T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
261.1 | Thru Box Not the Answer | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Fri Mar 07 1986 15:26 | 19 |
| A thru box will not solve your problem, as it does no channel filtering
and your problem is not driving multiple devices at the same time.
I believe the MIDI standard says that devices are supposed to power
up in OMNI mode, and you may have to do something special to get
it out of OMNI. Without seeing the JX3P documentation I can't tell
you where to look, but I'd bet it's in there somewhere. (Everybody
agrees that powering up in OMNI mode is dumb, but that's what the
standard says. Many devices ignore this admonition, especially
smart ones that send and receive on all channels.)
If push comes to shove, you can get a channel filter that will filter
out everything except data for the selected channel. I think Roland
and JLCooper make such things. The Roland device is the MPU-103
I think (I may be wrong, so don't take this as gospel).
Good luck.
len.
|
261.2 | More on OMNI | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon Mar 10 1986 09:34 | 24 |
| I thought about this a little more. MY Roland sequencers send a
MIDI command that says "OMNI off" when they power up. Thus, I have
learned to power up all my synths/etc. BEFORE I power up the
sequencers, and to make sure that all the synths/etc. are MIDIed
to the sequencer when I power IT up. This results in everybody
being nonOMNI.
You may have to ask somebody (like Roland) if you can't find out
otherwise. I went browsing through my manuals and this seems to
be a neglected point. I have the impression many synths can only
be controlled with respect to OMNI on/off over the MIDI port and
NOT from their front/back panels. This is especially true of earlier
products. There seems to be no convention. E.g., my TR909 powers
up in OMNI, indicating MIDI channel "0". If you change the channel
to anything else it goes to OMNI off, but the only way to get back
to OMNI on is to go through the power up cycle. I think my POLY800
works this way too. Some of my MIDI devices have OMNI on/off switches
(physical, i.e., a real switch, or logical, i.e., a parameter value).
Good luck. Let us know what you finally learn. How do other folks'
synths handle this?
len.
|
261.3 | Now there's an idea! | MENTOR::COTE | | Mon Mar 10 1986 12:26 | 19 |
| A LOGICAL switch! Now there's an idea I hadn't thought of.
My Yamaha sequencer has a monitor function. I'll check out what
sort of messages are sent/recieved during power-up. I'll also
see if I can load a channel select sequence from my DX into the
sequencer and then pass it off to the Roland.
If I power-up the sequencer AFTER the DX I get "MIDI DATA ERROR"
on the DX. (Pressing any function key clears it.) For this reason
I've been bringing the synths up last. Perhaps my sequence of events
is a-whack...
Full report and pictures at 11:00.
Thanks
Edd
|
261.4 | | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Mon Mar 10 1986 13:22 | 5 |
| I would be interested as I will be MIDIing my JX3-P soon.
thanks
dave
|
261.5 | :^( :^( :^( | MENTOR::COTE | | Tue Mar 11 1986 08:28 | 30 |
| After 4 hours of intense experimentation, I am sorry to say the
JX3-P is still OMNI only.
I tried loading an OMNI OFF sequence to my QX-21 from my DX and
then "downloading" the sequence to the Roland via the DX MIDI-thru
port. N.G. Not only was the Roland still OMNI but the DX didn't
respond to it either. (Before running the sequence, I put the DX
in OMNI to see if the sequence had any effect.) I then MIDI'd the
2 synths together (DX-out to JX-in). Still no effect. I also tried
various power-up sequences and toggling various parameters on the
DX. (System, channel, ect.) All to no avail.
It would appear that some/all of the following are true...
1. I have no idea what I am doing.
2. The 2 - 2 1/2 year old Roland may not conform to
MIDI specs. It was sold during the infancy of MIDI.
3. The Roland has a bug...
Unless someone else has an idea, it looks like it's "Hello, Roland...?"
time. I still have a couple parameters to check on the QX sequencer,
but until then, it looks like the most effective way to shut the
Roland up is to change patches to one with the level set to "0".
I'll post any further developements in a separate note, as this
is getting away from the base-note title.
Thanks Len for the help....
Edd
|
261.6 | Woe is You! | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:08 | 24 |
| Hmmmm... interestinger and interestinger. Have you tried calling
your dealer?
Interesting that the DX complains about the sequencer's power up
output - maybe it's a glitch rather than a legitimate MIDI message?
Note that the DX may not send "OMNI off" over its MIDI out when
you tell it "OMNI off" through its user interface. On some synths,
this is under control of a "mode switch" - e.g., the Juno-106 has
three modes under the control of a little slide switch on the back
panel. In one of these modes it sends everything, including parameter
changes. Check out the MIDI implementation chart that came with
the DX. I don't know if Yamaha provides the same sort of documentation
that Roland does, but all of Roland's MIDI devices come with a
poop sheet that spells out exactly what MIDI messages the device
recognizes and sends, under what circumstances. The JX-3p should
have such a sheet (it looks like photoreduced lineprinter output);
confirm on it that the JX3P recognizes the MIDI system message
'OMNI off'.
