T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
799.1 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Mon Feb 28 1994 09:12 | 4 |
| Well, if you don't like Lucien's approach, then there must be something
good about it. I'll have to take a closer look to find out what it is.
Glenn
|
799.2 | | CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE | | Mon Feb 28 1994 09:39 | 8 |
| Bouchard is in Ottawa, he says, to promote the interests of Quebec;
really to try to discredit the federal system in every way he can and
thus promote Quebec independence. He doesn't care how the things he
says sound elsewhere in the country. The important question, and the
only one he cares about, is: how are his statements received in
Quebec?
-Stephen
|
799.3 | The medium is the message (or so they would like to think) | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Mon Feb 28 1994 09:51 | 11 |
| CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
Interesting point. I suppose it depends on how faithful the media is
in representing the facts. If they only parrot what he says there is no
doubt he will be well recieved, if they present the full picture, there
is a chance that he will be exposed as the "spin doctor" that he is. I
have about as much faith in the Quebec media as I do in Lucien himself.
I expect the oppressed masses of Quebec will devour this serving of
self pity with relish, regardless of the reality of the situation.
Derek.
|
799.4 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | A dead man with the most toys is still a dead man. | Mon Feb 28 1994 15:38 | 22 |
| Derek,
Please remember as you read on that I despise Lucien and I think he is a big
joke. I wish we had a more credible opposition leader and Manning is not one
of them. Hence:
- If Lucien didn't defend the rights of the French, then who would? As an
opposition party, it's their jobs to question almost anything that the
government does. I just wish he looked beyond the borders of Quebec when
he does his opposition thing.
- If Preston Manning was the opposition party leader, would he defend the
case of the only French military college around? I guarantee you he
wouldn't.
- Now, if we had a more credible party in the opposition seat, such as
the conservatives or the NDP, then I know that they would defend the
French military college as they would defend the rights of all other
Canadians beyond the borders of Quebec, after that last budget.
/Mario
|
799.5 | Defend Quebec ? Try the Prime Minister. | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Mon Feb 28 1994 16:16 | 20 |
| Maio:
Why does the closure of the college in Quebec become a matter of
"defending" ? The government decided to keep one (1) college. They
closed the one in BC (English only I presume), and the one in Quebec
(French only I presume) and keep one centrally located between Montreal
and Toronto. Equally accessible to both linguistic groups. If they had
kept the one in BC, and Kingston, and dropped the one in Quebec I could
see a problem. As it is, the government took a reasonable action, and
tried to accomodate as best they could, considering the fiscal
situation. In this light, Lucien's complaining seems self serving, and
only used to stir up the "paranoia" Quebecers seem to feel. I, as a
non-Quebecer am saying that since he only has one side to every issue,
his input is not valid. Even if he thought the closure was good, he
would not say it. Basically, if you know what he is going to say,
before he says it, and it always has the same point of view, he is a
waste of space on the hill. I already know Quebec wants it's cake and
eat it too, I don't need a seperatist to tell me that.
Derek.
|
799.6 | Anglophone/Francophone/Telephone! | POLAR::STOODLEY | | Mon Feb 28 1994 18:53 | 19 |
|
Derek, I couldn't agree with you more. Bouchard began his
campaiging as a Separatist, and he will go down as a Separatist!
These recent statements by him are just a futile attempt to stir
up some separtist feelings in all Qu�becers.
This threat of separation has been going on since the early days
of R�n� Leveques. We had a referendum then, and we just had one
a couple years ago. I tired of the whining which is costing us
taxpayers an exhuberant amount of money each year.
Qu�bec is going NOWHERE as far as separation is concerned!
Qu�bec knows it, and the rest of Canada knows it!
Slovakia separated from Czechoslovakia and now they want back
in with the Czech Republic. Nobody wants to see a repeat of this!
Blair
|
799.7 | Barnum and Bailey. | POLAR::MCNALLY | | Mon Feb 28 1994 20:50 | 8 |
| No room for the likes of Bouchard in any Parliamentary System.
Only in Canada would you see a disgraceful side show such as
the one we have with the BLOC being second in command. At least
the reform party doesn't want to break the country up. Maybe when
Lucien goes down to speak in the States he will get the message
that what he wants is not what the Americans want. I suspect
his reception will be cool, to say the least.
|
799.8 | | CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 08:33 | 9 |
| One problem of the current situation is that there is no credible
opposition on issues affecting Quebec. People outside Quebec are not
inclined to give any credence to Bouchard. Chantal Hebert's column in
the Citizen yesterday made an interesting case against the closing of
the St. Jean military college. There's nobody in Parliament from
Quebec with the credibility to make such a case.
