T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
745.1 | One thumb down | JAWS::COTE | Hunting the dread moray eel... | Thu Apr 02 1987 18:44 | 17 |
| Before I decided to buy a Mirage I checked into the AKAI. At that
time (1 year ago) it was close to $800 w/o disc drive.
My impression is that this unit will probably be a bad investment.
There doesn't seem to be a very large user base, or a whole hell
of a lot of samples.
Sampling is not a particularly easy task. Some of the new units
like the S-50 are decidedly more friendly, but it's an option you
pay (dearly) for.
With the price dropping like a stone, I get the feeling they may
be unloading them
Good luck...
Edd
|
745.2 | can you say 'doorstop'? | CANYON::MOELLER | Don't Worry, Just Party. | Fri Apr 03 1987 12:36 | 12 |
| another thumbs down. Are you familiar withthe term 'multisampling'?
This means that you take multiple samples and distribute them across
the (remote) 'keyboard'.. a MUST for realistic reproduction.
Well, this unit allows ONE sample to be distributed across 5 octaves.
Are you familiar with the technical term 'munchkinization'?
Of course, at THAT price youcould buy three, split your master keyboard
three ways (3 MIDI channels) and STILL not approach the Mirage for
sound or functionality.
karl moeller
|
745.3 | simple related question | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Fri Apr 03 1987 17:11 | 11 |
|
Is there anything on the market between the SK1 (<$100) and the
Mirage (>$1000) that has decent bandwidth (>10KHz) and more sample
time than the .5 second you get in the SPX-90? I don't need a keyboard
or multisampling, and a tape drive is fine for storage. It must
be a rack mount unit.
Ideas?
CdH
|
745.4 | | 16514::MOELLER | Drink & mow, lose a toe! | Fri Apr 03 1987 18:24 | 9 |
| re -1.
I hear the AKAI S612 is ~$400. Perhaps there's a note on it in this
conference. As you don't 'need multisampling'. It even comes with
a builtin floppy drive. Great deal for the price, if you can put
up with a 1.5 octave usable range around the sample's center frequency.
Beyond that it's Mickey Mouse time.
You play bass, right?
|
745.5 | guess I'd rather wait for the next wave | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Mon Apr 06 1987 15:46 | 12 |
|
I play nothing anymore. I play 12" round vinyl discs. However, I've
been dabbling with doing some remixing, and would like to use a
sampler to take snapshots of pieces of songs and layer them into
the original, using an 8 track machine.
1 1/2 octaves around the center frequency sounds like too narrow
a bandwidth for any decent fidelity.
Thanks Karl,
Chris
|
745.6 | from each accordin' ta his means, | 16514::MOELLER | Drink & mow, lose a toe! | Mon Apr 06 1987 15:59 | 26 |
| nonononono.... major ambiguity... ya shoulda stated yer needs up
front.
Okay. What I meant by 'single sampling' is that a given musical
sound, usually a single tone, is sampled into the machine.. then,
based on its harmonic content, the sampler can be told to play the
sound (at the CORRECTED pitches) on EACH key down, say, 8 notes (from
center frequency) and UP say, five notes. Realize that the sampler
does the work of dividing or multiplying the original frequency
to match the actual key you're pressing. AND certain kinds of pitched
sounds sound extremely strange played far outside their original
recorded pitch. The dread 'munchkinization'.
HOWEVER ! This isn't what you're doing at all ! You wanna sample
a chunk of a piece, and, at the ORIGINAL frequency, dump it out
on command onto a multitrack deck. I feel the frequency range available
on most commercial samplers is adequate for your needs. The actual
frequency range of most samplers is ~50hz-~10Khz.. your mileage may vary.
So, having a keyboard is unimportant as long as you can trigger the
sampler to play on demand. As you wish to sample pieces of songs for
playback, then the REAL question you need to ask is, "What is the
maximum sampling time available on the AKAI S612?" Not having seen
the specs, I'm gonna SWAG about 2.5 seconds.