Does the JX3P's programmer (the little box with sliders and switches)
interface to the JX3P through the MIDI port, or is there a separate
innterface? If so, I'd be surprised if the JX3P didn't recognize
OMNI off, it'd've cost them (Roland) essentially nothing to provide
it. It's hard to believe that the JX3P is OMNI only.
|
261.7 | Consider Erroneous Documentation | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:20 | 9 |
| One last thing - Roland's (and they're probably not alone in this
regard) documentation is known to contain errors. It's usually
(poorly) translated from the Japanese. The MIDI implementation
charts are usually correct though - it's the narrative stuff in
the user's manual that can be misleading. So don't berate yourself
if you can't figure out what's going on.
len.
|
261.8 | Woeier is moi... | MENTOR::COTE | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:24 | 19 |
| I suspect (gut feeling, no proof) that the QX sends a glitch to
the DX on power-up...
The JX programmer interfaces via a seperate DIN-type connector.
I don't have the programmer, by the way, the edit map provides
enough info to create patches without it. (Thanks to Derek Speed
for the poop on that, in some other note.)
Please note the JX does not have ANY MIDI physical switches,
or a MIDI thru port.
Oh yeah, one other thing. The Roland isn't really mine. It's on
kinda "Perma-Loan", so I'm a bit hesitant to do any real heavy
experimentation with it.
We'll keep you posted...
Edd
|
261.9 | I think I'm going Japanese-a! | MENTOR::COTE | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:27 | 5 |
| re: .7
Tell me about it!
"Press number switch of wishing voice for putting out..."
|
261.10 | Hmmm no MIDI thru??? | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Mar 12 1986 09:05 | 3 |
| Your JX does not have MIDI through? I'm sure mine does. Curiouser
and curiouser.....
dave
|
261.11 | OMNIScience | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed Mar 12 1986 09:08 | 81 |
| I went wandering through my library of MIDI documentation and dug
up the following about how OMNI mode is treated for a variety of
MIDI devices. While this won't solve Edd's problem, it is kind
of Eddifying. ;-)
Sequencers
Both of Roland's sequencers, the MSQ-100 and MSQ-700,
output OMNI OFF on all channels at power up. The "all channels"
is important - "mode messages" (which include OMNI ON) are only
recognized on the channel transmitted on, regardless of the receiver's
mode. Thus, even if you're in OMNI mode, the standard doesn't require
you to recognize OMNI OFF sent on a channel different from the one
you're receiving on! Only "voice messages" are recognized in OMNI
mode regardless of the receiving channel. Cute, huh? Neither
sequencer will record OMNI OFF (or any mode message). Both "recognize"
OMNI OFF, though it has no meaning to them.
Synthesizers - all possible variations seem to be in use.
The Korg POLY-800 powers up in OMNI ON mode, and can only be switched over
the MIDI in. There is no indication of the current mode.
The Roland JUNO-106 transmits OMNI OFF when it powers up. Probably
on all channels, but I don't know for sure (not documented), it
might be only on the selected channel. When the MIDI transmit/receive
channel is changed, it transmits OMNI OFF (again, on what channel(s)
is unspecified). There is no mode indicator.
The Chroma Polaris powers up in whatever mode it was left in,
contrary to what its documentation says (it says it powers up
in OMNI ON, as required by the MIDI spec). It recognizes OMNI
OFF over the MIDI in (undocumented but observed). OMNI mode can
be controlled from the front panel and there is an indicator to
tell you what mode you're currently in. It's not clear if the
Polaris sends OMNI off over its MIDI OUT when you change its mode
from the front panel. There is a "front panel" switch as part
of the MIDI parameters, but the details of its effects are
undocumented in the early Polaris manual I have.
The Casio CZ-101 seems to not have any notion of OMNI whatsoever.
The documentation says nothing about it, but the CZ-101 behaves
as if always in OMNI OFF mode.
The 360 Systems MIDIBass (a MIDI slave device) goes into OMNI
ON mode when you select "ALL" channels as its receive channel.
Selecting a single channel (only 1 - 14 are available) puts it
in OMNI OFF mode. The selector switch is thus the indicator.
I don't know what it does if it receives an "OMNI OFF" while in
"ALL" channels mode. I'll have to do this experiment.
The Roland MKS-80 Super Jupiter powers up in whatever mode it
was last in. It recognizes OMNI OFF over the MIDI IN, and there
is a front panel OMNI indicator. There is no way to change the
mode from the front panel. It's not clear if a received OMNI
OFF is forwarded over the MIDI OUT or THRU ports, or both. The
documentation says it's forwarded over the OUT port, and says
nothing about THRU.
Drum Machines
The Roland TR-707 and TR-727 both power up in the mode last set.
The OMNI mode can be toggled from the font panel and there is
an indicator telling you what mode you're currently in. The
documentation implies they don't recognize OMNI OFF over the MIDI
IN, but I'll have to confirm this with an experiment.
The Roland TR-909 powers up in OMNI ON mode. Selecting any MIDI
channel sets the mode to OMNI OFF. The channel number serves
as the indicator - if 0, it's in OMNI ON mode. Once set to OMNI
OFF, you have to power it up again to go back to OMNI ON. No
documentation about recognizing OMNI OFF over the MIDI IN.
