T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
558.1 | Yamaha breath controller won't blow you away | DECWET::MITCHELL | | Thu Oct 30 1986 17:15 | 14 |
| I bought a Yamaha breath controller as a gift once. What a piece of
CRAP! Anyway, this is the way I think it works. As you may have
noticed, it is just a small plastic doohickey with a tiny hole at one
end and a wire leading from it. When you blow into the thing, it
hisses like a dog whistle. I believe there is an ultrasonic pickup at
one end that "listens" to this noise. The harder you blow the louder
the hiss. This voltage is then amplified, rectified, smoothed, and
used as a control voltage.
I don't know if this is how it works for sure, but from all
indications, that seems to be the case. Needless to say, it doesn't
work very well. Stay away from it.
John M.
|
558.2 | Out of Breath ? | MINDER::KENT | | Fri Oct 31 1986 03:32 | 7 |
|
What it the BC intended for? I have one that came with the KX88
but apart from setting it up to do pitch wheel type modulation to
keep both hands free I can't really see the point. What do Yam intend
you to do with it?
Paul.
|
558.3 | Breath Controller Sucks | JAWS::COTE | It's a strange reaction... | Fri Oct 31 1986 08:12 | 22 |
|
I think Todd's theory regarding a piezo is probably the closest,
if not the actual, way it works. The end is terminated in a 3 wire
1/8" stereo-type (tip, ring, sleeve) connector.
I threw mine on a DVM last night. A good "blast" into the thing
produced a voltage up to about 150mv between tip and ring.
Use of the unit seems to take over parts (if not all) of the EG
of those operators set to respond to it.
The hole in the sucker forces you to keep blowing for the duration
of the note, hence modulating the amplitude for the duration. Blocking
the hole with your finger makes the thing *TONS* easier to play.
I think it would be better if it offered more resistance to you.
I'm a pretty heavy smoker and a couple minutes with this thing sends
me to hyper-vent city...
I'm not impressed either... Luckily it was cheap.
Edd
|
558.5 | See D.Dreher for Telephone synths... | JAWS::COTE | It's a strange reaction... | Fri Oct 31 1986 08:43 | 21 |
|
Ring
|
v
----------- --- --v-- -----
| | | | \ ^
Sleeve | | | | / <-- Tip v 1/8"
----------- --- --^-- -----
^ ^
\ /
Non - conductive
TOm, when you were 11, what names did you learn these parts by?
If your still confused, give me a ring. I have a tip for you. I
promise there's nothing up my sleeve.
:^)
Edd
|
558.6 | Designed for Blow Hards? | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Fri Oct 31 1986 11:15 | 10 |
| The nominal purpose of a breath controller is to allow the sort
of expression typical of wind instruments, in a way more natural
to wind players than keyboard velocity and aftertouch. If you're
not a wind player it must feel as unnatural as a keyboard feels
to them. The Yamaha may just be a poor implementation. I learned
this when I was 37.
len (again, not an expert in this subject, but admitting this is
good for my soul).
|
558.7 | I don't think that its a piezo junk | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri Oct 31 1986 11:29 | 19 |
| Good. It's piezo. Thanks Edd. It'll be fun to hook up a simmons pad and
see what happens. This way I can create a good Bass drum or snare drum patch
on the DX and set up the appropriate BC parameters and voila! Geez, does
the BC cause the DX to send MIDI data? Wow, a simmons to MIDI converter!!!!!
Just what I've always wanted!
The breath controller can allow you to do LFO modulation, and can also
allow you to control the operator envelopes as discussed in .0. This
means that you can control timbre and/or volume as well. Not bad!
It does have its uses.
Edd is right about the hole in the thing. I strongly recommend putting
a piece of tape over the hole. This way you don't have to blow into
the thing - you just apply pressure using the air you have in your mouth.
Todd who_will_experiment_and_post.
PS: anyone have a good piezo foot pedal? How about a microphone that's piezo?
[a piezo tweeter hooked up as a backwards?] The possiblities are endless!
|
558.8 | Breathless | MINDER::KENT | | Fri Oct 31 1986 12:08 | 5 |
|
But if you cover up the whole how will you breath.
Paul.
|
558.9 | That nasal sound | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri Oct 31 1986 13:30 | 4 |
| > But if you cover up the whole how will you breath.
Don't tell me you bought the nose controller too!
|
558.10 | | DYO780::SCHAFER | Sir Loin of Beef | Fri Oct 31 1986 15:00 | 7 |
| Re: .8, .9
I think he meant tape the hole on the controller, not the hole(s) in
your head. I learned about this when I was VERY young ... Of course,
I'm no expert on the subject ... 8-}}
brad the ridiculous
|
558.11 | | REGENT::SCHMIEDER | | Fri Oct 31 1986 15:39 | 9 |
| I mentioned a jam I had in an earlier note with a celtic musician, formerly a
classical french horn player, who used a DX7 with a breath controller. The guy
had incredible technique and sounded exactly like natural horns when using the
breath controller with horn patches. Wasn't just the DX7 sounds, because I
heard the patches both ways. You have to coordinate the tongueing with the
fingering on the keyboard to get it right, apparantly.
