T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
620.1 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Wed Oct 07 1992 10:27 | 4 |
| I hate to dissapoint you Derek, but the infamous Great White North
McKenzie brothers are not brothers ... and are Americans!
Stuart
|
620.2 | one small point for mankind.... | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Wed Oct 07 1992 10:43 | 4 |
| I knew they were not brothers, but are you sure niether of them are
Canadian?
Derek.
|
620.3 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Wed Oct 07 1992 10:58 | 2 |
| Sorry .... Hollywood 1 ... Canada No score
|
620.4 | | KAOT01::D_PAWSEY | | Wed Oct 07 1992 11:29 | 7 |
| Yo Stewart,
Dave Thomas is the brother of Ian Thomas who is a musician of some notoriety
in the Canadian music scene. Definitely a Canuck. You're British aren't
you?
Don the Friendly
|
620.5 | the hosers are Canadian, eh! | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | What is the strategy today? | Wed Oct 07 1992 11:54 | 8 |
| I'd recommend you view "The Canadian Conspiracy" often shown in CITY TV
in Toronto. It is a very tongue in cheek look at how Canadians are
conspiring to take over the American entertainment industry. You'd be
suprised at all the Canadians in Hollywood. Dave Thomas is definitely
Canadian (from the Hamilton area I believe), went to McMaster
University and is the brother of Ian Thomas.
|
620.6 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Wed Oct 07 1992 12:29 | 4 |
| OK, I eat humble pie ... I'd heard quite definitively that they
were both American ... OH well ... Hollywood 1, Stuart lost.
|
620.7 | | KAOFS::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Wed Oct 07 1992 14:50 | 2 |
|
I thought they were Somalians...
|
620.8 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:08 | 14 |
| >Yo Stewart,
>
That's Stuart
^
Just a subtle hint ... :-)
> ..............................................You're British aren't
>you?
WRONG! Surprise surprise, eh, I'm Canaj'n.
|
620.9 | | KAOT01::D_PAWSEY | | Wed Oct 07 1992 15:35 | 5 |
| Stuart,
I'm so sorry!
Dawn
|
620.10 | The #1 diference... | POLAR::ROBILLARDB | | Wed Oct 07 1992 16:34 | 6 |
|
Of course the #1 difference is...the alchohol level in the beer!!!
Ben
PS. I'm pretty sure that Rick Moranis is also a Canadian.
|
620.11 | eh? | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Wed Oct 07 1992 19:37 | 0 |
620.12 | The beer stops here! | KAOOA::MHOGAN | | Thu Oct 08 1992 10:56 | 6 |
| Actually, it's hard to tell about differences in alcohol level of the
two countries' beer because Canada measures alcohol by volume,
whereas the States measures alcohol percentage by weight.
(I read it in the BEER conference, so it must be true!)
Mike
|
620.13 | ???? | POLAR::ROBILLARDB | | Thu Oct 08 1992 15:16 | 5 |
|
Then how come I can drink twice as much American beer?
Ben
|
620.14 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Fri Oct 09 1992 09:52 | 14 |
|
The real main difference I see is that Canadian tell me they're Canadian,
and tell me about Canadian culture, way of life etc.
Americans tell me they are English-Americans, German-Americans,
Jewish-Americans, African-Americans, Polish-Americans, Irish-Americans,
Japanese Americans, Italian-Americans etc......and then tell me about the
part of their family history generations ago that isn't American.
Sometimes they leave out the American bit altogeter and tell me they're
English, Irish etc., and its only after a while that you find out it was a
great-grandmother that happened to be English.
Heather
|
620.15 | What about Korff Barbunk? | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in a balanced sort of way | Fri Oct 09 1992 12:50 | 9 |
| Everyone has forgotten the biggest difference!
Canada has the Grand Canal!
(This is where Stuart soakes his blanket) 8^)
Glenn
|
620.16 | ex | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Fri Oct 09 1992 13:37 | 3 |
| And Amereicans have Watergate to empty the Grand Canal ...
my blanket is perfectly dry thank you! :-)
|
620.17 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Fri Oct 09 1992 15:10 | 36 |
| If Canadians tolerate Qu�bec, would you then say that we are a distinct
society?
other tid-bits;
Canadians will buy from outside of their country 99% of the time if:
1-The price is less by the tiniest of margins
2-If they can do so by not paying tax(es)
3-They beleive quality products are not built in their
own country.
