T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
309.1 | Sure, count me in... | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Mon Apr 14 1986 16:10 | 9 |
| "Liner notes" would be helpfull. I do all my recording on a
4 -->2 mixer straight to cassette, and wouldn't want the sound
quality judged on the same standards as somebody who's cousin
owns Longview. :^)
I'll volunteer to do the editting to cassette.
Edd
|
309.2 | tell me everything you know in 30 sec's. | CANYON::MOELLER | the RFP for TUSD is DOA & I'm PO'd | Mon Apr 14 1986 16:23 | 13 |
| I've been thinking on this for a while. Since I've got quite a bit
of material recorded, 5 min. seems too limited. What about setting
up one person as the initial recipient of all contributor's cassettes.
Using NOTES, a list of contributors and listeners could be set up.
A box of cassettes would be shipped to each person on the list in
turn. And the current listener would be known, so would have to
send the box along to the next listener within 2-3 days. Eventually
the tapes might return to the initial recipient, who would send
the cassettes back to the owners.
A corollary topic could be set up for all listener's comments.
Karl Moeller SWS Tucson
|
309.3 | I 'm Not Sure I Know That Much | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon Apr 14 1986 16:55 | 26 |
| A similar suggestion has been made in the MUSIC conference, and
in fact tapes are now circulating informally. I have two tapes
(Steve Klosterman's Jamaican Vacation demo and Ed Bernstein's
Tem Noon/Gravity sampler) - anybody interested in getting them
next? I am putting together my own sampler, but it will take
a few more weeks to turn some loose ends into finished "product".
I think a multi-person sampler is an interesting idea although
finding 5 "representative" minutes might be difficult. I'm
currently doing three (maybe 4?) kinds of things - "classical
covers (e.g., my "arrangement" of the 1st movement of the 6th
Brandenburg for 6 harpsichords), pop covers (e.g., "Pipeline",
an old 60s surf instrumental; my version is synths only, no
guitars), originals (you wouldn't recognize them) and percussion
originals (with a long "this is how I did it" description in
progress).
I'm a little wary of exposing my stuff to strangers, especially
given the fangs that some of our noters periodically bare. If
people would agree to say "I don't care for it" instead of
"it's garbage", I'd be less reluctant.
Let's do it!
len.
|
309.5 | Yays = 4, Nays = 1 | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Mon Apr 14 1986 17:57 | 8 |
| Sounds like a decent idea. Would also be a good way for us in the
nether regions to get to "know" you up-northers a bit better.
Don't have much to contribute yet, but am willing to work on it.
Count me in!
8^)
|
309.6 | ...not all that bad... | CANYON::MOELLER | the RFP for TUSD is DOA & I'm PO'd | Mon Apr 14 1986 19:20 | 13 |
| Since the next person to receive the tapes would by definition be
listed (w/complete address) in the contributors/listeners list,
and the LAST person to have the tapes could post who he/she sent
them along to, it's hard for me to get paranoid about loss or ripoffs.
All except the latest of my stuff is copyrighted, anyway.
As for the cost, it costs all of $0.71 to send a single cassette
anywhere in the U.S. I still suggest someone there out East volunteer
to receive the tapes, listen, box them up, send them to the next
on the list. We'll all share in the shipping cost, as we'll need
to send the box of cassettes along to the next listenee.
Karl Moeller Tucson
|
309.7 | UK involvement ? | MINDER::KENT | | Tue Apr 15 1986 06:34 | 9 |
| I'me not sure what the implications are but I really would like
to be included. I have enough material (mostly songs) and it is
all original material so no copywright problems. I think we
broached the subject in an earlier note and it eventually got
no response. I hope my involvement from the U.K. does not destroy
the whole idea, if so then just count me out (but i would really
like to be counted in and would be prepared to fund the extra costs).
|
309.8 | Copyright Issues? | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Apr 15 1986 10:13 | 9 |
| I think copyright's only a problem if money's involved. I don't
think swapping tapes for noncommercial reasons breaks any
laws or violates any moral principles. I mean, why should I pay
a royalty to somebody because I gave/loaned a copy of a cover of
their song to a friend? Aren't we getting a little paranoid about
this?
len.
|
309.9 | Got to pay ya dues if ya wanna sing the blues... | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Tue Apr 15 1986 10:32 | 4 |
| If I buy the sheet music to a piece, doesn't that give me some right
to 'perform' it?
