Title: | True North Strong & Free |
Notice: | Introduction in Note 535, For Sale/Wanted in 524 |
Moderator: | POLAR::RICHARDSON |
Created: | Fri Jun 19 1987 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1040 |
Total number of notes: | 13668 |
Car plan B in Canada effective July 1 to be elligible you must have driven 4800 business km in the last 6 months. If you didn't make this number you'll be switched to car plan C... 26 cents/km if your your fy95 business mileage exceeds 20,000 km the reimbersment goes up to 32 cents/km. For me this is good news, but I can see where this would really tick some people off. I have a 9 month old van through PHH and if I didn't qualify for car plan B I'd be sunk. If your business km were just under 4800 you'd recieve only $ 1248.00 but if you were just over 4800 km you'd recieve $ 2550.00!!! Brian V oh yea Discuss
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
821.1 | to tax or not to tax | TROOA::DHODGSON | Wed Apr 27 1994 13:49 | 6 | |
Brian What if you factor in the tax component on plan B against no tax on plan C. Does this level the playing field? dh | |||||
821.2 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Wed Apr 27 1994 16:57 | 12 | ||
Don't know... but I would not be able to pay for my lease so it really wouldn't matter. Just on the surface though I run about 70 % business and about 20,000 km/year business so I am able to keep my taxable benifit to about $1-3k/year. Even if I was taxed at a rate of 100 % on this amount it might still just break out even with car plan C. Brian V | |||||
821.3 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Wed Apr 27 1994 17:11 | 27 | ||
I don't want to fight other peoples battles but it appears that this is just the latest in a series of expenses that Digital is trying to force onto its employees. Drug plan cut to 80 % Dental cut to one visit per year Ellimination of car plan A Situation : When Digital still had car plan A an employee that signed up for it could not get out officially for one year and unofficially for 3 years or until the vehicle reached 96k whichever was sooner. Question : Does Digital have a commitment or contract with its car plan B employees that they can break with only 2 months notice ? I know that my lease is with PHH but it is for 50 months and I'm only 9 months into it. As long as I am employed by Digital in a job that requires me to have a vehicle then I think that Digital should stand by its original commitment to me. (allowing for minor adjustments due to inflation up or down) What's your opinion Brian V | |||||
821.4 | OTOOA::ESKICIOGLU | Grace Note | Wed Apr 27 1994 17:52 | 11 | |
> for 3 years or until the vehicle reached 96k whichever was sooner. I didn't know about the 96K limit, are you sure about that? I am still on Car Plan A, and I am approaching to 96K fast. Thanks Lale | |||||
821.5 | I'm with Brian | CGOOA::RATHNOW | Eat right, stay fit, die anyway... | Thu Apr 28 1994 02:42 | 17 |
I'm with Brian, When Digital canned Plan A, they forced people who were on it to get vehicles that conformed to the company car standards and put them on Plan B. People bought/leased vehicles based on those standards and on the monthly allowances and are now making payments. I dont think it's fair of DEC to can the plan with two lousy months notice. They owe these people more than that. There is another problem with this plan: A co-worker and myself are currently on long term assignment at a customer site. We both drive directly from our homes to the site. It just so happens that he lives 5 KM away and I live 50 KM. There is no way he can make 4800 KM in a six month period to stay on Plan B. Dave. | |||||
821.6 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Thu Apr 28 1994 09:21 | 14 | ||
Lale, Yes its 96,000 km as a rule. Digital used to use this so that they would be assured of getting something out of the vehicle by selling it, and also to avoid the big repair bill that come with high mileage. There have been many acceptions made by individual manager but the 96K was fleets policy (when we had a fleet admin). Brian V PS you can bet that if your still on car plan A they are going to try and force you off as soon as possible. | |||||
821.8 | Saving money or spending more money? | TROU45::D_CHENG | Thu Apr 28 1994 11:00 | 25 | |
