T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
19.1 | Good Idea!!!! | 39409::GROCHOWSKI | | Fri Oct 09 1987 09:42 | 9 |
| I agree. This note is a very good idea. It would help a person
like myself (who is Canadian but does not live in Canada presently)
to find out what is happening in Canada politically. Where I live
now I hear very, very little news about Canada and would appreciate
any news at all.
Catharine.
(GO TI-CATS!!!)
|
19.2 | Politics and More ! | RTOIC1::CSCHMIDT | Scio, Me Nil Scire | Wed Oct 14 1987 14:14 | 9 |
| This is what I would like to see here, too.
I am a German who was studying in Canada for some time. When I saw
the announcement of this conference I hoped that it would shift
from discussing Toronto-only topics to more general discussion about
Canadian issues, which has happened to some extent, yet not enough.
Let's hear more about that marvellous country, the people and the
politics !!
Christoph
|
19.3 | get out and vote | TROU02::ZWIEP | I'm a BOZO, want to feel my nose... | Thu Oct 15 1987 09:26 | 27 |
| See the base note for thoughts on changing this to a
Canajun_Eh notesfile.
As for politics, I don't think anyone gives a hoot. That is a
big problem here. The last provincial election, I didn't even vote.
Interesting things are happening though.
Ontario elects largely Liberal gov't during DECworld.
New Brunswick elects all 58 seats Liberal, after 17 years of
Conservative reign. Stats from the Globe and Mail (Canada's National
Newspaper):
500,000 eligible voters
62% voted liberal, 28% Conservative, 11% New Democrat Party
Previous gov't - 37 Conservative seats, 20 Lib, 1 NDP
Only once has a single party won all the seats in a Legislature:
In 1935 all 30 ridings in Prince Edward Island went Liberal.
In 1975 in Alberta, Progressive Conservatives took 62% of the
votes for 69/75 seats
In 1982 Tories (thats the conservatives, Grits are the liberals)
took 75/79 seats.
Ontarios biggest margin was 1929, with 58.8% of the votes giving
90 of 112 seats to the Conservatives.
|
19.4 | eh? | TROU02::POOTS | | Thu Oct 15 1987 18:21 | 12 |
|
Not a particularly serious political comment ....
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney announced today that a special
edition of the Canadian $1 loon coin will be minted in Ottawa
shortly.............
.......there is no truth to the rumour that this loon will be
equiped with a Canadarm to facilitate its removal from your pocket.
....back to you Rick for that serious Globe and Mail stuff...
|
19.5 | Bob Rae - Bridesmaid? | BMT::RIZZO | Carol Rizzo | Thu Oct 22 1987 19:13 | 17 |
| re .3
Who is the official opposition now in Ontario? When I lived in Canada,
I had secretly hoped that Bob Rae would replace Ed Bent-out-of-shape
as leader of the NDP. The man has some marvelous insights on labour
relations, trade agreements and criminal justice. I always thought
he would be the right kind of guy to keep the conservative Liberals
and the liberal Conservatives honest. (Never really wanted to see
the NDP in power until I saw how badly the Conservatives could sell
the country down the river.)
re.4
Tell me that this is a joke! I heard that they were going to mint
a $1.00 coin but.... Has Brian put his name/face on the coin?
(Are the inmates running the asylum yet?)
Carol
|
19.6 | Yet More Fuddle Duddle | TROU02::POOTS | | Thu Oct 29 1987 10:44 | 25 |
| re .4
Yes, there is in fact a Canadian $1 coin. One side, the queen, and
the other, a loon. THIS IS NO JOKE.
re .5
Bob Rae is the leader of the official opposition in Ontario.
The Liberals have a huge majority, and it is felt that
the opposition will be quite busy trying to keep up.
The Conservatives were basically wiped out. The situation is
similar to what happened in Prince Edward Island, however
not quite as extreme. In Prince Edward Island there is NO
official opposition -- there was a Liberal sweep of all seats
in the legislature. Richard Hatfield's Conservatives were
completely tossed out of power and influence.
Free Trade
The big topic of national conversation here remains free trade with
the United States. The battle lines are being drawn. Energy producing
provinces (Quebec, Alberta) are firmly in favour of the agreement.
Ontario, with its large manufacturing base, has some real concerns
about the agreement. There have been some calls for an election
over this issue. Should be interesting over the next few months.
|
19.7 | more thoughts/corrections. | KAOFS::S_MACDONALD | REALITY:The crulest joke of all | Tue Nov 03 1987 13:37 | 16 |
|
RE:.6
I think that you will find that it is the NEW BRUNSWICK government
that is 100% liberal, not the PEI. government....
While on the topic on $1.00 coins...I feel that they could have
found something other than a loon for it, but the poetic justice
in it is terrific.
On free trade....