Edd
|
309.11 | Centralize ! | CANYON::MOELLER | Collard greens for collared people | Tue Apr 15 1986 14:00 | 23 |
| re#10 - I disagree, Tom. Leaving the mailing of tapes to & from
individuals is exactly what's (not) been happening already.
let's be organized : One topic for full names and addresses of:
a) the first mailee - waits 1 week, then sends ONE BOX containing
ALL the cassettes to the next listenee.
b) all listenees (may include contributors, of course)
-With FULL HOME mailing address
And a second topic, the LATEST REPLY containing the name/address
of the person in CURRENT POSESSION of the box of tapes
And a THIRD topic, containing all listener's comments !
Regarding tape loss, copyrights, etc.: Since I compose all my own
material, I just don't want it to appear as someone else's - either
the taped performance of mine or recreated by someone else. If you
do covers, since this is a noncommercial venue, no problem. About
tape loss: big deal! How much do cassettes cost?
Karl Moeller
|
309.12 | A Word of Caution | NOVA::RAVAN | | Tue Apr 15 1986 17:16 | 10 |
| The problem with copyright is that the composer may not want to
consider the work published simply because it went out to a few
people on a cassette. To do so, I would suggest putting something
like "(c) Copyright 1986, <name>, All Rights Reserved, an unpulished
work" on the tape to protect the ability to REALLY publish and copyright
the work later. And yes, distributing to more than one's immediate
circle of friends can be considered publishing (at least according
to this book I read on copyright stuff).
-jim
|
309.14 | <Count me in!> | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Apr 16 1986 10:52 | 11 |
| Count me in...I have a few songs to offer, there will be more after
I complete my studio construction this fall.
RE: the usenet compiliation: It is my understanding from Greg that
the tape will be completed soon (soon=??) I recently sent him some
of my material to be used if there was room.
I look forward to hearing the works of all you "noters"....
dave
|
309.15 | Cheerleading 101 | CANYON::MOELLER | The RFP for TUSD is DOA & I'm PO'd | Wed Apr 16 1986 13:07 | 20 |
| re -1:
Well, Dave, at this rate it looks like you may wait awhile. Everyone
contributing here has their own ideas (including me) on how the
music could be circulated, yet NO ONE has stepped up and said, 'send
the tapes to me and I'll get the ball rolling'.
I disagree with the need to redub noter's music onto a compilation
cassette...taking that guy in USENET a while, isn't it?
I'll certainly volunteer to collect, listen, box and send along
all tapes submitted, ONLY if noters agree to use TOPICS creatively
as I suggested in two previous notes. This method avoids confusion
as to who receives the tapes next, as well as identifying who has
them now.
This is real exciting, I for one WOULD like to hear other noter's
music. Let's get this off the ground !
Karl Moeller
|
309.16 | Lets go... | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Wed Apr 16 1986 13:43 | 17 |
| OK, so where do I/we send our contributions?
Another suggestion.... start 2 new notes. The first one to be replied
to by the authors. This could function as the 'liner notes' I mentioned
earlier. Recording tecniques, instruments and other info would be
posted and not as likely to get lost as a paper data sheet travelling
with the tape(s). After the tape is edited, the person who did the
editing (Karl?) could list the playing order of the final tape,
so we'd all know what was who's.
And of course the second note... the critique. I certainly trust
we'll all be on our best behaviour... Duets for tabla and piccollo
are not my favorite, but I won't tell you it sucks for that reason.
Real constructive criticism is what we want, right?
