a sheet of plywood
and a couple of hinges several years ago. I got the idea from the old style
big-band music stands.
|
820.46 | resurrecting an old topic | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | I used to wear a big man's hat... | Fri Nov 02 1990 12:13 | 24 |
| Anyone had some experience now with the stands discussed in .0-.45
(Rok-Steady, Invisible, Apex, etc)?
I just picked up a KX88 (after all these years!) and, because of my
KX76 (which I've decided to not sell) and my Oberheim, I'm in need of
another stand.
I currently have a USS 3-tier which, in spite of all the good advice in
this note, bounces like a ball. I am simply unable to get the thing to
stay still if really pounding - using one x-bar, that is. I've gone to
two x-bars for the KX76, and that seems to have helped. Either way,
the USS is (again!) not wide enough for the KX88. So rather than yet
again getting new and longer x-bars, I thought I'd see what else is out
there.
BTW I'm not sure I want another 3-tier stand (read: I could live
without playing the Oberheim directly) ... I do want something that is
very sturdy, easy to tear down, and does not have a "length limitation"
as far as the keyboard is concerned. Support for KX76 on top and KX88
on bottom is minimum.
Any experiences would be most appreciated.
+b
|
820.47 | | RICKS::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 225-5487, 223-3326 | Fri Nov 02 1990 13:02 | 6 |
| I used to have an Invisible stand. It meets your requirements for
being easy to set up and tear down and for being able to put about any
size keyboard on it. But, it wobbles something fierce. I usually had
it propped up against a wall corner to keep it steady.
Steve
|
820.48 | apex column - no bounce | CSC32::M_MOSHER | Cause he's a happy guy | Fri Nov 02 1990 14:50 | 10 |
| I have owned uss 3 tier, the invisible and an Apex Column.
I agree the that the 3 tier bounces too much and the invisible
does twist a bit. My favorite to date the Apex column.
Easy to set up, no bounce. The only problem is that if that it
is probably easier to knock over than the other two.
Mark...
|
820.49 | Reddi-Crete, here we come! | CTHULU::YERAZUNIS | I refuse to wear a 'power suit' unless it's powered armor! | Fri Nov 02 1990 15:53 | 5 |
| How about a prestressed concrete keyboard stand?
:-)
-Bill
|
820.50 | Maybe a QUIK LOK!!! | NWACES::PHILLIPS | | Fri Nov 02 1990 16:26 | 8 |
| How about a QUIK-LOK, they are cheap, and easy to set up and break down.
I have never experienced any bouncing, however I recommend getting the
the hardware for the second tier, this helps keep the keyboard on the
the lower tier for slipping off the front.
Good luck,
Errol
|
820.51 | egad - hernia time | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | I used to wear a big man's hat... | Fri Nov 02 1990 16:41 | 2 |
| Er, didn't I say *portable*, Bill? Sheesh. 8*)
|
820.52 | | KEYS::MOELLER | What's 'disingenuous' mean ? | Mon Nov 05 1990 11:46 | 35 |
| Boy.. we should be using decwindows notes so you could see how I solved
my KX88 bounce prob.. BTW you won't get 127 velocities out of it if
it's bouncing..
I use a USS 'A' frame stand with the LOOONNG crossbars. The one on the
front (closest to me) upright is under
the KX88, centered as you might expect, with four of its own flat uh,
cross-crossbars under the keyboard. These little guys have a rubber
coated tang or bolt thru one end, if you recall, and I have two tangs
behind the KX88 and two in front - can't slip forward or backward.
But that's not enough to stop the bounce. The second crossbar is
mounted on the rear upright (farthest from me), and its top edge,
follow me on this, is even with the top surface of the KX88. I then
take two of the flat cross-crossbars (oh, for a picture!) and mount
them to apply DOWNWARD pressure on the back edge of the KX88. This is
also a handy mounting surface for my compact KM802 mixer.
I'll try some VT graphix
O (hinge, side view)
/ \
/ \
/ \
Performer / \
/ +------+ mixer side view
/ | |
+------------+--+---+
| KX88 | O - top rear xbar
+---------------+ \
O \
/ \
|
820.53 | an owners opinion of Rok-Steady | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Nov 05 1990 12:50 | 37 |
| I have a three tier Rok-Steady. If I had it to do over again I think I
would look harder at the Quick-Lok.
I tried using all three tiers a few times but I didn't like the way my
view of the rest of the band was cut off. Since I only plan to have
three keyboards total two tiers will be enough. (I keep the strap-on
Roland Axis in a guitar holder.)
