T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1302.1 | Use SUbinterfaces & 10.3/11.0(x)! | ORION::OUIMETTE | Zat was Zen, Dis is Dao... | Fri May 02 1997 18:03 | 42 |
| Hi John,
> I know I should set up sub-interfaces, but are these
> required when using RIP? Also, is it true sub-intf's
> are only available on v 10.06 IOS and above?
It's true that subinterfaces are only supported in 10.0 and above,
not in 9.14. Actually, cisco first supported them in 9.21, but that
software was never released for the DECbrouter, and cisco pulled it due
to too many bugs. But keep in mind that 9.14 is NO LONGER SUPPORTED by
either DEC or cisco; I'm not sure about 10.0, it's so old that I would
assume no bugfixes are available for it either. If this is a "new
proposal", the customer should run 10.3, which new DECbrouters should
ship with (or is it 11.0(something now, Neil?). You don't wanna give them
unsupported 9.anything software.
Re: RIP, I don't remember any requirements of subinterfaces, though
if you don't use them, it may be necessary to make sure split-horizon
is disabled... My strongest advice is to *use suinterfaces*, this is
what they were designed for, to ease implementation and avoid
split-horizon issues, and DBMA issues in OSPF, if they ever convert to
that religion...
> Can I bridge Netbeui over Frame using CHDLC with anything
> less than 10.3 IOS (note 1000 seems a touch cloudy on this)?
Bridging over FR has been supported since forever... Early versions
of software didn't support IETF rfc1490 encapsulation bridging, so you
*had* to use CHDLC if you needed to bridge. But I think you're correct
that 10.3 was the first to support rfc1490 bridging.... again, my
advice would be to implement the latest shipping 10.x11/x software &
subinterfaces; if you have problems in any earlier versions of software,
it can be difficult to get cisco to care (advisory: I am *not* a product
manager, and I don't play one on TV), as they are focused on later
versions.
Good luck,
-Chuck O. (DECbrouter kibbutzer)
|
1302.2 | Further Clarifications | OHFSS1::MALOTT | Lost in a Maze of DecNis' | Mon May 05 1997 10:45 | 23 |
| Chuck,
Thank you for your quick reply.
I am coming into this situation after the customer has already been
sold some equipment (brouters, etc...) through a network reseller (we,
NSIS, are brought in by the reseller to implement). Having said all
that, I believe this customer may have been sold some equipment at
Ver 9.x. Do you know how long that version has been unsupported?
I think that part of the implementation strategy should be to upgrade
the brouters to current revision. Are there any HW revision concerns
that need to be verified prior to upgrading these brouters to current
revision (ver 11.xx)? Then, as you have suggested, I can properly
'craft' the best strategy for Frame Relay implementation.
I believe with their current revisions the whole thing is 'do-able'.
However, this would create a puzzling solution that would not take
advantage of current feature(s), etc...
Best Regards,
John Malott
|
1302.3 | Hardware limitations | ORION::OUIMETTE | Zat was Zen, Dis is Dao... | Mon May 05 1997 17:58 | 24 |
| Hi John,
You'll want to search the notesfile "dir/title=support" for a "real":
answer... but it's been about 1.5-2 years since 9.x went unsupported,
as my memory goes.... At the time, an upgrade program for customers to
upgrade from "v1" brouters (which could only run 9.x) to V2, then later
V3 brouters was announced.... This has also been discussed many times
in here.... I don't think that the upgrade program is still in place,
but you should probably check w/the product manager, Mike (HOTBMW::)
Cinnamon to be sure.
Basically, if you do a "sho version" command, look for the amount of
memory and the amount of flash. V1 brouters will show as having
1024/1024 for memory, and can only run 9.x. V2 brouters will have 8 Mb
of memory (shown as 60xx/2048), but only 4 Mb of flash, and can only
run up to V10.0 software. "V3" DECbrouters will have 8 MB DRAM & 8 MB
FLASH memory, and can run up to 11.1 software, which is the latest
available from SSB; see recent notes (1273? 1279?) for extensive
discussions re: 11.x availability.
Good luck,
-Chuck O.
|
1302.4 | Once again, Clarifications... | OHFSS1::MALOTT | Lost in a Maze of DecNis' | Mon May 05 1997 18:08 | 11 |
| Chuck,
Once again, thank you for your quick (and very helpful) reply.
One more question. You note V2 routers being able to run 'up to 10.0'
code. Does this exclude version 10.3, 10.2 ??
Best Regards,
John Malott
|
1302.5 | Got dem flash memory blues, mama.... | ORION::OUIMETTE | Zat was Zen, Dis is Dao... | Tue May 06 1997 09:19 | 10 |
| Hi John,
Yes; 10.2 through 11.1 require > 4 Mb of flash memory for holding the IOS
operating system. 10.0 was <4 MB in size so it was OK; 10.1 was never
released.
best regards,
-Chuck O.
|