Edd
|
309.17 | ex | MOSAIC::SAVAGE | | Wed Apr 16 1986 14:19 | 19 |
| How about this:
One note entry for:
LIST OF RECIPIENT ADDRESSES - I'll start it. If you want to be on
the list enter your name. You get the tapes in the order of the
list. Since I'm going to start this list you can start by
sending your tapes to me first. I'll keep them for seven days and
send them along to the next name.
CURRENT HOLDER NOTE - When you get the tapes (I guess compilation
is out) you write in and say you got them and when you're ready
to send then say you've sent them to then next person on the list.
LINER NOTE (ONE FOR EACH ENTRY) - When you send your tape in you
enter a liner note and all replies/comments to your composition
go into this note as replies.
Dennis
|
309.18 | Our next contestant is... | CANYON::MOELLER | once a semipro musician | Wed Apr 16 1986 14:41 | 13 |
| GOOD ! Now, a personal question:
I've issued two complete (hour-long) albums and have enough material
taped for a third. Several different idioms.
What is the (time) limit? Do you suggest we hold it down to one
piece, or can I send one of my albums, or should I do my favorites
anthology of no more than 5 pieces? what?
How about some suggestions? (no, THAT's anatomically implausible)
Karl Moeller
|
309.19 | | NOVA::RAVAN | | Wed Apr 16 1986 14:51 | 10 |
| Two suggestions from your moderator:
1) Please make the LINER NOTES a single topic in order to keep
the directory manageable.
2) Please delete yourself as the current recipient when you
send the tape(s) to someone else. Algorithms which grow
without bound should be avoided.
-jim
|
309.20 | I vote for a ONE tape master | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Wed Apr 16 1986 15:03 | 37 |
| Let's not let the conglomeration issue die.
Maybe no one else is willing to put together a "sample tape", but I am.
I'm not into spending megabucks to ship 10 or 12 tapes around the globe
at a shot. One cassette containing multiple works is one thing - many
cassettes containing a few is another.
If you're looking for someone with a couple of tape decks to "build"
the "master tape", I'll volunteer. A person is designated as the
conglomerator (?). For now, let's assume that's me. Here's a
suggested tack:
o Prepare 1-3 tunes to a cassette. You can mix down yourself.
o Label each song, include text similar to what Dennis listed
in note 313. Send that to me via VAXmail.
o Send me the cassette (either to DYO or to address listed
in note 311) and I'll start making a master tape. I'll donate
the master (probably either TDK-SA or UDXL-II).
BTW - I'll be using a Yamaha k-960 and TEAC decks to make
the masters.
o After your recording is mastered, it will be returned; or,
if you wish, you can donate it for subsequent master tapes.
There still arises the issue of who pays the postage. It seems the
most fair to let the submitter pick up the cost of postage, but what
about tape return? How would that be handled? I guess if I'm gonna do
the mastering, I could be grudingly persuaded to cover the cost of
return-mailing the tapes as well.
What's DEC's position on sending things like tapes thru interoffice
mail?
8^)
|
309.21 | Another Vote for Anthology | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Wed Apr 16 1986 15:26 | 11 |
|
Here's another note for "The Best of Commusic". I certainly don't
have enough material to warrant a full tape. (1 tune).
An anthology type tape would give us all a sampling of what we're
doing AND keep postage down. You can always make arrangements to
hear more later.
Looks like all we have to do is settle this point and it happens!
Edd
|
309.22 | Conglomerate!!! | MOSAIC::SAVAGE | | Wed Apr 16 1986 15:42 | 6 |
| I say we go with the conglomerate and keep it down to one song each
and send 'em all to Brad Schafre and get this thing on the road.
I say we also abide by Ravan's guidelines. I'll change my Mouse
and Cats title to be TAPE ONE ENTRIES.
Dennis
|
309.23 | More Ideas | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Wed Apr 16 1986 15:53 | 19 |
| Re: .22
Rather than each of us post our stuff in the conference, why not just
send me VAXmail (or something) and let me assimilate and post?
