T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
527.1 | FB01 sounds good | NIMBUS::DAVIS | | Thu Oct 02 1986 09:56 | 7 |
| Haven't seen an FB01 yet but there's a review in the new Keyboard.
Sounds like more bang for your buck with the one problem being that
you need a computer (or possibly another synth?) to program your
own sounds.
Rob
|
527.2 | Look closely | SCOTIA::RHODES | | Thu Oct 02 1986 10:33 | 24 |
| Beside the keyboard, there are differences between the DX100 and the FB01.
Yes, they are both 4 operator sound generators, but from what I understand,
the FB01 is based on the CX5M architecture which differs from the DX100
architecture (I don't know what the exact differences are).
The FB01 is multitimbral, the DX100 is not.
The DX100 is programmable w/o a computer, the FB01 is not.
I'm not sure whether the FB01 has a pitch envelope, but the DX100 does not
(the DX21 does tho - I thought the only difference between the DX21 and the
DX100 was the key size and key split ability. Boy was I wrong. The DX21
also has a stereo chorus!)
Does the FB01 respond to velocity info?
One last thought: Since my studio is too cluttered with stuff to use it
(remodeling some of the house), I have been able to continue to
play the DX100 by ploping it in my lap down in the living room
and porting it through the stereo. I think it weighs 7 pounds.
Also, when I go on vacation, I pack it up and bring it with me -
it can even be run off batteries and monitored with headphones.
So the DX100 wins the portability contest...
Todd.
|
527.3 | DX100/FB01 | BEAGLE::MULELID | | Thu Oct 02 1986 14:30 | 12 |
| RE:-1
The DX100 is suposed to be the same as DX27 not DX21.
As far as I know both FB01 and DX100 respond to toutch data, so
that far they should be the same, I also tought that the programing
should be the same but I am not sure. I have a DX100 already and
like it a lot. Hopefully this week or next week I will receive a
FB01 that I have ordered from Paris if it does not get blown up
before they send it. I can have a look in the manual then and post
what I find about programing and other stuff of interest.
Svein.
|
527.4 | the DX touch | BARNUM::RHODES | | Thu Oct 02 1986 15:39 | 8 |
| > As far as I know both FB01 and DX100 respond to toutch data, so
I don't think the DX100 responds to touch data, just velocity. I guess
if you have a smart controller, it can send touch data as modulation
or pitch bend data though and the DX100 will respond accordingly...
Todd.
|
527.5 | Sorry my mistake. | BEAGLE::MULELID | | Thu Oct 02 1986 18:42 | 7 |
| Sorry my fault, I mixed up velocity and touch. Still when the FB01
arrives I will try to find the differences DX100/DX27/DX21/FB01.
Thanks for the correction Todd.
Svein.
|
527.6 | The DX dictionary | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri Oct 03 1986 10:48 | 8 |
| No problem Svein. Geez, someone who knows about all the 4-operator
DX's (DX100,DX27,DX21,FB01) is a valuable resource. I'm looking forward
to your contrasting these units...
Thanks...
Todd.
|
527.7 | I got mine ! | MINDER::KENT | | Tue Oct 07 1986 04:36 | 11 |
|
Well Guys I went out and bought an FB01 yesterday and I'me pretty
impressed. The unit is based on the SFg05 tone module which is based
on the DX21/27/100 4 operator tone module (quote YAMAHA). It does
everything the book say's and all in such a small box. I'me not
sure I'me capable of a Fehskens type review but if there is a need
I'll post one here.
Paul.
|
527.8 | Yes please. | BEAGLE::MULELID | | Tue Oct 07 1986 08:25 | 9 |
| OK, please give us a review, it will be nice reading while I'm
waiting for mine. Already I see a big difference in the price that
the different shops charge for it ranging from 2500 FF (which is
what I pay) and up to 3100 FF which I think is the list price.
I hope I will get mine soon.
Svein.
|
527.9 | I know you just got it, but... | BARNUM::RHODES | | Tue Oct 07 1986 09:53 | 4 |
| RE: .7 Paul, does it have chorusing? Does it have a pitch envelope?