Effects
The Roland SRV-2000 reverb powers up in whatever mode it was last
in. It recognizes OMNI ON/OFF over the MIDI IN. You can control
the mode from the front panel, and there's an indicator.
As I said, all over the map, with respect to both implementation
details and quality of documentation.
|
261.12 | More Poop... | MENTOR::COTE | | Wed Mar 12 1986 12:21 | 29 |
| This info may help the "MIDI-Masters" bail me out...
I connected the JX3-P MIDI-out port to the MIDI-in port
of my QX-21 sequencer, and put the sequencer in "Monitor Mode" in
order to observe what was comin' down the pike.
Note on = 91
Note off = 81
Now if I understand MIDI protocol correctly, 9n breaks down as...
9n Note On. (I realize I'm not getting the full
info. What note? Velocity? Ect...)
8n Note Off ( ditto, most of above.)
Where n = MIDI channel number
So it appears the Roland sends on MIDI 1 (only) and (currently) recieves
in OMNI. There seems to be too much evidence for me to buy-off that
I'm stuck in OMNI, so I'll keep pluggin' away...
One thing that surprises me (and I'll bet alot of other noters)...
"Where is John Sauter's reply? The world awaits!!" :^)
Edd
|
261.13 | Oh yeah, another question... | MENTOR::COTE | | Wed Mar 12 1986 12:46 | 6 |
| re: .1
Len, if your sequencers send OMNI OFF at power up, what channel
do your synths end up on? Last used? Channel x default?
Edd
|
261.14 | Yes | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed Mar 12 1986 13:05 | 18 |
| It depends. Some of them remember what channel they were last set
to (e.g., MKS-80, TR-707/727, Polaris). Others reset to channel
"0" (TR-909) which is really OMNI (TOTALLY ignoring channel number
in all messages, not just voice messages). The JUNO-106 and CZ-101
reset to channel 1 at power up. The Poly-800 always sends on channels
1 (keyboard) and 2 (internal sequencer). The receive channel is
whatever you set it to last. The MIDIBass powers up in whatever
channel the front panel slide switch is set to.
Note that you can't change a synth's send or receive channel over
the MIDI port - there is no "change channel" MIDI message. Thus
this is independent of whatever the sequencers do. I don't think
your question was meant to imply such an interaction; rather, given that
my sequencers tell everybody else to go OMNI OFF, what channels are they
(everybody else) then listening on?
It's all perfectly sensible, don't you think? ;-)
|
261.15 | My reply | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Wed Mar 12 1986 15:35 | 4 |
| re: .12--I've just been reading and learning; I can't contribute
much to this discussion. I do wonder about the QX-21's Monitor
Mode. Doesn't it show you the complete MIDI message?
John Sauter
|
261.16 | Wish I had a MIDI Monitor | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed Mar 12 1986 17:07 | 16 |
| Right John, I was going to ask where's the other bytes (they contain
the note number and velocity data). Most MIDI messages are 3 bytes
long.
I have several times wished for various kinds of MIDI "buss monitors",
e.g.:
a device with 16 lights that would show active channels (NOTE
ON turns the light on, NOTE OFF turns it off)
a device that would show on an LED bar graph kind of display
the velocity of NOTE ONs on a selected channel, perhaps with a
"sample and hold" option
len.
|
261.17 | 2 digit diplay | MENTOR::COTE | | Thu Mar 13 1986 08:02 | 16 |
| The "Monitor" function on the QX-21 consists of a 2 digit hexadecimal
display on the front panel. Since it's displaying hex, I assume
I am monitoring 8 bits out of the message...
9 1 (Note On, channel 2)
1001 0001
8 B (Note Off channel 12)
1000 1100
Which 8 bits? ("Duh...") And why only 2 bytes? Remember, this is
a $200 sequencer. I don't suppose I can ask for the world. Then
again, given Yamahahaha's propensity towards documentation, the
full MIDI message may be available and I just can't find it!
Edd
|
261.18 | 8x unusual | DSSDEV::SAUTER | John Sauter | Thu Mar 13 1986 08:51 | 8 |
| It is rare for a keyboard to use the 8x form of Note Off.
If the keyboard doesn't have Release Velocity it is more
efficient to use 9x nn 00, since it can then use Running
Status to suppress the status byte. Thus, the 8B on the
monitor may be something other than a MIDI status byte.
I've never seen any documentation on the QX-21 so I can't
guess what it might be.
John Sauter
|
261.19 | Oh, Dopey me... | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Wed Apr 02 1986 09:55 | 4 |
| I forgot to ask the obvious... How do you owners of JX's get yours
out of OMNI?
Edd
|
261.20 | Epilogue | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Thu Apr 24 1986 07:47 | 17 |
| I finally stopped by Union Music in Worcester where the Roland was
purchased and questioned them. After a call to Roland in CA., we
found there is a $49.95 IC chip that can be retrofit by the user
and will cure the problem. The catch...
You get your choice of MIDI channels 1 or 3. This
doesn't impress me as too big a deal.
The keyboard is disconnected from the synth whenever
the unit is set to OMNI off. A small price to pay.
