T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
259.1 | Try the Alesis XT:c | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Mon Mar 03 1986 17:13 | 10 |
| The only digital reverb I'm aware that's "a little further down
the scale" is the Alesis XT:c. It's around $700. I had an XT for
a while, but upgraded to a Roland SRV-2000, which put the XT to
shame. My XT also developed random noises after it had been left
on for more than a few hours - I don't know if this is generic or
peculiar to my instance. Anyway, the XT:c is an improved version
of the XT. Check it out.
len.
|
259.2 | Reverbs et al | MINDER::KENT | | Tue Mar 04 1986 03:12 | 30 |
| Theres a company called Alessis (I think thats the spelling) who
have just produced an item called a midiverb. This is basically
a stereo reverb (gated effects and all) which can be controlled
from a midi sequencer (or not if you prefer). This little machine
has no knobs at all it just has 63 pre-set programs which can be
called up as you require from a sequencer. The sound is tremendous
and whilst it doesn't have the flexibilty of the REV7 it is less
than half the price and has all the effects and rooms that ic ould
ever use. e.g. small bright,large warm, ex large dark etc etc.
Price approx 390 pounds in the U.K. I hope this is also available in
the states.
There is also the new Yamaha digital effects processor the SPX90
this can handle quote "full reverb, early reflections (can somebody
explain this ?) and delay/echo facilities plus midi control. Digital
parametric EQ programming ? Modulation effects including chorus
and stereo flange, (not finished yet) freeze sampling, pitch change
Gate reverb (look out Phil Collins) ADR noise gate and autopan. All
for 700 pounds.
But if all you need is reverb the alessis wins hands down. I'd
appreciate it if you's let me know what you think of these two items
as I am also just about to invest. I am assuming they are available
over there.
PK.
|
259.3 | Try Analog | KRYPTN::JASNIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 04 1986 08:05 | 11 |
|
What do you want to do? I mean, if all you want is reverb you
can go very cheap. Why digital? The analog stuff is cheaper and
smaller. I mean, if your not sampling second long sounds and then
blasting PROMs for a Simmons pad - why go through all the fuss?
You'll find that you can get a nice reverb sound for 200 or under.
Some units are spring based, others are not. Listen to how they
sound (most dont like the spring based stuff - but they're not YOU)
Look in the Want Advertizer, I seen stuff cheap there.
Joe Jas
|
259.4 | analog vs. digital, and other things | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Mar 04 1986 13:09 | 25 |
| With analog delays you get what you pay for. "Bucket brigade" type
analog delays usually have some frequency response limitations.
Spring reverbs just don't work for percussion, and reverb goes
a LONG way to dramatically improve the sound of most percussion.
I don't understand Joe's point about sampling, which is orthogonal
to reverb.
Anyone who looks at the Yamaha stuff ought to look at the Roland
SRV-2000. It's a little more expensive but ultimately more flexible,
though it doesn't have a builtin chorus. It does have a digital
delay capability that the user's manual doesn't tell you about -
if you power the thing up with the middle button on the top and
the two outside buttons on the bottom pressed (all together), it
powers up as an up-to-450 msec digital delay with all its controls
mislabeled. If anybody's interested in this "feature", ask and
I'll tell you what I know.
Early reflections are exactly what they sound like. The first
reflections back from the space boundaries are discrete (well, more
discrete) compared to the later ones, which merge and overlap to
provide the continuous decay that distinguishes reverb from echo.
The SRV-2000 gives you control over early reflections as well.
len.
|
259.5 | digilog reverb | CANYON::MOELLER | | Mon Mar 10 1986 16:22 | 8 |
| I have also used the Alesis xt:C and liked it very much. You can
essentially adjust the size of the reverberant environment. The
only problem I noticed was running a drum unit into it, getting
a 'grainy' reverberation off the bass drum. I actually used it
to master a tape. The original was a mono grand piano track. I
ran it into the Alesis and got stereo reverb out. Very pleasing.
Nice for the price. Thumbs up here !
|
259.6 | Reading about Digital Reverbs | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:32 | 8 |
| There's a nice two part article on digital reverbs in the last two
issues of Electronic Musician (February and March 1986) which includes
summaries of 8 or so digital reverbs under $1500. The first part
covers the technology in general. More useful than anything else
I've seen on the subject.
len.
|
259.7 | SRV-2000 Review? | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Tue Mar 11 1986 10:33 | 4 |
| If there's enough interest, I could probably flog myself into doing
a review of the Roland SRV-2000. I've lived with mine a few months
now and can tell you all about it. Any takers?
|
259.8 | Shoot, Len. I'm all ears. | MAX::MCPHERSON | Normal healthy boy w/normal healthy interests | Tue Mar 11 1986 11:20 | 17 |
| re .7
"Note On, O Ye of plentiful toys!"