Todd.
|
527.10 | gotta get one | GNERIC::ROSS | Bb9add6/Eb bass | Tue Oct 07 1986 10:08 | 9 |
|
Clear up the confusion about velocity and after touch (pressure)
response(s) too, if possible.
How are you programming it? I hear that in addition to the 240
presets, there are 96 user-editable programs. True?
RR
|
527.11 | Glug Glug | MINDER::KENT | | Wed Oct 08 1986 08:06 | 46 |
|
I knew it was a mistake to announce my latest aquisition this early.
Let's just say that my unit has now been in my posession for 2 days.
I requried it to add some more FM voices to my pallette, the 200
or so that you get with the box are great. I will eventually program
the machine with my CX5 when Yamaha produce the software (quote
from my supplier:- "next month or so but don't hold your breath").
I auditioned the unit with a KX88 keyboard and it played softer
when I "carressed" it and louder when I bashed it. I don't have
a velocity sensitive keyboard at the moment, this is next on my list.
Any ideas anyone? I can't decide whether to go for another synth
or a mother keyboard.
The FB01 does all that I wanted. From a voice programming point of view
it is exactly the same as a DX21 except there is an extras parameter
which relates to the key velocity and I think the volume enevlope
however more on this when the Yam software is available.
As a straight performance expander the ability to split a number
of performance settings along the keyboard must be great however
I am unlikey to use it in this mode. I will use it sequenced from
my CX5.
I also borrowed a Qx7 from the shop just on a try out basis. I must
say that from a user point of view this thing was a nightmare. I
know that Edd has one so perhaps I could solicit an answer to the
following from him. I use my sequencer as a songwriting notebook
I start with a basic Idea and build from there. e.g. first 8 bars
of each instrument. Chain this to itself then add say a middle 8.
On the Qx7, if I already have the first 16 bars recorded and placed
on track2, how can I build up the next 8 bars and listen to the
instruments playing together, because track 2 is taken up by the
previous 16 bars and I need to copy the first instrument to the
end of this 16 bars before I can record the 2nd.
Do you understand this problem statement ? If not let me know.
Confused of Manchester.
|
527.12 | Gotta run.... | JAWS::COTE | Hey! I can't play these things! | Wed Oct 08 1986 09:26 | 34 |
| I think I understand the problem....
You have 16 bars on track 2. These bars consist of 1 or more tracks
(say a piano and a bass track). Now you want to do X number of bars
starting with 17, but have no place to put the 1st pass because
track 2 has the first 16 on it.
You have 2 choices...
1. (Slow, tedious and precise) Leave the 1st 16 bars
on track 2. Start the sequencer in real time record
and listen to track 2. Start playing on bar 17.
When finished, listen to both tracks. If happy,
*track down*. This will have the same effect as
chaining, with the advantage being you can listen
to the parts consequetively. Had you started
recording on Track 1 measure 1, you would not
be able to listen to the new part following the
old. This method affords you the advantage of
quantization, if your timing is sloppy. (like mine)
Option 2. (fast, but you better be good) Move the contents
of track 2 to track 1 and then to the temporary
buffer (Job D2). Now you can start playing on
measure 1. DO NOT QUANTIZE!!!!!!! When you quantize
track 1, the unchanged data is shipped to the temp
buffer *DESTROYING* any data residing there. (This
may seem like a bit of a hassle (and it is) but
it does give you the oppurtunity to get your original
data back if you Q to a bad value.
SYSTEM GOING DOWN! WILL FINISH LATER...
Edd
|
527.13 | Ok, we're back... | JAWS::COTE | Hey! I can't play these things! | Wed Oct 08 1986 09:52 | 35 |
| False alarm...
OK, like I said, if you have any data in the temp buffer, it will
be destroyed by quantizing, so anything you record on track 1
had better be tight. If it is, move it to track 2. Lay down the
second part on track 1. Listen to both together. If happy, track
down (Job B3). Now move the data out of the temporary buffer to
track 1. Exchange (Job B1) tracks 1 and 2. The first sixteen bars
are now on track 2 and bars 17 - n are on 1. Chain 'em together....
If your working in step mode, things are somewhat easier. As you'll
never have to quantize, you can just move finished measures to the
temp buffer.
