T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
147.1 | Use the notwithstanding clause | TRCA03::OBRIEN | Glenn O'Brien @TRC 18/6 | Fri Jan 13 1989 14:51 | 12 |
| I didn't read the article, but it doesn't sound like a big deal. If the
schools choose to say a quick prayer in the morning before starting the
day, it's not a problem. No school is forced to do this, and no child
would be forced to pray. The Ontario government simply said it had no
objections to school prayer.
BTW, the preamble of our Constitution contains the phrase,
'... recognizing the supremecy of God... '
I wonder if that's worth discussing. :-)
Glenn
|
147.2 | Good Policy | KAOO01::LAPLANTE | THE INTERLOPER | Fri Jan 13 1989 15:28 | 13 |
| The schools have had for some time now a publication of prayers
from various religions. It was left up to the school/teacher if
a prayer was to be said. The only caveat was that they could not
stress one religion over another. The idea was that today they would
say a Catholic prayer, tomorrow a Hindu prayer, the day after that
a Jewish prayer, etc.
This would only apply, obviously, to public schools. Secular schools
could continue to insist on religous teachings of their own sect.
I am in favour of the provincial policy on this one.
Roger
|
147.3 | One Person's View | TROA02::AKERMANIS | There is always one more bug | Tue Jan 17 1989 09:26 | 4 |
| I understand -.1 and -.2, but still feel this should be left out of the public
school system.
John
|
147.5 | Religion best at home | KAOFS::J_MORRIS | | Wed Jan 18 1989 09:09 | 35 |
| ON SOAP BOX
John A.'s point seems very well taken -- leave religion up to the
parents. If parents want to pass on their values and religion, it is
most appropriately done in the home, the church, the synagogue or the
temple etc.
For my part, I do not want any teacher, of who's values I am
unfamiliar, leading my children in prayer -- regardless of whether the
prayer happens to be a prayer of my own religion. Further, I don't
really want my children "praying" someone else's prayer. This is
disrespectful of both my values, my children's values and someone
else's prayer. A prayer is not something that you just do because it
happens to be on some random school board agenda today.
It is sometimes suggested that children who do not wish to pray can
leave the room during prayer. This again is disrespectful of the
values of these children, singles them out for riducule and suggests
that one religion, or any religion is more equal than others. Public
schools should welcome all equally and leave religion in its proper
place.
Those who are concerned about the health of their religion will not
find it improved by using the state to force prayer in public schools.
Their efforts would be better directed to supporting their churches
and temples and accompanying their children to such places of worship.
OFF SOAP BOX
John
|
147.6 | I agree and disagree with John | DUB01::EGRI | | Wed Jan 18 1989 12:35 | 23 |
| IN ANSWER TO JOHN MORRIS.
I agree to a certain extent about you're not wanting your children
to say other people's prayers and leaving the onus on parents to
teach their children religion. However, I do feel that teaching
children something about other religions is a good idea.
At the moment I live in a country (i.e. Ireland) that has been torn
apart by religious bigotry for hundreds of years. I would hate to
see anything like that happen at home (i.e. Canada). I like to think
that Canadians are quite respectful of other people's religious
affiliations and I'd like to see it stay that way. But I think that
only happens when you understand other religions and your own better.
I went to a catholic school and we had religious instruction in
class. I take your point that public schools should be
non-denominational and that parents should look after their childrens'
religious training. I just wonder how many parents are capable or
feel comfortable doing that?
Any views?
Ted.
|
147.7 | ( Amen ) | MTADMS::DOO_SECURITY | Linda Drescher -- 267-2211 | Wed Jan 18 1989 22:22 | 14 |
| I have little against praying in school. In fact I wish they would.
Maby a different belief every month and then have a question and
answer session after. I would like my kids to learn in every way
not just what is found in history and english books.
Freedom of choice is nice but before the choice is made I would
prefer to know what to expect. If you don't want your kids to
hear what is going on around them. I don't understand. But if
you prefer they do not pray with the others that would be between
you and your family.
just my view.
Linda
|
147.8 | ex | CURIE::THACKERAY | Ray Thackeray MR03 DTN 297-5622 | Thu Jan 19 1989 12:20 | 23 |
| Praying implies a belief in the deity or any deity. There are people
(in some countries or cultures) who don't believe in prayer or any
deity at all and are offended if forced to pray to such.
When I was at school, I was forced against my will to attend morning
prayer. Later, when it became voluntary, kids still stayed in the
room because of the inbuilt desire of children to "conform" and
not be singled out from the rest.
Yes, by all means let us have education about religion. But let
us NOT have enforced conformity, whether denominations are cycled
around or not.
Therefore, I support a class during school hours which has an emphasis
of being INFORMATIVE about the various major religions and putting
them into their historical and contemporary contexts.
Children have to make up their own minds. Dogmatic praying every
morning is a form of brainwashing.
Sincerely,
Ray.
|
147.9 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Jan 23 1989 02:03 | 7 |
| re .3
> This would only apply, obviously, to public schools. Secular schools
> could continue to insist on religous teachings of their own sect.
I'm really confused. Now let's see. In England, public schools are private.
So you're going to tell me that in Canada, secular schools are religious, right?
|
147.10 | Secular | CURIE::THACKERAY | Ray Thackeray MR03 DTN 297-5622 | Mon Jan 23 1989 11:34 | 11 |
| John,
I suspect that you've spotted the popular misconception that "Secular"
implies a form of religion. Probably because "Secular" is not a
very common word, has been confused with "Sect" and has been through
a massive campaign of disinformation by various churches, mainly
to make Secular Humanists look like devil-worshippers.
Cheers,
Ray.
|
147.11 | Private Public Schools | OTOU01::BUCKLAND | There's no room in this space to write anything significant | Mon Jan 23 1989 13:40 | 11 |
| re: .9
England: Public schools (Eton, Harrow, etc) are private schools
funded by the patents of the pupils.
Canada: Public schools are state (provincial and municipal)
controlled and funded by the public at large.
Confused the hell out of me when I came here. I didn't want my son going
to PUBLIC school with the sons of the Hoi Polloy. Besides, I couldn't
afford it. -^)
|
147.12 | I agree with your view | TROA01::AKERMANIS | There is always one more bug | Tue Jan 24 1989 18:57 | 19 |
| re. -6
< -< I agree and disagree with John >-
<
< IN ANSWER TO JOHN MORRIS.
<
< I agree to a certain extent about you're not wanting your children
< to say other people's prayers and leaving the onus on parents to
< teach their children religion. However, I do feel that teaching
< children something about other religions is a good idea.
Yes, teaching children something about other religions is a good idea. I
feel that this is part of the education process and a separate topic from
receiting prayers in class. Children are then left with an awareness and
hopefully respect for a person's religious beliefs.
As stated before, prayer should be left to the parents and not the school
system.
John A.
|