2 week lead time on the chip.
According to the salesman and Roland alot of the early Rolands made
it out this way due to confusion about the then new MIDI specs.
Edd
|
261.21 | | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Apr 24 1986 08:57 | 9 |
| I believe the retrofit will also make your JX3-P velocity sensitive
when driven via MIDI, by a PC or another velocity sensitive machine.
$49.95 is a small price to pay. However, I understand that the upgrade
is very difficult to install due to the large number of screws that
need to be removed/repaced and other features such as having not
been built to be worked on.
dave
|
261.22 | Roland Builds Hard to Break, Hard to Fix | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu Apr 24 1986 14:35 | 7 |
| I'll second that, if my experience going into my msq-700 to change
its battery (still haven't got one!). The battery was soldered
to the underside of the PC board, which was in turn mounted to the
chassis with TEN screws! (At least it wasn't riveted...)
len.
|
261.23 | :^) | MENTOR::COTE | Sue me if I play too long... | Tue Apr 29 1986 10:11 | 17 |
| I ordered the upgrade chip via Union Music in Worcester.
$49.95 and 2 weeks.
The real owner of the JX was a tad squimish about opening up the
unit and performing any surgery. So I asked Union if they'd do the
upgrade. They said OK but only under the following UNGAWDLY terms...
1. They'd charge me $20.00
2. I'd have to wait around the store for close to an
hour while Rolly was under the knife.
3. I'd be subjected to coffee and donuts.
Reluctantly, I agreed.... ;^)
A whole-hearted endorsement for the service and sales at Union Music!
Edd
|
261.24 | | BAXTA::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Tue Apr 29 1986 15:21 | 5 |
| Sounds great! I was quoted a price of $125 to do the upgrade......
unfortunately Union Music is a little far from Augusta
dave
|
261.25 | For $20, it was worth it!! | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed | Tue Apr 29 1986 17:48 | 10 |
| re: .23
If the owner is the Field Service engineer I think it is, tell her
that she should have more confidence in her ability to perform
upgrades! :-)
My experiences with Union Music have also been pleasant. Nice bunch
of folks.
Derek
|
261.26 | Anxiety City | MENTOR::COTE | Bodacious Cowboys... | Tue Jun 10 1986 08:57 | 15 |
| Well, the Roland goes under the knife tonight! (gasp!) I'll post
the details here later. Cards and letters may be sent c/o Union
Music.
Re. .25 - I passed the word along. The issue is not so much one
of "ability" to perform the upgrade, (I'm a Field Service Engineer
also, so I'm sure either one of us could do a $20 retrofit), but
rather one of "liability". What if the chip arrived DOA? No company
is going to keep giving Joe User $50 IC's to hack around with. By
having them do it, I'm not gauranteed a success, but I do have some-
one to push back on if it fails. Well worth $20.....
Edd
|
261.27 | Now was that IC23 or IC32??? | ADVAX::SPEED | Derek Speed, WS Tech Mktg | Tue Jun 10 1986 16:48 | 6 |
| Good luck with the upgrade. Even though I am an EE by education,
I resist the temptation to go futzing around inside my gear when
things break. Better to "leave that to the professionals", as they
say.
Derek
|
261.28 | Static over the FCO | MENTOR::COTE | High in The Custerdome... | Wed Jun 11 1986 22:37 | 33 |
| ... so there goes Edd, happy as a clam, runnin' down to Union Music
to pick up the JX3-P with the new OMNI-off, velocity sensitive upgrade.
He proudly presents his claim ticket and off goes the sales-type.
Tick, tock, tick, tock. Some minutes later the saleman returns.
"Uh, like we can't find any Roland back there with your name on
it..." AARRGGHHH!!! I just dropped it off yesterday! A quick search
and they find it, under the real owner's name. Logical. It was left there
under her name! He disappears again. Tick, tock, tick, tock....
Again he returns. "Um, like the chip we got from Roland was bad."
I smile. This is why we didn't do it ourselves!!! Now for the kicker,
I ask, "What did you do then?" Luckily, the old chip went back in
and functioned perfectly. I set it up in the middle of the floor
and tested it on the spot; all is OK. OMNI never looked so good!
So I ask if they get lots of bad chips. When he indicates yes, I
ask about static protection. "What?" Static bags, floor mats, wrist
and heel straps. Nope. Nuthin.
So I'm wondering. Was it DOA? Or fried by some "tech" who shuffled
across the rug to get it? We'll never know. I'm damn glad I didn't
fork over my hard-earned cash (no snickers) for it though.
So why don't we all do ourselves a big favor. Ask your local keyboard
emporium what they do about static. I bet not much. Educate 'em!
They'll save time and money and retain customer good will. You'll
get better/faster service next time you have repairs done.
What if my original chip took a hit? I shudder to think....
BTW, Union Music is still a good place to do business, I can't
blame them for this. DOA's DO happen.
Edd
|
261.29 | Finally!!!!!! | MENTOR::COTE | A race of men in the trees... | Wed Jun 18 1986 20:04 | 20 |
| OMNI-OFF! OMNI-OFF! OMNI-OFF!