Un-advertised feature. The QX allows you to start recording in the
middle of a song in real time mode. Heres how....
Lets assume you want to add those next 8 bars to the end of the
first 16. The first 16 are on track 2 and your all set to record
on track 1. Start record mode while listening to track 2, but don't
do anything, just let it play until track 2 stops at the end of
bar 16. Now hit pause and back up a couple bars. If you now press
record and Pause/Continue the machine will start recording from
the point you backed up to. Play you next part. If you bungle,
hit pause and back up a couple bars and hit record and continue.
This method allows you to start recording a part in the middle of
a song. I saw nothing in the manual about this feature, and it's
probably the one I use the most.
If I do say so myself, I've got this beast mastered. I hope I answered
your question. Lemme know if I can be of any more help.....
Edd
|
527.14 | More Yams than A | MINDER::KENT | | Wed Oct 08 1986 14:48 | 7 |
|
Well thank you sir, I'll try the last one tonight. But all this sure
makes my CX5 system look simple. I'd also be interested in how you
store patch changes. Perhaps we should move my ineptitude to another
note.
Paul.
|
527.15 | Simple enuf!!! | JAWS::COTE | Hey! I can't play these things! | Wed Oct 08 1986 15:08 | 30 |
| Patch changes? Easy as pie....
Although it is unnecessary to do so, I highly recommend putting
your patch changes in last. This gives you the oppurtunity to
change your mind later...
Anyhow, to the QX a patch change is just another message. I always
enter mine in step mode, so they happen *precisely* where I want
them to. Just press the button that addresses the patch you want
at the apprpriate time and the sequencer will go to that address
(address:== bank and voice) upon playback.
*IMPORTANT* The QX refers to the address, *NOT* the patch. If you
nomally have, say, a guitar patch at address B2-V7 (Bank 2, voice
7) and change it to something else, your gonna get the something
else at playback time.
*HOT TIP* Always have a patch change as the first event in a song.
That way, you'll always start on the right voice.
I even use the QX's "midi echo" (Job C1) as a way of playing either
my Mirage or JX from the DX. I also store patch changes for the
Roland on it.
*'NOTHER HOT TIP!* Use of midi-echo mode will cut in half the number
of simutaneous voices available on a DX. The DX 21 has 8 oscillators.
Split mode = 4 to each side. Split plus "echo on" equals 2 to each
side, maximum. They're getting played from 2 places....
Edd
|
527.16 | From The QX SIG | MINDER::KENT | | Thu Oct 09 1986 04:33 | 20 |
|
Well Edd what can I say. This is a real justification for having
this notes file running. I had alrady packed the Qx7 ready to ship
it back to the shop. I dug it out of the packing again last night
to try the things you suggested and lo and behold !!!
I really can't understand why Yam didn't publish this method in
the userguide. How did you find it. Thanks for the info on the patch
changes I have however on more problem which I am not sure is fixable.
On the Fb01 I have 7 banks of 48 voices each. The only straight
Midi keyboard I have is the Cz1000. When I change patches on the
CZ it has no effect on the Bank number on the Fb at all and worse
still The voices in the CZ seem to be numbered 1-16 33-48 etc which
means that I can't get at any of the voices in the 17-32 range at
all. Any ideas?
Yours Strandedly Paul.
|
527.17 | Now, it gets deep.... | JAWS::COTE | Hey! I can't play these things! | Thu Oct 09 1986 09:51 | 73 |
| I can only guess at a couple things...
1. In order for me to transmit patch-change commands from my DX to
the JX (via the QX) I must have...
A. Midi Echo (Job C6?) set to on. Note that this is
only necessary to change patches in real time. If
your intent is only to store a patch change command
in a sequence, it can be set to off. MIDI-echo
directs all data from the IN port to the OUT port.
B. Chanell and System exclusive data set properly
on the DX. I forget what the proper set-up is, but
I do know one is set to "off" and the other is set
to "on". (I think it's chanell info "off" and system
info "on", but don't hold me to it. I set it once
and never went back.
