T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
287.1 | Thanks for the signed confession, Citizen Jean! | TRCO01::OBRIEN | Glenn O'Brien @TRO 2/9 | Thu Apr 26 1990 11:39 | 9 |
| Just in case anyone is confused, Jean is royally PO'd about the
comments of one of the Liberal Leadership candidates. John Nunziata
stated that Quebec separtists are traitors and racists. Last week
he conceeded defeat with two months to go in the campaign. Yet another
genius from the Liberal Rat Pack.
Liberal Leader. Is this an oxymoron?
Glenn
|
287.2 | | POLAR::POND | | Thu Apr 26 1990 12:57 | 2 |
| One vote for Nunziata as 'twit of the year' from this corner.
JP
|
287.3 | The definition | VAOU02::HALLIDAY | She could promise the moon... | Thu Apr 26 1990 17:09 | 2 |
| The difference between traitor and realist is who has won when the dust
settles...
|
287.4 | Nunziata is an idiot but... | CGOFS::R_RYAN | I used to be a coyote but Im ok nowooo | Thu Apr 26 1990 17:25 | 23 |
| At the risk of getting into a p***ing match with Jean et al.....
I don't believe you are a traitor or a racist or a biggot. The words
used are much too strong and undoubtedly have little basis in fact.
But.... to want to separate from the rest of Canada is a nothing less
than a slap in the face of other Canadians. Those of us that love Canada
find it hard to believe that you would want to seperate for any reason.
I have never heard a good reason for Quebec or for that matter for
Alberta to seperate.
The Western Seperatists are no better, and much less of a political
force.
All seperatists should be taken out side and maimed!
I agree Nunziata is an idiot!
Regards,
Ron
P.S. This is not in any way meant to get you pissed off. I just don't
like seperatism and would love to hear a good rational for it.
I don't think there is one!
|
287.5 | | TRCA01::SANDHU | | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:25 | 7 |
| re: .4
Agree with R_RYAN. As much as I agree Nunziata's a bit of goofball,
his comments are being grossly taken out of context. His use of
the word traitor is equating it with separtism. The question we
should be asking is fundamentally is a separtist a traitor? Many
would say "OUI"
|
287.6 | Oui ou Non? | CGOFS::R_RYAN | I used to be a coyote but Im ok nowooo | Fri Apr 27 1990 17:15 | 2 |
| re: .5
A traitor in mind, not in deed.?
|
287.7 | Put YOURSELF in my place | MQOFS::DESROSIERS | Lets procrastinate....tomorrow | Mon Apr 30 1990 10:16 | 12 |
| I don't think separatism would be an issue IF the provision for a
distinct society in the meech lake accord was respected by the rest of
Canada. Now it seems that all other provinces want to take this
opportunity to blackmail the central governement and members of
distinct societies into giving them whatever THEY want, be it fishing
rights for New Brunswick or electric coridors for Newfoundland.
And when I go out of MY province and hear some of the comments, I
really don't feel like I am welcomed as part of Canada!
Jean
|
287.8 | Flying flags | VAOU02::HALLIDAY | She could promise the moon... | Mon Apr 30 1990 12:10 | 4 |
| I am told that the Canadian flag doesn't fly at the National Assembly
in Quebec City - true? You can't have it both ways.
...laura
|
287.9 | No Maple Leaf Outside CTH | KAOFS::LOCKYER | Garry | Mon Apr 30 1990 13:52 | 4 |
| The Canadian flag does not fly outside the new Customer Support
Centre in Hull, Quebec.
|
287.10 | What do the Qu�becois *really* want? | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | and things were going so well... | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:08 | 13 |
| re: no Canadian flag at Hull facility
I heard that when the facility opened there was a Canadian flag flying
there. But when one of our legal people went to visit the plant he
pointed out that this was against Qu�bec law. If there is only one
flag pole then the flag of Qu�bec takes precedence over the flag of
Canada.
This gives me the impression that the Qu�becois see themselves as from
Qu�bec first, Canada second.
Not saying that english Canada is blameless, however this attitude
doesn't help me believe that Qu�bec wants to be part of Canada.
|
287.11 | It should not be so morally speaking ! | MEMV02::OSTIGUY | Ice it ! | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:50 | 4 |
| If that's true then it stinks. No Province or State (in my case) flag
takes precedence over the Country's flag.
Lloyd
|
287.12 | Perhaps we need a good civil war to give us perspective | POLAR::RICHARDSON | He who laughs best | Mon Apr 30 1990 15:13 | 11 |
| I am afraid that there is little hope of Canada staying together.
I viewed Meech Lake as Canada's last chance of survival as a nation.
I fear that the large gap between the two visions of Canada cannot be
bridged.
I believe this is the end of Canada as we know it. WE are ALL too
stubborn to make it work. Canada won't be the first country in history
to die. Chalk it up to change.
