T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
687.1 | RS232 'BLAST' Connectivity.. | 16514::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support | Fri Feb 20 1987 17:24 | 10 |
| Re S-10's 'Quick Disks'... lying marketeers in action ! [the worse
it performs, the more adjectives]
My west coast technosource tells me that Roland is announcing the
rackmount versions of both the S-10 and S-50 (hear that, len?)
They MAY be called the S-10R and S-50R. Imaginative.
Don't see/hear what you want in your price range ? Wait a month...
except I've been waiting for almost a year... sigh.
|
687.2 | Name for S-10 in rack is MKS-100. | PILOU::MULELID | Madman across the water. | Sat Feb 21 1987 04:52 | 6 |
| The rack mount version of the S-10 is called MKS-100. I can't
tell the price in the states but a guess would be 40% lower than
the S-10. For the S-50 I have not seen any info sofar.
Svein.
|
687.3 | QDs...NO WAY! | LOLITA::DIORIO | | Fri Apr 03 1987 11:31 | 3 |
| I like the S-10 except for the quick disks. I dislike QDs so much
(I don't trust anything that is not an established standard) that
it has kept me from buying one.
|
687.4 | minor nit, really minor ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | quality first cause quality lasts | Mon Feb 06 1989 17:24 | 16 |
| This seems like as good a place as any to post this. Last night,
I tried to sample a vibraslap into my S-10. Seems the sampling
frequency is low enough on it that this particular instrument does
not sample well. Yes, I checked, and it was sampling at 30 kHz.
And, just for kicks I tried some other percussive instruments out
to see if something was wrong with the sampler. Nope. Bandwidth
kills the worth of the vibraslap (kind of a ratchety sound). I
also played around with the filtering algorithms enough to prove to
myself that this sample gets unrecoverabley squashed on the high end.
Here and I thought I could sample anything ... ;-) As I recall,
the S-50 will have the same problem since it has basically the same
guts. Fortunately, finding an appropriate musical substitute isn't
a problem. I can do it with a different synth or a drum machine.
I ain't gonna spend more dough just to get a good vibraslap ...
Steve
|
687.5 | slap my vibes | SUBSYS::ORIN | Laissez Faire | Tue Feb 07 1989 13:13 | 7 |
| Hi Steve,
I have a reasonable S50/S550 sample of a vibraslap, but I agree, the high
end is weak. I had to sample at 39k on the EPS to get reasonable fidelity
from a vibraslap on a Prosonus percussion CD.
dave
|
687.6 | Am I gonna be sorry I asked this? | MUSKIE::ALLEN | | Wed Feb 08 1989 17:11 | 8 |
| re .4, .5
What, pray, is a "vibraslap"?
Bill
PS Are they legal in all 50 states?
|
687.7 | legal in Mass, as far as I know ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | quality first cause quality lasts | Wed Feb 08 1989 17:45 | 5 |
| Hmmm. I think it's basically a ratchet that makes noise when you
turn the handle. A poor approximation would be to hold down a key
on your terminal. Saaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ...... ! ;-)
Steve
|
687.8 | Sound like a Cabasa.. | CASPRO::SEDER | I don't care if I'm apathetic | Thu Feb 09 1989 04:45 | 13 |
| A Vibraslap sounds kind of like a rattlesnake. It has a rattle-like
sound with about a 3-5 second decay. It's used in latin music a lot, but
it is more of a sound effect than a rhythm instrument. The "ratchet"
instrument sounds like a desription of a Cabasa (kah-BAH-sah).
A Cabasa looks like a bunch of pull-chains (from ceiling lights)
wrapped kind of loosely around a corrugated, circular piece of metal
with a handle on one end. The player holds the handle in one hand,
and holds the "chains" in the other, and twists the handle back
and forth, and it sound like a ratchet.
PJ
I was in a band with a latin drummer, and he MADE me learn about
all that stuff..:^)
|
687.9 | so, one more thing I can't sample? ;-) | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | quality first cause quality lasts | Thu Feb 09 1989 10:09 | 4 |
| Hmmm. Well, the sample tape said vibraslap. I'll take a look at
the cabasa ...