C. Should go without saying. Are your chanells set properly?
Make sure device X is set to receive on the same chanell
the data intended for it was transmitted on. (Don't
laugh, I got beat-up on this a couple times!)
As far as the way different units have their banks set up, I'm afraid
your on your own. My DX has 4X8, but they're arranged logically
as 2X16. The JX has 4X16. The patch addresses of the DX map 1:1 to
the first 2 banks of the JX, but I have yet to be able to access
the 3rd and 4th JX banks. And to make matters more confusing, I
have the Mirage placed between the 2 in the MIDI network. The Mirage
responds to commands sent from the DX, but I haven't taken the time
to really figure out how to control it (Mirage) via MIDI. Samples
take about 15 seconds to load, so I'm not really saving much by
doing it over the buss.
A couple of other things on the QX... Deleting a measure will insert
an "all notes off" message at the end of the previous bar. While
this does prevent stuck notes, it also prevents you from removing
middle bars in sustaining notes...
ex...
| o | o | x x |
|:== bar line
o:== whole note
x:== half note
Suppose the first three notes above had been tied together. (2.5
measures of one note followed by .5 measures of the second.) You
cannot delete measure 2 in the hopes of getting 1.5 measures follwed
by .5. You'll get 1 measure of note, a half rest, and a half note.
You also cannot start a measure with a tie. (Using the above example,
you could get the desired results by deleting the first measure,
but this would only work if it contained *only* whole notes. Had
measure 1 consisted of 2 half notes, with the second tied to the
second measure your sequence whould be
half note, half note, half rest, half note.
Not having ever used any other sequencer, I can't vouch for the
relative ease of use of the QX. But with a little bit of planning
I've sequenced stuff like "Sirius/Eye In The Sky" by Alan Parsons,
"Four Brothers" by Jimmy Giuffre and "Sonata #2 for Piano and Violin"
by Mozart.
Good luck. Lemme know if you find anything on changing to the non-
Yamaha address banks.
Glad to help!
Edd
|
527.18 | Just Buy an "Add-16" Box! | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu Oct 09 1986 12:32 | 9 |
| re .16 - I think you're stuck unless you get some sort of outboard
remapping device or a different keyboard. The "holes" in the CZ-101
patch address space (MIDI program change numbers 16-31, 48-63, etc.)
are there because the CZ-101 uses the same memory organization as
its bigger brothers, which store twice as many patches. I think this
was done to make the memory cartridges compatible, and it is a pain.
len.
|
527.19 | More Thanks and grovelling | MINDER::KENT | | Thu Oct 09 1986 12:56 | 12 |
|
Thanks again for your help Edd and sorry to everyone else for boring
you with this saga. I think the base problem lies with the voice
groupings on the CZ1000. I wonder if I can do the patch changes with
the TR505 or the RX21.
I think you hit the nail on the head with your statement re "A bit
of planning" The beauty of the computer based system is that you
don't have to plan ahead to much.
Thanks Again
Paul.
|
527.20 | | GNERIC::ROSS | 2B + ~(2B)... | Fri Oct 10 1986 10:47 | 7 |
|
Stop grovelling, Paul. Myself, and I'm sure others are
interested in the information, techniques, etc.. that
are coming out of "confusion resolution" discussions.
Ron
|
527.21 | More CZ-1000 Problems... | 4TRACK::LAQUERRE | | Wed Dec 20 1989 12:49 | 30 |
|
Well, this is the only note under the keyword CZ1000...
I've had a CZ1000 as the keyboard in my modest home setup:
Fostex X15 4-track
Acoustic Guitar, Electric, and Bass
Rockman Soloist
TR505
MidiVerb II
The CZ1000 has been a workhorse for me, but last week it started acting up. At
first I could get sound back by giving it one swift punch across the back. But
last night it konked out while I was in the middle of laying down an organ
track. Can't get any sound out of it now, except for a high hissing sound,
sometimes a grunting static as well. Possibly a nice effect on a song about
jungle living, but I don't know...
NOW what do I do?? Sure, sounds like a great excuse to buy that Roland D20
I've been thinking about, but well...I can't afford it. Just bought a new
house.