-Stephen
|
799.9 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | A dead man with the most toys is still a dead man. | Tue Mar 01 1994 08:38 | 12 |
| Re: .6
>> Qu�bec is going NOWHERE as far as separation is concerned!
>> Qu�bec knows it, and the rest of Canada knows it!
Of course you meant: Qu�bec *separatists* are going NOWHERE as far
as seperation is concerned! Qu�bec separatists know it and the rest
of Canada knows it!
/Mario
|
799.10 | Inquiring minds and all that.... | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Tue Mar 01 1994 08:44 | 10 |
| CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
>>Chantal Hebert's column in the Citizen yesterday made an interesting
>>case against the closing of the St. Jean military college
Care to elaborate ?
Derek.
|
799.11 | | CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 09:20 | 20 |
| Basically, that it would be serious blow to bilingualism in the forces.
Apparently frncophone cadets were treated pretty roughly at RMC in the
50s, before the St. Jean college was created.
I also heard a commentary on the radio the other day that said the gov.
was still being too generous to Quebec in defence spending --
apparently the recruits who used to go to Cornwallis, now closed, will
go to St. Jean instead, so that its population will actually increase.
Also, a coastal defence HQ is being built in Quebec City, a river
port that is closed half the year by ice. This comentator was the
editor of "Esprit de Corps" magazine, who I believe supports Reform.
A study was done under the Tories, completed last summer, that
recommended that St. Jean and Royal Roads be kept open. The Reform MP
for the riding that includes Royal Roads tried to get it released
before the budget, unsuccessfully.
So there are arguments to be made against these closures, but no
credible federalist opposition to make them, at least as regards
Quebec.
|
799.12 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Tue Mar 01 1994 09:23 | 12 |
| Well, I've just recently compared Lucien to a snooker player and you
should all be glad to know that Lucien appears to be a virile athlete.
Perhaps he should do a few laps on Meech Lake this summer to garner
support in Quebec for separation. It could be a stroke of genius.
Wooops! Wait a minute, I just realised I was comparing Lucien to my
jockey photos.... Well, that explains it. Okay. Sorry folks, I have
some more research to do. Once I find the right photos I'll let you
know how Lucien does.
Glenn
|
799.13 | The two "opposition" parties combined don't have a platform to stand on. | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Tue Mar 01 1994 09:37 | 9 |
| CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE
As I suspected, a case made from 30+ year old facts.
A Reform party member trying to quash a spending cut ? Didn't take
long to get into the NIMBY syndrome did it ? Reform is as big a joke as
the Bloc, they just have to speak up more to prove it.
Derek.
|
799.14 | | CTHU26::S_BURRIDGE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 09:45 | 2 |
| Don't dimiss Hebert's argument on the basis of my very brief summary of
her main point.
|
799.15 | Don't cut the Umbilical Cord (yet)! | POLAR::STOODLEY | | Tue Mar 01 1994 19:49 | 19 |
| Re: .9
>> Of course you meant: Qu�bec *separatists* are going NOWHERE as
>> far as separation is concerned!
Mario....
Qu�bec, the province and all the population it contains (separatists
as well as non separatists) is going NOWHERE. Qu�bec will NEVER leave
Canada period.
If I'm wrong and it comes down to (heaven forbid) another
referendum which ends up in Qu�bec separating, you can bet your bottom
dollar Qu�bec will want back in again!
That's the way I see it and that's the way the majority of
all Canadians see it. Plain and Simple.
Blair
|
799.16 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | A dead man with the most toys is still a dead man. | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:59 | 11 |
| >> Qu�bec, the province and all the population it contains (separatists
>> as well as non separatists) is going NOWHERE. Qu�bec will NEVER leave
>> Canada period.
If you agree that Quebec will never seperate then you agree that Quebec
separatists who happen to be the minority, are going NOWHERE and federalists
like me are going SOMEWHERE. I don't think it's fair for you to say that all
Quebeckers are going nowhere.
/Mario
|
799.17 | Yea, though I walk through the valley.. | POLAR::ROBINSONP | EVO Inside | Wed Mar 02 1994 10:56 | 9 |
|
Of course, RMC has a valuing differences program now, so even
if you are gay, french and of say, somalian extraction, you should
not fear anything as you walk the streets of Kingston in your cadet
uniform (otherwise known as the monkey suit).
Suuure...
Pat
|
799.18 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Mar 02 1994 12:30 | 8 |
| I think they should close ALL the military colleges and get rid of an
expensive useless army, navy and air force.
Jean
PS the comments from the press say that french proportion in the armed
forces went UP (from less than 6% to more than 20%) after Saint-Jean
was opened.
|
799.19 | RMC Cadets | POLAR::MCNALLY | | Wed Mar 02 1994 15:33 | 9 |
| I lived in kingston for some time during the 80's and yes the RMC
Cadets do walk around in their monkey suits always in a group.