Union called the day after I picked up the Roland to say they had
a second chip. I brought it in yesterday and picked it up today.
Sure enough, OMNI-off, choice of ch. 1 or 3, and velocity info
recieve.
OMNI is shut off by powering the unit up while holding down voice
selector 7. All on-board sequencer light come on to verify it is
"in the mode". Chanell selection is made by pressing the "Tape Memory"
button, off=1, on=3. The keyboard is disconnected when in this mode,
so you MUST use an outboard controller. I could find no faults with
the upgrade.
They did misquote the price to me earlier though. They said $49.95
plus $20 for labor. Ended up costing $61.90.
:^) :^) :^) :^) :^) :^)
Edd who_never_had_much_use_for_OMNI_anyhow
|
261.30 | Back on the subject... | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Sun Oct 16 1988 19:18 | 8 |
| Well, the title mentions thru-boxes so I'll dump this here...
My QX has a thru port I have no use for due to the "local echo"
feature. What I could use is a second out port.
Can I wire 'em in parralel? (Did I spell that right, Uncle len?)
Edd
|
261.31 | parallel | NRPUR::DEATON | | Mon Oct 17 1988 09:06 | 0 |
261.32 | Anti-serial... | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 09:16 | 5 |
| Thanks!
But will it work?
Edd
|
261.33 | Didn't someone else do this? Keyboard? Hmmm... | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | | Mon Oct 17 1988 12:26 | 7 |
| Seems to me I read about someone doing this somewhere else when the QX
was the rage ... I don't see why there would be a problem.
Rather than get inside the box, you may want to build an external box
that simply splits MIDI out.
-b (up north this week in someone else's account)
|
261.34 | Need A Circuits Jock | DRUMS::FEHSKENS | | Mon Oct 17 1988 13:51 | 6 |
| Since the MIDI spec involves a current loop interface, I wonder
if things will work ok if you just wire two outputs together.
I think they may require separate optoisolators/drivers.
len.
|
261.35 | MIDI Innie, MIDI Outtie... | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 13:57 | 7 |
| Mind you, this is just an exercise in wishing, as I got the same
optoisolator line at my local purveyor and ended up walking out
with a $60 1->6 thru box...
Didn't somebody in here actually convert a thru to an out?
Edd
|
261.36 | Maybe we're thinking ST, not QX. | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | DYO780::SCHAFER in another account @PKO | Mon Oct 17 1988 14:34 | 4 |
| The Atari ST MIDI out is also wired for THRU on the unused pins (see
notes elsewhere). Maybe that's what we're thinking of.
-b (still at PKO)
|
261.37 | You're nobody till you've been BIMmed... | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 14:45 | 5 |
| Wait. Brad is a Parker St.???
For how long?
Edd
|
261.38 | oops (brain damage) - U mean "bim" as in LERDS-BIM? | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | Really DYO780::SCHAFER in Maynard | Mon Oct 17 1988 14:55 | 8 |
| No, I'm not *A* Parker St (but I've been called lots of things before,
so no big deal).
I'm AT Parker St. For the whole week. Honest. And what's bimmed?
I've been bashed, beat up - even sucker punched once, but I don't think
I've ever been bimmed ... what's the scoop?
-b
|
261.39 | BIM:== The act of attending LERDS-BIM | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 15:58 | 11 |
| Of course!
It's usually on Wednesday (although a move to Tuesday this week
only wouldn't break my heart...).
I'm sure I can speak for len and Ron when I say were really kinda
hurt it wasn't on your list of things to do while in MA. It's at
least as much fun as looking at a $1200 car insurance policy.
(Bet you ain't got none of them in Ohio!)
Edd
|
261.40 | Obviously a $SET ARM /TWIST=MODERATE from .-1. | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | Really DYO780::SCHAFER in Maynard | Mon Oct 17 1988 16:07 | 13 |
| [I'll delete all these garbage notes when I'm back home, since they're
off the topic.]
Weeellll, I s'pose I could be flim-flammed into attending one for a
while. Wherizit, and how far from MLO? (I'm staying at the Best
Western Royal Plaza on 20 off 495.) Dress code? Soft drinks
supported? Etc, etc, etc.
Is there an associated jam before/during/after the BIM? And, or
course, my heartfelt apologies to Len, Ron ... and yes, even you, Uncle
Edd.
-b the_chagrined
|
261.41 | You're there.... | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 16:38 | 19 |
| Well, gheesh, you be practically there!! The Royal Plasma Hotel
is right across the street from Mt. Royal, where JAWS:: lives.
But I moved so ignore that...
Tom Foolery's (default site and exhalted BIM breeding ground)
is about 4 miles from there. Get on 495 South and get off
at the next exit, Route 9 West. TF's is about 2 miles down
route 9, on the right. The lounge is inside. On the right.
Soft drinks are supported. Dress code is neo-yuppie. (They'd
prefer no T-shirts or sneakers but the 3 of us seem to have a
little bit of pull with the hostoid.)
Usually starts Wednesday at 5:00. Assume that unless there is
an overwhelming cry for Tuesday. (My preference this week.)
Of course, Barbara's not there on Tuesdaze....
