T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
579.1 | Other births in jan.... | JON::ROSS | BOZONICS | Sat Nov 22 1986 17:49 | 21 |
| hmmmmm, "tis the season"....rumors, that is. Related:
A conversation with Kawai indicates the the new
midi controller is also destined for Jan Namm prevue,
and then on the shelf Feb. at dealers. (Promises, promises)
Good news: Multiple outputs that can control 64 synths
(apparently 4 midi outs times 16 midi channels)
assignable controllers, other goodies.
$1700 target price. (!)
Bad news: The action will not be the same as one of their
pianos (the prototype shown last NAMM DID have
this) To keep the price down (or the profit up),
weighted wood is used, but its a new action.
That could be why its been so long comming.
Who knows? It might feel just right.
looks like a nice new year...
ron
|
579.2 | more for less? | JON::ROSS | BOZONICS | Sat Nov 22 1986 18:15 | 25 |
| Alll right time to SPECULATE!
On the DX end? What more can they do??????
Look at it from a marketting (read:price) slant:
They've got 'cheeper' DX-ish units. (21,100)
They've got DX's without KBDs (TX7)
They've got 'big bucks' DX's without KBDs (TXn16)
They've got 'cheeper' DX-ish units without kbds (FB01)
What could 'replace' the DX? Choices:
1. Fix the "less_than_optimal_features" of the DX.
But otherwise not much change. maybe price cut?
2. A multi-timbral DX for same-ish price. Or some
other 'advance' in technology. Could cost a bit more (I BET!)
Given the Fb01 8-voice 4 operator chip is history,
I place my tarot guess that the new DX will be a
6-operator 8 or 16 voice MULTITIMBRAL synth. It
has to have a kbd to replace the DX7 of course.
Maybe a sequencer since like mamy of the <$1500 units.
Alright, your turn for 'engineering guess'....
ron
|
579.3 | Might have these enhancements | CLOVAX::RATASKI | Tom Rataski SWS Akron,Oh. | Mon Nov 24 1986 11:02 | 4 |
| Rumor has it that there will be a floppy disk for storing voices,
a full MIDI implementation, and alternative tunings.
But again these are just rumors.
|
579.4 | | CACHE::FONTAINE | | Tue Nov 25 1986 10:57 | 7 |
| Just spoke with my Yamaha dealer and he confirmed the "enhancements"
mentioned in 579.3. It will have 16 voices and also have split and
layer configurations- 8 and 8. Not fully polytimbral. Seems that
this info came from a newletter release in Japan about a new DX-7
II being introduced there. The drive is a 3.5" micro floppy. Data
is compatible with existing DX-7's. Price will be around $1800 I
believe.
|
579.5 | From german Yamaha add. | BEAGLE::MULELID | | Tue Dec 30 1986 05:42 | 25 |
| The DX7 II D/FD is here. Just saw an add in a german magazine.
Here are what they list as new.
MICRO TUNING, every key is individualy tunable (for tempered tuning)
FRACTIONAL SCALING (didnt the old DX7 have that too?)
Single-Split-Dual modes
2 x 32 internal memory
32 performance memory
Patches compatible with DX7
Unisono-poly-mono modes
Random pitch for "analog" sound
2 sliders for changing params live
New Pitch-EG, can be controlled by after-touch or breath controller.
LFO-multitrigger and stereo pan effect
Bigger display with light (2 x 40)
New ROM with 128 sounds + 64 performance data + new params.
New RAM-4 with 64 sounds + 32 performance data.
Two versions DX7 II D DM 4500,-
and DX7 II FD with built in 3.5" floppy DM 5300,-
This is translated from german so mistakes may be included.
Svein.
|
579.6 | Has DX-7 II appeared yet? | FGVAXU::LAING | | Thu Jan 29 1987 18:50 | 5 |
| Has the DX-7 II appeared in this country yet? Has anyone heard
one? I read the writeup in the latest Keyboard mag; but am anxious
to hear it and hear what others think of it ...
-Jim
|
579.7 | no news yet... | GNERIC::ROSS | no time like the present | Fri Jan 30 1987 09:39 | 7 |
|
Same review. Different subject: I wanna TK81Z.
Cant wait for the DX7s oldies to drop in price!
ron
|
579.8 | The "Classic" DX7 | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Fri Jan 30 1987 10:43 | 10 |
| Nah, Ron - how much ya wanna bet their "value" goes up as people
complain about how the new ones "just don't sound the same". Sorta
like vacuum tube amps, ya know?
What're you gonna do with your two FB01s when you get a TK81Z?
(No, I don't want'em, I'll get a TK81Z myself!)
len.
|
579.9 | Obsolete already? | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Fri Jan 30 1987 12:51 | 8 |
|
Say, this TK81Z isn't multi-timbral, is it? Just in terms
of 'voices' and simultaneous note capacity, what are it's
capabilities?
I guess what I'm asking is, how similar to my TX816 is it?
- Karl
|
579.10 | | REGENT::SCHMIEDER | | Fri Jan 30 1987 13:08 | 28 |
| The TX81Z has more in common with the FB01 than the TX816, from what I
understand. The numbering is similar to indicate it's a professional unit.
From what I have heard, this will be the hottest thing Yamaha has unleashed
since the original DX7.
Too bad it's not six operators vs. four. A passive NOTER who reads but does
not write notes here informed me (if my memory is correct) that the six
operators are really necessary for strong and long decays on many sounds.
Possibly the new approach would make that redundant? I don't know.
At any rate, after lots and lots of consumer products and no new
"professional" equipment for awhile, it looks like Yamaha finally got their
act together. This looks like an answer to the CZ101, perhaps cementing
Yamaha as the all-around industry leader in keyboards.
