T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
292.1 | | PSGMKH::BESSER | | Thu Apr 03 1986 17:35 | 4 |
| Who is this MAX? Are you sure you're in the right note? Do you use
a computer MIDI interface with MAX?
-um so
|
292.2 | Right Conference | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu Apr 03 1986 18:02 | 6 |
| The MAX is a MIDI-compatible synth from Sequential Circuits (the
Prophet folks). It is derived from the SixTrak synth they offered
a few years ago.
len.
|
292.3 | | NOVA::RAVAN | | Thu Apr 03 1986 19:51 | 17 |
| For those of us who don't know the MAX's features, could you relate
some basic info for us, such as:
a) how many simultaneous notes can be held down at once?
(which is to say, is this synth 4-note, 6-note, 8-note,
16-note polyphonic?)
b) velocity-sensitive keyboard?
c) pressure-sensitive keyboard?
d) Does the synth have an on-board sequencer? How many notes?
e) By what method are the sounds produced? FM? Additive
synthesis? Subtractive synthesis? Distortion (a al Casio)?
-jim
|
292.5 | MAX Audio Flexi-disc | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Fri Apr 04 1986 13:39 | 8 |
| Those plastic records that show up bound into Keyboard sometimes
contain an audio ad on the back side. At least one of them in the
last year was for the Max. I'll riffle through my file of discs
to see if I can find which issue it came from. If I find it I'll
give it another listen and tell you what I think Max sounds like.
len.
|
292.6 | MAX Update | PSGMKG::RODENHISER | | Fri Apr 04 1986 13:50 | 11 |
| Ooops! Forgot to answer all the basic questions on MAX. It has
neither a velocity- nor pressure-sensitive keyboard.
Another nice feature (though it may be standard offering with all
sequencers - I don't know) is that if you store a sequence of notes
in any or all of its tracks, besides being able to change the
relative speed and volume (and, pitch) is that you can substitute
a timbre without having to re-key the sequence. Additionally,
you can erase (and overdub) on a per-track basis.
Dick
|
292.7 | MAX Demo Disk | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon Apr 07 1986 10:00 | 14 |
| The MAX demo disk I mentioned was in the February 1985 Keyboard.
There may have been one more recently, but that's the one I found.
In essence, the MAX is 6 monophonic analog synths packaged together.
Each synth/voice has one oscillator (yes, only 1, and no "suboctave"
option apparently), one low pass VCF, 3 (THREE!) ADSRs (but I don't
know what you can route them to - at least the VCF and VCA, I assume),
and a VCA.
The sounds on the demo are mostly simulated real instruments, and
they sound fake.
len.
|
292.8 | MAX demo | PSGMKG::RODENHISER | | Mon Apr 07 1986 12:03 | 14 |
| Thanks for the information, Len. I'll go off and get a copy of
Feb.'s Keyboard. Does the edition have any review, critiques, etc.
of MAX?
Not being totally familiar with all the terms of trade yet, I'm
wondering what limitations (if any) having only 1 oscillator
poses.
What is a "suboctave" option? Is the lack thereof really limiting?
One last question: you indicate (emphatically) that MAX has 3
ADSRs. Is this goodness? What (if anything) does this buy me?
Thanks again for your input!
|
292.9 | More on Max | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon Apr 07 1986 18:03 | 27 |
| There's nothing in the Feb issue about Max other than the demo record,
the MAX demo is on the "flip side".
A single oscillator means you can't get chorus type effects by slightly
detuning one relative to the other, and you can't put separate
envelopes on each for weird effects (and some useful effects), or
mix waveforms (e.g., select a width-modulated pulse for one and
a sawtooth for the other), making for richer tones.
The lack of a second oscillator is sometimes compensated for by a
"sub"oscillator, that tracks the main oscillator one octave lower.
This give some bass/oomph to the sound.
3 ADSRs is unusual. Most synths have only 2 per voice, many have
only one. Having many is a virtue, as you can use them for different
things and they don't have to envelope in lockstep. I.e., it's
not usually the case that the same envelope should be applied to
BOTH the VCA and the VCF. My guess is the third ADSR controls the
VCO's pitch, or maybe the LFO frequency. (Did I forget to mention
that each Max voice has its own LFO? This is unusual too, usually
all the voices share the same LFO. Separate LFOs is nice because
you have the option of them not tracking one another in phase or
frequency, making for richer sounds. The only other synth I know
of with separate LFOs per voice is the Polaris.)
len.
|