| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 737.1 | Be a real 'murican... | JAWS::COTE | Fight for your right to pate'.. | Mon Mar 30 1987 09:03 | 3 | 
|  |     Buy a Synclavier....
    
    Edd
 | 
| 737.2 | look on the bright side | MARVIN::MACHIN |  | Mon Mar 30 1987 09:20 | 7 | 
|  |     From what I gather, a synthesizer with a disk drive will cost
    you twice as much as one without. 
    
    This should force up the value of all those minimoogs that must
    be floating about.
    
    Richard.
 | 
| 737.3 | Buy now | TALLIS::BARTH |  | Mon Mar 30 1987 12:26 | 3 | 
|  |     When will this happen?  Real soon?
    
    Better buy up all the Jap goods soon . . .
 | 
| 737.4 | i dont believe it either... | GNERIC::ROSS | we have good gnus and bad gnus | Mon Mar 30 1987 14:15 | 15 | 
|  |     
    Bet there will be more detail on the news tonite.
    
    2 weeks for them to 'fix' things, else....slam.
    
    Not clear if 100% tariff is on product cost or chips inside....
    
    I fear the former, from what I heard, and the other would be
    a 'big deal...'
    
    Retailers will be able to PETITION the govt. to get certain
    products off the tariff list. Swell. How long will that take.
    
    ron
    
 | 
| 737.5 |  | SSDEVO::MCCOLLUM |  | Mon Mar 30 1987 16:06 | 5 | 
|  |     re:-.1
    I had the impression that the tariff was on "certain chips that
    are inside of certain products", rather than on the whole product.
    Anybody know for sure?
    
 | 
| 737.6 | reply for un-offendables only | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Mon Mar 30 1987 19:40 | 14 | 
|  |     That wouldnt be even a slap on the wrist.
    Cutting the market by doubling the price WOULD.
    
    Who loses?
    
    us.
    
    Thanks Washington.
    
    Mr. Moderator: Can I use the word "assholes" in this conference, or
    will it get removed?
    
    ron
    
 | 
| 737.7 |  | ECADSR::SHERMAN | You have *my* word on it... | Tue Mar 31 1987 08:27 | 3 | 
|  |     You can bet that the govmint will do what it considers to be in
    its own best interests.  It'll raise prices on whatever will fill
    the coffers faster.
 | 
| 737.8 | More severe ramifications | TALLIS::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Tue Mar 31 1987 11:32 | 8 | 
|  | 	Higher cost musical toys may be the least of the repercusions of this. 
	
	Closer to home, be concerned about what higher cost Japanese chips could
to the price of VAXes.  
	Applying for a mortgage today.  Interest rates rose across the board
1/8%-1/4% yesterday because of the news about tariffs.  That's a very real
$40-$50/month out of my pocket for 30 years...
 | 
| 737.9 | yes,topic: "$$ theory for musicians" | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Mar 31 1987 17:22 | 18 | 
|  |     uh huh. Now your catching on....
    
    Look the 'fellas' is DC are fiddling with the $ and driving
    its value down. Intentionally.
    The goal is to try to make US goods more AFFORDABLE. They get
    bought, the deficit is reduced. clever.
    Ah, but 2 flaws: Just because a product is 'cheaper' does not
    guarantee that it will sell (quality,image,etc...)
    AND since the dollar is worth less, one requires a higher interest
    rate on the LOANING of dollars to make the same 'actual' return.
    
    If this works, fine. If not we have a situation that could
    develop into a fine recession. 
    I dont like these games.
    
    rr
    
 | 
| 737.10 |  | MORMPS::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Mar 31 1987 18:04 | 7 | 
|  | According to the WSJ, the appropriate official said that the only 
effect of this will be to drive up the proices of foreign made 
electronic goods, which shouldn't affect anyone because "in most cases 
there are domestic substitutes available".
So, where do I get my GE MIDI keyboard (or is it DELCO?) :-)
 | 
| 737.11 |  | SSDEVO::MCCOLLUM |  | Tue Mar 31 1987 18:11 | 22 | 
|  |     re: .8
    One thing they DID say for sure was that "raw chips" are not subject
    to a tariff -- only assembled Japanese products that contain the
    chips. The price of U.S. goods with Japanese chips will not be
    affected.
    