The Rok_Steady is sturdy. It wobbles the least of the stands that I
looked at, and IMHO it looks "cooler" than most of the other stands,
(except maybe the Apex.) It sets up fairly easily, and comes down just
as easily.
My complaints with the stand have to do with little things. The
materials used in its construction are sturdy enough but things have
gotten loose on me. The screw socket on the left side that holds the
second tier is a little loose and wobbles a bit. This doesn't affect
the keyboard when playing, but it does make it sit a bit crooked.
The rubber strips and caps on the stand keep coming off an I have
to re glue them. One of the rivets that holds a screw socket keeps
working its way out.
My only other complaint is one of safety. Since the Rok-Steady is
basically an "X" with a cross brace to keep it from collapsing I think
that the designers should have put a bit more thought into the cross
piece. The cross piece is a notched bar the allows you to select the
set up height by which notch you clamp down on. This is done with a
large wing nut. If you are not careful on how you clamp this down it is
possible for this bar to pop out of the clamp and your whole rig will
come crashing down in your lap. I know of one person who dumped an 80lb
MIDIboard on his knee this way. I made a trivial mod to mine
consisting of a couple of washers, so that I can really clamp the thing
down well.
So, a few complaints... but temper your opinion with the knowledge
that I have been doing a fair amount of gigging with my Rok-Steady, so
maybe my criticisms are harsher than it deserves.
Mark
|
820.54 | b-b-b-b-bounce | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | I used to wear a big man's hat... | Mon Nov 05 1990 17:18 | 16 |
| Hmmm. It never ceases to amaze me how many hoops people with USS
stands jump thru to get rid of the "bounce". I agree with you, Karl -
you *won't* get 127 out of either the 76 or the 88 with bounce.
I've almost given up hope of getting my USS to work - I was excited
about your (Karl) idea until I saw how it works ... you have the
*shorter* A, it appears, and I have the 3-tier. The legs in the A are
too far apart for me to do this and have the 88 at a reasonable height.
Of course, I could get the extended x-x pieces, along with the longer
x-pieces ... but I'd be spending as much for the new hardware as I
would for a new stand, methinks. 8-(
One of my friends has a Rok-Steady stand, and is going to bring it over
this week.
+b
|
820.55 | too many choices. | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | I used to wear a big man's hat... | Tue Nov 06 1990 10:30 | 27 |
| Back again. I've been thinking about what I *really* want to do with
these things. I'll have 3 different controllers available to me when
all is said and done:
a) KX76
b) KX88
c) OB-Xa (not really a controller, but I gotta put it somewhere)
I don't think I want to go any higher than the USS 3-tier, and I can't
very well stack all 3 of these on one stand and have them easily
accessible, so ...
What about a setup that looks (from top view) like this:
?______________
/ KX76/KX88
/X
/B
/O
The "?" indicates a weird corner piece. I seem to remember seeing
stands like this in a music store display, but don't know if they're
mega expensive ... and I don't want to end up with a "pit" that takes
forever to tear down/set up. Is this a rational thing to do, from a
gigging point of view? Am I going to go bust buying the stand?
+b
|
820.56 | Any Problem Can Be Solved With More Hardware | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:37 | 19 |
| re .54 - I have a three tier USS, and my JX-10 was bouncing, so I
solved the problem by using two pairs of support arms (the flat things
with the countersunk holes in them), one pair mounted in a front crossbar
and one pair mounted on a back crossbar. By mounting the support arms
through the holes closest to the little upright post, I was able to
easily span the separation between the front and back uprights at a
reasonable height for the keyboard. It takes a little adjusting, and
is probably not practical for a portable setup, but works terrific
for me. The keyboard is as stable as if sitting on the floor.
The crossbars and support arms have to be properly aligned for
whatever angle you want the keyboard to sit at, and taking account
of the thickness of the arms, so one pair of arms can sit flush on top
of the other. Using a similar trick at the top of the stand (two
crossbars supporting single support arms to span the gap) I was able to
stably support two filled 8 space racks.
len.
|
820.57 | can't throw h/w at it | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | I used to wear a big man's hat... | Thu Nov 08 1990 13:42 | 15 |
| I tried doing the dual-support thing - in fact, what you're doing with
your JX is what I'm doing with my KX76. The problem is going *further*
down the A. For example, I have enough hardware to "double-support"
the Oberheim, but the brackets aren't long enough to reach the back
side of the A. Like so:
/\
/ \ <-- okay here
/ \ <-- okay here too
/ \ <-- NOT here
/ \
Don't you love ASCII graphics? 8-(
+b
|
820.58 | Mine's using Three Tiers | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Mon Nov 12 1990 17:48 | 29 |
| How low do you want that keyboard to be? I've got my JX-10 mounted
with the keys about 24 inches off the floor, no trouble. The support
bars only overlap about 2 inches, but that's enough to provide a solid
foundation. Maybe your bars are shorter than mine? I can't imagine
anything usefully mounted underneath it, in fact I use underneath the
JX as storage space. Tonight I'll measure the span. Maybe my USS
doesn't spread as widely as yours.