Edd
|
261.42 | No T-shirts, especially not "Y-word" T-shirts | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | Yo! | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:16 | 22 |
| To my great surprise, LERDS-BIM *does* have a dress-code!!!!
No T-shirts are allowed!
Obviously this dress-code is enforced by the host establishment,
not the organizers and patrons of LERDS-BIM.
I once drove all the way down from Nashua, NH (about 1� hours)
only to be refused admittance. Fortunately we were able to persuade
(by threatening to take our considerable business elsewhere)
them to overlook the dress code this one time.
db
p.s. By the way, you may not get such a break if the T-shirt you
happen to be wearing says "Yamaha" on it.
On the other hand, if your T-shirt says "Roland", don't
be surprised if instead of getting thrown out, they roll out
the red carpet instead
;-)
|
261.43 | Should entitle this "NOTER VISITS BOSTON AREA". | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | Really DYO780::SCHAFER in Maynard | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:22 | 8 |
| Howzabout "sin sux"? Seriously, I'll be normal and wear a (fairly)
decent nonT-shirt and a nice pair of blue jeans (all I got, guys - they
don't pay us dweebes in the field).
What time should I arrive? Any pointers? I think I remember Tom
Foolery's ... ain't it on the way to Len's apt.?
-b
|
261.44 | Wear a chicken on your head....;^) | WEFXEM::COTE | It was a dark and stormy night... | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:34 | 6 |
| You got the right place.
Is tomorrow OK with you? With anyone else? If not assume Wednesday...
5:00. I can't stay long...
Edd
|
261.45 | Don't wait too long, or Wed. it is. | GEMVAX::LINNEHAN | Really DYO780::SCHAFER in Maynard | Mon Oct 17 1988 17:45 | 4 |
| If tomorrow, you gotta let me know ... fast. I'll have to shuffle my
schedule, and as it stands now, I'm completely full. Let me (us) know.
-b
|
261.46 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | socialism doesn't work ... | Mon Oct 17 1988 23:20 | 13 |
| I'm the guy that hacked my QX5 thru to become an out. I've been
using it this way for a year with no problems. The hack is simple,
requiring a snip and soldering a joint. It does not involve soldering
on the PC traces. Near as I can tell, they designed the board so
they could have gone either way (thru-out or out-out) with the jumper
wires. I tried looking for the note but couldn't find it. I'm
sure I posted it ... Anyway, look inside on the component side
of the main PC board and you'll see two jumper wires parallel to
each other and rather close. One feeds the thru and the other feeds
the out. The fix consists of breaking the one and soldering one
side of it to the other. But, I don't remember the exaxt details.
Steve
|
261.47 | Out vs Thru? | LEDDEV::HASTINGS | | Tue Oct 18 1988 13:02 | 5 |
|
What exactly is the difference between MIDI thru and MIDI out?
Mark
|
261.48 | Simple, until you use it | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Tue Oct 18 1988 13:34 | 4 |
| Thru's what has come in from somebody else, while out is your own
contribution to network congestion.
Richard.
|
261.49 | You still misunderstand. | MIDEVL::YERAZUNIS | There are sparks coming out of the printer. Is that normal? | Tue Oct 18 1988 18:19 | 7 |
| Nope, THRU is an exact duplicate of what came on the IN socket,
nothing added, nothing taken out.
OUT is what was generated locally, and nothing else (in particular,
OUT does _not_ have a copy of IN on it.).
-Bill
|
261.50 | Is crystal cle-uh.... | WEFXEM::COTE | It looks like Fruit Loops out there! | Tue Oct 18 1988 21:24 | 4 |
| Unless, of course, your unit has a MIDI merge facility, which,
to my mind, negates any use for a thru port on the unit.
Edd
|
261.51 | IN, OUT, SHAKEITALLABOUT | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Wed Oct 19 1988 05:28 | 15 |
| I thought merge was used for:
IN: other stuff in down one string
OUT: your stuff out down another string
MERGE: Your stuff + other stuff out down the second string (or a
third string)
THRU: other stuff out down yet another string.
I can see a use for this (but not for me)
Richard.
|
261.52 | ...just to add to the confusion... | MUNCSS::BURKE | | Thu Jan 12 1989 11:20 | 16 |
| As I understand it (I'm sure I've experienced it also), MIDI THRU
does NOT handle the stuff your machine has generated - this goes
out via MIDI OUT. Therefore, it's a kind of filter. ie.
(Assume the device is set to handle channel 3)
MIDI IN MIDI OUT MIDI THRU
------- -------- ---------
1,2,3,4 3 1,2,4
Note that this may be device-dependant - I use a CZ, MT-32, TR-505
and an Atari.
Jim Burke (waiting to get shot down, but as I say, I'm sure I've
experienced it !)
|
261.53 | Try this | NRPUR::DEATON | | Thu Jan 12 1989 11:26 | 19 |
| RE < Note 261.52 by MUNCSS::BURKE >
> -< ...just to add to the confusion... >-
That you did!
MIDI OUT (as specified by the MIDI SPEC) will only transmit data that
is originated in the device it is located on. MIDI THRU will only transmit
data that comes in the MIDI IN port. It's not a kind of a filter.