    The question in my mind is still: is the tariff based on the price
    of the finished product, or only on the value of the Japanese chips
    that it contains? I watched the news again last night, and they
    didn't say anything about "doubling the price" of consumer goods.
    I believe that doubling the cost would mean zero sales, and I can't
    imagine that that's the intent. HOWEVER, if it meant double the
    value of the internal chips, then either the chip makers pay the
    difference, or the whole Japanese industry suffers REDUCED sales.
    I believe that this IS the intent, since it's the chip makers who
    are allegedly at fault.
    
    (Actually, I seriously question that more than one or two Japanese
    companies has done anything wrong at all. The first news item I
    saw on the news pointed to a distributor selling OKI parts, not
    to the industry as a whole.)
    
 | 
| 737.12 | yes. | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Tue Mar 31 1987 21:41 | 20 | 
|  |     Jeff, either you jest (I hope) or you dont get it at all....
    (hey, binary choices!)
    
    re. -1: Gee, none of us can really imagine a dx21 for $600-ish
    or a Fb01 for $700 or??????????????????????????????
    
    But OTHERWISE it is no big deal. 100% markup on $5 worth of chips
    is not even a slap on the wrist. 
    
    Thats why I think its "posturing": 100% markup on CERTAIN items.
    So far whats been named (to my EAROM recolection) is calculators,
    floppy disks (assumedly drives: thats like $80 going to $160), 
    communications satellites (huh? do they make all those too?)...
    
    but who knows?
    
    I hope I'm just pushing smoke around....
    
    ron
    
 | 
| 737.13 | Up and up and up | TALLIS::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Wed Apr 01 1987 08:41 | 3 | 
|  | 
	By the time I filled out the loan application...interest rates
had jumped another 1/8%.  Wonder what today will bring.
 | 
| 737.14 | for what ever it's worth | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Al Whitman -- always ready to fish | Wed Apr 01 1987 08:47 | 19 | 
|  | 	With all this conjecture about how the tariff is going to jack up
	the prices of the Japanese imports, I think I'll throw in my $.02.
	I suspect that the importer will pay the 100% tariff based on his
	cost from the manufacturer.  On an item that retails here now for
	$1000 I suspect the wholesaler's cost runs about $333 (the idea is
	that the wholesaler marks up 100% and the retailer 33% so in the end the
	consumer pays 300% over the wholesaler's cost).  The tariff then
	would jack the wholesalers price by $333  which would be passed on to
	the retailer and ultimately to you and I.  The result here is that we
	would then pay $1333 for the same item that we buy now for $1000.
	This conjecture is based on the way the guitar manufacture,wholesale,
	retail chain worked domestically a few years ago.  I may be all wet,
	but that's my 2.9 yen (based of course on 145 yen = $1.00).
							Al
 | 
| 737.15 |  | SSDEVO::MCCOLLUM |  | Wed Apr 01 1987 10:59 | 16 | 
|  |     re:.13
    That's because the prime rate went up yesterday. A separate issue.
    
    re:"Wockin' Juan"
    I don't think that a 100% tariff on $5 worth of parts would be a
    "slap on the wrist" to the chip makers, if they have to absorb a
    100% tariff ON THEIR ENTIRE PRODUCT LINE.
    In my suggested scenario, it would be a $5 hit on $5 worth of parts,
    NOT a $5 hit on a $1000 product. Wakarimasu ka? (Japanese - "do
    you understand?").
    
    re:-whatever
    The wholesaler-retailer price increase scenario sounds believable,
    also, since the tariff would presumably be paid (initially) by the
    wholesaler, as you suggest.
    
 | 
| 737.16 | Xeno-what? | NEXUS::DICKERSON |  | Wed Apr 01 1987 15:44 | 15 | 
|  |     The tariffs are to be levied on "finished" products, not the chips.
    A tariff on the chips would have hurt U.S. industries harder than
    the Japanese ( lots of Japanese chips in your VAX, G.I. ).
    
