T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
598.1 | cheap | SAUTER::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Dec 10 1986 07:58 | 11 |
| I think they were cheap. Adding "prog down" would have meant another
pedal and another pedal connector. That would have raised the
selling cost, and so made the unit less competitive, and so cost
them sales.
I have heard of a case in which Digital engineers resisted adding
a valuable feature to a product because it would have raised the
cost of the product by $1, due to the larger ROMs needed. If that
is symptomatic of electrical engineers in general, then adding another
pedal would have been unthinkable.
John Sauter
|
598.2 | Have I got a car for you... | BARNUM::RHODES | | Wed Dec 10 1986 08:53 | 10 |
|
I think John's right. Your synth was designed back when Korg's company
charter was to have the most affordable stuff available on the market.
If it were Yamaha, they would have had a "prog down". The reason being,
of course, is that they would love to sell you an extra foot switch for
$25 or so. Yamaha seems to like the profit from the accessory market,
much like car dealers...
Todd.
|
598.3 | Compatable my foot.... | JAWS::COTE | That's just the way it is... | Wed Dec 10 1986 09:02 | 7 |
| If it were Yamaha, they'd reverse the topology. You'd have to take
your foot *off* the pedal to scroll and keep it on to stay in one
place.
:^)
Edd
|
598.5 | Up/Down Special Case of Random Access | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Wed Dec 10 1986 11:18 | 11 |
| I saw an article somewhere recently (sorry I can't be more specific)
where a guy wanted not only program up and down, but essentially
random access. So what he did was build a special pedal that kept
sending "pedal down" until you took your foot off it. The repeat
rate was adjusted to a "happy" balance between too slow to be of
any use and too fast to be able to stop it on the right patch.
I suppose what you'd really want is a pedal whose repeat rate was
proportional to how hard (or how far) you were pushing it.
len.
|
598.6 | Couldn't have been that expensive | RSTS32::DBMILLER | Cecil B. D'Miller | Sat Dec 13 1986 13:19 | 7 |
| They should have made it a stereo jack to allow a double button
foot-switch. If you used a single button switch, you would only
have prog-up.
(Just my 2�)
-Dave
|
598.7 | | 21971::DESELMS | | Thu Oct 27 1988 10:35 | 17 |
| The poly-61 is regrettably the only SGU/controller I have, and I would
like to ask a few questions...
First of all, the poly-61 DOES support MIDI. However, it is very limited;
it only sends and receives on channel 1. This is no big problem for me
since I don't have anything else that's MIDIable except a Roland TR-626,
and the most I can do in that area is play drum sounds from the keyboard.
Yippee.
Anyway, somewhere down the line I would like to get a sequencer and
maybe a TX81Z or something, so I have a few questions:
1) If I can only send/recieve on ch. 1, will I be able to use the
sequencer to play the 81z multitimbrally?
2) Would I be able to play the poly-61 through a sequencer and therefore
be able to play the 81z live?
- jim
|
598.8 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Oct 27 1988 11:12 | 25 |
| RE < Note 598.7 by 21971::DESELMS >
You will be able to use the sequencer effectively as long as the
Poly-61M supports OMNI-OFF. If it doesn't, then you'll only be able to either
sequence single tracks or keep the P61 out of the midi network during playback.
Another important feature you may want is program change, i.e., the ability
of the P61 to recieve commands accross the MIDI network, telling it what patch
to play. this is not essential, but it helps. Finall, it would help you to
have a sequencer that can re-direct midi channels (i.e., you play into it on
channel 1, it changes that to what ever channel you tell it to).
The TX81Z is nice for cases like yours in that it can perform
'soft-splits' (my term, not Yam's). That is, if you set up a performance
setting where the TX81Z takes certain ranges of notes and assigns certain
patches to those ranges. You can define up to 7 splits.
As far as being able to play the TZ live through the sequencer, you'll
need to watch for a MIDI merge or mix feature. That is where the sequencer
mixes the MIDI OUT with the MIDI THRU. This is a common feature, but not
universal. It is something you definately should ask about when trying out
a sequencer.