8AC9/karlunit
|
745.7 | But wait anyhow... | JAWS::COTE | 1110 1101 1101 | Mon Apr 06 1987 16:06 | 14 |
| Re: .5
The '1.5 octaves around the center' phrase is a bit misleading.
Without multi-sampling, the usable range of most sounds with anything
but a gate-type envelope, gets too munchkin-y or darth vadered to
be usefull. I believe Karl was refering to this effect.
It doesn't imply any sort of deficiency in the frequency response.
High-resolution one-shot samplers are still pretty expensive. Certainly
more than $400.
Edd
|
745.8 | Splice of life... | JUNIOR::DREHER | Maintaining self-readiness | Mon Apr 06 1987 16:29 | 9 |
| Re: .5
Wouldn't it be cheaper to do it the old fashioned way?
Record the song or song a couple of times onto the tape.
Then get out the grease pen, razor blade and, and splice the
tape up into the desired mix.
Dave
|
745.9 | | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Mon Apr 06 1987 18:02 | 28 |
|
Thanks for all the interest!
Sliding the pitch up and down doesn't matter too much to me, at
least for effects. 1.5 octaves should be ok.
Insofar as manual editing goes, I'm *real* familiar with the process.
Sampled sounds, punched in by keystroke, sound different than tape
sections edited together. I'd probably have to run a sync track
as well to keep things together, which sort of negates the cost
savings if I need an autolocator or SMPTE box. What the sampler lets me
do is punch the sounds/music/effects in on another track to be remixed
later.
Maybe I should clarify things. I don't play keyboards. I have an
SK1 that's been a lot of fun to use in my performances. However,
there are two major drawbacks to this little gem:
1) You can only store one sample, it must be generated at performance
time, and it goes away after 10 minutes if you don't press a key.
I'd like a sampler with storage capability that can be created in
the studio and loaded at performance time.
2) You get $79 worth of bandwidth. I'd like some more.
Thanks for all the input,
CdH
|
745.10 | dave's on drugs, again, I bet. | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Mon Apr 06 1987 22:51 | 8 |
| Figure_1: [uh, gag, {barf}, gulp, huh?, yikes!, whoa., wha?....]
Dreher,babes, whatcha been smokin?
See figure 1.
have a spacial day.
|
745.11 | I know, I know - they ain't MIDI... | BARNUM::RHODES | | Wed Apr 08 1987 14:47 | 21 |
|
Chris:
Casio has put out (or will put out shortly) an entire SK line of
"consumer" samplers - SK-5, SK-8, SK-100, SK-200, SK-2100.
List prices:
SK-1 - $129
SK-5 - $149.50
SK-8 - $179.50
SK-100 - $299
SK-200 - $399.50
SK-2100 - $699
If you can do w/o MIDI, one of these may fit your needs. Send me
mail if interested in learning more. I have the current Casio
catalog...
Todd.
|
745.12 | thank you all for your help | MPGS::DEHAHN | | Thu Apr 09 1987 14:29 | 4 |
|
c-c-c-hris
|
745.13 | so I'm late..so what | SRFSUP::MORRIS | | Fri Oct 30 1987 14:26 | 12 |
| I have an S612 w/drive and I got it back when they were $1000 without
the drive. The times they are a changin... The thing sounds better
and has less noise than any mirage I've ever heard, but I've only
got one sound on board at one time..(I use my eight track a lot).
If a drummer is looking for a one shot sampler--this is it. However,
for a keyboardist, you should go for an Emax, or you could mortgage
the house and buy a Fairlight. If any S612 owners out there need
any sounds--send me mail (SRFSUP::MORRIS) I've got tons of samples.
Later
Ashley
|
745.14 | s s s samples | MINDER::KENT | | Mon Nov 02 1987 03:36 | 7 |
|
Well I have a S700 which is compatible. What do you have on offer
that is startling ?
Paul.
|