T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
618.1 | 16 voices take a little longer ! | CANYON::MOELLER | What was the question ? | Mon Dec 22 1986 10:57 | 12 |
| A good friend of mine has an older brother who is quite successful
in the L.A. based soundtrack-and-album scene. This brother (let's
call him 'Michael') has traditionally rented Emulator IIs for sampling
work. He recently purchased an S50. Feedback is, compared to the
E-Mu way of sampling, it is INCREDIBLY TEDIOUS and timeconsuming
(not always the same thing- expenses are tedious, but take little
time). Apparently the user interface is not well thought out. Or
it could be that a person new to sampling would not have to unlearn
old patterns. I look forward to any hands-on reviews of this new
product.
karl
|
618.2 | free speach, copyright 1986 | JON::ROSS | dont shoot the piano player! | Mon Dec 22 1986 17:31 | 14 |
| hot item.
Just the facts ma'am.
Your opinions.
I cant wait.
We ARE talking large delta dollars compared to EM II.
It might be unfair to compare.
ron
|
618.3 | Roland S-50 Sampling Keyboard | FDCV01::SIDBDEV | Actually ISWISS::ARVIDSON - 223-2003 | Thu Jan 08 1987 18:29 | 9 |
| I has been said that Len *just* made it out of E.U.Wurlitzers last visit
without an S-50 under his arm. Wonder what will happen next time he stops
by?
I stopped by E.U. Wurlitzers about a week ago and became very interested
in this unit. Will have to wait until the end of Sept. to buy one, I too
would be interested in hearing 'finger's and mind's on review'.
Dan
|
618.4 | simple S50 help needed thanks | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Thu Mar 29 1990 15:42 | 20 |
| I was at the local HS again this morning and now they have a simple question.
They have been using their S50 mostly as playback. They want to sample some
sounds now for a show. Fine. They have sampled a sound and edited that sound
and SAVE ALL allows them to save it. NOw they want to sample a second sound and
save it with the first sound. They loaded the first one back in and then
sampled the second sound and the first was gone. Now, I assume what is
happening is that the sound is in the edit/sample buffer and needs to be
saved in some sort of TONE buffer (or whatever the Roland jargon is) and then
the second sound can be saved and copied tyo a different TONE. Is this correct?
Then a PATCH can be set up with the tones mapped to the keyboard and then
the whole thing can be saved to disk. Is this right?
Could some one please outline the process for doing this on the S50? The kids
at the school have a tough time reading the manual ( I didn't do much better
looking at it while I was there to try and figure it out). Thanks.
Chad
PS: Any replies detailing help will be extracted/noheader for the folks to
read and use at the HS unless you say not to do it.
|
618.5 | Wild guess | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Conliberative | Thu Mar 29 1990 16:30 | 10 |
| Only thing I can think of is that when they sampled it, the selected
"destination" tone was that of the first sample and it over-wrote
it. It could be that the default/current destination tone happens
to be where their sample is (probably tone I1).
Other than that, it's a mystery to me. There is no real temporary
"edit" buffer that gets thrown away when you create something new
on the S-50.
BTW, I have a S-550, not an S-50 but their almost identical.
|