T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
260.1 | try Syntech | STAR::MALIK | Karl Malik | Wed Mar 05 1986 13:53 | 8 |
|
Aside from Passport, a company called Syntech makes a bunch
of C64/MIDI hardware and software. Ask your local music store if
they have any of their literature.
Also, check out the ads in good old Keyboard magazine.
- Karl
|
260.2 | | OZONE::DAVIS | | Wed Mar 05 1986 17:02 | 25 |
|
I've just started to try and get my C-64 to talk MIDI (to my
Casio CZ-101). I have the Passport hardware interface and have played
with the MIDI 8+ software. It's basically an 8 track MIDI recorder
with some nice features like "punch-in", quantizing, and sync to
MIDI or drum machine clocks. Very easy to use.
Some of the music stores around Boston say nice things about
software from a small company in Waltham, MA called Dr. T's, but
I haven't been able to get a demo of it. They make a sequencer/recorder
which is supposed to be more sophisticated than Passport but not
as user friendly. They also have a CZ librarian program which can
play back files made with their sequencer software (for live
performance I guess).
I haven't actually bought any software yet because I'd really
like to write my own, but so far lack of time has kept me from doing
anything more complex than a simple Sample and Hold type program
using the LFOs in the C-64.
I think the C-64 makes a good MIDI controller for the price.
It's major drawback, as you probably already know, is that the disk
drive is very slow when compared to other machines. This is not
too bad for use at home or in a studio, but could give be a problem
if you were trying to load long compositions in live performance.
- Rob
|
260.3 | C64 & DR T's a good combination | CANYON::BABCOCK | | Tue Apr 29 1986 16:02 | 12 |
| I have been using a C64 for over a year with DR-T's software
and have found it as good as any I've seen. I have written some
software for CPM on a DECMATE and tried to build a interface that
would work at 9600 just for the fun of it. It worked fairly well
but this approach was taking me away from my main objective.
If anyone wants more input please let me know.
Some said that the program load speed of the C64 is slow in a
performance situation - but it is cheap enough that you can afford
two and you aren't slowed down then.
|
260.4 | <More info please> | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Apr 30 1986 08:10 | 6 |
| Could you do a review of the Dr T software? I am interested in the
features it offers for editing and sequencing, especially for use
with my TR 707 drum machine, but also for my JX3-P. Also what synths
are you using it with? many thanks....
dave
|
260.5 | Bad C64 w/Dr. T? | ORACLE::WATERS | | Wed Apr 30 1986 08:40 | 12 |
| I just bought Dr. T's stuff recently, and I have a problem. My
roommate's C64 was purchased some time ago, and has a fairly low
serial no. When I loaded the Keyboard Controlled Sequencer, all
of the menus save 1 are invisable, and large portions of the data
screens are invisible. The program works OK, but you can't see
what you're doing. Running the same disc and interface on the
C64 in a music store shows no problems. I looked for the Commodore
Notes file, but it's gone. Can any of you C64 fans recall any
information that may be of help to me? The Dr. T patch librarian
works fine on this C64, by the way. Thanks...
Greg W.
|
260.6 | More on Dr. T? | OZONE::DAVIS | | Wed Apr 30 1986 10:04 | 17 |
| RE: .5
Some of the earlier 64s were different in their display. It has
something to do with the way the default background colors were
initialized. You might try printing a screen full of spaces or pokeing
screen memory in some way before you load the program. I'll try
to check some of my old Gazettes or COMPUTE books for details.
RE: .3 & .4
I'm very interested in Dr. T's sequencer software and would love
to see a review. I'm interested in a sequencer which programs like
a drum machine (patterns which can then be combined to make songs)
as opposed to a MIDI recorder. Can you have more than one sequence
in memory ? Can you switch between sequences while they are playing?
Do the sequences also remember program changes for the synths they're
controlling? Do I ask too many questions?
|
260.7 | where did VIC notes file go? | BAILEY::RHODES | | Thu May 15 1986 14:54 | 6 |
| What the heck happened to the VIC notes file anyways????? My disk
drive is acting up and would like to know what software is out there
to calibrate the heads, etc. Any ideas?
Todd.
|
260.8 | Whither C64... | CGHUB::IBBETT | OIS Performance Group | Fri May 16 1986 13:26 | 2 |
| The c64 stuff is in SPHINX::COMMODORE. There is also a SPHINX::AMIGA
for users of that machine...
|
260.9 | Keyboard reviews | ECAD::SHERMAN | | Wed Aug 20 1986 16:18 | 8 |
|
Check out KEYBOARD's Synthesizers '86 ($3.95). They have a fold-out chart on
page 44 that compares the spec's on Dr. T and a LOT of other sequencer S/W and
H/W. Dr. T's ranks among the best, as far as software goes.