It looks like this (not to scale, of course)
/ \
/ +------------------------------\--------+
/ |XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\XXXXXXX|
/ |XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\XXXXXX|
/ +---------------------------------\-----+|
| / _________________________\_____+_
-+-----/----------------------- \
/ \
/ \
/ \
The support bars sit flush on one another; they're only about 1/4"
thick.
len.
|
820.59 | We Software Guys *Can* Throw Hardware at the Problem | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG2-2/W10, DTN 226-7556 | Tue Nov 13 1990 09:54 | 29 |
| I measured my USS and got the following:
The JX-10's support bars are 26" above the floor. At that point, the
USS's legs are 16.5" apart at their centerlines. The support bars
overlap one another by about 2 inches.
The support bars are each 14" long. 4.5" of that overhangs the
crossbar at the vertical stop end.
The arithmetic more or less works out:
----+----------
------------+----
|4.5 | | 2| | 4.5|
| 14 |
| 14 |
| 7.5 | | 7.5 |
| 16.5 |
So there's half an inch missing/extra somewhere... All measurements to
the nearest quarter inch or so.
Anyway, at the floor, the legs are 27" apart.
Also, my picture in the previous reply is a little wrong; the rear
support bar sits on top of, rather than underneath, the front one.
len.
|
820.60 | now I understand customers with hardware config probs better | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Say yer prayers, varmit! | Tue Nov 13 1990 11:39 | 28 |
| Oh - I see what you're doing - you're overlapping the "swing-out"
pieces. These are available in different lengths. I happened to get
the short ones when I bought the stand, and I need the long ones
instead.
I run a single flat piece across two support bars for the KX76:
/\
/ \
/ \
front !-o------o- (similar to this, but at
/ \ an angle tilted forward)
/ \
/ \
If I had a longer "!---" piece, I could do the same thing lower on the
stand (or if I had another pair of "!---" shorts, which I don't). I'd
also need another "o" piece as well, plus two plastic twist lock
brackets ... and that hasn't even addressed the length problem (in
short, the "o" pieces all need replaced!). I figure the new parts
would cost as much as another stand.
I tried a Rok Steady stand last week, and was very pleased with its
stability (but it's kinda ugly, imo). I'll be trying another friend's
Apex sometime in the next few days. I may keep the USS, but it'll
remain in the studio and not used live.
+b
|
820.61 | Cheap, strong, custom stands... | MANTHN::EDD | Daze of the weak... | Tue Jan 14 1992 11:25 | 29 |
| For those of you with "unique" needs, AND on a budget...
Not too long ago a reader submitted an article to Keyboard about
building your own stands. I tried it, and it works GREAT.
The material is schedule 40 DWV (drain, waste, vent) pipe, available
at any building center. I used 1.25" stock, but it's available in other
diameters. Price? Around 30 cents a foot. There are also a variety of
"L", "T", and "Y" type connectors available. The "T" type go for less
than a buck a piece.
Construction couldn't be easier. You'll need a hacksaw. That's it. The
saw goes thru the stuff in about 5 strokes.
My first project was an "entertainment center" to hold my TV, VCR,
integrated amp, tuner, eq, CD, tape, TV tuner and turntable. Total time
was about 4 hours, not including paint. Total cost was under $50.
After a couple errors, I learned not to bother with glue. The fittings
are very tight, and if you have glue on them you'll never get them
apart after about 15 seconds. Even without the glue, I was able to
climb up on mine and sit on the top. (200 lbs, 6' in the air!)
Painting is the aggravating part, as the stuff is real shiney and
requires a thorough sanding for the paint to stick.
Next project is a stand for the mixing board...
Edd
|
820.62 | PVC??? | EZ2GET::STEWART | the leper with the most fingers | Tue Jan 14 1992 13:03 | 1 |
|
|
820.63 | Caution against press-fit assembly. | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Tue Jan 14 1992 14:34 | 20 |
| re <<< Note 820.61 by MANTHN::EDD "Daze of the weak..." >>>
> -< Cheap, strong, custom stands... >-
> After a couple errors, I learned not to bother with glue. The fittings
> are very tight, and if you have glue on them you'll never get them
> apart after about 15 seconds. Even without the glue, I was able to
> climb up on mine and sit on the top. (200 lbs, 6' in the air!)
