Conference kaosws::canada

    Well, Mike, obviously you've never tried those 1-900 numbers listed on
    the back pages of the Sun!!! :-)
    
    Otto.

talk about 1-900 numbers!


Do what everybody else does: sit by 1 bottle of beer for a whole night at 
the Brass Rail in downtown Toronto (or any other S. Joint in town), 
surely nothing beats this D.F.D. value!


/Mr. Cheap Skate

This could be considered quite a good value for money (DFD):

(short notice, but hell, who cares!)

There's a 60's style Rock & Roll party this coming Friday 
(07-MAY-1993) @around 7pm here in Toronto (western To.) $22 per person 
(or $37 for couples) that covers food plus rental & door prizes 
(ranging from hotel rooms , T-shirts, etc,...) a friend of mine is 
organizing it but I only found out today...  So, if you're around 
Toronto on Friday night you should be there!  

So if interested please PHONE me A.S.A.P. so that I can reserve 
tickets for you!

My DTN is 631-7014 (home number 416-368-5311)

and once again:

	The Time:	07-MAY-1993	19:00

	The Place:	3100 Keele Street,
			Ramses Shriner's Club,
			Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Planet Earth...

/Tamas ;-)

oh, and don't forget to dress like in the 60's if you can!

P.s.:	so far about a hundred people are coming!

/Tamas.

Derek,

there'll be chips (!) ... and Coke (!) ... not sure about the ice 
cream wagon, but definitely a lot of beer, etc...  Have you arranged 
for a lift to Toronto yet?  or a training course on friday at TRC... 
and then you'll be in the neighborhood

    
    <<<< oh, and don't forget to dress like in the 60's if you can >>>>
    
     You mean PAMPERS !!! Thats' what I was wearing during the 60's,
     sometimes " birthday suite". ( I was born in 1960 you know ;^)
        I'll be there but I think I will wear pants.
    
     So you're DEC now Tamaz, welcome aboard and hang tight !

Ricardo, you're old, man...!  I was only a dirty thought on my parents 
mind when you were already mastering LIFE.  Then it happened and in 
1966 I came around.


So, pampers are ON dude! But make sure you wear it with suspenders & 
greased back hair-do!

/Tamas.

    I wish you'd all shut up! 
    
    1951

    That previous reply of mine was not meant to be offensive. I should
    have put a :-) beside it.
    
    Apologies,
    
    1951

    Whew,

    Ted, good thing you were quick on the draw there, I could almost here
    the incoming wet blanket missiles.

    Glenn

    1963, Cloth with rubber pants if I remember correctly.

    re .9
    
    I'm glad you qualified that!
    
    1955 Buck Naked

	1963

	One tube stuck up my nose and an "alien" type thing sticking out of
	my stomach.

	Ben

	PS. The big 30 for Glenn and I this year!!!

    
    1912

    This note should be re-titled  "Loonie for Loonie"
    
    Glenn (In a white wine sauce with shallots mushrooms and garlic)
    
    

    re .10    
    
    >>>1963, Cloth with rubber pants if I remember correctly.
    
    Your parents were ahead of their time.  Imagine the combination:
    Green parents, and green skin(under the rubber pants).
    
    Shawn

    Well Shawn, actually back 1963, there were no disposable diapers, cloth
    diapers and rubber pants was the only alternative. Then of course the
    assassination of John F. Kennedy changed all of that and then began the
    Vietnam War which propagated the development of Pampers by Johnson &
    Johnson during the Johnson administration in the 60s.

    Certainly turbulent times to be potty trained to say the least!

    But, I survived.

    Glenn

    The Vietnam War started under the Kennedy administration.

                              -< Technically Yes >-
    
    During the Kennedy administration, the Americans were not sent in to
    go to war with North Vietnam but by the request of the South
    Vietnamese for protection. Things escalated into war with the North
    during the Johnson (Pampers) administration. The reason I remember this
    is because one day I was spanked because I did potty in my pants when I
    heard the news. I was then told that: "potty goes in the potty, bad
    boy!"

    Certainly turbulent times to be doing latrine duty.

    Glenn

    re .16
    >diapers and rubber pants was the only alternative. Then of course the
    >assassination of John F. Kennedy changed all of that and then began the
    >Vietnam War which propagated the development of Pampers by Johnson &
    >Johnson during the Johnson administration in the 60s.
    
    They really kept the lid on that story.
       
    Shawn

    I want to complain!
    
    Where are the moderators?
    
    How can they allow this kind of silly drivel to go on? It's clear that
    this doesn't have anything to do with Canada and only confuses the
    onlookers.
    
    Where are the famed SCUD wet blankets?
    
    In a nutshell, this isn't as fun as when you know the teacher is going
    to yell at you.
    
    In Sincerelyincredulousnaciousnessniditty,
    
    
    Sam the Eagle
    

    The moderators have been noticibly absent recently.  That means we can
    talk about whatever we want.  That said...
    
    
    Did anyone take offense or have anything REALLY bad to say about
    Somalians invading the former Yugoslavia and forcing all residents to
    learn French so they can help Quebec overthrow Canada and claim the
    Grand Canal so they can then load water bombers to flood Iraq, and make
    Saddam Hussein flee to China where he can be fully repressed and forced
    to make non-working refrigerators and ride a bicycle? :-) :-)
    
    Have I succeeded at not leaving anyone out?
    
    Otto.

    Well, after that, I feel kinda left out.
    
    Glenn

    re: .21  Otto, you've been hanging around Cot� too long.  Go directly
    to the nearest ho(s)pital (French or English is OK), do not pass GO, do 
    not collect $200...
    
    Lockyer, who hopes Parker Bros. doesn't find out about me using a few
    words from one of their games!

    We are all VERY, VERY SICK people.
    
    Ted.

    Hey, WE aren't the ones living in Dublin!
    
    ;-)

�    We are all VERY, VERY SICK people.
    
�    Ted.

	And your point is??? ;-)

    
    RE: .25 DBO
    
    I think Ted was using the "Royal WE" as in "We are not amused".
    
    This is in contrast to using the "Royal We We" which has other
    darker implications.
    
    Pat