4-They absolutely can't get it from outside.
5-They think it is "in"
Evidence of the above: cross border shopping, japanese car sales...
It is true that Canadians are more peacefull than other nations and the
most peacefull of all canadians are the residents of the province of
Qu�bec. We were dragged into three wars by the rest of the country,
two of them (WW1 and WW2) by referendums after being promised we were
not going to be drafted.
While we do have better social programs than all the other countries,
we are not too happy about paying for those programs.
Canadians generaly spend their vacations outside their country unless
they don't have enough money, then they go camping or stay home.
Altough there was no mention of the Grand Canal in the constitution
accord, it is beleived to be the only unifying option available to all
residents.
Canadians also produce the best rum in the world (screech)!
Jean
|
620.18 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Fri Oct 09 1992 16:19 | 10 |
| Do you believe that Quebec tolerates the rest of the country ?
If so we are a distict society ... :-)
Most countries will buy outside their borders under the conditions
you specify ... another criterion ... the handbook is readable.
This is not just a Canadian phenomenon!
Stuart
|
620.19 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in a balanced sort of way | Fri Oct 09 1992 16:53 | 11 |
| I think if we lined the Grand Canal with Flea Markets and Beaver Tail
vending establishments from coast to coast it would would be just the
shot in the arm this country needs!
Vote YES for beaver tails!
Vote NO for wet blankets!
Vote YES for better toilet seats!
Glenn
|
620.20 | Well kept secret... | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Oct 09 1992 17:06 | 5 |
| > Altough there was no mention of the Grand Canal in the constitution
> accord, it is beleived to be the only unifying option available to all
> residents.
There's hope for you yet... ;-)
|
620.21 | It's all in the definition | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Tue Oct 13 1992 00:50 | 76 |
|
Now I'm as proud of Canada and it's achievements as you are Jean, but
I don't think we should let our patriotism cloud our judgement. The
best rum in the world comes from the Barbados.
Seriously, you risk having your notes categorised as trivial or
irrelevent by mentioning the Grand Canal. Just a friendly suggestion,
when you are trying to make a serious point, don't mention the GC.
I feel your attack on camping to be unwarrented. The best way to see
the natural beauty that Canada has to offer is by going to National or
Provincal Parks. The fiords in Gross Mourn National Park don't take
American Express. I also feel you may be reflecting a regional
phenomenon when you suggest that Canadians prefer to vacation outside
their country. It is a well document fact that people from Quebec flock
to Florida during the winter months.
Perhaps you are representing another regional attitude when you
suggest that Canadians are unhappy about paying for social programs. I
don't know, because I have never heard that Canadians felt that way. I
have seen polls indicating that Canadians are proud of their Health
Care system. It would seem strange to begrudge the money to do
something you are proud of. What I have heard people saying they were
not happy about paying for, is this endless constitutional wrangling.
I am really surprised you would mention Quebec's resistance to
fighting in WWII (in light of the potential outcome). Sticking your
head in the sand will not make the problem go away, or perhaps those
German U-Boats in the St Lawrence were just sight-seeing? Besides, I
said Canadians were committed to humanitarian goals, not peaceful.
Anyone who watches hockey will understand what I mean.
As for cross border shopping, I suspect that an activity that has been in
existance for a couple of years cannot have worked it's way down to the
level being ingrained into the culture. But you raise the point, so we
should keep an eye on it.
If I may summarize, you have defined culture in terms of:
1. Shopping
2. Ignoring world politics
3. Complaining about paying for services
4. Vacation planning
6. Distilling alcohol
With your definition, I am sure there will be no problem getting
the rest of the country to respect Quebec's right to protect it's
culture, or distinct society.
I disagree with your definition for what Distinct Society means. Since
I did not have a good definition of my own, I looked it up.
Distinct:
- not identical
- seperate
- different in quality or kind
- clearly perceptable
- definite and unmistakeable
Society
- organized community
- distinguished or fashionable member of a community
- mixing with other people
- companionship
- company
- association of persons sharing common aim or interest
Out of all the possible cominations I choose:
CLEARLY PERCEPTIBLE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONS SHARING A COMMON INTEREST
If we could agree on a definition, perhaps I would say that Quebec is
a Distinct Society.
Derek.
|
620.22 | | KAOFS::J_DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Wed Oct 14 1992 12:42 | 17 |
| Re -.1
Well I guess there is hope for you too.