Not bothering with the glue might have been your next error (-:
Unless everything is going to be very still and quiet these things are
going to loosen up as they rack(verb), I just can't imagine playing
keys on one of these and suddenly finding the KX88 actually IN my lap.
I wouldn't trust my precious toys to unglued pipe furniture, still
less my bod' If you "NEED" to make these things take-apart, for
gigging or whatever, I think you should at least consider drilling and
pinning the joints. IMHO, FWIW, etc.
R
|
820.64 | | MANTHN::EDD | Daze of the weak... | Tue Jan 14 1992 15:06 | 12 |
| > loosen up as they rack...
True, but for my entertainment center I don't plan on moving it a whole
lot. A gigging musician may find it safer to glue a few strategic
junctions and then just dry fit the ones that have to move.
Racking (verb) hasn't proven to be a problem. Yet?
> PVC????
That may be what it is, but if you look for the "SCH 40" tag you'll
have the right stuff. I've only seen it in white.
|
820.65 | Don't fall asleep under it | 4GL::DICKSON | | Wed Jan 15 1992 15:33 | 11 |
| You may wake up one morning to find your entertainment center in a pile
on the floor. Heat/cool cycles will do the job without you having to
move anything.
Particularly any joints that you do not want to rotate or pull apart
should be pinned. Any joint in compression should not be a problem.
Considering the value of the stuff on the rack, I would not take the
chance. But assemble the whole thing without glue first to make
sure you have all the measurements correct, if you still want glue.
Pins (probably long bolts is best) is easier.
|
820.66 | | TERSE::ROBINSON | | Thu Jan 16 1992 10:43 | 17 |
|
Very conservative architects in this conference. :^)
Anyone who has built with Tinker Toys or "Contructs" knows that you can
build things that are quite strong in certain "directions". As long
as you plan ahead and use the structure only as intended, there are lots
of cases where adding pins will do nothing significant to the strength
of the structure. Of course I used to love those "nomadic" furniture
books from the `70s... I built a living room chair out of cardboard
carpet tubes held together by long threaded bolts.
As for heat and cool cycles, this probably won't have significant effect when
the connected materials are the same - mostly when unlike materials are
connected. And PVC isn't really going to change much is it? That's why
it is used for plumbing.
Dave
|
820.67 | Material selection criteria 101 | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Thu Jan 16 1992 14:15 | 39 |
| re <<< Note 820.66 by TERSE::ROBINSON >>>
> Very conservative architects in this conference. :^)
> Anyone who has built with Tinker Toys or "Contructs" knows that you can
> build things that are quite strong in certain "directions". As long
Yeah, OK concrete is great in compression, but not in
tension, etc.
> as you plan ahead and use the structure only as intended, there are lots
> of cases where adding pins will do nothing significant to the strength
> of the structure. Of course I used to love those "nomadic" furniture
right, in a timber frame house (for example) the pegs DO
serve to hold the load bearing joints together, though the pegs
themselves don't carry the structural load.
> books from the `70s... I built a living room chair out of cardboard
> carpet tubes held together by long threaded bolts.
WoW ! How very, errrrr - po_wo_yu_ru_ve'ish (-:
> As for heat and cool cycles, this probably won't have significant effect when
> the connected materials are the same - mostly when unlike materials are
> connected. And PVC isn't really going to change much is it? That's why
> it is used for plumbing.
I thought it was used in plumbing not because of its thermal
stability, but because of its ability to
"take a lot of sh*t"
|
820.68 | ;^) | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Thu Jan 16 1992 15:08 | 5 |
| I thought thermal stability and the ability to "take a lot of $#*%"
were directly proportional. I mean, that's why *I* have always thought
of myself as being like PVC tubing ...
Steve
|
820.69 | Fill it with green magic markers? | MANTHN::EDD | Daze of the weak... | Thu Jan 16 1992 15:47 | 4 |
| Do you guys think if I glued all the joints and then filled the stand
with water the highs from the stereo would be more fluid?