Do I bring it in to a shop around here--Daddy's is the closest, although
their repair shop is in Salem. Or should I try to call a Casio repair center?
Is there such a thing as a Casio repair center?
How can I convince my wife that it's time I invested in a "real" keyboard? Oops.
that question just slipped in. I *know* we can't afford it. Really. I do.
Peter
|
527.22 | When in doubt, rip it out!! | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Wed Dec 20 1989 13:08 | 19 |
| Does it have a headphone output? Same grundge there???
Does it have a magic key-stroke sequence to re-init?? Try that??
Open it up? Look for something stupid?? (Broken wire to audio out?)
Wiggle some wires? Tap things lightly with a plastic screwdriver??
Do it work over MIDI??
I've gotten to the point where the first thing I do is open the
offending unit up and check it out. The only thing I haven't been
able to repair was my MKS-30 which needed a custom IC. (And even that
was easy for the repair shop as I documented all my diag's...They went
right to the problem.)
I can field strip an HR16 in under a minute...
Edd
|
527.23 | Re-seat all connectors and cross your fingers | EVETPU::EIRIKUR | The best of tines, the worst of tines | Wed Dec 20 1989 14:51 | 15 |
| With any luck, this one should be fixable ala Edd's suggestions in the last
response. I'll add my own 2 cents: Open it up and re-seat all the internal
connectors. That means unplug and re-plug everything. I would do this to all
inter-board connections and all board-to-world connections. Especially since
hitting the unit used to fix it, you may simply have a tarnished connector
somewhere.
P.S. At this time of year, take static precautions. For this type of unit
that can be as basic as making sure that you hold onto some metal part of the
unit that is "ground" with one hand whilst working on it. Of course you have
the unit unplugged from EVERYTHING while doing this.
Eirikur
|
527.24 | | 4TRACK::LAQUERRE | | Thu Dec 21 1989 10:50 | 23 |
|
Okay, this helps. I did take the back off the unit and looked things over
and nothing "obvious" jumped out at me. Then, I lost my nerve a bit and
put it back together. It worked for a short time and then died again.
This problem affects both the Line Out and the Headphone Out. I can select
different patches and change parameters (the LED responds with the changes)
even when the thing is lying their dead.
When it came back, each time all my own sounds were still available so I
don't think it's a software problem. I think I'll spend some time on the
connections as you suggested. Must be somewhere close to where the signal
heads over toward the out jacks, kind of late in the stream. Also,
one of the first times it happened, it started working again right after
I inserted a sound cartridge. So, I'll also look in that area.
Good comment on the static--I've been experiencing a lot of that
recently--it can actually hurt when I drag my foot accidentally across the
carpet with the headphones on--ouch!
Peter
|
527.25 | Gopher it... | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Thu Dec 21 1989 11:15 | 7 |
| You're on the right track.
I'd open it up, turn it on, and start gently taping things with a
plastic screwdriver to try and induce the problem. Don't forget to
tap the wires also, not just the components.
Edd
|
527.26 | Watch out for static! | GUESS::YERAZUNIS | There's no force like brute force! | Fri Dec 22 1989 14:26 | 20 |
| Before you do that, go to your onsite FE and borrow an anti-static kit,
and have him show you how to use it.
If you don't have an onsite FE (or he doesn't have a kit to spare)
go to Radio Shack and get an anti-static wrist band, and clip yourself
to the metal case (disconnected from everything else) before you open
the bugger up.
Also run the humidifier/vaporizer for a few hours before you open the
case up, remove all synthetic-fiber clothing, and do the work on a
bare (unvarnished) wood (or, even better, metal) tabletop.
[For the ultimate in static protection, wear the wrist-band/groundwire
and _nothing_ else... I actually bought some "install-em-yourself" PC
RAM chips once that this was the "preferred-best" procedure. They did
make a comment about "be real careful about solder dribbles if you
do this". :-) They also recommended covering the tabletop with aluminum
foil- seems bizarre, but the RAMs still work fine, 4 years later. ]
-Bill
|
527.27 | | JUNDA::Schuchard | Love them death beep's | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:50 | 12 |
|
Not sure this has anything to do with it, but last night, my
well used cz101 (which i got from rodney who got from len) locked
up in strange fashion - i could not affect any change parameters.