I'll collect, sort, and spell check 8^) each one. I think it would be
easier to see what's where with what who and how (?!) if the responses
in the conference align with the order of tunes on the tape.
That way, each of us can extract and print the "TAPE nnn" note, and
have our own personal copy of the "credit sheet".
This method will also eliminate "oh, yeah, i forgot that..." responses
and keep things cleaner for our illustrious moderator. ;-)
And, again, what are DEC's policies on using interoffice mail? I don't
know 'em.
8^)
|
309.24 | Interoffice Mail | DONJON::CROWLEY | | Wed Apr 16 1986 16:03 | 10 |
|
re: -1
You can take the chance of sending tapes through the interoffice
mail, but it is generally frowned upon by Corporate Mail. Also,
DEC isn't responsible for the loss or damage to personal mail.
After seeing mailroom procedures for almost five years, I don't
think I'd want to take the chance with my tapes.
Ralph (VRO5 Office Services)
|
309.25 | READ_ME_FIRST.TXT | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Wed Apr 16 1986 16:05 | 25 |
| If/when you mail me a tape, PLEASE make sure that it's in a format
that I can deal with. I need:
o A cassette tape, preferrably decent quality (no sandpaper
on a roll, please)
o Noise reduction: none, Dolby B or dbx. NO DOLBY C!!!
o Master tape(s) will be on Maxell UDS-II C90 cassette(s) with
Dolby B type noise reduction.
In mail sent to me, please list at least:
o Date of recording (if known)
o Equipment used to produce tune(s). Include recording info,
synths, guitars, amps, effects, personnel, etc
o Name of tune(s) (again, if named)
o How much you'll pay me not to pirate it 8^) 8^) 8^)
That's it.
8^)
|
309.26 | 2 or 3 symphonies? | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Wed Apr 16 1986 16:51 | 10 |
|
Just a point of order for you folks - not everyone does 'tunes'.
The '2 or 3 tunes' limit will not be especially helpful if
someone does 20 minute pieces.
You will probably have to impose some kind of total time limit
if you wish to keep the number of tapes to a minimum.
- Karl
|
309.27 | ya go out for lunch and what happens? | CANYON::MOELLER | once a semipro musician | Wed Apr 16 1986 17:15 | 11 |
| re -1. Time limits... tape recopying... whyncha make it tough ?
I'll be glad to contribute, but I think it's a shame that only 6
people @15 minutes each will be able to be on this compilation tape.
BTW, sending a small box of tapes thru the mail is no more than
$2.00 any where in the U.S. Are we underpaid or what ?
What if you get more than 90 minutes of music ? You ARE going to
do a 90 minute tape, right, Brad?
Karl Moeller
|
309.28 | I used to be a pro, too, but I wanted to eat | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Wed Apr 16 1986 17:38 | 13 |
| I'm not restricting the master to one tape. It may be a set of
tapes, for all I know.
Besides, if submissions are too many to fit on a C90, I can always
create a "half speed master". 8^) 8^) 8^)
For a trial run, I see no problem with 1 or 2 songs a piece, and
a limit of 10-15 minutes per tune. Perhaps on future efforts we
can do some more elaborate stuff.
In the meantime, let's start small and work up.
8^)
|
309.29 | let's finalize our first attempt | BARNUM::RHODES | | Wed Apr 16 1986 18:24 | 11 |
| I agree with Brad's idea and feel we still need a reply that represents
the final method of exchange. I feel the best thing here would
be for Brad to enter one final reply, explaining the entire system
as a final first attempt at a COMMUSIC exchange. If this doesn't
seem to work good enough, then we can revisit our exchange method.
As far as the copyright stuff, I have entered a seperate note that I hope
will clear all of the uncertainties up.
Todd Rhodes.
|
309.30 | Me to? | MINDER::KENT | | Thu Apr 17 1986 04:18 | 8 |
|
Can't help but agree with .-1 I am now (as usual) a little confused.
Before I put my name on the address list does anyone object or have
any reasons for me (in the U.K) not being included.