They never have problems on the street, but they have gotten
into trouble in some bars. The abuse builds character. It's
a test to see whether they take their career seriously or not.
Overall the armed forces and the civilian population of Kingston
co-habitate rather well although I understand they will be
closing CFB Kingston. Am I correct about that one?
|
799.20 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Thu Mar 10 1994 14:13 | 6 |
| The answer from one of the ministers after the closing was announced;
"We will spend $50,000,000 to promote the use of french in Kingston to
make the french speaking students more confortable". And I tought we
were going to SAVE money by closing those schools, how silly of me.
Jean
|
799.21 | I admire you fiscal restraint. | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Fri Mar 11 1994 08:48 | 12 |
| KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS
"We will spend $50,000,000 to promote the use of french in Kingston to
make the french speaking students more confortable"
So you are saying leave Kingston alone ? Let the Francophone students
learn a little English ? Wanna bet on the inter-governmental language
used by NATO ? The UN ? Is it going to kill them to learn a little of a
language that just might save their life in a combat zone ?
Derek.
|
799.22 | | KAOFS::M_COTE | I was there | Fri Mar 11 1994 14:50 | 4 |
|
The ROC welcomes the fact that we spending tax dollars on our
Brother in H'arms.
|
799.23 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Mon Mar 14 1994 12:56 | 16 |
| Re Derek,
No I am saying if we are going to close a military college in Qu�bec to
SAVE money, we should not spend $50 millions to pretend it never
happened. My solution would be to get rid of ALL military spending in
Canada (abolish ALL armed forces). To those people saying we NEED an
army, just look at Costa-Rica, they have NO army (and have not had one
for close to 100 years), armies are unconstitutional since 1948 and
Costa-Rica is wedged in between Panama and Nicaragua, so far they have
not been invaded by their belliquous neighbors.
Jean
PS Even the United Staters don't need an army to invade us, all their
citicens have guns, fortunately, they can't stand the cold.
|
799.24 | | R2ME2::HINXMAN | In the range of strange | Mon Mar 14 1994 15:53 | 12 |
| re .23
> PS Even the United Staters don't need an army to invade us, all their
> citicens have guns, fortunately, they can't stand the cold.
Ahem, Jean. One of the lessons of the war of 1812 was that militias
were inadequate for prosecuting a war. The logical consequence of
the U.S. having a standing army should have been the repeal of the
second amendment to their constitution (the one that talks about
militias being important). :-)
Tony
|
799.25 | Caught telling tales out of school. | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Tue May 31 1994 15:37 | 11 |
| Well, Lucy has been up to his tricks again. He has gone to an "off the
record" meeting, said what he felt, and when it got leaked, called it
all lies. Saying BC would be annexed by the states, Bloc MP's would all
resign if the referendum was lost, obstruction in parliment if Canada
tried to stop seperation...
In his own words "Am I crazy, Am I crazy ? Do I look Crazy ?"
In my own words "YES"
Derek.
|
799.26 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Jun 01 1994 01:05 | 7 |
| "canadians" all say they would not let Qu�bec break up Canada, yet for
a few dollars, they would join the US without batting an eyelash, true
patriots if you ask me. Now just think how the US would laugh if they
could pick up all these territorries for peanuts.
Jean
|
799.27 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Wed Jun 01 1994 08:03 | 11 |
| I disagree, in fact I remember a poll taken not long ago in each
province concerning joining the United States, and Quebecers were the
ones most for it. Seems they like the U.S. a lot. I would like to see
such a poll taken again to see if things have changed.
Also in the early 1970's, the U.S. Government did a study on Canada to
determine what parts of it would be worth annexing, and the only
province they would be interested in was British Columbia because of
the link to Alaska and the pipelines.
Glenn
|
799.28 | Don't let reality cloud you judgement Jean. | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Wed Jun 01 1994 09:57 | 19 |
| KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS
1. The word is Canadians, not quotes, with a capital letter at the front.
2. As usuall you attribute Quebec charactoristics (love affair with the
US) to the rest of Canada.
3. Maybe you should not listen to your seperatist propoganda masters,
it makes you look as deceitful as they are (or badly misinformed
your choice)
4. Most people respect the right of self determination, what most
people don't respect is periodic blackmail based on that right.
Come on Jean, please tell us more about how the ROC thinks, feels,
and will act in the future. I am always amazed at how clearly the
seperatists see things (like the cake walk to sovereignty) and how the
federalists are always confused (like international law requires Quebec
to get permission to seperate).
Derek.
|
799.29 | | KAOFS::M_COTE | I was there | Wed Jun 01 1994 10:58 | 9 |
|
[Start whining music here!]