Glenn
|
287.13 | Team Canada , Yeaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!! | CGOFS::R_RYAN | I used to be a coyote but Im ok nowooo | Mon Apr 30 1990 19:34 | 11 |
| re:-.1 etal
Canada will not die as a result of Meech Lakes pass or failure and
any Province that puts its flag before the Canadian flag should be
taken outside and maimed ( or maybe south of the border and maimed
which would lessen the environmental impact within Canada ).
I like Alberta, and B.C. and Ontario ( where I have lived ) and the
only time I like my Province better than any of the others is during
the hockey season ( Go Oilers, Boo Habs ) but even then I like Team
Canada best of all!!!!!
Regards,
Ron
|
287.14 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Here today and here again tomorrow | Tue May 01 1990 19:06 | 44 |
| > OK, I admit it I am a traitor (NOT in the criminal sense mind you), I
> am also a bigot and a racist.
It's bad enough being called a traitor, but the problem with Nunziata's
remarks were the parallels he drew. I have seen and heard his remarks
several times and I don't believe he described the Qubecois as bigots
and racists. Whether he meant that or not I don't know but it is not
what he said.
I am not convinced that the politicians of Quebec with their hard-nosed
approach are speaking for the people of the province. Certainly having
taken that line, Quebecois are falling in behind their political
leaders ... why not ? The people of Quebec may well feel that they
have had a raw deal out of Confederation, and so have a lot of other
provinces and peoples. I don't believe the people of Quebec are
traitors, but I do have to wonder about the politicians both Federal
and all the provinces.
What Mulroney tried to do was to resolve the anomoly of Quebec not being a
part of the Canadian Constitution in one fell swoop in basically a few
hours at Meech Lake to seek some glory as the Prime MInister who pulled
the country together. This was like wandering into a car lot just out
of curiosity, not intending to buy a car, and after the salesman
pounces on you, you suddenly find that you are driving out with a car
you don't necessarily want. In spite of the escape clauses to back out
of the deal, you now find you cannot because the salesman intends to
make life miserable for you if you do .....
What turned into the Meech Lake Accord should have had MUCH more
careful consideration before it became an agreed accord ... Now no
one is willing to back down because they are afraid of losing face.
The time has come for our leaders to stop worrying about their face,
their prestige and so on ... Admit that Meech Lake was a rush job in
need of improvement and get on and find a process to improve it.
Then we'll implement it. Never mind setting dead-lines ... I'm sure
the country can survive a few more years without Quebec formally in
the constitution until the job has been done right. After all the
country has survived in a very hodge-podge state for over a hundred
years already. Better for Quebec ... better for Canada.
Stuart
|
287.15 | Native Rights | TRCO01::SANDHU | | Wed May 02 1990 12:17 | 10 |
| Very well put Stuart.
Some of these sentiments were voiced by Prof. Schwartz when the
Meech Lake hearings went to Manitoba. He was the one that got
questioned about this credentials by the Tory member.
Aside from the Quebec issue, Meech Lake does not address the Native
Aborignial rights and completely ignores women. I feel any deal
that ignores the Native people of this country is not worthy of
implementation.
|
287.16 | Whats Newfoundland doing? | CGOFS::R_RYAN | I used to be a coyote but Im ok nowooo | Wed May 02 1990 12:41 | 19 |
| I agree. Nicely put Stuart.
I would add that Meech Lake sucks swamp water. It does not meet the
needs of Canada in any way. It attempts to deal with Quebec issues and
fails utterly while ignoring the *more important* issues of Native
rights, women issues (as -.1 states) and what we do with the malcontents
that put their Provinces rights before that of Canada.
It is a politically motivated document that does nothing good for this
Country.
Bullroony should be put through a vote of no confidence, have his
peepee wacked, and then be taken outside and maimed.
IMHO We do not need Meech Lake!!!!!
Regards,
Ron
P.S. I love Newfoundland. I have not heard anything in a while from
their quarter. Whats happening?
|
287.17 | In the phone | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | and things were going so well... | Wed May 02 1990 13:03 | 7 |
| re: .16 by Ron
� P.S. I love Newfoundland. I have not heard anything in a while from
� their quarter. Whats happening?
^^^^^^^
They lost it when they tried to phone Mulgroany to tell him what to do
with Meech.
|
287.18 | Bankrupt of intelligence | KAOM25::RUSHTON | Support the Grand Canal! | Wed May 02 1990 15:35 | 10 |
| I believe Bob's two-cent's worth about Newfoundland's quarter may be
construed as passing the buck; in spite of Baloney's nickle and dime
story. Franc-ly, the Prime Mover has been off the Mark with the
Creep Lake Discord but then he has always had a Yen for sticking it
to the electorate. If we had the good Pence, we would exact a Pound
of flesh from his Shakel-ed hide.
Yours in impecunity,
Pat
|
287.19 | Want to kyat baht that? | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | and things were going so well... | Wed May 02 1990 16:21 | 1 |
|
|