T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
358.1 | Cheesy Effects Menu | CANYON::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support Group | Wed May 14 1986 20:32 | 13 |
| 50's slapback echo on vocals.
60's cheesy phase on guitars (still heard on Muzak).
-remember the Mutron?
70's extra bass drum overdubs, disco flavor.
76 on - Eventide harmonizers on everything
80's metronomic drum machines. Simmons fills.
I agree on the DX7 already being a cliche. No matter WHAT patch,
I think I recognize it.
However, I *like* digital reverb. Guess I was tired of flat
productions. Good idea for a note.
KMII
|
358.2 | One for the tapes | MINDER::KENT | | Thu May 15 1986 05:07 | 4 |
| re.-1
You missed out the late 60's mellotrons.
|
358.3 | | UGOTIT::CHARBONNEAU | | Thu May 15 1986 09:31 | 3 |
| How about the Theramin......
Now that was an obscure device!
|
358.4 | Throwing vocals in a food processor | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed | Thu May 15 1986 09:38 | 10 |
| Another "electrocliche" is getting to be sampled vocal bits that
get sliced and diced and rolled together. Same thing goes for sampled
violin section sounds which just do a "burst" of sound, like on
"A View to a Kill" by Duran Duran.
Any thoughts to what might _become_ an electrocliche in the future,
other than digital reverb (which I also happen to like given that
I hated spring reverbs and couldn't afford a plate)?
Derek
|
358.5 | | BAILEY::RHODES | | Thu May 15 1986 09:56 | 11 |
| How about the trumpet sounds that sound like their sampled from an
old T.V. show and are diced and rolled together (I hate ZZtop and
all that crap).
I like the old mellotron used in the old King Crimson and Genesis
stuff. Anybody want to sell me a midi mellotron?
How about cover songs being about 3 minutes in length. Talk
about a cliche'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Todd.
|
358.6 | Mellotroning | MINDER::KENT | | Thu May 15 1986 10:48 | 8 |
| I have a patch for my CZ which sounds just like the old mellotron
string sounds e.g. Moody Blues, King Crimson etc. when put it through a
reverb. Let me know if you want me to put it in the CZ patch topic.
As to more cliche's how about extended disco versions with boring
drum/synth/sample sequences in the middle, beginning and end.
PAUL.
|
358.7 | What's in a word? | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad (aka Dr. Fingers) | Thu May 15 1986 10:48 | 15 |
| <Flame on>
This is more esoteric, but ...
Ever notice the lyrics to every blasted "hit" tune? If it's not "party
hearty" or "nuke the ________" (fill in your latest political gripe),
it's "use me, use me, but don't abuse me". One would think that
musicians are a bunch of stoned, left-wing, slavering sexpots.
Frankly, I'm tired of hearing someone do it on an album. Isn't there
anything else to write about?
<Flame off>
8^(
|
358.8 | Tasteful gimmicks? | JUNIOR::DREHER | | Thu May 15 1986 13:49 | 25 |
|
re: .3 What is a Theramin?
How about digital delays and chorus on everything?
I also like digital reverbs. Some of the current most popular effects
with digital reverb is gated reverb on the snare and reverse reverb.
A form of reverse reverb is called 'preverb'. That's when you flip
the multi-track tape over and record a regular reverb of one track
that's playing backwards onto another track. Then you flip the
tape back over and the recorded reverb is backwards in front of the
original sound. Like the beginning of the Car's 'Hello, Again'
Another trick is to fly in backwards parts from a 2-track onto the
master, like the beginning of Yes's 'Roundabout'.
Compressors and noise gates can be used as gimmicks. How about weird
Eq's like in the middle of Aqualung on Ian Anderson's voice.
I like gimmicks, but tasteful use of them. Who defines tasteful,
though? After all most popular music is recorded to catch the ear of the
public, not other musicians...
Dave
|
358.9 | MIDI Gimmick... | JUNIOR::DREHER | | Thu May 15 1986 13:53 | 6 |
|
MIDI can be considered an electrogimmick. They now have MIDI
controlled light shows. Imagine a velocity sensitive dimmer pack.
Now you can MIDI control your household appliances... ;^)
Dave
|
358.10 | The Theremin | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu May 15 1986 13:59 | 19 |
| re .8
The Theremin was an electronic instrument designed by Bob Moog
(yes, the same Moog). It used capacitive coupling of the performers
hands to two antennae to control volume and pitch. One antenna
was a vertical rod, the other a small plate on the instrument's
end. It produced more or less pure sines and because pitch was
continuous had a generally ethereal sound.
It had brief pop currency during the '60s as the featured instrument
of Lothar and the Hand People. Playing it gave new meaning to the
phrase "waving your hands".