Mark
|
558.12 | This is important... | JAWS::COTE | Luckless pedestrian... | Fri Oct 31 1986 16:06 | 3 |
| How old was he when he learned this?
Edd
|
558.13 | I'm hungry; get me a peiza... | COROT::CERTO | | Fri Oct 31 1986 17:02 | 13 |
| Some of the better earphones (can you say "mono") as used for a
portable radio (something that came before walkmans) are piezo's.
They can be used as a simple microphone; just connect it up.
They are flesh colored with a screw-in clear plastic earpiece and
a twisted (usually) flesh colored cord. Unscrew the earpiece and
inside is an aluminum diaphram with a wire or something cemented
through the center.
Radio Shack probably has em for two or three bucks.
Fredric DVINCI::CERTO
|
558.14 | I'm a carrier | JON::LOW | aka the NULL process | Fri Oct 31 1986 17:20 | 7 |
| You guys are all very young, and you haven't learned anything!
I, on the other hand, am developing a dotage transducer, with
which I shall endeavor to modulate my decay.
Yours with sustain,
David
|
558.15 | but breath is "live" not sequenced! | GNERIC::ROSS | untitled | Mon Nov 03 1986 09:05 | 25 |
|
Linear, exponential, or F(x_sub_yamaha) decay, david?
Is that in reference to lung capacity for exhaling
through a b.c.?
Great, live performance anyone? all you have to do is:
Right hand on one kbd
left hand on another
right foot on sustain,volume, or midi_related switchs/pedals
left foot playing bass pedals
a gismo in the mouth doing something
your nose playing the drum machine?
Whats left? "Air-drum" transducers crazyglued to your elbows.
eyelids and ears (if you can wiggle yours) may be capable of
conversion to midi info. And knees. Ah, Ive got the ultimate:
a "private-parts"-to-midi-converter.
What was the subject of this note again?
ron
|
558.16 | Time to start up those trumpet lessons again... | ELGAR::KLOSTERMAN | Stevie K | Mon Nov 03 1986 09:25 | 6 |
|
The trouble with breath controllers is due to not being a wind player I
bet. I tried a friends DX7 with the controller and didn't have too much trouble
at all. It requires the same kind of air control as playing wind instruments or
singing.
|
558.17 | | REGENT::SCHMIEDER | | Mon Nov 03 1986 15:48 | 11 |
| Good to hear you say that Steve. Now I'm more convinced than ever that I want
one. Hopefully without departing from the subject of the original note, I
hope someone could briefly answer ("yes"/"no") whether the FB01 supports the
BC input or not.
The guy I jammed with was in his late thirties and had just recently bought
the breath controller. He played French Horn in the Syracuse (?) Symphony
for several years, though...
Mark
|
558.18 | yes and no. | JON::ROSS | BOZONICS | Mon Nov 03 1986 17:47 | 7 |
|
The FB01 supports breath as a voice Pitch Modulation Destination.
(not exacly what we want...) See note in 463.83 or so, which
I'm just about to write...
ron
|
558.19 | AC or DC ? | KLOV04::COLLINS | Steve @ Clonmel Ireland | Mon Dec 15 1986 09:31 | 13 |
|
I'd also like to try experimenting with the breath contoller I/P .
I have a DX100 but no breath controller (and am not tempted to buy
one after all I've heard in this file) I was thinking of using a
paddle arrangement attached to a potentiometer ..
Edd can you or someone else tell me if the "150 mv" produced by the
breath controller is A.C or D.C ?
Thanx
Steve...
|
558.20 | DC | JAWS::COTE | Go ahead, take your cheapest shot... | Mon Dec 15 1986 10:00 | 1 |
|
|
558.21 | Home-brew Breath controller | AKOV68::EATOND | Where d' heck a' we! | Tue Jul 12 1988 10:13 | 29 |
| RE < Note 558.19 by KLOV04::COLLINS "Steve @ Clonmel Ireland" >
I know you pop in now and again, Steve, so I hope you catch this note
again. Did you ever build the alternate controller for the breath control
port of your DX-100?
The following is an open question to any or all the technodweebs in
residence...
I've been toying with this idea for some time, but would like some
advise on my current plans (get it? 'current' plans... (ahem)).
I have a Korg MS-10 that sports a pretty elaborate patch panel for
re-routing things. Among other things, it allows you to control the filter,
or the pitch, or the LFO amount via foot pedal, or the multi-purpose wheel,
etc. In the never-ending quest to simplify live playing, I've wanted to
build a breath controller for these routings.
