T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
668.1 | No!! I won't enter a title! You can't make me!! | JAWS::COTE | Let's change the rules and giggle!!! | Tue Jan 20 1987 13:18 | 13 |
| Since the QX7 has only a 2 character display they had to compromise
on some of the abbreviations. "nF" is a condensed version.
Hint - Score big gobs of memory on your QX7 by deleting the contents
of the temporary buffer. This buffer holds the unquantized rev of
your last hatchet job ("Why play tight? I can quantize!!").
D2-B4(1)-D2 will get you acres of luscious green bits in which to
sow your musical wheat.
Edd of_tacky_metaphors
|
668.2 | Ing-spa Everb-ray | DYO780::SCHAFER | ROCK the planet | Wed Jan 21 1987 11:09 | 14 |
| Re: .1
Thanks for the hint, giggles. I thought that the quantize function had
its own buffer which was seperate from main memory.
Another unrelated gripe - I've been using a spring reverb (built in w/
mixer board) to get some ambience in my recordings. I've been having a
heck of a time trying to get boing out of percussive patches. (I've
almost given up on reverb for the 707.) What do I do? Do digital
units have this problem, or is this peculiar to spring reverbs?
Maybe a little more volume ...? Nahhh. Help!
8^)
|
668.3 | They're Great. Don't Buy One | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Jan 21 1987 11:35 | 10 |
| Spring reverbs do not mix well with percussive sounds. I know of
no way to get rid of the "boing". Digital reverbs don't go "boing"
on percussive sounds, but they can produce a "hissy" kind of tail
on a percussive sound. Sharp percussive sounds are one of the real
tests of a quality reverb. One of the reasons that I like the Roland
SRV-2000 so much is that it works *very* nicely on percussive sounds.
(Not to be construed as a sales pitch.).
len.
|
668.4 | Boingie, Boingie, Boingie... | JAWS::COTE | In Search of Excellence. Seen any? | Wed Jan 21 1987 11:41 | 12 |
| Different springs have different amounts of ping....
The spring in my mixer is all but useless for percussion, but I
have a fairly high-end (is that an oxymoron when discussing springs?)
Fostex unit that is considerably more usable.
I've heard that springs of different lengths in the unit will cut
down on the boingies.
Mix-master Dreher also tells me they can be eq'd into submission.
Edd
|
668.5 | | JUNIOR::DREHER | This space for rent... | Wed Jan 21 1987 13:02 | 8 |
| Jam Master 'D' here.
I've had success with spring reverbs by EQ-ing the high end off
the reverb return. Start high and work your way down in frequencies
until it disappears to an acceptable level. I used a spring reverb
on the Linndrum snare and congas on Acapulco, which is on COMMUSIC I.
Dave
|
668.6 | length. | JON::ROSS | dont shoot the MKS20 player! | Wed Jan 21 1987 13:35 | 19 |
|
Must say that the shorter the springs, the :
1. Boingier they are (cant eq out. makes a 'noise')
2. They have a resonant peak mid to low freqs somewhere.
(Might eq out)
High end hiss from mega-amping the teensy signals out of these
critters is of course eq'able. The 16inch or so spring in my
2600 is very good. The 6 to 8inch springs Ive experimented with
are downright poor.
rjr
|
668.7 | Thanks & undocumented feature of SRV | DYO780::SCHAFER | ROCK the planet | Wed Jan 21 1987 14:25 | 9 |
| Thanks. I tried eq'ing the snare, but I lost tone altogether. Did NOT
try eqing verb return. Will screw with that this evening.
BTW, Len - did you read the reader comment in Keyboard (Feb 87) that
you can get digital delay out of your SRVs? Seems that you can press
three selectors (?), power up, and voila! the display comes up with
"DELAY". I'd be interested to know what the deal is.
8^)
|
668.8 | Press KP7 for No Effect | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Jan 21 1987 14:28 | 5 |
| Thanks, Brad, but see my review of the SRV where this "feature"
is described in full detail (including how all the parameters work).
len.
|
668.9 | Oh | DYO780::SCHAFER | ROCK the planet | Wed Jan 21 1987 14:39 | 4 |
| Brain damage. Now I remember. I should have known that no feature
can escape the grasp of the mighty len. ;-} Egad, I must be tired.
8-(
|
668.10 | QX5 nit fix, if you've got the guts | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Things get curioser and curioser... | Tue Jun 02 1987 17:47 | 19 |
|
One of the nits I have with the QX5 is that it has only one MIDIout. It has
a MIDIthru, but I have no use for it. I found I needed one more output, and
I didn't want to buy/build a thru-box. So, I found that a simple jumper fix
in the QX5 was sufficient. This probably voids the warranty (so sue me!), but
it works well and satisfies the MIDI specs. If you open the box up and get to
the board that has the MIDI sockets on it, you'll see three jumpers labelled
J20. Cut the middle jumper and solder the end closest to the sockets to the
jumper on the right. This will make the MIDIthru socket circuitry drive by
the same driver that drives the MIDIout socket circuitry. Yamaha pretty much
follows the MIDI spec for the circuit except that they add what looks like some
kind of resistor/fuse/filter pack in line with the sockets. If you do decide
to do the fix, be sure you know what you're doing i.e.; be especially careful
with the ribbon cables and connectors and with the display board which has some
hairy surface-mount stuff on it. I was tempted to mount a switch so that the
MIDIthru would be programmable, but I'm too lazy and cheap.
Steve_the_MIDIddler
|
668.11 | wokkin won agwees weeluctantly | JON::ROSS | Network partner excited first try!{pant} | Tue Jun 02 1987 19:47 | 9 |
| awwwwwwwwwwww, now you cant dump 128k worth of formatted
sysex HIT TUNES to your cumputor.
You trust tape backup?
max out and die young eh?
why not.
|