| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4588.1 | Conference has moved | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Jan 15 1997 12:08 | 9 |
| 4588.2 | PATHWORKS32 conf lost or moved? | VMSNET::DMCFARLAND | still TurboMom[tm]... | Tue Apr 08 1997 11:17 | 11 |
| Hello,
Has the PATHWORKS32 conference been moved or something? I tried to
access JAMIN::PATHWORKS32 and saw no new notes. A DIR revealed 0
notes. A search on anything showed no such notes.
Help, please!
Diane
looking for pw32 in all the wrong places?
|
| 4588.3 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 08 1997 14:13 | 5 |
| It's another case of "someone created an empty file on top of the good one".
Use JAMIN::PATHWORKS32.NOTE;-1 until this is fixed. I'll notify the system
manager.
Steve
|
| 4588.4 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Apr 08 1997 14:20 | 4 |
| It's fixed now (at least the bogus copy is gone, the system managers will
change the directory protection soon.)
Steve
|
| 4588.5 | JAMIN is apparently gone now... | DAVIDF::FOX | David B. Fox -- DTN 285-2091 | Tue May 20 1997 09:55 | 8 |
| Me thinks JAMIN is now gone, at least from LKG. Node 4.350 doesn't
respond and running DECNET_REGISTER on my Phase V system says that the
nodesynonym and fullname no longer exists.
Anyone know where PATHWORKS32 has moved to now?
Thanks!
David
|
| 4588.6 | LKG network problem? | FUNYET::ANDERSON | OpenVMS pays the bills | Tue May 20 1997 10:41 | 4 |
| Something funny is happening at LKG. JAMIN is unknown, and NOTED and RANGER are
unreachable.
Paul
|
| 4588.7 | Yup! | CPEEDY::ANDERSON | Dave A. | Tue May 20 1997 11:04 | 4 |
| There was reportedly a network problem overnight that had LKG cut off
from the rest of the net.
Dave
|
| 4588.8 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Tue May 20 1997 11:05 | 5 |
|
I was just able to connect to NOTED.
And MCR NCP SHOW NODE JAMIN works now, and returns 4.350.
|
| 4588.9 | I'm laughing ;^) | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Tue May 20 1997 11:06 | 7 |
| >Something funny is happening at LKG. JAMIN is unknown, and NOTED and RANGER are
>unreachable.
I can get to all of those nodes. You might want to check your own node's data
base. That's one of the possible solutions.
mikeP
|
| 4588.10 | You guys... | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Tue May 20 1997 11:07 | 3 |
| You are just too quick.
mikeP
|
| 4588.11 | No database here | FUNYET::ANDERSON | OpenVMS pays the bills | Tue May 20 1997 11:52 | 5 |
| > You might want to check your own node's data base.
Don't need no steenkin' database when you got DECdns. ;-)
Paul
|
| 4588.12 | | MRPTH1::16.34.80.132::slab | [email protected] | Tue May 20 1997 13:14 | 3 |
|
NOTED and RANGER appear to be unavailable again.
|
| 4588.13 | fyi...received this in email | JARETH::PAINTER | | Wed May 21 1997 11:40 | 21 |
|
From: TNPUBS::TNPUBS::MARK "20-May-1997 1337" 20-MAY-1997 20:37:50.57
To: @TNPUBS
CC: DONVAN::KILLELEA
Subj: Update on Network problems in LKG
To update you on the Network problems in LKG, the Networks group has
told us the Core Router is down. This is a WAN (Wide Area Network) problem
(affects LKG, TAY, and AKO), and not locally to LKG. They have been working on
this problem since this morning and do not have an estimated time as to when
this will be fixed...They did tell us to not anticipate the network being up any
time soon. At times it appears that the net is up, but does not stay up for
any long period of time. This is a part of the problem being worked. We will
keep you updated as we hear info.
Regards,
Nancy, Jay & Mark
|
| 4588.14 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed May 21 1997 14:29 | 10 |
| Wasn't the Internet designed to handle routing problems caused by pesky
little things like nuclear wars? Why is one router cutting off major
portions of Digital's network?
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
| 4588.15 | because this failure scenario was designed in? | MAZE::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Wed May 21 1997 16:25 | 13 |
| re: .14
>Why is one router cutting off major portions of Digital's network?
Probably because that one router is the only path to that portion of our
network.
And this is probably because someone thought they could save a few bucks
off their budget by eliminating the backup paths we used to have.
Networks are only as good as they are designed to be.
Ray
|