[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | ACMS comments and questions |
Notice: | This is not an official software support channel. Kits 5.* |
Moderator: | CLUSTA::HALL AN |
|
Created: | Mon Feb 17 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4179 |
Total number of notes: | 15091 |
4131.0. "Distributed ACMS on OSI over IP?" by GIDDAY::REINHOLD () Thu Mar 20 1997 23:20
Gidday,
This one is lots of fun.
VMS V6.2
ACMS V4.1
DECFORMS V2.1a
CDD V6.1 ECO 1
OSI
UCX
BE Alpha 8400
FE VAX 7640
I have a customer whom is migrating their FE/BE envrionment from
DNET OSI (with X25 transport) to DNET OSI (with IP transport). All
works fine, except when the BE server is bounced.
In the past with X25 as the transport, when they bounced the
backend, the front end systems would still run, and re-establish
connection to the backend when it came back up.
However with IP as the transport, when they now bounce the backend,
the users on the front end get the error 'Server not available' and the
CP dies. The solution is to restart ACMS and the application when the
backend system comes back up.
Unfortunately the last time they tested this was last weekend, and
they don't currently have the SWL logs on line, they claim that they
will retest this next week. I am hoping the SWL logs have an indicator
of the actual failure.
Meanwhile, distributed ACMS supported on DECNET OSI over IP ?
Is this a known problem with this kind of configuration/ anyone have
any suggestions for how to fix it (ie, increase MAXBUF?) ?
Cheers,
Dave Reinhold
CSC Sydney
Australia
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4131.1 | | ACMS::HALL | Bill Hall - ACMS Engineering - ZKO2-2 | Tue Mar 25 1997 09:09 | 5 |
|
Can you get the UCX and DECnet/OSI version # and ECO levels?
Bill
|
4131.2 | Multinet not UCX | GIDDAY::REINHOLD | | Wed Mar 26 1997 22:01 | 29 |
| Gidday Bill,
The plot thickens....
DECnet/OSI for OpenVMS Version V6.3-ECO06 on both the FE and BE.
The TCP/IP is NOT UCX, it's Multinet.
Multinet V3.5-B on BE
Multinet V4.0-A on the FE.
I beleive that RFC1006 covers DNET OSI with IP as the transport.
According to the customer, DECNET OSI engineering Support MULTINET
as an IP Transport Layer.
What do you think? Should I still escalate this to get an
Authenticated reply on if it is supported for ACMS?
Cheers,
Dave
|