Therfore, the scenario should be:
MIDI IN MIDI OUT MIDI THRU
------- -------- ---------
1,2,4 3 1,2,4
(assuming the device being operated is set to transmit on MIDI ch. 3)
Dan Eaton
|
261.54 | I didnt use to be confused! | TROA01::HITCHMOUGH | | Thu Jan 12 1989 14:15 | 20 |
| On most machines (that I've had experience with), MIDI OUT can almost
be considered "hard wired" to the MIDI IN, therefore anything coming
into MIDI IN would be reflected at the MIDI THROUGH. The unit would
not normally suck of any channel dependent data (unless of course
you had a special intelligent interface that would do this for you.
Even if the kbd was set to Tx on 3 and chan 3 data was coming IN,
this would still be seen at the THROUGH. Any data generated by the
kbd would only be seen on the OUT, thus the scenario could be:
MIDI IN MIDI OUT MIDI THROUGH
1,2,3,5 3 1,2,3,5
The difference would be that unless a merge was used, the two sets
of channel 3 data would be different.
Hope this doesn't add more confusion...particularily to me!!
Ken
|
261.55 | OOPS!! | TROA01::HITCHMOUGH | | Thu Jan 12 1989 14:21 | 5 |
| Ooops, in last note, first line should have been MIDI THROUGH can
be considered hard wired to MIDI IN. Sorry for the confusion.
Ken
|
261.56 | | STORMY::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Wed Sep 06 1989 22:35 | 29 |
| I'm about to do a major boo-boo here. I'm going to ask a question
without having read all 55 previous replies. I hope I'm not going
to be too redundant.
In a few short months, I've gone from midi-nothing to midi-much
(well, much to me anyway).
Now, I could "chain" my EPS (as master) to my HR16, R8, O3, to the
P3 but that sounds sloppy.
Is a midi-through box like my idea of a midi-distributor?
--------
|Chan 1|--> HR16
|Chan 2|--> R8
EPS out --> |Chan 3|--> O3
|Chan 4|--> P3
|Chan 5|-->
|Chan x|-->
--------
Guitar Center showed me a small box with two midi-in (A/B) and four
outputs assigned to each a and b. Cost $99
Does this sound like a good deal, or can someone suggest something
more suited to what I might need (hey, I don't know what I need).
Thanks
"jackin' the house", Bob
|
261.57 | | HAMER::COCCOLI | guess i'm just a spudboy,looking for a real tomato | Wed Sep 06 1989 23:34 | 16 |
|
Yup, thats a thru box. Except in your drawing the channel
assignments seemed internal to the thru box. The recieve channels
are assigned in each of the midimodules.
Seems to me all you need is a thru box, at this point. You may plan for
the future and get something that merges at the same time, but this
would probably run you a good $100 more than just a thru box.
I have a Kawai MX8r mixer which actually has a one input ,four out
midi thru box built-in. Good idea, eh?.
Rich
|
261.58 | Philip Rees Midi toys ... | RDGENG::MCNAUGHTON | Bruce, IE Process and Quality | Thu Sep 07 1989 07:03 | 18 |
| Philip Rees (a uk manufacturer) makes some inexpensive midi thru,
merge and switch modules. I've got a couple V3 modules (battery operated).
V3 (1 input 3 output) 12.95 pounds (battery operated)
2M (2 input , 2 thru outputs, 2 merge outputs) 79.95 pounds
9S, 9-1 switch 35.95 pds
5S, 5-1 switch 25.95 pds
2S, 2-1 switch 12.95 pds
3B, 3 input 2 output rotary changeover switch.
I don't have a latest catalog - but I've been pleased with the units.
I also have a 2 input 1 output JLC merge/filter box which costs about 70pds
which works fine too..
Bruce
|
261.59 | One silly question deserves another...;^) | DCSVAX::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Thu Sep 07 1989 07:39 | 5 |
| Do you realize that you don't *need* a thru box? Use of the MIDI
THRU port will allow you to access all your SGUs when they are
connected serially...
Edd
|
261.60 | Not all SGUs have THRUs | RDGENG::MCNAUGHTON | Bruce, IE Process and Quality | Thu Sep 07 1989 07:53 | 19 |
| Your right! but some of us have equipment without THRU ports.
Yamaha CLP-50 and ROLAND TR626 and the ATARIst.
(these are features ...)
I also believe P-R makes a 1-5 thru box...
I classify the P-R equipment as TOYS since they are not rack mounted
and do not eliminate a lot of cables running around and are not
programmable. ... but they work... and met my needs...
I also looked into a number of the patchbays and realized that though
they have a lot of ins and outs - they generally only have one merge.
I have actually reduced the need for a lot of these toys by getting
a ROM replaced in my CLP-50 ... the active sense and local off features
were broken - but I was able to work around them using alternative midi
paths using these extra modules.
Bruce
|
261.61 | nice, but not necessary. | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - boycott hell. | Thu Sep 07 1989 11:27 | 12 |
| Bob, the thru-box may be cleaner conceptually, but I doubt that it
would provide you any real practical advantage. I used to have 11 MIDI
devices chained together using MIDI THRU, and had no trouble or delays
or anything else.
