T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
747.1 | Anticipation.... | EMERLD::DUBE | | Fri Apr 03 1987 17:34 | 5 |
| Edd,
Can't wait to see your review of this machine. I'm VERY interested!
-Dan
|
747.2 | sys-ex? | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Fri Apr 03 1987 18:10 | 2 |
| Please check to see if it handles system-exclusive.
John Sauter
|
747.3 | At least I did the dbx thing.... | JAWS::COTE | Hunting the dread moray eel... | Mon Apr 06 1987 09:35 | 12 |
| I didn't get a chance to play with the QX-5 this weekend.
However, I did find out that...
A. It does have an 'unmerge' facility.
B. It handles sys-ex, and even lets you
edit down to the byte level...
I've got this month's AfterTouch with me if anyone wants to
know more...
Edd
|
747.4 | oh boy! ........maybe | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Mon Apr 06 1987 23:00 | 19 |
|
uh huh:
Can you define macros that can be used to assemble Z80 code?
Does it allow 'Zappa-esque' time signatures?
Every measure?
And, of course, how many watts does it draw when making toast?
nevermind. I want one.
(I read the article too....and cant see >$1100 for Mc500....)
You can always dump/load to/from a cheep computer instead of tape....
{pant,slobber, drool} Just gotta see one to make sure.
|
747.5 | Yamara ra ra | MINDER::KENT | | Tue Apr 07 1987 04:49 | 25 |
|
I've had my QX5 for about 4 months now and have to say it meets
all my unsophisticated requirements. I bought it on a deal from
my store on the basis I would give it back when their new version
of the CX5 sequencer was produced. This is now 5 months late and
I don't think the QX will ever leave my studio.
It sits neatly on top of the KX88 which is an important consideration
because I can do all my sequencing siotting at the one stool without
reaching for a keyboard of peering at a monitor. I have found the
micro-edit facilities really useful expecially for editing patch
changes through a piece. I have never used up enough memory to require
the use of the macro's but these are usefull places to store backups
of a track. It sync's to tape. ALthough I am yet to use this feature.
It remember's everything you did everytime you turn the machine
off so I only have to dump to tape when I have completed a sonmg
and want to store it for posterity. I can also store the sys-ex
messages from my drum machine. So I can store the drum data and
the song data on the same file. But this is a sloooow process. About
4 minutes I guess. But 4 minutes after each song isn't to bad.
Any questions ?
Paul.
|
747.6 | Song position pointer??? | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Apr 07 1987 09:59 | 9 |
|
It does sound good.....
what deficiencies,nits, or kludges have you noticed? Can
you say something about your 'recording technique' with
the beast....
ron
|
747.7 | And my RX21 fits nicely on top!!!! | DARTS::COTE | 1110 1101 1101 | Tue Apr 07 1987 10:34 | 9 |
| One caveat. The QX is *hardware* based. You live with any bugs
and weirdisms. The MC is *software* based, allowing you at least
a shot at getting things fixed...
But still, 600 beans for a disc drive?
You realize this calls for an in-depth comparison.....
Edd
|
747.8 | CQ CQ CQ | MINDER::KENT | | Tue Apr 07 1987 11:41 | 19 |
|
re -2
In terms of my usage of the QX (without wanting to sound smart).
I turn in on press the record, play a bit turn it off, and press the
play and it plays. It really is simple. I have found no KLUGES as
yet. It does implement song position pointers and it even has a
delay built into the start to allow other slower devices to catch
up. Unfortunately this delay. (up to 999 msecs. Is that a second
?), is not slow enough for the DDD-1 once we get past about measure
78. Can anyone think why this should be ? This isn't to much of
a problem as the delay required can be handled manually.
I have no problems with the machine at yet. I thought about the
disc drive but decided that unless I was going to play live, in
which case the Yamaha drive would be to slow, I wouldn't need it.
Paul
|
747.9 | ok, pass the macro... | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Apr 07 1987 19:49 | 22 |
| macros macros! you gotta start using them.
they are like reusable sections of music. You actually put a
"hey_go_play_Macro_n" on the track instead of the whole section.
result: save lotsa memory! Say you have ABACAB (original,no?)
make each section a macro. Insead of copying the repeating sections
entirely event for event on to the track WHERE they repeat, thus
using up valuable memory, the "go to macro_n" flag takes up well,
lots less, eh?
So for you ELP fans trying ABCABDABEFFAGACCAHBCDEFFAGACCAHAIJK....
kinda tunes (you *are* out there arent you?) well, you have a chance
to fit it in.....
q: Tape save takes 4 mins. Does tape load?
q: Does it save/load via system exclusive too?
q: Anyone heard a better price than $495? where?
ron
|
747.10 | | GIBSON::DICKENS | Distributed System Manglement | Thu Apr 09 1987 14:45 | 1 |
| H?
|
747.11 | Macro 4/4 | MINDER::KENT | | Fri Apr 10 1987 10:18 | 9 |
|
The tape load takes about the same time as the save. The deciding
factor being the resollution of the tape I guess. The only reason
I haven't used the Macros yet is that I haven't found it nescessary.
I have used all the other features and can't find any problems.
Even some of the ones mentioned in Keyboard are non-problems once
you know the machine.
Paul.f
|
747.12 | question | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Thu Apr 23 1987 10:03 | 2 |
| How does the QX-5 compare to the Korg SQD-1?
|
747.13 | No Comparison | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Thu Apr 23 1987 10:27 | 5 |
| I have heard nothing but good things about the QX-5, and nothing
but bad things about the SQD-1.
len (who loves his MC500).
|
747.14 | there goes my tax refund | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Thu Apr 23 1987 12:18 | 11 |
|
Took the plunge.
Ordered a QX5..........$430 shipping included.
{pant,slobber,drool}
Plan to hear good things bout it.
ron
|
747.15 | One born every minute... | JAWS::COTE | Fishheads. Eat them up, yum!! | Thu Apr 23 1987 12:32 | 7 |
| HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! It worked!!!!
April fool, wackin' juan!!! The QX5 is crap-ola!!!!
;^)
Edd (l'jealousmente el largo tempo!!)
|
747.16 | we talkin' bro. pass my tutu | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Thu Apr 23 1987 20:06 | 7 |
|
eh? Yo hey el dorito de la diablo y mucho caliente de cabasa, gringo.
ronaldo ( Largemente de bulge des shorts toute suite)
|
747.17 | let's you and him fight... | 16514::MOELLER | we be jammin'/you be illin' | Thu Apr 23 1987 20:13 | 3 |
| Ron: you call Edd a "muhado".
Edd: you call Ron a "fituzo".
|
747.18 | What Channel Are You Guys On? | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Fri Apr 24 1987 11:36 | 5 |
| Just which manufacturer code do all these system exclusive messages
belong to?
len.
|
747.19 | oops..... | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Fri Apr 24 1987 13:27 | 8 |
|
Oh gee. I forgot to apply for a manufacturer's ID Midi code byte
for the new business...
Hey, anyone know how and howmuch it costs or who you have to know...
ron
|
747.20 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | How much help you think Ah need? | Fri Apr 24 1987 17:47 | 6 |
|
Why not just choose any number above 4B? That's as high as they
go as of Jan. 1, 1987, and besides, *you* aren't going to sell enough
stuff to create a problem, anyway, are you? ;-)
Steve
|