For those people who now drives less than 9.6k a year they probably would be a bit more aggresive in putting more business miles on their plan B car because $364/mo is a lot of money when you have to pay your car loan or lease payment. This may mean unnecessary site visits or more "direct form home to customer site" activities. Trips may be planned to claim them max number of kms instead of saving money. I don't know how they get the 32�/km for those who exceed 20k. I think the increase should be progressive from 9�/km to 32�/km instead of a big jump. The fleet always say that our plan B is inline with other companies and they do research on a continue basis to make sure that the reimbursment is sufficient to cover our costs but they never publish how other companies' plan looks like nor do they tell us what formule they use to figure out the cost of running a motor vehicle nowadays. I personally am making money from the plan because I have only 60% business (some techs have 95%+) and I am using a 5 year old car(ie. my plan B benifit is more than my business milage pro-rated auto expenses). I cannot see how the car plan can justify a new car (said a Tarrus or an Accord) every 3 year with 90% or more business portion. In the past people have the choice to go for plan A or B but now we are stucked with plan B (or C if you wish). David | |||||
821.9 | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Thu Apr 28 1994 11:11 | 7 | |
As it is always the case for excess in the past, the excess will be in the oposite direction. How long did we have all kinds of people with company cars which were used EXCLUSIVELY for home--->work and back without a SINGLE customer or site visit. Jean | |||||
821.10 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Thu Apr 28 1994 11:20 | 21 | ||
If you don't qualify for car plan B but require a vehicle for work, 1. will Digital provide me with a leased car/floater/specialist vehicle ? 2. Can Digital still try to enforce its car requirements on you ? model years/condition/size 3. If you make life difficult for Digital will you be here after the next round of (insert PC terminology here) ? re -1 yes it would be interesting to see everyones 1994 T2200 and compare it to 1995's. This could end up costing Digital even more Brian V | |||||
821.11 | Time will tell the difference | TROU45::D_CHENG | Thu Apr 28 1994 11:45 | 16 | |
re .10 > 1. will Digital provide me with a leased car/floater/specialist > vehicle ? Don't think so but if you do need to go outside the office on occasional basis then we should be able to claim cab fare or car rental or the manager should have someone else to go for that trip. > 2. Can Digital still try to enforce its car requirements on you ? > model years/condition/size I believe there is no such a restriction on plan C as long as your car can take you to your destination. David C | |||||
821.12 | flogging a dead horse | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Thu Apr 28 1994 12:25 | 11 | |
What about on a regular basis that doesnt total more than 4800km/6months ? How many software types or CSE's in Toronto or Montreal put on less than 4800 but use thier vehicle for work every day ? Brian V | |||||
821.13 | Gotta start returning recruiters calls | TROOA::SOLEY | Carbon Blob, Sector 7G | Thu Apr 28 1994 12:44 | 7 |
If you are greater than 80% billable and drive to the customer for all engagements you have good chance of making the 4800, but it's by no means guarenteed. Given that DC corporate targets for billability are somewhat less than 80% I think lots of DC folks will lose Plan B. I beginning to think that the catch phrase for FY95 wil be "get yourself another boy". | |||||
821.14 | Industry standard?? | CGOOA::RATHNOW | Eat right, stay fit, die anyway... | Thu Apr 28 1994 13:16 | 11 |
Getting back to the concept of "industry standards"... HP occupies the building across the parking lot from us. Until they moved in, the parking lot was relatively empty. Now it is full of Ford Tauruses and Taurus wagons, each equiped with a cell phone. I would like to know what kind of "industry standards" their car plan complies with? Dave. | |||||
821.15 | vechical costs | KAOFS::W_GILROY | Thu Apr 28 1994 13:46 | 9 | |
For more information on vechical cost any one with a CAA/AAA membership can ask their local office for a CAA/AAA sponsored survey regarding the annual cost of operating a vechical and I think they have survey results for average company reimbursements. I have let my membership slide. Can someone out there ask for this information? WKG | |||||
821.16 | Needs 7k a year | TROOA::DCHENG | Thu Apr 28 1994 22:13 | 14 | |
re .15 It is $7031/yr according to CAA. It is based on a new Ford Tempo with 24,000km/yr milage and it assumes that you sell your vehicle at the end of 4 years. The highest cost to running a car in Canada is in Quebec at $7229/yr. The lowest is in Alberter at $6502/yr. Ontario the 2nd most expensive. No sure if car plan is different for employees form different provinces. David Cheng | |||||