The voltage is +/- 5 volts.
If I were to act on someone's suggestion of taking one of those flesh
colored earplugs, attatching a tube of some kind to blow into, amplifying the
voltage somehow to get at least the positive side of the 5 volt requirement,
do you think it would work? Any caveats? Could anyone help me with the
amplification circuit design? (I was simply going to try a simple op-amp
circuit to start with)
Dan
|
558.22 | I actually use mine fairly often!! | JAWS::COTE | yawn... | Tue Jul 12 1988 10:27 | 4 |
| Serious question: Why would you want to go through the gymnastics
of building a controller when you can buy a BC-1 for ~$30???
Edd
|
558.23 | three reasons... | AKOV68::EATOND | Where d' heck a' we! | Tue Jul 12 1988 10:38 | 12 |
| RE < Note 558.22 by JAWS::COTE "yawn..." >
For one thing, the earphone thingy is only $1.49, and the related
amplification circuitry I'd expect would bring the total cost to less than
$10. Secondly, I'm not sure it'll work for the MS-10. I'd rather not spend
thirty bucks for a non-returnable item when I'm less than confident of the
results. (BTW, no-one that I know still sells the BC-1, they all have the
BC-2, and all want more than $30 for it). Finally, I'd appreciate the
education I'd get out of building it meself.
Dan
|
558.24 | Do you mind if anyone actually SEES you using this? | MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS | A wizard is someone who's been doing something for a week longer | Tue Jul 12 1988 11:27 | 34 |
| A couple of problems:
The "earphone thingy" you're referring to comes in two flavors:
a dynamic one and a crystal one. I haven't seen a crystal one
in years, but it's the kind you need. The dynamic ones only produce
a voltage when the diaphragm moves, not when the diaphragm is
stationary-but-under-pressure. Second problem is that the crystal
type is VERY high output impedance; zillions of ohms. You'll need
a very high impedance op-amp to get a decent DC signal out of it.
A TL082 is probably enough. Third problem is that those crystal
earphones dissolve in saliva. :-(
How about this instead: Take an orange juice can. In the bottom put a
flashlight lamp and a CdS cell, shielded from each other by a soda
straw 'round the flashlight lamp. Stretch a piece of baloon or other
elastomer across the mouth of the can. Halfway from edge to center on
the balloon membrane glue a small piece of mirror (or aluminum foil).
Punch a hole in the side of the can to blow into (or to glue a rubber
tube into.
Light goes up the soda straw, and bounces off the mirror.
Depending on the angle of the mirror, it either hits the CdS cell
square-on, or only partly, or misses. That's how you get
a proportional resistance out (CdS cell resistance varies with
light intensity).
You may want to flip the assembly inside out at first so that
you can adjust the light and CdS cell without taking the balloon
off of the can. But such is life...
A cat-food can would be kind of neat to use, too. A real punk-rock
look.
|
558.25 | Some refinement necessary | AKOV68::EATOND | Where d' heck a' we! | Tue Jul 12 1988 12:11 | 15 |
| RE < Note 558.24 by MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS >
Thanks, Bill.
I think I'd need to refine the oj can/balloon idea, as I'd think there'd
be little control over the actual resistance that would be sent...
What if I were able to find the crystal-type earphone? Couldn't I just
set some kind of diaphragm in front of the crystal to keep it from coming into
contact with the saliva?
Or for that matter, would some kind of a microphone be better?
Dan
|
558.26 | BC1 gives a 'zipper' effect | NRPUR::DEATON | | Wed Nov 22 1989 15:29 | 15 |
| Has anyone else ever used one of these breath controllers?
I was playing around with one on a DX100 MIDI's to the TX81Z and had a
nice tone coming from the BC Trombone sound (ROM patch).
BUT
It seems that now, instead of sending a nice gradual signal from the
breath controller, it sends the voltage in steps, making it very unnatural
when you try for a slow attack.
Is mine BC1 broken? Is it an easy fix?
Dan
|
558.27 | BCAFU | WEFXEM::COTE | OK, who wants a Tangwich??? | Wed Nov 22 1989 16:20 | 16 |
| I've got one and have never noticed any zipperization, even when I used
it for a slow, bluesy, back-porch harmonica on John Mellencamp's tune
"Small Town"...
I submit yours is broke.
They are easy to fix. There's only one part that can break (the entire
unit), so ya just swap it out...
I imagine some zipp'in is inevitable. The BC-1 output is an analog
voltage, so it must be converted into discrete steps. I suppose that
would cause a zipper effect, but I've never heard it.
Sorry...
Edd
|
558.28 | might have to clean it out ... ecch ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 235-8176, 223-3326 | Wed Nov 22 1989 21:53 | 4 |
| Might also check the sensitivity setting on the TZ. Could be too high,
maybe?
Steve
|