It would be nice to have a free trade agreement, they really do
work. However I fear that the agreement that the Conservatives
have made is going to be the worse thing they have done while in
power. Now thats BAD......
|
19.8 | Expand Please on Free Trade | BMT::RIZZO | Carol Rizzo | Tue Nov 03 1987 22:39 | 11 |
| Please expand on your perceptions of the free trade agreement. Here
in the US, many congressmen from the Northern States are warning
that the free trade agreement would further eradicate the US' ability
to compete with the subsidized products from Canada. Additionally,
many feel that free trade would greatly benefit Canada by providing a larger
market for their goods than US companies could get. The current
state of the dollar would also work against the US in that its goods
would end up being prohibitively more expensive in both countries.
Carol
|
19.9 | No Trade is Free | TROA01::POOTS | | Mon Nov 09 1987 13:42 | 46 |
| Free Trade:
Interesting observations which you present:
1. An agreement will impede the US ability to compete with Canadian
subsidized goods.
2. The agreement will benefit Canada more so than the US.
3. Exchange rates are in Canada's favour.
It would appear that subsidies, like anything else, are in the eye
of the beholder. US grain subsidies are causing MAJOR problems for
Canadian grain producers. Actually the US needs competition if it
wishes to continue to be a world leader.
There is no question that Canada has much more at stake in such
an agreement. I'm not sure that "benefits" have been clearly
established by both parties. What is clear is that this agreement
will serve as a model for future international negotiations.
The international press has judged this agreement much differently
than US congressmen. Mexico has said that it would NOT sign an
agreement which binds it to the US economy as tightly as the
Canada/US agreement. Israel has made similar statements.
The arguement that exchange rates will unfairly favour Canada is
a false one. What exchange rates illustrate is that the world
currently judges Canadian dollars to be worth $.7 US -- you only
get what you pay for.
The issues covered by the free trade negotiations (as I recall)
were:
1. Raw Materials
2. Energy
3. Automobiles and Manufacturing
4. Agriculture (?)
5. Financial Institutions
6. Culture
The debate in Canada continues on perceived "unneeded compromises"
in most of these areas. The debate is becoming polarized -- the
energy producers vs the manufacturers. Energy producers see
a large market. Manufacturers see a loss of jobs. There has been
discussion that free trade will be a major issue in the next
election.
Interesting, eh ?
|
19.10 | Scary isn't it? | IND::RIZZO | Carol Rizzo | Mon Nov 09 1987 23:30 | 13 |
| Thanks for the perspective. Seeing as I am the Financial Industry
Consultant for the US Sales team, (they haven't deemed it necessary
to acquire others of my persuasion), I'd be very interested in the
Financial Industry comments. I understand the benefits to US firms
in the Canadian financial community but where is the advantage to
Canadian Banks.
Also please give me some idea on the cultural exchange. Somehow
I can't really imagine a greater American influence being tolerated
in Canada! (Would they make you watch the FOX network??)
Carol
|
19.11 | Canada's 11th Province | KAOM24::RICHARDSON | He who laughs best | Thu Nov 19 1987 10:51 | 20 |
| re. .10
The advantage to Canadian Banks is having free access to the
American market. The Canadian banking system is very different than
its American counterpart, our banks are for the most part quite
large and have a broad "national" base. I think that free trade
on the fanancial end of things will be very positive for Canadian
banks.
As far as culture goes, I don't see what everybody is so worried
about. Free trade isn't going to turn us into Americans or a 51st
state, Canadians have more integrity than that! I certainly do not
gage Canadian culture by what I see on cable t.v., there's more
culture in yogurt than there is on the tube. If anything, I see
free trade as an oportunity for us to influence them. I think Canadians
are selling themselves short if they think they can't compete with
the Americans. The leaders of the opposition parties don't seem
to think Canadians have the ability to do anything better than the
Americans, I think we can! We can make them our 11th province, or
perhaps just a territory would suffice. ( The Southern Territories)
Ya... I like it!
|
19.12 | Advantages questioned | BMT::RIZZO | Carol Rizzo | Mon Nov 23 1987 17:11 | 29 |
| re .11
Currently, all foreign banks have much freer access to the retail
market than US banks. First of all they can set up a US affiliate
(Like Natwest or Sumitomo) and enter into states which previously
forbid outof state banks to establish branches. Also they are under
less reserve requirements than domestic banks.
On the other hand, Canadian Banks have lived in a protective
environment and would have a tough time competing with the likes
of a CITICORP or a Sumitomo. (Citi spends $1 billion annually on
technology. Their existing technology would force Canadian banks
to play follow the leader with a foreigner and add no significant
advantage to the Canadian consumer). Citibank already is the largest
foreign bank with at least 40% market share of the Schedule B
institutions. Sumitomo owns 35% of Bank of America and 30% of the
prestigious investment Bank; Goldman Sachs. The Japanese have vowed
to stay in this market for the long term and to that end will do
a deal for 1/16 or 1/ 32 of a point profit. After only two years,
Nomura Securities is the largest Governments broker in the US.