If you drank screech, you may know that it does come from the west
indies and is repackaged by the Newfs. The best in the world is
St-James rum, with screech a very close second, but with a distinct
price advantage screech wins. It is a real shame I have to buy it in
Ontario since it is not available in Qu�bec
Since I did include references to the Grand Canal all my responses
should have been taken with a grain of salt except of course the
reference to screech.
Jean
|
620.23 | other differences | TROOA::BROOKS | | Wed Oct 14 1992 14:53 | 29 |
| I'm suprised that no-one mentioned what I perceive the differences to
be:
Yanks are perceived to be obnoxious, while we are considered to be
polite (to the point of boring).
I also think that non-north-americans would find it helpful to know
that in general Canadians have a higher taxation rate (but have yet to
start REALLY complaing about it) than Yanks, but get more services for
it (needed or not). I remember the stink raised south of the border
when someone wanted to add a penny to the cost of gas to help pay for
roads (or some such thing). That motion eventually got rescinded,
while in Canada it seems every provincial/federal budget invites more
taxes on Gas and Smokes.
I don't mind paying taxes on gas since it is a non-renewable resource
and it does harm the atmosphere, and that is something the States
should start to realize.
Oh, Yeah, one more thing. Canadians outside of Quebec aren't really
flag-wavers (you certainly see a lot of flags on St.-Jean Baptiste
day). The U.S. flag seems to be very common south of the border. This
thought came to mind because I just purchased a house and wanted to
show my pride in the country with a small Canadian flag outside. For
various reasons, I ended up doing the Canadian thing and hanging it at
the back of my house. :^)
Doug
Canadian First!
|
620.24 | If you're passing by, please do... | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in a balanced sort of way | Fri Oct 16 1992 12:52 | 6 |
| It also seems to me that Canadians have a drier sense of humour than
Americans. Grand Canal notwithstanding.
I like the difference!
Glenn
|
620.25 | on difference | DNEAST::OHALLORAN_BO | | Fri Oct 16 1992 13:11 | 5 |
| This note has been very educational for me (a yank from Maine).
Previous to today I thought the major difference between Canadians and
Mainiacs was that Canadians had more left over snow bags in the back yard.
Not so, eh. Bob
|
620.26 | Go Jays. | KAOFS::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Mon Oct 19 1992 09:28 | 8 |
|
Canadians know what an American flag look like and could, by instinct without
even thinking about it, display one right-side up.
Americans don't know that a Canadian flag look like, let alone display one right
side up...
/M
|
620.27 | O' Boy Canada! | TROOA::SMCDONALD | | Mon Oct 19 1992 11:07 | 10 |
| re:-1
Not to mention that lovely rendition of O'Canada by Tom Cochrane
at last nights ball game.
Re: the flag
What a kick in the teeth for all Canadians; mistake or not!
|
620.28 | Some Marines are in deep doo-doo! | KAOFS::LOCKYER | | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:21 | 31 |
| Was listening to (phonetically spelled!) Zoskey on CBC Morningside (a
current affairs talk radio show) this AM. He led off with a bit on the
flag affair and spoke with a public relations Warant Officer in the US
Marine Corp. He seemed to be genuinely emabarassed on apologized a
number of times for the screw-up. They also talked to a radio station
producer in Atlanta and between the two of them (the marines and the
producer), it sounds like there were a number of foul-ups concerning
the flag and opening ceromonies:
1. The marines were not originally supposed to raise the Canadian flag
and were only given the task a few minutes perfrom they performed. The
public relations gut said the color gaurd doesn't actually see
(probably meant pays attention to) the flag they're putting up.
They're focused on staring straight ahead and carrying out the
ceromony...
2. After the error was noticed, the Atlanta Braves or the stadium
issued a press release (by the end of the second inning) blaiming the
US Army.
3. The radio producer said Cochrane screwed up the national anthem -
what did he get wrong?
The Marine officer was adamant that this would never happen again -
what do you think the color gaurd is doing today, and maybe for a few
more days...
Regards,
Garry
|
620.29 | Flag up-ending a mistake??? | VAOU09::BOTMAN | pieter | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:52 | 7 |
| Do you **really** believe the flag up-ending was unintentional? I
mean, whether or not the color guard member looked at it, someone had
to look at the flag as it was being mouted/positioned! Do you string
up a flag without looking at it?????