You could get a Theremin kit or an assembled instrument from the
Melodia Theremin Co. someplace in upstate New York. They disappeared
a long time ago.
len.
|
358.11 | Additional Cheese Menu | CANYON::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support Group | Thu May 15 1986 14:02 | 8 |
|
FLANGING ! Sky Pilot ! Itchykoo Park ! Overdriven Marshall stacks!
WahWah pedals! Choruses of Black Girls. Leon Russell and Gospel
backgrounds! Sensitive Singer-Songwriters! ELECTRIC SITARS!
stop me before this gets out of hand!
|
358.12 | | CANYON::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support Group | Thu May 15 1986 14:11 | 10 |
| re -2, Theremin...
I beg to differ. My impression is that the Theremin has been around
since the late 1930's or early 1940's. I believe there was an article
in Keyboard mag within the last couple of years.
If Bob Moog is THAT old, he sure looks good. Or maybe the photo
I saw was from 1953.
Karl Moeller
|
358.13 | white noise? NOISE is a good description | BAILEY::RHODES | | Thu May 15 1986 14:36 | 9 |
| Electric sitars.......Yeeeeeeeaacccchhhhhh....
I hate their sound incredibly!!!!!!!!!
How about the white noise bursts being used as cymbols.
Hate 'em with a passion!!!!!
Todd.
|
358.14 | More Music Cliche's | CANYON::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support Group | Thu May 15 1986 14:43 | 9 |
|
... surf in wimpy New Age solo piano tapes ...
... wind or nature noises in any music anywhere ...
WAIT A MINUTE! This is hitting too close to home !
Karl and Walter Ego
|
358.15 | Beat it into the ground | STAR::BRANDENBERG | Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. | Thu May 15 1986 15:17 | 6 |
| re -3, Theremin
I believe you are right. Theremin may even be the name of the inventor
(a Soviet), and later 30's sounds right. As I recall, the soundtrack
(incidental noise) for "Forbidden Planet" used a Theremin.
|
358.17 | Old and new... | BOVES::SEIGEL | | Thu May 15 1986 16:10 | 19 |
| RE: .5
You can always call Novatron. Considering that they still build
Mellotron clones ( I believe), they might br inclined to go for
a midi-version. I have the_old_Mellotron and although I don't use
it live, I keep it around for sentimental value. It needs a bit
of action work, but the tapes are clean. Anyone know someone (other
than Aztech Electronics in Cambridge, who I am considering) who
does Mellotron work?
RE: the topic of the note. The thing that really bugs me nowadays
is that same old Fairlight "Bra ap" (space intentional) that was
started, I think, on Owner of a lonely Heart and has since been
used by everyone from Doooooooooran Doooooooooooran to ZZ Top.
Oh well, my $.05.
/andy
|
358.18 | way down inside..... | DONJON::CROWLEY | | Thu May 15 1986 17:08 | 8 |
|
RE. the Theramin...
Probably one of the more popular recordings of the use of a
Theramin was by Jimmy Page in Led Zeppelins 'Whole Lotta Love`.
All those wierd sounds while Plant sounded like he was having
an orgasm were done with a theramin.
|
358.19 | To Err is Yoomin | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu May 15 1986 17:20 | 10 |
| OK, OK, I was wrong, forgive me. I thought Moog invented the Theremin.
I guess it's older than that. I don't think it was used in Forbidden
Planet, as the couple that did the soundtrack used all their own
instruments. Nor do I think it was used in Whole Lotta' Love -
that sounds to me more like Page's guitar than a Theremin. Anybody
got facts rather than recollections? I know my memory's full of
parody errors.
len.
|
358.20 | What?! More Theremin?!! | DRIZLE::MITCHELL | | Thu May 15 1986 19:23 | 22 |
| See what I mean about people beating something to death? And now here *I*
go...
As I recall, the Theremin was invented in the early 1920s by Leo (sometimes
Leon) Teremin. When he came to the U.S. from Russia he changed his name to
Theremin (the Th is pronounced). As for Bob Moog, he sold theremins while he
was in college. I still have an old Radio-Electronics article of his about the
Moog Theremin, somewhere.
EVERYBODY has heard a theremin. The best example of where to here one is on
the Beachboys' "Good Vibrations." (I may be wrong, but I don't think Forbidden
Planet used a Theremin. That was the RCA synthesizer, or trautonium, or
something).
I used to build and sell theremins myself. I can still play one and rather
well, if I may be so bold.
As for Mr. Theremin, he's back in the USSR. They don't know how lucky they
are ;-).
John M.
|
358.21 | ..."trautonium"? | CANYON::MOELLER | PLANKALKUL Language Support Group | Thu May 15 1986 20:08 | 4 |
| re -1:
... sounds a little fishy to me ...
KM
|
358.22 | | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Fri May 16 1986 02:15 | 7 |
|
Forbidden planet; yes. Also, nobody's mentioned the Odnes Martinot.