Steve
|
687.10 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Feb 09 1989 11:02 | 16 |
| RE: Vibraslap...
I thought a vibraslap was a thing that had a metal rod bent around in a
kind of a 'U' shape, with a ball on one end and an small wooden box with one
open side. In the box was a metal bar with holes in it, and freely moving back
and forth within these holes were metal pins. The unit I'm thinking of operates
by holding the rod and striking the ball with the palm of the hand, causing the
unit to vibrate the metal pins back and forth against the resonant wooden box.
If I remember correctly, there was a kind of a natural decay to it. The first
time I remember hearing the sound was when the TV show 'Room 222' was on. They
used that sound in the opening theme song.
Is that the right beast?
Dan
|
687.11 | Bingo... and further digression.... | CSG001::MCPHERSON | I'm an ADULT now... | Thu Feb 09 1989 12:29 | 16 |
| re: .10 Yes. That's a vibraslap.
sidenote (absolutely unrelated to samplers):
The Vibraslap (stupid name. sounds like an S&M marital aid) is the
modern version of a jawbone (of an ass or horse ?) used a in Latin
music long ago. The idea was that the teeth rattled in the jawbone
when it was struck... This may have been supplemented by pebbles or
something put inside the bone structure itself.
The best place to hear what vibraslaps *really* sound like (as well
as a lot of other weird percussion stuff) is to listen carefully
to a the background music on a lot of 1970s cop shows or detective
movies... You'll be amazed.
/doug_who_actually_has_a_vibraslap
|
687.12 | ;-) | HPSMEG::LEITZ | bang a gong | Tue Feb 14 1989 13:09 | 8 |
| (geez, don't you hate people who inanely pursure a different
topic within a note of a dissimilar heading? i do.
that being said...)
Another vibra-slap ref: the intro to Sweet Emotion by Aerosmith.
( call (212)976-1212 for a free over the phone demo....)
|
687.13 | Now that they've been discontinued for >1 year... | MAY26::DIORIO | | Tue Feb 14 1989 14:42 | 6 |
|
Has anyone seen any used MKS-100s around? Sure would be interested
in hearing how much one of these would go for now.
Mike D
|
687.14 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Tue Feb 14 1989 16:12 | 9 |
| RE < Note 687.13 by MAY26::DIORIO >
Strangely enough, they have not gone down in price on the used market.
You'd be hard-pressed to find one for less than $500 in the WantAds. Now,
whether they are SELLING for that amount remains to be seen. I couldn't get
$500 for mine when I sold it a year ago.
Dan
|
687.15 | used.. | HAMER::COCCOLI | Midihell II...Revenge of the SGU's | Thu Feb 16 1989 21:45 | 4 |
| RE notes .13 + .14
I've seen used MKS100's going in the $400 to $435 range.......rich
|
687.16 | Are they that rare around here (eastern MA)? | MAY10::DIORIO | | Fri Feb 17 1989 11:07 | 7 |
|
Rich,
where did you see these? Are you in the NY area? In the (eastern
MA) Want Ads, I never see them for sale.
Mike D
|
687.17 | | HAMER::COCCOLI | Midihell II...Revenge of the SGU's | Fri Feb 17 1989 22:35 | 8 |
| re:.16
Yes, I am in the N.Y. area.....I work Field Service nights in
Manhattan.I've seen them at Rogue Music (see note 9.4 bottom) and
in the Village Voice ads.
rich c.
|
687.18 | Saw one yesterday!! | PCOJCT::RYAN | | Thu May 18 1989 14:50 | 20 |
| Boy is this timely....I was checking out an S220 at Sam Ash yesterday
they were asking $499 which seems like a real good price. They claim
they are overstocked but I suspect that it's a closeout. I was going
to ask you folks your opinion of the S220 anyway. I'm looking for
some good sounds, possible sampling of my other keyboards to make
my stage setup less cumbersome, multi-tim for helping with my home
sequencing and all for 400-500 bucks (please stop laughing!!).