Suspicious...
|
620.30 | I definitely smell a rat! | KAOOA::VLASIC | | Mon Oct 19 1992 12:57 | 6 |
| I agree.
I hope we win it in four and then send "them" a telegram announcing
that we are renaming it the Canuck Cup.
/susan
|
620.31 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Sick in a balanced sort of way | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:29 | 4 |
| Well, was the pole at least upwind from the flag? I'm sure they
probably got that part right!
Glenn
|
620.32 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Oct 19 1992 13:35 | 22 |
| Normally a flag of any size to be "flown" cannot be accidentally flown
upside down, even when furled. The reason is simple, a flag has a
toggle on the top and free rope at the bottom vis ...
<=> <- Toggle put through a loop in the upper halyard
|
-----------------------------------------
| |
| |
| |
-----------------------------------------
|
|
| <- Free end tied to the lower halyard
|
Thus it seems unlikely that this was flown upside down ... unless it
was a small flag.
Stuart
|
620.33 | Win it in 5 or Win it in 4 STRAIGHT? | KAOFS::LOCKYER | | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:00 | 9 |
| Re: .30:
Susan,
I hate to break the news to you, but there is going to be at least 5
games...
Garry
|
620.34 | I stand corrected | KAOOA::VLASIC | | Mon Oct 19 1992 14:01 | 6 |
| Yes (4 straight)
Thank you, Garry
/susan
|
620.35 | I HOPE it was a mistake!! | TROOA::PILGRIM | Expatriate Newf - Insanity Intact | Mon Oct 19 1992 15:00 | 18 |
| RE: .32
I took a look at the "Toronto Sun" picture of the inverted flag this
morning, looking for exactly what you described (I only hung about 500
of 'em in my Forces days). The flag in question looks like one of
those permanently attached jobbies with no lanyards, just a "tunnel" of
material that the pole is run through and then stapled. The mistake
could have been made at the factory, or the Base, but I don't think the
Guard strung the flag there in the stadium. The poor guys were
probably just handed the flag and told to march out there.
I was kind of perturbed to begin with that the Canadian Flag was being
carried about 20 paces behind the American and Pennant flags instead of
to the left of the American flag (between the pennant flags).
It just looked like poor organization, not a deliberate slur.
BB
|
620.36 | Flags, flags, and more flags | KAOOA::MHOGAN | | Tue Oct 20 1992 09:58 | 6 |
| I heard on the radio last night that over 5000 american flags have been
purchased in Toronto. Do you suppose anybody is going to hang those
flags UPSIDE DOWN at tonight's game ?
I wonder what those CBS guys will say about that ?
Mike
|
620.37 | lotsa nasty T-shirts out there too | TROOA::PILGRIM | Expatriate Newf - Insanity Intact | Tue Oct 20 1992 10:30 | 7 |
| MIX 99.9 is offering $1000 to any fan who is shown on CTV with a banner
displaying "MIX 99.9", the Jays logo, and an inverted Braves logo.
Also, as previously noted, one store alone here in T.O. has sold 6000
U.S. flags since Sunday's game. Hmmmmmmmm...
BB
|
620.38 | Toronto showed class, we could use more... | KAOFS::D_STREET | | Wed Oct 21 1992 13:42 | 6 |
| I for one am glad the apology was accepted so graciously by the
Canadian fans. A country can only do so much to apologise, and the
States did pretty much all of it. Only an immature insecure society
would blow a flag incident into a national crisis.
Derek.
|
620.39 | | KAOFS::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Wed Oct 21 1992 15:56 | 11 |
|
Derek,
Glad to see you're better and able to dial-in. BTW, there's been 2 calls in
the queue from the same customer (Oxford Develoment, your favorite) since
Monday. They've been asking for you, you lucky guy. We told them you were
sick but they said they'd wait. Bet you can't wait to get back to work now...
:-)
Mario
|
620.40 | An American will admit to it... | KAOT01::T_ROSS | He who laughs, lasts best. | Thu Oct 22 1992 00:06 | 17 |
| The quintessential difference between Canadians and 'Murricans:
- No matter what their race/colour/creed/ethnic background, etc,
an American is always in the final analysis an American - and s/he'll
fight like a wildcat to prove that point and retain that privilege.
Call 'em "unamerican" - and get your face handed to you.