Paul.
|
309.31 | And me? | HSK03::LEHTINEN | Timo Lehtinen | Fri Apr 18 1986 08:36 | 9 |
| Same here. Any objections?
Mailing costs might end up even a little higher here than to the
UK, but like Kent I am also willing to pay the extra. I'm just
wondering, if people can accept the longer wait even if I would
act as fast as possible (1-2 days instead of 1 week). Some opinions,
please!
Timo Lehtinen
Helsinki, Finland
|
309.32 | <dec mail is not defined?> | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Fri Apr 18 1986 10:56 | 13 |
| re: decmail system: We recently ran into a similar problem on
EKLV00::FLYFISH.....as near as we can tell there is no specific
rules or regulations pertaining to dec interoffice mail, however,
since this is not defined it can be interperted locally, and possibly
could be considered "theft, or fraudulent use of company assetts"
But one particiapnt on flyfish from AYR has influenced the policy
in his plant such that they do not object to his forwarding magazines
via the mail system.
Not much of a real answer is it??
dave
|
309.33 | Opinion and Questions | BIZET::ARNOLD | John E. Arnold | Fri Apr 18 1986 11:06 | 21 |
| Re: the people from Europe, etc. who want to be involved.
I don't mind sending the tape overseas. I'd welcome a view of my
music from anyone, especially people with different cultures,
backgrounds, etc.
Having read the lengthy note on copyright, however, I would ask that
the tape and the box the tape is in contain any copyright notices that
are necessary. (This could call for some microscopic writing!) That
way, we can all feel somewhat safe that we are least trying to deal
with it correctly.
Brad: Is it OK if we send you a note with our tapes explaining what
notice we'd like you to put on? That puts the responsibility on us to
tell you what notice we'd each like to see.
- John -
P.S. Is there a deadline by which Brad should have received the
tapes? I'm hoping to send mine out Saturday or Monday. Is that
too late?
|
309.34 | U.K. INPUT | MINDER::KENT | | Fri Apr 18 1986 12:05 | 15 |
| Re.-1
Thanks for the support John it was beginning to feel quite lonely
out here. I would be happy to abide by your copywright rules.
RE the Deadline I will be producing a tape this weekend and will
mail it to Brad Monday so he should receive it by Friday I guess.
I am a little unclear at the moment whether we are talking 5 minutes
worth or just one piece. If it was 5 minutes I could probably fit
2 songs into this time.
I am looking forward to hearing you all.
Paul.
|
309.35 | | CANYON::MOELLER | once a semipro musician,alwa.. | Fri Apr 18 1986 12:24 | 13 |
| uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......... I may have jumped the gun on this but it
certainly isn't the first time! I have already mailed a TDK SA-90
off to Brad with 15 minutes' material on it... one piece 10:30 long,
and a second piece 4:30 long. The reason is that '15 minutes' was
bandied about about 10 replies back... it won't cost that much more
to send two 90 minute compilation tapes around, will it? It was
rough for me to even pare my stuff down to 15 minutes...
Didn't I see, either here or in MUSIC, some comment on cassettes
mysteriously disappearing while going thru Customs in Britain...
karl Moeller
Tucson AZ
|
309.36 | Various and sundry replies | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Fri Apr 18 1986 14:04 | 40 |
| Re: "Foreigners" 8^)
Sure, send 'em in. I will echo the sentiment - will be good to get
non-American influenced stuff.
Re: Deadline
Let's try and get the tapes to me by, say, the end of the month? That's
30-April. That oughta give everyone enough time to get things
together, and will give me a chance to see my wife more than once
during that period of time. 8^)
Restate - DEADLINE IS APRIL 30th (unless someone screams)
Re: Mailing
Did we ever decide what to do with the tapes you all are sending me? Am
I supposed to mail these back to you? Save 'em for the "next round"?
Did I agree to send back 50 tapes at a buck a crack?
What do you think should be done with all the input tapes??