I'm one phase short of the "shopping phase" for a reverb unit and
I would be glad to hear your comments on the SRV-2000...
Oh yeah... the Electronic Musician articles ARE good pointers!
I've subscribed to the magazine for some time (back when it was
"POLYPHONY" ) and I have ALWAYS found it to be extremely interesting
and informative. If you read this note/conference/whatever-we're-calling it
regularly, then you may want to read "Electronic Musician", too.
(No. Craig Anderton didn't pay me to write that.)
/doug
|
259.9 | craig who ?? | CANYON::MOELLER | | Tue Mar 11 1986 12:31 | 4 |
| Uhh... yeah. I would appreciate an address for 'Electronic Musician',
even tho I disagree vehemently with Anderton that four-track machines
are only good for low-fi mono productions. karl
|
259.10 | Can't beat a good review! | MIDAS::RHODES | | Tue Mar 11 1986 13:27 | 7 |
| Review of the 2000 would be well appreciated as are reviews of any
other Digiverbs!
As always, thanks...
Todd.
|
259.11 | Electronic Musician Subscriptions | ERLANG::FEHSKENS | | Wed Mar 12 1986 09:15 | 22 |
| Electronic Musician provides two different subscription addresses
and rates. You figure it out.
The bound in subscription card says $14.95 a year, and is addressed
to
MIX Publications
2608 Ninth Street
Berkeley CA 94710
The subscription junk in the front of the magazine says $22.00 a
year, send requests to
Electronic Musician
5615 West Cermak Road
Cicero IL 60650
or call (312) 762-2193.
A review of the SRV-2000 is in the works. Stay tuned.
len.
|
259.12 | ART Digital Reverb | FRSBEE::MALLETT | | Thu Mar 20 1986 12:30 | 7 |
| My band just picked up an ART (engineers who bolted from MXR and
started their own company) DR2. It goes for around $650 and so
far, we're very pleased with it. One of these years, when this
job slows down a mite, I'll try to write in a few words about it.
Steve
|
259.13 | Yamaha Multi-Effects unit | BARTOK::ARNOLD | John E. Arnold | Tue Mar 25 1986 09:55 | 56 |
| I saw this review of one of the new Yamaha units and thought this
group might be interested.
- John -
======================================================================
*** Beginning of post ***
Newsgroups: net.music.synth
Path: decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!hplabs!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!hako
Subject: Re: Yamaha Rev 7
Posted: 21 Mar 86 18:29:46 GMT
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
I heard the new Yamaha SX-90 (?) Digital Multi-Effects Unit (?) last
night, right next to the Rev 7. Its reverb functions were very listenable,
almost as good as the Rev 7's, it's in stereo, and it also choruses/flanges/
stereo pans/pitch shifts/echos/slapback-echos/etc... It's cheaper, too,
going for about $500 (after discount), if I'm not mistaken.
The reverbs sound the best, and do things like reverse, gate, and delay before
coming in. There were some nice patches that the demo guy came up with,
called "Phil Collins" and "Jeffrsn Star". (Speaking of naming your patches,
not only were there upper/lower case chars, numbers, and "graphics" like
%,$,#,!,etc., there were also some Japanese ideograms!! at least 20 or so!!)
The pitch shifts were a bit unnatural sounding (fast "beats") and were just a
bit tough to get perfectly in tune. If used for chourising, it sounds quite
nice.
The other types of sounds were quite good; it was fun to hear a drum machine
pattern bouncing back and forth between left and right channels, especially
in trigger mode (where the input level determines when to pan, I think).
I didn't get to try/hear the "freeze" function, a simple one-shot sampling
mode.
There are 30 preset sounds, grouped into the functions mentioned above. To
get your own sounds, you modify the parameters of these presets. There are
60 user slots, for a total of 90 sounds.
Another nice feature is it's capability to map MIDI patch numbers to different
(or the same) internal sound numbers.
All in all a quite useful machine. Now if I only had the spare cash...
Jim Menard
...!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!hako
Univ. of Rochester Cancer Center
601 Elmwood Ave., Roch., NY
... I don't work for Yamaha. I barely work!
*** End of post ***
|