- A Canadian, on the other hand, is too ready to be something else :
Quebecois, Aboriginal, Ukrainian, Italian, Asian, or whatever - and
thinks s/he must be bribed with special privileges and statuses before
s/he'll condescend to acknowledge Canadian citizenship.
Canadians should learn to abandon those who'se allegiance must be
bought.
/Todd.
|
620.41 | so there... pPpPpPpPpPp | TROOA::PILGRIM | Expatriate Newf - Insanity Intact | Thu Oct 22 1992 11:10 | 9 |
| RE: -1
You forgot the quintessential self-definition of a Canadian...
The thing Canadians are most proud of is that we are NOT 'Murricans.
NORTH Americans... yes; 'Murricans... nuh-uh!!
BB
|
620.42 | Quebecois first | VAOU09::BOTMAN | pieter | Thu Oct 22 1992 19:29 | 8 |
| re .40:
Todd, its not that Quebecois' allegiances must be bought - they simply
don't se it. How many times have we all heard from Quebecois: "I am a
Quebecois first and foremost, NOT a Canadian"?
Pieter
|
620.43 | | KAOFS::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Fri Oct 23 1992 13:38 | 16 |
|
Pieter,
You may have heard it many times but surely not 6.5 million times.
It appears that non-Quebecers like to push Quebecers to say that they Canadians
first, not Quebecers first. The fact is, in my opinion, that only a Quebecer
who was born and raised in the province can even comment on whether it is right
or wrong to say *I'm a Quebecer first or a Canadian first*. Anyone who has
not ever lived there before for a reasonable amount of time doesn't know what
it is to grow up as Quebecers. I myself was born and raised there and, even
being a federalist, if someone would ask me, I'd probably I'm a Quebecer. It
doesn't take away from the fact that I'm proud to be Canadian at the same time.
Maybe I'm more attached to my Province because of my culture.
/Mario
|
620.44 | Not an ex-patriot but an ex-resident!! | POLAR::ROBILLARDB | | Fri Oct 23 1992 14:53 | 5 |
|
On the other hand, I was also born and raised in french in Quebec
and consider myself a Canadian (who used to live in Quebec).
Benoit
|
620.45 | correction!! | POLAR::ROBILLARDB | | Fri Oct 23 1992 14:56 | 7 |
|
>On the other hand, I was also born and raised in french in Quebec
>and consider myself a Canadian (who used to live in Quebec).
A Canadian first and foremost is what I meant to say.
Benoit
|
620.46 | Me too... | KUTIPS::LACAILLE | Half-filled bottles of inspiration | Fri Oct 23 1992 14:58 | 5 |
|
Born and raised in that part of Canada called Quebec but I was
a Canadian then and I'm a Canadian now...and damned proud of it!
Charlie
|
620.47 | ME 3 | KAOOA::HASIBEDER | Trekkie DECie | Fri Oct 23 1992 15:12 | 4 |
| Me too.. (just like Charlie, born there, raised there, only moniker
that applies is Canadian!)
Otto.
|
620.48 | | KAOFS::M_MORIN | Le diable est aux vaches! | Fri Oct 23 1992 15:57 | 9 |
|
There you go. We all have different opinions but it doesn't make us any less
Canadian does it? Even if we are fedaralist or separatist.
The point I was trying to make is that English-Canada can't force-feed the
idea of being Canadian 1st on any Quebecer. It's all up to you as to how
you want to call yourself.
/Mario
|
620.49 | No flags down anyone's throat | VAOU09::BOTMAN | pieter | Tue Oct 27 1992 12:02 | 23 |
| Mario:
FYI, I was born in Montreal and spent 12 years of my life there.
Being Anglo doesn't mean I totally ignored my surroundings.
Also, I was **observing** that Francophone Quebecois simply identify
themselves as Quebecois first, Canadians (somewhere lower on the list).
I was not implying that Anglo Canada wants to force the idea of
Canadianism down their throats. Doesn't the Distinct Society mean
anything? What is that, if it isn't an attempt to recognize the other
culture??????
By the way, I heard the phrase "Quebecois first, Canadians less so"
**again** last night, from an analyst on the referendum converage.
Another interesting thing was the difference between Ile-De-Montreal votes
and hors-De-Montreal. There was a higher percentage of Non outside of
the city, higher percentage of Oui in the city (not certain of the
actual numbers, however). This was explained by the analysts by the
concentration of Anglo and Allophone votes in the city.
Pieter
|