Electronic music was around a lot longer than rock and roll.
- Karl
|
358.24 | from behind the turntables | APOLLO::DEHAHN | feel the spin | Fri May 16 1986 09:39 | 27 |
|
Re: 12" remixes and dance music
If you've ever mixed 12" dance music you'd understand why those
"tacky" rhythm breaks are put in the remix. Long intros, outros,
and timely rhythm breaks are there for the DJ, not the disgruntled
consumer. Conscious producers are aware of this and structure the
remix like this:
body of song - rhythm break - repeat chorus - optional rhythm break
This way the DJ has the option of a smooth blend mix at the first
rhythm break or let the song play to the finish and use a cut or
fade mix to the next song.
If you don't like the way they sound then buy the album or the 7"
single. 12" singles are 12" because they're easier to handle than
7" which are impossible to slip cue. They came into being as a promo
item for pre-release to club and radio DJ's. Record companies found
another product to market so they put the 12" remixes in a fancy
cover and charge you $4.99.
Chris
|
358.25 | Theremins are Forever! | DRIZLE::MITCHELL | | Fri May 16 1986 14:13 | 8 |
| RE: Theremin, Martinot
The theremin and martinot may lend themselves to cliche, but they do not
qualify as electrogimicks.
Hey! If the theremin is 60 years old this year, shouldn't we have a party? We
could hold it in the Soviet Union (but NOT in Kiev) and play old Clara Rockmore
records. Heck, I'll even fix my theremin and play "The Birthday Song!"
|
358.26 | Brand New Bitch | DRIZLE::MITCHELL | | Fri May 16 1986 14:26 | 26 |
| When oh when is somebody going to build a synthesizer again without one of
those crappy digital noise sources?! I know that the digital ones are
preferred for several reasons:
(A) They have a uniform output amplitude
(B) You don't have to sort through zeners or transistors to find out which
ones avalanche best when back-biased
(C) It is not easy to tell a computer to be random
But let's remember that an analog noise source is truly random and costs only
about $1.50 to build. Surely there must be a way to incorporate one into a
digital setup.
The ear-brain is not stupid and is not fooled by "pseudo random" sequences.
One need only listen to the DX7's, Prophet 5000's, or any other synthesizer's
digital noise source for half a second to realize that it is not random. It's
not surprising that wind, explosions, and such sounds made on these machines
are so hoaky. And forget about sampling. Once you sample an event it
is no longer random. The Kurzweil costs $14,000 and it's "ocean" effect is a
joke. And all for the want of a $1.50 noise source! Good grief.
John M.
|
358.27 | | RAJA::SCHMIEDER | | Fri May 16 1986 14:54 | 11 |
| Yes, but over in England the 12" has become a different breed altogether. It
is the place where the artist is MOST LIKELY to experiment, whereas in America
it generally represents the artist at their most conservative. British 12"
singles usually contain at least three tracks, the third of which is not found
on the 7" and quite often is jazz-flavoured or folkish (and rarely winds up on
the U.S. release). I find 12" mixes almost invariably superior to 7" mixes
within the so-called "new-wave" genre. Unfortunately, Newbury Comics now
charges $6.99 for 12" EP's and $12.99 for LP's!
Mark
|
358.29 | Noisy Theremins? | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Fri May 16 1986 16:11 | 20 |
| My goodness, three conversations going on in parallel. What was
the base note about?
I looked up Theremin last night too. Yes, It was Leon Theremin
who invented the Theremin in Russia in 1926 (if I compute from Tom's
anniversary correctly - I thought I saw 1935, but we all know how
broken my sensoria are at this point). And I found my Lothar and
the Hand People record, but I couldn't bring myself to listen to
it. I checked out Whole Lotta Love, and there are credits given
for all kinds of instruments, but no Theremin.
My Super Jupiter makes pretty good noise. Its thunder, surf and
wind are excellent. The MKS-80 is analog all the way, though.
And I have, in moments of reckless self indulgence (actually on
somebody else's behalf, at their request) made tapes of NOTHING
BUT surf and wind and thunder, multitracked even.
len.
|
358.30 | next top 40 hit | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri May 16 1986 18:17 | 6 |
| re: .29
Are your wind/surf/thunder compositions 3 minutes in length.
If so, they could be the next number one hit single! :-)
TR
|
358.31 | Spare Me | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon May 19 1986 10:21 | 8 |
| Nah, they go on interminably. I wouldn't dignify this stuff with
the label "composition". How about "sound effects"?
This sort of stuff HAS been sold, you know. Remember those environment
records? "Dawn At New Hope Pennsylvania"? Etc.?
len.
|
358.32 | | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Mon May 19 1986 13:07 | 4 |
|
Len, why is it not 'composition'?