821.17 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Fri Apr 29 1994 08:15 | 11 | ||
The monthly reimbersment varies between areas. Perhaps someone in the know could answer this... The new program starts 1-jul...but is this when they are going to start collecting the 6 month data OR are they going to look at the last 6 months of FY94 at that time ? Brian V | |||||
821.18 | What! | KAOFS::W_GILROY | Fri Apr 29 1994 13:27 | 2 | |
explain your question a little more clearly I'm confused on what you are asking! | |||||
821.19 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Fri Apr 29 1994 18:23 | 8 | ||
on 1-JUL-1994 will our managers receive a report containing our last 6 months mileage, or will their first report be received on 1-JAN-1995 tay ? Brian V | |||||
821.20 | New KM calculation | OTOU01::LAROCHELLE | If you can't say it in Macro... don't say it | Mon May 02 1994 13:38 | 7 |
They will have to start to count from July 1st 1994 because the Km count will be done differently. Right now, Km are counted from the DEC Office to customer's site. Starting July 1st, Km will be calculated from employe's place to customer site. PBL | |||||
821.21 | play the numbers game | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Mon May 02 1994 13:59 | 9 |
I used to work for Burrough's, and their reimbursement scheme was a bit different. In those days (pre-inflation) they had the equivalent to a plan C (no company cars), we were reimbursed 16� for the first 100 miles per week and 5� per mile for each mile after. Needless to say it was quite common to report 100 miles per week, but not too many people reported the rest unless it was grossly exagerated. Jean | |||||
821.22 | re .20 | KAOFS::W_GILROY | Mon May 02 1994 14:39 | 7 | |
re. .20 I tend to differ with your point "form the office to customer" If I have a service call scheduled for 8:00 am I start my meter as I drive out of the driveway, and record the total km when I return home if it is directly from site. Bill | |||||
821.23 | New??? | TROOA::SOLEY | Carbon Blob, Sector 7G | Mon May 02 1994 14:46 | 5 |
Re: .20 I don't see a change. Policy has been the milage between your home and the Digital office was not counted but home direct to/from customer was eligable. | |||||
821.24 | I never said everybody applies the rule | OTOU01::LAROCHELLE | If you can't say it in Macro... don't say it | Mon May 02 1994 14:58 | 40 |
There is a difference between what was done in the "real" life and what the rules are. Many times it also depends of your manager. I can tell you that in DC in Ottawa the rules have been stricly applied for the last year. Here is an extract of the rule: For eligibility for reimbursement from Digital as business mileage, allowable distances (kilometers) are only kilometers to and from the Digital office at 2 Constellation Crescent and client sites, and between client sites. Distances to and from the office and not allowable. In the event that a consultant drives directly to a client site from home, the allowable business charge is the lesser of the distance from home to the client's site, and the distance from the Constellation Crescent office and the client's site. For instance, if a consultant lives 50 kilometers from his home and an assignment at Mitel in Kanata and drives directly to that Kanata site, and the distance between the Digital Constellation office and Mitel is 30 kilometers, then the allowable business charge is 30 kilometers. Conversely, if another consultant drives from his home in Kanata to the Mitel site and that distance is 5 kilometers, then the allowable business mileage is 5 kilometers. Now the new rule says: 3. BUSINESS KILOMETERS DEFINED In line with market practices, Digital will use the Revenue Canada definition for business kilometres. Between home and customer site is considered business mileage, between home and office is personal mileage. Whatever was the rule applied by your manager doesn't change the fact that (and that was the purpose of my reply) as the car plan folks wont calculate the business millage the same way, they will have to start to do their calculations in July so will all have another 3 or 6 months to legally/officially move to our cousins' house 200km from the office. PBL | |||||
821.25 | Another way again... | OTOU01::LAROCHELLE | If you can't say it in Macro... don't say it | Mon May 02 1994 15:02 | 11 |
Re: .23 � I don't see a change. Policy has been the milage between your home and � the Digital office was not counted but home direct to/from customer was � eligable. So Toronto does it differently ? I wonder if we'll have a different rule in every DEC office (if it's not betwwen different organization in the same office) So any other rules ? | |||||