Power up and down did not do it. Finally, and regretably as i
had not saved the weekend patches to nvr i hit the re-init all
presets button. This re-enabled the beast, but broke my spirit
and i quit for the night.
bs
|
527.28 | Authorized Service Centers | 4TRACK::LAQUERRE | | Wed Jan 03 1990 10:49 | 19 |
|
Well, with help from you folks, I built up my confidence and opened the sucker.
I thought I was on to something when I was able to induce the problem
(sometimes) by tapping one of the boards. Unfortunately, that particular board
holds about five chips and about 800 tiny solder connections (slight
exaggeration, but you get the point). The problem could be anywhere on that
board.
So, my next step was to get on the phone to Casio. Using the numbers listed
by Alex Conn back in the Manufacturer's info note, I was able to get the number
of a Casio-authorized service center in South Windsor, CT. They're called
PROSOUND and it's going to cost me some money to mail the CZ-1000 down there
and have it fixed. Their hourly rates remind me of the rates mechanics get
at new car dealerships, but they are recommend by Casio for synth repair.
Anyone out there have any experience with PROSOUND in Connecticut? Any similar
experiences getting synths repaired at "authorized" service centers?
Peter
|
527.29 | Good start! Keep going now! | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Wed Jan 03 1990 12:09 | 10 |
| If it were me, I'd spend a little bit more time tapping and wiggling
wires before shipping it to anyone. My experience has been these
problems are usually something mechanical, like a bad solder joint.
My Mirage failed once and I found the bad joint by examining the
power supply board with a 45mm ocular.
The problem with these type of failures is you end up paying someone
else to do the legwork. I'd like to see you save your cash...
Edd
|
527.30 | There's a bright side to everything... | 4TRACK::LAQUERRE | | Thu Jan 04 1990 13:24 | 37 |
|
Well, Edd. I'll say this much. You've helped me "clarify" the situation. With
your renewed encouragement fresh on my mind, I opened up the CZ-1000 again.
This time, I even removed several screws and lifted up one of the boards,
looking for loose connectsions and such.
Well, I couldn't find anything that resembled a problem, so I put it back
together again. Somewhere along the way, I must have touched something I
shouldn't have because now this baby's got some artificial intelligence! I mean
lights are flashing and strange characters are flashing in the display window.
I did good...
Now I can send it my authorized Casio repair center, fully assured that I'm
doing the right thing. Without this latest happening I would have mailed it
out, paid a lot of money, and always wondered if I could have fixed it myself.
Now, I can sleep better knowing very well that I couldn't! :)
But seriously, Edd, thanks for trying to help. I have a feeling that my
opening the box didn't really cause the latest symptoms--this problem had
progressed from a momentary dropout while playing to a full-scale system failure
all on its own over a couple of weeks. This latest light show may just be the
final stage in its degeneration!
For those of you wondering, I did try re-initializing, but that had no affect.
Only a certified repairman can find this one!
I'll be sure to give a review of PROSOUND's service when this is all over.
I'm still considering, however, putting the CZ aside and putting the
potential repair money toward a future purchase. The only question is whether
I can do without a keyboard for that long a time...
...now if I use two-part harmonies in place of my
string parts for a while...
Peter
|
527.31 | ouch. | WEFXEM::COTE | Call *who* Ishmael??? | Thu Jan 04 1990 13:49 | 9 |
| Um, I, ah, I, oh my...
Well, sorry about the death of your machine. Hope ya don't hold me
responsible!! ;^)
...the good side is you've got a HARD failure now. So much easier to
troubleshoot than some intermittant booger...
Edd
|
527.32 | | 4TRACK::LAQUERRE | | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:58 | 12 |
|
> Hope ya don't hold me responsible!! ;^)
No way. I'm the one that opened it up. If it had worked out and I'd found a
loose wire or something and saved $100, you'd be a hero right now.
Unfortunately, This thing was heading for some serious problems anyway!
These things have a way of working out--this may be my motivation to start
really planning the future of my home studio and to start saving some serious
money toward a *major* purchase...
Peter
|