Re: Tune length
Let's try and limit it (again!) to around 10-15 minutes. That a LIMIT,
mind you - not a requirement. I personally will probably only throw on
one 5 minute tune this time around. Karl - your stuff is fine the way
it is. If we need a "double album set", so be it. ;-) That's life.
Look at it this way - if I get 12 15 minute submissions (which is NOT
an unrealisitic estimate), that will waste 2 C90s.
Re: General
Once we get some rules hardcoded, they should be written down in
a clear concise one-note form.
I think that's everything.
8^)
|
309.37 | Keep the tape | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Fri Apr 18 1986 14:28 | 3 |
| You can keep my tape for your effort...
Edd
|
309.38 | returns/limits | MOSAIC::SAVAGE | | Fri Apr 18 1986 15:58 | 10 |
| If you want your submission tape back just enclose $1 for Brad.
Otherwise don't expect to get it back. No reason he should pay for
returning them.
Please do me a personal favor and keep it down to no more than 10
minutes for each author. That's more than enough to listen to for
anyone. If this goes right it'll be just the first of many tapes
to go around.
Dennis Savage
|
309.39 | Send stamps for return postage? | BARNUM::RHODES | | Fri Apr 18 1986 16:12 | 6 |
| Right. If you want your tape back, I suggest enclosing some stamps
to cover the return postage (wrapped in wax paper?). Otherwise,
write the tape off as a donation to the Brad Schafer fund ;-)
Todd Rhodes.
|
309.40 | TAPE SENT | MINDER::KENT | | Mon Apr 21 1986 12:32 | 7 |
| Brad
I have mailed my tape to you using the address in 311.2 I have just
tagged "U.S.A." to the bottom of the address I hope this will get
to you. I am assuming that OH is OHIO is this correct ?
PK.
|
309.41 | Liner Notes vs. Comments/Reviews | CANYON::MOELLER | Field of Fire | Mon Apr 21 1986 13:52 | 17 |
| I surely am pleased to see this getting off the ground. It will
be interesting to hear other noter's material. Making this all a
bit more real, if you know what I mean.
There is a point (or two) that I'm not clear on. Now, as the
compilation tape is being assembled (compiled/linked...), 'liner
notes' need to be posted. I thought I saw a request from Brad that
we DECmail our liner notes to him; he'd EDT and submit them as a
new topic. However, the existence of topic 313 seems to prove me
wrong.
Also, when the tape starts circulating, we'll want to (gently?)
comment/review the contributions. Are these reviews gonna be replied
into another topic, or is THAT what Brad is looking for thru DECmail?
Karl Moeller
|
309.42 | On Topic 313 | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad Schafer | Mon Apr 21 1986 18:01 | 17 |
| Re: .40
That'll get to me, PK. Thanks.
Re: .41
What I was hoping for is that 313 would end up getting VAXmailed
(please, please, NO DECmail!!!!!) to me - viz a viz DYO780::SCHAFER.
I thought that I would compile the "liner notes" (as Karl suggested)
and then submit a new note regarding that particular master tape.
If you all would rather just reply to 313, I guess that's ok by me.
Makes a lot less work, but it may not be as easy to figger out what
belongs to who, much less you're listening to at any one time.
8^)
|
309.43 | Are band entries allowed too?? | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed | Thu Apr 24 1986 13:19 | 9 |
| I apologize if this was covered elsewhere but:
What are the guidelines for musical content? Does it have to be
works performed solely by me or is music recorded by my band fair
game? I would be willing to contribute both eventually but the
band stuff is already recorded.
Thanks for your input,
Derek
|
309.44 | Band entries are welcome | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad (aka Dr. Fingers) | Fri Apr 25 1986 14:00 | 5 |
| Re: .43
Sure, Derek. Just tell us who is you, so we know who to flame on.
8^) 8^) 8^)
|
309.45 | International exposure is worth the flames! | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed | Fri Apr 25 1986 14:25 | 4 |
| Thanks Brad. Now I'll have to drag out my recordings quickly if
I hope to make the April 30th deadline!!
Derek
|