Title: | ACMS comments and questions |
Notice: | This is not an official software support channel. Kits 5.* |
Moderator: | CLUSTA::HALL AN |
Created: | Mon Feb 17 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4179 |
Total number of notes: | 15091 |
More front-end problems are becoming apparent at Pacificare. This is the latest. They would appreciate feedback if the problem is a known one but as documented in this note they are not yet prepared to upgrade their software. Your comments are as usual appreciated in anticipation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Butler at time of ACMS/ENTER/NORETURN SWLUP DATA IS: forms-f-fatinterr, fatal internal error forms-f-intdatcor , internal data corruped at 5 in forms$wmg_open_display forms-f-mgrciobase, form$manager = 00142800, forms$cioshr = 001d0400 lib-f-badbdloadr, bad block address TERMINAL DATA IS: acmstu-i-cpi or user thread died reported from front-end image SYS$SHARE:ACMS_MENU.EXE This occurs as the system is trying to display the menu (standard MDB) and the terminal locks. A reset clears the terminal and the user can get on the system with another ACMS/ENTER. It appears to be related to a single CP. Not able to stop terminal subsystem controller there are 1000 people logged on at present. TSC will be recycled along with rest of system at 6 pm this evening. So hopefully this rogue CP problem will go away. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current versions are ACMS v4.0-2 and Decforms 1.4-5. I raised the issue of upgrading to v4.2 of ACMS as requested by engineering in order to trace these front-end problems but the technical staff are having some difficulty getting an OK on that upgrade. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Butler
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4171.1 | GEM02::GASS | Wed May 21 1997 16:40 | 29 | ||
Is this the same node that is having the DECNET problems? The customer should think of upgrading to DECforms V2.2 along with ACMS 4.2. Since, they are receiving DECforms errors, this should be cross posted in the DECforms notes file. You might also check in the DECforms notes files for pointers to all the patches to 1.4-5, this should bring them to either 1.4-12 or 1.4-13. Are there any other problems in the SWL file? How is this related to a single CP? Do they see a lot of data set hanups on the effected CP? Do all users within the "bad" CP become effected? What happens when another user is assigned to the "bad" CP? You could do a stop-id on the effected CP, of course this would logout any of the other users within a CP. Gail |