I think Canadians should be very wary of any deal that allows
foreigners to potentially dictate economic policy. Don't think
it can't happen. It has before.
Carol
(I still don't see an advantage to Canadian Banks)
|
19.13 | Underestimated Canadian Banks | KAOA01::GLOBRIEN | | Wed Dec 16 1987 13:57 | 13 |
| re .12
Here are some facts which may shed some light on the implications
for the financial industy. Canada's largest bank, the Royal Bank,
has just over CDN$100 billion in assets. This makes it the sixth
largest bank in North America. In addition, most Canadian banks
have large overseas operations which account for 20-30% of their
income and assets. Far from being protected, the major Canadian
banks have been restrained from competing in other financial industries
within Canada (until recently, when they were allowed to compete
in the securities industry), and have increasingly moved abroad
for growth.
Glenn O'Brien
|
19.14 | A trip down memory lane. | CHEST::ROWELL | Searching for an angel in white | Wed Jul 25 1990 09:59 | 6 |
| When I left Canada, back in 1971, We stopped en-route, in Trenton
Ont. During our stay, they were having their provincial elections,
and one TV advertisement that I remember was for Bill Davies. I
have always wanted to know, did he make it ?
Wayne.
|
19.15 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | It's time for a summertime dream | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:13 | 5 |
| Sure did ... I dunno if it was in '71 but he was Premier in '81!
He has since retired after his party lost a few years ago ... if
the party fails ... shoot the leader!
Stuart
|
19.16 | Bill Draconian | KAOM25::RUSHTON | Unscathed by inspired lunacy | Wed Jul 25 1990 11:08 | 16 |
| When I was at UofT, Bill baby was Minister of Education (an oxymoron) and
he was responsible for making it almost impossible to get a student loan
unless you could prove that:
1. you lived in a rolled-up newspaper in a septic tank
2. your parents had to line-up at the soup kitchens for their
meals
3. the barrel you used for clothing was a used one
4. you had to walk to classes from at least a 20 Km distance
5. you were deaf, dumb and blind
I don't think the guy realized that those students were future voters...
|
19.17 | | KAOO01::BORDA | On the Horns of an Enema | Wed Jul 25 1990 12:12 | 6 |
|
We only wished we had a rolled up newspaper to live in,we had to
live in a septic tank with no lid that was never cleaned out and floated
around on used toilet paper untill it got too wet to support us
then jump ship to a dry piece.
|
19.18 | Scatology reigns supreme | KAOM25::RUSHTON | Unscathed by inspired lunacy | Wed Jul 25 1990 12:51 | 0 |
19.19 | | KAOO01::BORDA | On the Horns of an Enema | Wed Jul 25 1990 14:01 | 3 |
|
Is this the study of the scattered mind???...I'm well versed with
this...
|
19.20 | Nanook of the North | KAOA01::ADLER | Non Urinatus Contra Westrum | Wed Dec 05 1990 16:38 | 29 |
| Shame on me!! A Deccie for 13 years and I've just discovered the Canada
Notes. (Almost as funny as Dave Barry)
Re comments on the Loonies ($1.00 coin): The Mint's original design for
the coin to replace the dollar bill was the traditional "two indians in
a canoe". However, our coins are minted in Winnipeg and both master
dies were 'lost' in transit from Ottawa to Winnipeg. They were shipped
together via Purolator (Only in Canada, you say, pity!!). In order to
prevent possible forgery, the Loonie (y?) was designed and has sailed
on into history.
Re politics: My favourite passion and pastime. I really have only a
couple of things to say. We never seem to vote FOR a political party to
get them in because of their policies, but AGAINST the incumbents. This
showed up in spades on Sept.6th in the Ontario election. The NDP got
38% of the vote but wound up with a majority of the seats. The
Liberals, besides being a little out of touch, became a lightning rod
for the discontent with Mulroney in general, Meech Lake in particular,
and good old basic Canadian racism (Bill 8 and its reaction in Sault
Ste Marie, Thunder Bay and 29 other Ontario communities)
To close on a lighter note: What is the definition of a Canadian?
Explaining to the Americans that he's not British and explaining to the
British that he's not American.
Cheers,
Stephen
history.
|
19.21 | I WAS SCARED? | OTOOA::DOLAN | | Thu Nov 03 1994 16:47 | 1 |
| TEST
|
19.22 | | POLAR::RICHARDSON | Doing whirly twirlies | Thu Nov 03 1994 22:32 | 1 |
| This troubles me.
|