Jean is not ONE OF US! He can't understand us. You got to be one of US
to understand what we've been going through.
[End Whining music here, begin Oh Canada, English Version as sung by
the WWII vets, quickly move on to God Save the King including the
"We kicked some butt on DE Plains didn't we?" chant in the background.]
|
799.30 | Who supports Bouchard? | POLAR::MCNALLY | | Fri Jun 24 1994 16:35 | 4 |
| Why is Bouchard even mentioned in this notesfile. He is a traitor
to Canada and himself. I foresee a civil war not too far away if
the likes of Bouchard and Parizeau are allowed to stand on their
feet with any following much longer.
|
799.31 | | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | | Mon Jun 27 1994 11:21 | 13 |
| Pulleeease...Civil war....
This is Canada !! If Q decides to separate there will be a couple
of years worth of negotiating to determine their share of the debt,
and the actual land boundaries, but no one is willing to lose their
life over it. If there was Lucy would have had a bullet thru his head.
National unity Texas style.
Brian V
|
799.32 | Let's do it. | POLAR::MCNALLY | | Mon Jun 27 1994 18:43 | 9 |
| Predicting civil war may be going a little too far given the fact
we are talking about Canadians here.
However, the part about Lucy in the sky getting a lead lobotomy
doesn't sound so bad.
People of Quebec...please get rid of this clown and Papa Parizeau
as quick as you can. We can then take care of Presto " The Magician "
Manning.
Sean
|
799.33 | Caporal Lortie tried but missed it by that much | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Tue Jun 28 1994 11:10 | 6 |
| Since all those politicians are in Ottawa (closer for you than me), you
should go buy an uzi and do a number on them and save the country from
both those $%?&* french kebeckers and those right wing westerners.
John
|
799.34 | | KAFS31::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Tue Jun 28 1994 11:52 | 3 |
|
John, ya got a bee in your bonnet? Or have you been taking
lessons from Glen(n).
|
799.35 | I (little heart) Quebec !!! | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Tue Jun 28 1994 12:14 | 16 |
| Jean,
If you read carefully, you will notice YOU are the only one useing the
term "$%?&* french kebeckers". It would serve the seperatists purpose if
we did hate french Quebecers.
The sad truth (for seperatists) is that we only hate self serving
seperatists.
As a matter of interest, what part of the political spectrum does the
BQ represent ? Left ? Right ? Center ? Interesting "political party"
that only has one plank in it's platform.
"French Quebecers above all else"
Derek.
|
799.36 | wrong agenda again jean | KAORSC::R_HARPER | This space unavailable, Digital has it now | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:57 | 9 |
| not to make too much fun of that incident, but didn't Coporal Lortie
used a made in Canada gun. you are suggesting the use of a
foreign made weapon to do a strickly Canadian deed.
Come on, we want to talk about economics and jobs. :-) :-)
That will save the country. Buy Canadian, or American with an assemble
in Canada (CSA approved) sticker.
richard
|
799.37 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Tue Jun 28 1994 16:13 | 19 |
| No, I'm not sick, I have seen the light....english forever, god save
the Queen (and her duly appointed representative and all the court
jesters). I mean it, talk to anyone in the universe and the language
of choice IS english (ref: star trek, battlestar galactica, star
wars...) from now on I will never enter another note in a language
other than the one understood by the whole universe.
John (see I have even translated my name just to prove how sincere I
am)
Re Richard, I am sorry I even mentionned a foreign weapon, but
machine-gun was too long to spell. I am sure a true patriot and a
proud Canadian would never THINK of using a non-union non-Canadian
rifle or bullets, it just wouldn't be right.
I have even started a campaign to stop any further digging of the grand
canal on Quebec (see no accent on the "e") soil since we are not deserving
of such a grand scheme.
|
799.38 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Tue Jun 28 1994 17:17 | 12 |
| Dear Jean,
I am grievously vexed to learn of the prevailing attitudes to the
Grand Canal. I thought by now people would begin to understand the
great benefit of the Grand Canal and how it has been the glue that has
held us all together.
I think I'm going to cry...
<snif>
Glenn
|
799.39 | | CSC32::S_BROOK | There and back to see how far it is | Tue Jun 28 1994 21:16 | 9 |
| Jean,
Names are not, never, no way translated if at all possible. And it is still
not pronounced like the blue denim trousers either. Your name is or should
be sacrosanct. No one, should ever translate your name.
Your parents called you Jean. They did not call you John, nor Gene.
Stuart (not Stu or Stew or Stewart)
|
799.40 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in balanced sort of way | Wed Jun 29 1994 12:32 | 3 |
| Aw come on Stu, stop pulling Johnny Baby's leg!
;-)
|