The only advantage I can see to a box like this is that it prevents
your MIDI network from going away should one of the modules decide to
go south for some reason.
I'd add a few bux to my $100 and buy a �verbII if I were you.
-b
|
261.62 | THRU with MIDI THRU | MRSVAX::MISKINIS | | Thu Sep 07 1989 11:50 | 14 |
| I had to build (why buy!) a MIDI-thru box, since I now hve 2
SGUs without MIDI thru ports...
I redesigned it from an old Keyboard article, such that it uses
the HP-6N138 optoisolator, which is readiliy available. Most
project articles (and the ATARI ST) use the Sharp PC900, which
I couldn't find in any "over the counter" stores in the area...
If anyone out there wants to build one, let me know, and I'll send
you a schematic...
NOW all my equipment is networked!
_John_
|
261.63 | Depends on what you really want to do | CSC32::MOLLER | Nightmare on Sesame Street | Thu Sep 07 1989 11:56 | 28 |
| You might look into a MIDI patch bay to allow you to route things.
I have both a '1 in 4 out thru box' and an 'MX-8 Patch Bay/Processer'.
I find that I often have to reconfigure things (especially when I
want to be able to connect into other SGU's, or add something). The
thru box connects to my sequencer (after being routed thru the MX-8)
& this keeps the MIDI path fairly short, and tweekable. Why don't I
just use the thru ports on the SGU's, well, occasionally, something
gets turned off thats at the beginning of the chain & I get stuck
on notes. I also had a few problems with figuring out what was
connected to what (I spent quite a bit of time diagraming my set
up & defining my needs before wiring my rack).
I'd say that a patch bay or thru box might simplify management of
your MIDI network. I don't know how you sequence, but I tend to
use random MIDI devices for input (I have a CZ-101, ESQ-1 & TR-505
for most of the inputs, but have also connected up to KX-5's,
Octa-pads and a MIDI guitar (Suzuki product) to input data. Since
I'm really a guitar player turned keyboard player, I tend not to
focus on what the keyboard does, but try for certain things that
the random MIDI devices allow me to feel more comfortable with.
My network allows me to define up to 6 input controllers, and
still allows me to load either my MMT-8 or ESQ-1 sequencer while
the other is playing (This was quite a challenge). My emphasis
is for live performance & ability to swap things around fast is
quite important. MIDI networks can get messy in no time at all.
Jens
|
261.64 | | SALSA::MOELLER | Nested assumption calls | Thu Sep 07 1989 13:27 | 5 |
| I found that my KX88 was sending MIDI data that caused my EMAX to
barf.. not playing every eighth note. So I got a SONUS 2in, *8* out
box for... $99.
karl
|
261.65 | | STORMY::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Thu Sep 07 1989 17:21 | 22 |
| To answer your collective questions and comments....
I was considering this midi-through box because of various comments
read in here about devices getting confused ala' not being able
to keep up with the midi information passing "thru" them.
re: the suggestion to get a midiverb. I forgot to include them
in my list of toys. I have two midiverb II's.
re: That one reply about thru-boxes being 79.x pounds. "Damn!"
I thought, "That's awfully *heavy* for a little patch box. My EPS
only weighs about 50 pounds!"
Then I realized you mean *money*.
Karl: I think the SONUS box is what Guitar Center showed me. It
had 2 in and 8 out but they were grouped in 4's (Group A and Gruop
B). Yes? No?
Thanks everyone!
"jackin' the house", Bob
|
261.66 | | WEFXEM::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Thu Sep 07 1989 17:24 | 3 |
| I picked up a Korg 1 in, 6 out thru box for ~$60...
Edd
|
261.67 | Urban Myth? | WEFXEM::COTE | Another day, another segue... | Thu Sep 07 1989 17:25 | 4 |
| Oh, BTW, I've NEVER had a problem with datums clogging up my THRU
ports...
Edd
|
261.68 | Passive THRU Possible? | AQUA::ROST | Drink beer: Live 6 times longer | Mon Nov 19 1990 10:42 | 15 |
| I just picked up a MIDImix 5 thru box yesterday for a whopping $8, new.
It's a 2-in, 3-out device. Hooked it up, works great.
This thing looks like a ceramic ring stuffed with potting compund, into
which are placed five DIN connectors, a switch to slect input, a green
LED which I can't make light up and an electrolytic cap.
What I'm trying to figure out is whether this actually has optos
inside somewhere and sucks power off the current loop ala Anatek
Pocket things, or is this actually a passive device?
Potting has one severe side effect, if the thing breaks, it can't be
repaired. For $8, I guess that's OK 8^) 8^)
Brian
|
261.69 | Cheap test? | DCSVAX::COTE | Can't touch this... | Mon Nov 19 1990 11:25 | 3 |
| If it had opto's wouldn't it only work in one direction???
Edd
|
261.70 | I bet a number of people here have a use for these | RANGER::EIRIKUR | Eir�kur Hallgr�msson | Mon Nov 19 1990 18:37 | 4 |
| Gee, where do I get one?
Eirikur
|