Karl1
|
358.33 | I Don't Know (or Care) | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon May 19 1986 13:53 | 10 |
| Hmm, good question. 'Cause I didn't write it down? 'Cause I didn't
think (much) about it beforehand? 'Cause it's not "music"? 'Cause
it wasn't meant for somebody else to perform? 'Cause it has no
apparent structure? 'Cause it has no rhythmic sophistication?
'Cause it has no harmonic sophistication? 'Cause it's basically
just noise? 'Cause names are just names and things are what they
are regardless of what you choose to call them? I don't know.
len.
|
358.34 | better late than... | KRYPTN::JASNIEWSKI | | Mon May 19 1986 14:21 | 27 |
|
Gee, I could have bought a Theremin at the Hosstraders fleamarket.
It was a *kustom*, ran on batteries, and was in good shape (the
nice padded case) but was missing the front panel. For $10.
So I blew it, but we can design one, al la DEC. Lets see...we'll
use a radar or lidar to measure the picosecond roundtrip time from
the device to your hand...Of course, a digital output will be fed
into a PRO 350, which will look up in a table which note to send
out the midi adaptor WRT how far your hand is away from the thing.
Just think, you can assign any note to any distance and quantize
the thing - no more of that annoying "relative pitch drifting"...
I always thought that the "telephone sound" that Paul McCartny
(sp?) used to use on his voice "were so sorry...uncle Albert" was
a true cliche' - and a trademark at that. This was mentioned in
-.8 al la Jethro Tull.
I think the true cliche' nowadays is that you have to be a
soprano to be a lead singer - you know, sound like you're 13 yrs
old and all. I guess all the little girls have to be able to sing
along in their natural ranges for a group to be popular. Another
is to show off all the MEGABUCKS your group has spent on your
equipment. Hey! We've got all the latest! Don't know what to do
with it yet, but we *look* good.
Joe Jas
|
358.35 | Many $$$ .NES. good music | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed, WS Tech Mktg | Fri May 23 1986 10:46 | 15 |
| Re: .34
Joe hit the nose right on the head about groups showing how much
money they have (or how much overhead they have on tour from renting)
by having umpteen-million pieces of techno-rubble on stage. Nothing
gets me angrier than watching some bozo who couldn't play his/her
way out of a paper bag on stage with $100,000 of Fairlights, TX816s,
etc. that get wasted.
Let's hear it for musicians who are working on mastering the technology
to make MUSIC rather than showing how many $$$ they have available
for toys!
Derek (wishing I HAD the money for all the toys and
souding like sour grapes :->)
|
358.36 | the absolute worst! | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri May 23 1986 17:48 | 15 |
| Ok. I've thought it over, and have finally determined the cliche' that
*absolutely* puts me over the edge. I'm sure I'm not alone on this
one...
Don't you just hate watching videos on TV where the "musicians"
merely play along with their studio recordings???????? I *hate*
that!!!! There is nothing worse than listening to as obvous studio
recording while the video part shows the band on stage in an arena
holding 10,000 people. And worse than that, the drummer is visually
banging his snare drum 180 degrees out of sync with music!
Most of these videos look about as "real" as Championship Wrestling.
Don't ya just *hate* it???
Todd.
|
358.37 | Tacky, tacky, tacky... | MENTOR::COTE | Baby, I'm a Star... | Sat May 24 1986 10:47 | 6 |
| ...Elvis Presley on the beach with an electric guitar, and no AC
for 20 miles!! With a full string section backing him up!
Aaarrgghhh!!!!
Edd
|
358.38 | Page played the Theremin in "The Song Remains the Same" | ERLANG::DICKENS | Jeff Dickens | Tue Jun 17 1986 18:03 | 6 |
| Now that you're all totally sick of hearing about the Theramin...
You can actually see Jimmy Page playing (?) one in the movie "The
song remains the same". Go rent the video.
|
358.39 | Is NOTHING Sacred?! | DECWET::MITCHELL | | Fri Aug 01 1986 15:14 | 9 |
| I just heard the latest from "Steel Eye Span" (remember them? English
and Irish folksongs their specialty). It had all of the typical '80's
cliches--robot drum with that sound that sounds like someone hitting a
garbage can lid, lots of digital delay, and, of course, tons of that
gawdawful frozen-sounding DX7.
I think I'm going to puke.
John M.
|
358.40 | ElectroFolk! | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Fri Aug 01 1986 16:58 | 5 |
|
Some people like mechanical cliches and other people like
electronic cliches. Just a matter of taste.
- km1
|
358.41 | A Novel Idea... | DECWET::MITCHELL | | Fri Aug 01 1986 17:52 | 9 |
| How about NO cliches?
BTW Paul Simon's new "You Can Call Me AL" has some very nice digital
work going on in it.
John M.
|