T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
635.1 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Fri Nov 27 1992 09:49 | 20 |
| It seems like everybody except manufacturing in Kanata were affected.
With the closure of Burlington Vt. and Springfield Ma. some of their
business was transferred to Kanata, creating some new jobs there.
To be honest the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) is quite
scary for Canada ... with Canada - US free trade, it seems like a lot
of Canadian manufacturing jobs have gone south of the border, in part
because of higher Canadian wages and taxes. With Mexico in the picture
too, it will likely mean that a lot of companies will start using the
cheap Mexican labour, less stringent working standards and environ-
mental controls, taking more jobs from Canada and the USA. It will
get to the point where Canada and the USA are predominantly service based
economies ... and I for one can't see that as being good.
While it is due for signature, it still must be ratified by the
governments of the three countries ... it could be in for a bumpy
ride here, with an election due in 1993, and Mulroney and the
Conservatives are on the bottom of the pile now in popularity.
Stuart
|
635.2 | | ELMAGO::AHACHE | So many books, so little time | Fri Nov 27 1992 10:31 | 41 |
|
Thanks for the information on NAFTA and the layoffs. The unemployement
office here has been told to prepare for 60 within the next couple of
weeks, I don't know how many if any will come from manufacturing.
Albuquerque has a high unemployment rate all the time. There are a
lot of government offices and a lot of blue collar workers when
government gets cut unemployment goes up.
I understand NAFTA might help the corporation but it will hurt so many
other people. The people in one of the companies in Mexico, I think
it was TRW were paying their people $9 per day (that's right not per
hour). When their contract expired they went on strike for $12 per
day, after a while they got their $12 per day but no contract, 9
months later they were all replaced with new workers. It's not ok
to make a buck at any price, these are people who need to live. The
poverty level is incredible there. I don't know what the solution
is, their president has been working for this since it will help
get work there but if it's slave labor then it's an ethical issue for
the companies that go there.
Hopefully, it will help us to have Clinton as our new president, Bush
was much more interested in foreign policy than local unemployment.
This was brought up several times during the election and Clinton said
he will turn the economy around by creating more jobs.
Neither Canada nor the US can survive as service only. I liked Ross
Perot's speaches, he was right when he said you make money by making
things, there's not much money in service. He said we started moving
in the service direction with Reagan (another dodo).
Let's all hope for better times ahead, I would like to see all three
countries be successful. Even Japan's economy is in big trouble,
people aren't buying. When I was in Canada last summer I didn't
buy anything because of the new tax, I couldn't believe it. How
can small stores and businesses survive are people still buying
things?
Take care and hang in there.
Adele
|
635.3 | We need our own "Ross" | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Fri Nov 27 1992 12:46 | 12 |
| One of the major problems of being a "service" economy is the large
difference in wages for various services. A stock broker and a counter
person at McDonalds are both in the service industry. If the trend
continues, we can look at both the US and Canada becomming more like
Mexico, where there is a huge under-class, a few really rich people,
and almost no middle class. I think the whole thing smells fishy. As
usuall, the coperate backed politicians are looking out for their
buddies, and ignoring the people who actually cast the votes. I can
only hope that we (in Canada) get our own "Ross" so that I can have
someone to vote for in our next (long delayed) election.
Derek
|
635.4 | | ELMAGO::AHACHE | So many books, so little time | Fri Nov 27 1992 14:56 | 16 |
|
It's too bad that Ross wasn't able to get elected, he did better than
any other independent but he didn't take any states. Maybe next
time. He was able to rouse people up out of their stupor and make
them aware that they had to get out there and take the government
back, we had the largest voter turnout ever. He deserves a lot
of credit and I hope we'll see him again.
I agree regarding your commend on a service economy, I only hope that
we won't keep going that way. someone somewhere is making lots of
money. I'm often worried about DEC because I'm seeing a lot of
old boys protecting each other with less focus on saving money and
good people...
Adele
|
635.5 | | KAOT01::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Fri Nov 27 1992 16:27 | 7 |
|
When you were in Canada you didn't buy because of the new tax (GST)?
Actually, you could have gotten a full GST refund when you left Canada.
There are some forms to fill out and receipts to provide though.
/Mario
|
635.6 | | ELMAGO::AHACHE | So many books, so little time | Fri Nov 27 1992 21:49 | 12 |
|
Hello Mario,
Unfortunately, I didn't know that until I stopped at the duty free
store entering the US. I hadn't been to Canada in three years since
I was working in Valbonne. What's this new tax for and is it hurting
retail business?
Bon courage,
Adele
|
635.7 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Nov 30 1992 09:44 | 18 |
| GST (goods and services tax) replaced the hidden Federal Sales Tax,
and was supposed to be revenue neutral with that tax and is collected
at the retail level rather than the manufacturers' level. It has the
advantage that it taxes all taxable goods equally whether they were
imported or home grown, which had been a long standing complaint by
Canadian manufacturers agains teh old FST.
The GST is a "Value Added" tax, in that tax is levied every time there
is value added. The final consumer of a product or service always pays
the entire whack of the tax on the product, although, it is collected
any time there is value added.
It certainly did hurt retail business ... but then retail business was
hurting and is hurting even worse now, but how much of that one can
lay at the feet of the GST alone is questionable when looked at longer
term ... there are just too many other factors.
Stuart
|