821.26 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Mon May 02 1994 17:01 | 20 | ||
re .24 So if you live 50 km from the office but you do a call in your town 2 km from your house what do you charge for mileage ? I put this question to management years ago and was told that I should charge distance from my house. My response was no way... you cant have it both ways and that from then on I would charge mileage from the office only. As most of my sites where closer to my house then the office it wasn't long before management told me to use the revenue Canada guildlines. Works for me. ; ) Brian V | |||||
821.27 | Lucky you are | OTOU01::LAROCHELLE | If you can't say it in Macro... don't say it | Mon May 02 1994 17:50 | 14 |
I've been working at NTE for 6 months. NTE is 9 km from the office and I live 20 km from the office. To go from my place to NTE you almost passed in front of the office. Anyhow, I could only charge 18km a day instead of the real 58. For 6 months that means a difference of 100 * 18 * 0.09 = $ 162.00 100 * 58 * 0.09 = $ 522.00 -------- 360.00 I wish I had it. | |||||
821.28 | TROOA::SOLEY | Carbon Blob, Sector 7G | Mon May 02 1994 21:36 | 4 | |
It's worse than that. Since the numbers you report to Digital get filled in on the T2200 form you also lose your rightful tax deduction for those kilometers. | |||||
821.29 | Not true | OTOU01::LAROCHELLE | If you can't say it in Macro... don't say it | Tue May 03 1994 08:15 | 19 |
� It's worse than that. Since the numbers you report to Digital get � filled in on the T2200 form you also lose your rightful tax deduction � for those kilometers. Not true... as the directive also says: "It appears that Revenue Canada's definition of business mileage may be different from the Digital policy definition above. Distances directly from home to a client site may be entirely considered as business mileage. You may want to consider this in working out car allowances for income tax purposes." Which means that what Revenue Canada considers business millage is not what DEC considers business millage. So I always add 200 days * 30 km = 6,000 km to the km shown on my T2200 form. PBL | |||||
821.30 | They heard | KAOFS::R_RYAN | I used to be a coyote but Im ok nowoooo! | Thu May 12 1994 18:55 | 8 |
Rae Strathdee stated today in a meeting that the car plan B change is being rethought...at least as far as how it will be implemented. It appears that there were a number of people that did not like the way the change was going to be implemented. Two months notice isn't alot. Management does listen. Regards, Ron He who will get to keep his new Renegade a little longer 8-) | |||||
821.31 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Fri May 13 1994 09:05 | 7 | ||
truely good news for a friday ! have a good weekend Brian V | |||||
821.32 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Mon May 16 1994 13:06 | 9 | ||
Just recieved a memo from Rae. No real change to what was originally posted but he did say that the data collection would not start until 1-jul so this at least gives every one another 6 months notice. Brian V | |||||
821.33 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:49 | 5 | ||
An interesting side note here is that in the U.S. people are being forced onto car plan A because car plan B is too expensive for Digital. Brian V | |||||
821.34 | "ONLY IF IT IS CHEAP" | KAOFS::W_GILROY | Wed Sep 14 1994 16:20 | 1 | |
Thats fine I'll take one "ONLY IF IT IS CHEAP" | |||||
821.35 | Why is that? | TROOA::DCHENG | Thu Sep 15 1994 21:05 | 6 | |
re. .33 Could you please elaborate differences between US plan A and B and why is plan A cheapere to Digital. Dave Cheng | |||||
821.36 | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | Fri Sep 16 1994 10:53 | 304 | ||
Here you go Brian V <<< HUMANE::DISK$CONFERENCES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DIGITAL.NOTE;1 >>> -< The Digital way of working >- ================================================================================ Note 2888.22 Car Plan B??? 22 of 56 USHS01::HARDMAN "Massive action = Massive Results" 289 lines 18-AUG-1994 10:12 -< Car Plan Changes >- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hot off the presses: From: NAME: U.S. TEAM FUNC: U.S. Communications TEL: <U.S. TEAM AT A1 at SALES at MRO> Date: 18-Aug-1994 Posted-date: 18-Aug-1994 Precedence: 0 Subject: Fleet Plan Announcement 2 To: See Below The U.S. Management Team recently initiated a review of our Business Transportation Plan to ensure that our practices are competitive with those of similar companies. This review was conducted by a cross-organizational team of individual contributors and managers