Edd
|
820.70 | | SWAM2::MOELLER_KA | Up your old quota | Thu Jan 16 1992 16:00 | 5 |
| No, fill the pipes with sand to lower the resonant frequency. There
was some speaker mfr that did that - had double walled boxes with sand
inside. Keeping the cost issue in mind, the raw material is cheap.
karl
|
820.71 | Ideally, Black Sand from the Isle of Wight | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | len, EMA, LKG1-2/W10 | Thu Jan 16 1992 18:15 | 7 |
| re .70 - I think that was Wharfedale. Typically English. Of course,
a drummer would claim that the sand deadened the shell (ooops,
*enclosure*) resonance, making the speaker sound like a cardboard
box...
len.
|
820.72 | When men were men - and heavy speakers were. | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Tue Jan 21 1992 12:29 | 23 |
| re <<< Note 820.71 by DRUMS::FEHSKENS "len, EMA, LKG1-2/W10" >>>
> -< Ideally, Black Sand from the Isle of Wight >-
> re .70 - I think that was Wharfedale. Typically English. Of course,
> a drummer would claim that the sand deadened the shell (ooops,
> *enclosure*) resonance, making the speaker sound like a cardboard
> box...
> len.
errr, a while ago - - I'm surprised that anyone remembers it.
As I remember it all the build-yer-own-speakers enthusiasts
were pouring a couple of hundred weight (CWT) of sand into the backs
of their speakers too at that time. Also, there was at least one
article in "Wireless World" that detailed speaker baffles of lead
(pronounced "led", not "leed" - though l.e.d.s didn't exist yet/then)
to eliminate the resonances that plywood baffles have. This was the
sheet lead that was used on roofs, still is used in some places for
flashing (roof flashing).
R
|
820.73 | No S#^t ? | WOTVAX::KENT | | Tue Feb 04 1992 10:22 | 14 |
|
er Mr Fehskens I would suggest that your suggestion that filling a
speaker enlosure with sand was a very "English" thing is verging on
American dare I say Colonial elitism...Actually it was indeed the
stands that we used to fill with sand. I've still got mine I think I've
grown out of believing that I can hear the difference. I like the idea
of the waste tubing though. If you combine this with speaking to Ralph
on the white telephone we could almost end up with a concept album..
We could call it Huuuuuughie.
PeeKay.
Any Names?
|
820.74 | OK, field test results should be in now. Where's the Beta ? | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Wed Feb 05 1992 09:28 | 16 |
|
This topic continues to go down the 2ooobz
its been a while since we heard from our intrepid glueless
(did I spell that correctly) PVC pipe stand erector person, the IGPVCPSEP
Where is he ?
Should we send out a rescue party to dig him out from under a pile of
midi gear and sprung apart equipment stands ?
In short(s) how well is this stuff holding up ?
R
|
820.75 | Passed Beta... | MANTHN::EDD | Press END or pay! {argh} | Wed Feb 05 1992 12:41 | 11 |
| The GFS (glue free stand) is used to support my TV and stereo
equipment in the living room, not as part of my keyboard rig.
Given that... it's as solid as a rock. Even though the turntable
is almost 6' above the floor, I can walk around and not cause a
record to skip.
Constant assemble/disassemble cycles may cause the fittings to loosen,
but in my application that's not an issue.
Edd
|
820.76 | unfounded fears, IMhO | DYPSS1::SCHAFER | Name something that floats. | Wed Feb 05 1992 16:44 | 13 |
| Seeing that I've spent entirely too much time fitting PVC in the last
several months, I think I can accurately say that Edd is safe. There's
little need to worry about "expansion/contraction" - if the coefficient
was that great, the stuff wouldn't work for plumbing! Besides, I'd
challenge a skeptic to try putting a fitting real snug on one end of a
piece of PVC - WITHOUT glue - then try to get the two pieces apart.
Possible, but not easy.
I suppose there'd be some wear and possibility for working loose if it
was used live, but a) if the ends are cut square and b) you're not an
animal, I'd seriously doubt any problem there, either.
+b
|
820.77 | I can climb on it... | MANTHN::EDD | Press END or pay! {argh} | Wed Feb 05 1992 19:10 | 6 |
| My entertainment center is also constructed in such a way that for any
one joint to seperate there would have to be another that allowed it
to do so. I can take it apart from the top down, but from that point
on it kind of interlocks...
Edd
|
820.78 | I want one too ! | WOTVAX::KENT | | Thu Feb 06 1992 04:25 | 8 |
|
I think a 3D representation of this thing is required so I can really
get an idea of what you are talking about. You do mean the stuff that
plugs into the waste outlet of your sink yes?
PeeKay.
|
820.79 | | MANTHN::EDD | Press END or pay! {argh} | Thu Feb 06 1992 06:20 | 12 |
| >...the stuff that plugs into the waste outlet...?
Dunno what's used on the wrong side of the ocean, but it's probably
the same.
It's called SCH-40 ("schedule 40") DWV (drain, waste, vent) pipe. I
believe it's made of PVC, but couldn't tell you what properties qualify
it as SCH 40. It's quite stiff.
I'll see if I can come up with some VT graphics...
Edd
|