Aha, but what does Roland have up their sleeve? Apparantly, they and Korg are
doing nothing more than copies of FM now that the initial two years on patent
of FM technology are up.
No new keyboards from Yamaha except DX7 II (not sure what that is, but it
doesn't have weighted action). Guess the KX88 is it, unless Kawai's actually
comes out and is as good as their electric pianos. I've heard it isn't ready
and also that it's out in late March. I've heard it's weighted and that it
isn't, that it's 73 keys and also 88 keys. Man, this is going to be some
complex keyboard controller!
Mark
|
579.11 | ? | JAWS::COTE | Everything but the bitchin' sync... | Fri Jan 30 1987 14:56 | 5 |
| > 6 operators... necessary.. for long decays...
I'd like to hear the logic behind that.
Edd doubtful_but_no_FM_genius
|
579.12 | Some more on the TX81Z | AKOV68::EATOND | Impressionable Youth | Fri Jan 30 1987 15:11 | 19 |
| RE: Note 579.10 by REGENT::SCHMIEDER
>Too bad it's not six operators vs. four. A passive NOTER who reads but does
>not write notes here informed me (if my memory is correct) that the six
>operators are really necessary for strong and long decays on many sounds.
>Possibly the new approach would make that redundant? I don't know.
One thing the Keyboard blurb brought out about the four-op configuration
on this new module is that it is capable of producing more than just sine
waves in the oscillator - thus bringing more flexibility per operator. It said
that it used to take all four operators to produce a sawtooth, which will now be
available using only one. And it will have 8 different waveforms, not just one!
Sounds like a real winning product.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it also looks like it will be fully
programmable, unlike the FB-01. Did the rest of you get that out of it?
I'm beginning to save my pennies!
Dan
|
579.13 | ok I need 256 operators... | JON::ROSS | EbM9+13/Bb | Fri Jan 30 1987 20:53 | 21 |
| Ok. Upgrade your FM programs to multiply sawtoot and
6 other waveform choices (besides sine) together. Dont
know...think the result may pretty 'clagourous'.
16 voice multi-timbral with front panel programming in
a single rack. 12 bit D/A insteada 10. $499 list.
Best(?) price so far: "$439. I'll have some this wednesday".....
Do I have $439? Well, do I, punk?
Will it make my day?
Well,4 operators go a loooong way on most sounds. Fb01 took
some short cuts on velocity, but I am quite pleased with Fb01.
Havent heard an argument yet that *requires* 6 ops......oh, and
gee you could use all those 4 sawtooths slightly detuned for
a string section.... and THATS only 1 of 16 voices. well, what
will the other 15 be, sir?
whew.
rjr
|
579.14 | Its in the shops. | PILOU::MULELID | Svein Mulelid ETC Valbonne | Mon Feb 02 1987 09:51 | 9 |
| The DX7 II D is now available in the shops here in France. I just
saw one in a shop in Cannes last week. It was not connected and
I did not have enough time to stay and try it out.
The guy said that if I would put 16000,- FF on the counter I could
take it with me at once, well I didn't.
Svein.
|
579.15 | DX-7 II in Salem, NH | FGVAXU::LAING | | Tue Feb 17 1987 15:54 | 13 |
| I just played the DX-7 IID (the one w/o the floppy) at Daddy's in
Salem, N.H. The store was noisy, so I didn't get to critically
listen for improved sound (due to the 16-bit DAC) but I'd say from
what I remember there *WAS* noticable improvement. I'd like to
test it againt my 'old' DX-7 in a quiet room! Having 32 'performance
memories' is nice, to store your frequently-used splits, duals,
with voice number, split point, lots of other parameters.
No detailed review here until I get more time with one ... they
were asking aroun $2,400 for the FD and $2,200 for the D. They
also had the new TX81Z (I think that is what it's called) for $499.
-Jim
|
579.16 | Last of the New Wave Riders | HPSRAD::NORCROSS | Beauty, Feeling, Play, Creativity | Tue Dec 19 1989 14:03 | 10 |
| I may be obtaining an _original_ DX7 during the santa holiday.
Can anyone say what the major limitations of this device are?
Is it velocity sensitive? Pressure sensitive? How many voices?
How many patches in memory?
(I seem to recall something about MIDI channel limitations.)
Thanks,
/Mitch
|
579.17 | not sure if I'd want one... | NRPUR::DEATON | | Tue Dec 19 1989 14:43 | 8 |
| The original DX7 is velocity, aftertouch sensitive, has 61 keys...
Its limitations: Can only transmit on MIDI ch 1 and does not transmit
all velocity values (I believe it is limited to 118 on the upper end, as opposed
to 128). The sound is good but not void of noise/grunge.
Dan
|
579.18 | | NRPUR::DEATON | | Tue Dec 19 1989 14:45 | 5 |
| There *are* mods available to get past some of these limitations - most
notable is the one made by E!. I don't have any details on it, though.
Dan
|
579.19 | I recommend it, if the price is right. | TORQUE::BAILEY | Constants aren't. Variables don't. | Tue Dec 19 1989 18:44 | 13 |
| The E! mod is well worth it, if you can get it. I'm not sure
many dealers are carrying it any more.
I typed in a lengthy review some time ago, but I can't seem to find it.
By the way, the most I ever saw out of my unmodified DX7 was velocity
= 109.
I still like my DX7 very much, especially in light of the 6000 free
patches that I have. I don't forsee selling it any time soon,
and I have never had any trouble with it, in 5 years of mileage.
Steph
|