So.... what do you think? HOw about those quick disks? Do you think
only 4 internal sounds at a time will be limiting for live work?
Can I buy those quick disks anywhere othr that Roland's 10 for 50
dollar deal
HELP!!!!!!!
|
Gary Ryan
|
687.19 | Try & find them when you need them | CSC32::MOLLER | Nightmare on Sesame Street | Thu May 18 1989 18:23 | 14 |
| If the quick disks (60K bytes max) are used to load samples, I can't
imagine that you can get very many on a single disk. The Disks are
hard to come by (I still have a dead Yamaha MDF-1 Midi Disk Filer that
uses them). At $4.00 to $6.00 each, they are a lousy deal. Can the
S-220 do SYSEX dumps rather than only to quick disks?? If so, you might
find other devices to upload samples from. In case you are curious,
I put 20 quick disk sequences (same thing was on both sides, so there
were 20 full loads of my sequencer on the quick disks) onto a single
3 1/2 800K disk (Indian Vally Midi Disk Filer system).
If you have some other way of dealing with the loading/unloading of samples,
it might be a good deal. I'd avoid the quick disks if I were you.
Jens
|
687.20 | quick disks aint | SUBSYS::ORIN | Got a bad case of VFX | Thu May 18 1989 21:56 | 15 |
| <<< Note 687.19 by CSC32::MOLLER "Nightmare on Sesame Street" >>>
-< Try & find them when you need them >-
>Can the S-220 do SYSEX dumps rather than only to quick disks?? If so, you might
>find other devices to upload samples from.
Universal Sound Designer supports the S220 on the Macintosh, but of course
that's a mighty expensive load device package, and it's one sample at a time,
not an entire instrument. The S220 does apparently support SYSEX.
>I'd avoid the quick disks if I were you.
ditto.
dave
|
687.21 | ditto- down with QD | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Fri May 19 1989 09:07 | 11 |
| While I would avoid QD too, I've seen them in magazines at about $30 a box
of ten which is cheaper than the $4.00 -- $6.00 each mentioned here.
If you can find a "librarian" of sorts for it running on a PC/MAC/ST or even a
C64 or 8bit Atari to laod samples with it could be a neat box for that price.
Don't expect to replace your other boxes though. Steve Sherman had an S10,
a similar device that he really liked (I'm not putting words into your mouth
am I steve?). Maybe he can comment.
Chad
|
687.22 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 227-3299, 223-3326 | Fri May 19 1989 11:08 | 17 |
| Well, now that you've pulled me outta the woodwork ...
I *loved* my S-10. A great sampler. The QDs were expensive and
as mentioned can be had for about $35 from Soundsations. If I were
to do it again, I'd dump samples to a PC instead of QD. But, the
in the setup I had I had access to several different technologies,
so I was using the sampler for those sounds I couldn't get with
the other technologies. As a result, I never really needed to have
gobs of samples lying around. So, the limits of the sampler and
QDs didn't really affect me. I found 4 boxes of disks to be sufficient
for my needs.
I would say take advantage of blowouts due to folks not liking QDs.
If storage is an issue, invest in a PC and dump via sysex and forget
about using QDs.
Steve
|
687.23 | still shopping | NYEM1::RYAN | | Fri May 19 1989 11:57 | 4 |
| Thanks for the insight, I'm going back toda or tomorrow for a more
detailed try-out... I'll let you know the story...
Gary
|
687.24 | Comments, and a QD source. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Fri May 19 1989 12:05 | 15 |
| I don't want to rain on the parade, but using MIDI as a communication
vehicle for sample dumps is probably not a good idea.
Samples are generally large files, and can't reasonably be dumped live
(ie, in the middle of a song). Sysex can take a long time (up to
several minutes on some samplers!) and MIDI sample dumps don't include
machine specific settings (envelopes, modulation routings, etc).
It sounds to me like SYSEXing would be more hassle than trying to
find a cheap source of 2.8" QDs.
One source from Keyboard: SOUNDSTATIONS, 370 Mt. Vernon, Grosse
Point Farms, MI 48236 (313) 885-1539. $32.50 per box.
-b
|