Dan
|
598.9 | Gee - *I've* been there. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Thu Oct 27 1988 11:13 | 28 |
| I have an older board (OB-Xa) which is MIDI limited in a similar
fashion - and I used it as my main controller for a while. Here's what
you can do:
a) You can send (play an external MIDI module from the Korg)
or receive (have an external sequencer play the Korg) ONLY on
channel 1. (If the receiving synth is in OMNI mode, it'll
receive data on all channels.)
b) You cannot use things like pitch bend, modulation, or
sustain - Korg controllers are most likely analog and will
not xmit commands over MIDI. I could be wrong on a few point
controllers (such as sustain), but I think I'm correct
generally speaking. You will not be able to control velocity
or aftertouch from the Korg, either.
c) If your sequencer can rechannelize MIDI data (ie, record
on channel 1, then assign all that data to channel n), then
you will be able to play a multi-timbral unit such as the
TX81z - but not directly from the Korg's keyboard. There are
darn few sequencers that will take incoming data, assign it
to another channel on the fly, and echo it back to MIDI OUT.
In other words, the Poly will ultimately be useful only as a slave SGU
or as a separate keyboard. Eventually you'll have to think about
getting a real MIDI keyboard.
-b
|
598.10 | | 21971::DESELMS | | Thu Oct 27 1988 11:32 | 14 |
| I got the P61 used, and with a copy of the instruction manual, however
the manual came without any info on the MIDI implementation. And the
only place I see the word MIDI is where you put the cables in... not
even a single button, switch, or knob anywhere.
I don't think it supports OMNI-OFF; When I press buttons on the drum
machine, and I have a cable going from that to the 61, I always get sound
from the 61, regardless of what the send channel is on the drum machine.
I think it's time to get me a new keyboard. So, anybody wanna trade
one of their fancy Roland LA thingys for a "classic" synth? Didn't
think so.
- Jim
|
598.11 | Computer based sequencer | NORGE::CHAD | Ich glaube Ich t�te Ich h�tte | Thu Oct 27 1988 12:51 | 6 |
| If you have a computer, some computer based sequencers (and most likely
some dedicated) have a thru mode, which directs your playing on the
keyboard into the sequencer and back out on channel q, where you specify
q. Master Tracks pro does this for example.
Chad
|
598.12 | Don't sell it yet! 8-) | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Thu Oct 27 1988 15:14 | 15 |
| RE: .10
Jim, OMNI mode is only a function of the RECEIVER, not the sender. If
the TR responds to anything, then it's either set to channel 1 or is
itself in OMNI mode.
As for the Korg, don't discount it so fast. I probably sounded
negative in my first posting ... I still have my OB and love it. If you
can get nice fat analog out of it, better off to keep it. In the
meantime, it might be a good idea to find out what MIDI mod is
installed on the thing. Some are more flexible than others. If you
find out the mfgr, you might be able to get them to mail you some
instructions (or at least read 'em off over the phone).
-b
|
598.13 | Read it again | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Oct 27 1988 15:27 | 13 |
| RE < Note 598.12 by DYO780::SCHAFER "Brad - back in Ohio." >
> Jim, OMNI mode is only a function of the RECEIVER, not the sender. If
> the TR responds to anything, then it's either set to channel 1 or is
> itself in OMNI mode.
I made the same mistake when I read his reply, that is until I re-read
it a few times. He was saying that he connected the TR to the P61, using the
TR as MASTER and the P61 as SLAVE. It responded to all channels that he set on
the TR.
Dan
|
598.14 | | 21683::DESELMS | | Fri Oct 28 1988 09:41 | 12 |
| Thanks for clarifying that for me.
Anyway, I think I understand my situation, and these are the
conclusions I've made:
I should keep my Poly-61M because of the sounds I can get...
But if I ever want to get serious about sequencing, I should get
a _real_ MIDI keyboard.
Okay! Thanks for the help.
- jim
|
598.15 | Some more [non]� ... | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Fri Oct 28 1988 12:02 | 6 |
| And, if you're going to get a serious MIDI keyboard and want to do
sequencing, look into an ESQ1 (~$1000) or SQ80 (~$1750).
Good luck!
-b
|
598.16 | | IGETIT::BROWNM | Lightbulb! Lightbulb! | Thu Jul 04 1991 12:15 | 4 |
| What's the rest of the spec on this thing?
matty
|