from Sales, Services, Logistics, Sales Operations, Finance, and Business Transportation. The process included external and internal benchmarks, sample surveys of our driver population, vehicle life-cycle modeling, and a detailed assessment of business transportation economics. Following are the major conclusions from this review: o Digital's Plan A (company provided vehicle) is generally quite competitive and approaching "best-in-class" with the exception of the Personal Use Charge (PUC). o Plan A PUC is benchmarked higher than the competition. o Digital's costs for Plan B (employee-provided vehicle reimbursed by the company) are higher than costs for similar plans at benchmarked companies and higher than Digital's costs for Plan A. o Employees prefer a more extensive selection of vehicles and are willing to pay the premium for more expensive choices. As a result of these findings, the U.S. Management Team has reviewed and endorsed the recommendation of the review team. Accordingly, the following changes are hereby announced and will become effective October 3, 1994. U.S. BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION FLEET PLAN REVISIONS o Plan A Personal Use Charge (PUC) is revised from $0.225 per personal mile to a flat rate of $30 per week for a base vehicle, e.g., Ford Taurus. Benchmark studies indicate that most other companies providing similar plans charge a flat rate that averages $30 per week. The employee continues to be responsible for the cost of incidentals (gas, oil, parking, tolls, etc.) associated with extraordinary personal travel, e.g., vacation. o A broader selection of vehicles will be made available to participants under Plan A during the replacement process. The preliminary list of Plan A vehicles is expected to be available in October. o The flat personal use charge will vary according to the vehicle on the selector list. The base charge will be $30 per week, with more expensive cars having a proportionately higher personal use charge. o Vehicles placed on the selector list will vary from time to time, based on basic equipment offerings and manufacturers' discounts to Digital. o Plan B in its current form is costing the company significantly more than Plan A and equivalent plans of similar companies. Digital's drive to profitability requires that we move swiftly to bring our Plan B rate into line. Therefore, the Plan B rates will be revised for new participants, to achieve cost parity with Plan A. Current Plan B participants will be "grandfathered" for a period of time to ease the transition to either the new Plan B rates or Plan A. The new Plan B rate will be $210/month + $.08/Business mile. This flat rate will apply to all geographies across the U.S., because the cost of setting and administering a geosensitive rate structure is high and the validity of such rates is questionable. o Plan B "Grandfather" Policy: Plan B participants who enrolled in Plan B after January 1, 1994 will be reimbursed at the new rate ($210/month + $.08/business mile) as notified by Business Transportation at the time of enrollment. Plan B participants who enrolled in Plan B before January 1, 1994 will be "grandfathered" (reimbursed at the rate in effect prior to this announcement) as follows: Purchased vehicle: purchase date + 24 months Leased vehicles: lease date + 36 months Plan B participants who purchase, lease or renew a lease for a vehicle after the date of this announcement (August 17, 1994) will be reimbursed at the new Plan B rate ($210/month + $.08/business mile). To avail themselves of the "grandfather" period, eligible employees must send a photocopy of either the Bill of Sale or Lease Agreement (No Substitutes) to Business Transportation via internal mail (Paul Coute @ MSO2-3/G20), external mail (Digital Equipment Corp, 111 Powdermill Road, Maynard, MA 01754, Attn: Business Transportation, or FAX (DTN 223-9818 or 508-493-9818) by October 3, 1994. o The minimum monthly business mileage criterion for eligibility will be increased from 500 miles to 600 miles, consistent with the practices of benchmarked companies. Exceptions must be approved by a Vice President. The overall objective of our Business Transportation Plan is to provide company-sponsored transportation to support the business travel requirements of eligible U.S. Field employees that is safe, cost-effective, and presents a positive and professional image to our customers and the community. We, the U.S. Management Team, feel that these changes are consistent with that objective and with the best practices of similar companies. See the following Question and Answer section for further clarification. Any additional questions regarding this