    The implementation ( paid on wholesale price by importer, on retail
    price somewhere further down the distribution pipeline, etc ) 
    apparently is "discretionary" since it appears not to be spelled
    out in the legislation.  I think I'll go see if the bill which
    mandated this is in the Congressional Record yet.  Might not be
    able to figure it out even then since it will be written in
    public-servant-ese.
    
    				Regards
    				Doug Dickerson
    
 | 
| 737.17 | New line for sale drones ? | MENTOR::REG | Who is Sylvester McCoy | Thu Apr 02 1987 10:06 | 13 | 
|  |     
    	Well, it doesn't seem that the retailers have caught on to this
    yet.  As a long time price_shopper/procrastinater I have been keeping
    a little up to date file on what my dream equipment would cost.
    None of the over_the_phone_price_quoters that I spoke to this week
    have started to use the "Buy_now_and_beat_the_tarrif" line, in fact
    they seem to have even grown tired of the yen/$ exchange rate story.
    	Reg
    
    	(But I bought a KX 88 at Daddy's in Nashua yesterday; just in
    case......)
    
 | 
| 737.18 | RELAX for now | JON::ROSS | wockin' juan | Thu Apr 02 1987 13:52 | 16 | 
|  |     got the poop on what goods....
    
    Cant remember the list, but folks, its like everything that 
    as-few-as-possible-US-consumers-want.
    
    No high tech to speak of. 
    
    I guess its the thought (threat) that counts even if it has
    no teeth....
    
    keep hopin....
    
    Dont let any dealers use the now or never line....
    
    ron
    
 | 
| 737.19 |  | MENTOR::REG | Who is Sylvester McCoy | Thu Apr 02 1987 15:56 | 7 | 
|  |     re .18	Well, everything that as-few-as-possible-US-consumers-want
    sounds like it *WON'T* be VCRs, TVs, Boom boxes, Home Audio, cameras,
    home(personal ?) computers....    What's left ?    Anything that
    *ISN'T* the subject of this notes conference ? 
    
    	The pessimist
    
 | 
| 737.20 |  | REGENT::SCHMIEDER |  | Mon Apr 06 1987 15:17 | 4 | 
|  | Maybe now's a good time to buy Kurzweil stock, eh?
				Mark
 | 
| 737.21 | Amurican Stocks rebound.. | 16514::MOELLER | Drink & mow, lose a toe! | Mon Apr 06 1987 15:26 | 1 | 
|  |     ... and E-Mu Systems, and Sequential, and (garf) J.L. Cooper
 | 
| 737.22 | Phobo-xenia | BARNUM::RHODES |  | Wed Apr 08 1987 10:05 | 4 | 
|  |     Wanna buy some Linn stock?????
    
    Todd.
    
 | 
| 737.23 | Double or nuthin' ? | EUREKA::REG_B | Moutain Man(iac) | Fri Apr 17 1987 13:09 | 5 | 
|  |     
    	Well, today we get to know.  Watch tonight's news and be ready
    to zip down to your local toy store if Ya wanna beat the tarrif.
    I just don't see why he would leave electronic musical equipment
    out.
 | 
| 737.24 | 'our', not 'out'. | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Mon Apr 20 1987 12:50 | 8 | 
|  |     
    	So, what did you learn?
    
    	Is my Tx816 now worth $10k?   Hmmm, that brings up an interesting
    question - has the replacement value of our Japanese equipment doubled?
    How does this affect out insurance coverage?
    
    							- Karl
 | 
| 737.25 |  | SSDEVO::MCCOLLUM |  | Mon Apr 20 1987 14:27 | 7 | 
|  |     All they talked about was 18-12 inch TVs, portable computers, and
    power tools. Whoops - make that 18-21 inch TVs.
    They sounded like these are the only products affected -- so maybe
    we all lucked out.
    Also, items by Sony and Sanyo are not included since they are assembled
    in the U.S.
    
 |