Steve
|
260.10 | Dr T has a limited appetite? | BAILEY::RHODES | | Wed Aug 20 1986 16:44 | 10 |
| I've been looking into the Dr. T sequencer for my C64. The only problem
I have from looking at the specs is that it only has room for
somthing like 3500 notes. I don't think that is enough for even
a five minute song that is relatively "busy". Any comments on
this?
All the other features of the Dr T. sequencer look outstanding.
Todd.
|
260.11 | Bottle of Red, Bottle of White.... | JAWS::COTE | Button panic.... | Wed Aug 20 1986 16:53 | 13 |
| Right, Todd. 3500 notes (2 events per) doesn't go too far.
A relatively busy 5 minute tune would suck it up. As a reference
point...
Billy Joel's "Scene's From An Italian Restaurant" can't
be done in 8000 notes on piano only. I ran out of memory
about the same time Brenda and Eddie got divorced.
Whoa-oh, whoa-oh....
Edd
|
260.12 | It's a feature not a bug. | NIMBUS::DAVIS | | Thu Aug 21 1986 11:02 | 24 |
|
The 3500 notes is probably enough for only 3-4 minutes of music in
real time, but the problem is with the C-64, not the Dr.'s software.
I had the Passport MIDI +8 and that had only about the same (maybe
less) memory available, but didn't even come close to the features
available with Dr T's. The way to save memory is to make sections
that are repetitive (bass lines and other rhythm tracks) into sequences
that loop rather than straight recorded tracks. I heartily recommend
Dr. T's, it has the most extensive and imaginative editting
capabilities that I've seen or heard of in a sequencer for the C-64.
Also the way his software allows you to create control sequences
(sequences that call other sequences that call etc...) is much more
flexible for the way I like to work with a sequencer. If you're
looking for something that's more of a MIDI recorder with lots of
memory you might check out some of the MSQ recorders from Roland. If
you just want more note capacity in a computer I think you'll need to
get a new computer.
Dr. T's has a sequencer for the C-128 (10,000 notes I think) and
is also planning to heavily support the new Atari STs. You think
1 meg would be enough? 8^)
Rob
|
260.13 | MSQs Not to the Rescue | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Thu Aug 21 1986 13:48 | 17 |
| The MSQs (now replaced by the MC-500) only hold about 6500 notes.
If you are only doing one part of a song on the sequencer (i.e.,
drums and guitars don't take up any space), you can get a couple
of songs (< 4 minutes worth each) into a an MSQ. If you do all
parts, you can maybe get one song in. Time for tape sync and
multitracking. My touchstone for all this is the Bach 6th Brandenburg,
whose first 50 bars fill my MSQ-100 (6 parts, 4 of which are mostly
16ths all the way, and two of which are mostly 8ths all the way).
An MC-500 will hold about 27000 notes onboard, and 100000 on disk
(but you can only play the onboard stuff, and loading from disk
is not instantaneous). But an MC-500 will cost you about $1100,
and MSQ-100s and -700s are no longer available new, but there is
a good used market for them.
len.
|
260.14 | thanks for the info | BARNUM::RHODES | | Thu Aug 21 1986 14:11 | 22 |
| Re: -.2
Thanks for the info. I figured the limitations were in the C64. Fortunately
the Dr. T software allows looping and other filtering capabilities to save
space. Another advantage with the C64/Dr. T setup over a QX or MSQ is
the ability to store a sequence to disk.
Someday a computer sequencer will come out for the C64 that uses a virtual
scheme so that only parts of an overall sequence are in physical memory at
any one time (like virtual memory). Thus the note limit would be disk
capacity rather than what physical memory could hold. Of course, looping
would be impossible, but with a full disk of capacity, who needs it!
Hmmmm, how much could I sell it for if I wrote one?
Re: -.1
Good points Len. I really need to define what I want to do with the sequencer
to determine whether 3500 notes is enough.
Next problem: What C64 MIDI interface to get.
Todd.
|
260.15 | | BIGALO::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Thu Aug 21 1986 14:28 | 10 |
| re -1
Good question....I've been agonising over this questions since I
bought my 64..AS near as I can tell the interface needs to be passport
compatable (everybody writes their software to run on this interface).
Passport's are $149 (last I checked, direct from passport), seems
like I saw one in this months EM advertised at something like $70
or 90......let me know what you decide.
dave
|
260.16 | | DB::RAVAN | | Tue Sep 02 1986 01:27 | 12 |
| The problem with the 1541 disk drive is speed. It's about 2K baud
which make it the slowest disk drive I've ever used. Maybe the
1571 is faster. I sold my C64 et. al. when I bought my Amiga.
The problem with using the Amiga disk drive, however, is that
the driver uses the blitter to read/write the disk and doing
so takes time. I've only done a small test, but when I wrote
out data to the disk, serial I/O stopped. Seems that using
the Amiga disk drive transparently will also be impossible.
Has anyone with an Amiga found a way around the problem?
-jim
|