policy should be directed to Business Transportation, DTN 223-9500, OR Fleet Administration @MSO. Questions and Answers Q1 Why is the Plan B "grandfather" period different for purchased vs leased vehicles? A1 The economics between purchased and leased vehicles are different. Typically, the point at which the residual value of the vehicle exceeds the remaining debt is earlier in the case of a loan than a lease. Q2 Why is the Plan B "grandfather" period 24 months from the purchase date for a purchased vehicle, 36 months from the lease date for a leased vehicle? A2 In the case of a typical consumer loan (48 month term), the point at which the residual value of the vehicle exceeds the remaining debt is between 20 and 24 months from the original purchase date. The typical consumer lease has a term of 36 months and is closed end (term, rate, and buy-out price are fixed). This typical lease carries substantial penalties for premature termination and, as a result, we decided to protect the entire 36 month term. Q3 If I signed up for a loan with a longer term than 48 months, what is the Plan B "grandfather" period? A3 You are still "grandfathered" for 24 months from the purchase date. Loans with longer terms obviously carry lower payments. If you signed up for a 60 month loan, for example, your payments have been lower than those of a 48 month loan, affording you a more advantageous cash flow over the period that you were/will be reimbursed at the original Plan B rate. Q4 If I signed up for a lease with a term of greater than 36 months, what is the "grandfather" period? A4 You are still "grandfathered" for 36 months from the lease date. Leases with longer terms obviously carry lower payments. If you signed up for a 60 month lease, for example, your payments have been lower than those of a 36 month lease, affording you an advantageous cash flow over the period that you were/will be reimbursed at the original Plan B rate. Q5 If I purchased a vehicle but did not take out a loan, am I "grandfathered" under Plan B? A5 If you enrolled in Plan B prior to January 1, 1994 and you do not purchase, lease, or renew a lease after the date of this announcement (August 17, 1994), you will be "grandfathered" for 24 months from the purchase date. It is not necessary to show proof of a loan. You need only provide a copy of the Bill of Sale for your vehicle in order to be "grandfathered". Distribution: This message was delivered to you utilizing the Readers Choice delivery services. You received this message because you are part of the U.S. organization. If you have questions regarding this message, please contact the author of the memo. To Distribution List: MICHAEL SCHNEIDER @GGO, JAMES SCOTT @GGO, BARRY SHIELDS @GGO, CHRISTOPHER SMIGA @GGO, JAMES STEWART @GGO, LEH SUEN @GGO, KEITH SWEAT @GGO, MELVIN TRAYNUM @GGO, SHIRLEY TYLDESLEY @GGO, GLORIA WILLIAMS @GGO, KELLY BOELEMA @GJO, EDWARD COKE @GJO, ROBERT COOK @GJO, FRANCIS FELLO @GJO, MICHAEL GAYNOR @GJO, MICHAEL LANINGA @GJO, JAMES SEAY @GJO, WILLIAM SEVIC @GJO, KATHLEEN SHROYER @GJO, HANS VANBAAL @GJO, GLORIA WRIGHT @GJO, DAVID ZUHL @GJO, ROY BOULANGER @GNO, CLARE BUSH @GNO, RONALD DAVIS @GNO, RICHARD DESCHENES @GNO, WILLIAM FISHER @GNO, WILLIAM HUGHES @GNO, STAN JAMESON @GNO, RONALD MCKNIGHT @GNO, RICHARD NELSON @GNO, SHANE ONEAL @GNO, CHARLES PACKARD @GNO, GEORGE PENDERGRASS @GNO, JUSTINE PORELL @GNO, THOMAS SLUDER @GNO, JAMES SNOW @GNO, WAYNE STAFFORD @GNO, PADGETT STYLES @GNO, JAMES WENTLING @GNO, LEON WOOD @GNO, SAMUEL GUSHURST @GTO, JOHN MURAWSKI @GTO, ARTHUR JEFFERIES @GVH, TERRI SMITH @GVH, CHARLES WALDEN @GVH, VERA ALCOTT @HEO, LAWRENCE AUBRY @HEO, RANDALL BUSHEN @HEO, DOROTHY CARSON @HEO, DEMETRIOUS COLEMAN @HEO, TERRIE DAVIS @HEO, ROBERT HECKER @HEO, LEVI KINCHEN @HEO, JEANINE KULLMAN @HEO, DANIEL PHALEN @HEO, SHERMAN RATHER @HEO, DAVID ROHLFS @HEO, GREGG SMITH @HEO, VANITA STEVENSON @HEO, DANIEL TRAFICANTE @HEO, JOSEPH ULBER @HEO, DENNIS WHITE @HEO, GERALD ERLANDSON @HLO, JOHN MYLOTT @HLO, JEFFREY RODRIGUEZ @HLO, MARK VASAPOLLI @HLO, JEFFREY ANNANDALE @HSO, JEANNINE BARDSLEY @HSO, RUTH BONNEY @HSO, DON BULLARD @HSO, WOODROW CAMPBELL @HSO, MIKE FRAHLMAN @HSO, GARY FRIZZELL @HSO, LAVERNE FUENTES @HSO, KAREN GARRETT @HSO, HARRY HARDMAN @HSO, DENISE HERDMAN @HSO, GISELE JOHNSON @HSO, IRVIN JOHNSON @HSO, JUNE LAWRENCE @HSO, JANET LEE @HSO, GARY LITMAN @HSO, LINDA MACFARLAND @HSO, P MCCREARY @HSO, ANN MCLAUGHLIN @HSO, JAMES MOBLEY @HSO, EDWIN MOORHEAD @HSO, STEVEN MUELLER @HSO, MICHAEL PARKER @HSO, JOANNE POOLE @HSO, JANICE POSA @HSO, ELIO RONCHINI @HSO, JULIE RUSSELL @HSO, JOSE SALAS @HSO, CATHY SHANEYFELT @HSO, ADLINE TATUM @HSO, BRUCE TAYLOR @HSO, DONALD THOMAS @HSO, PATRICIA THOMPSON @HSO |