Title: | Terminal Servers |
Notice: | See Note 2 for Directory of important notes. Please use keywords. |
Moderator: | LAVC::CAHILL ON |
Created: | Tue May 14 1991 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3547 |
Total number of notes: | 12300 |
Have a customer, NBC, which is currently using hundreds of DS200s, DS300s, and DS700s to offer reverse-LAT connections to their staffs worldwide. The have setup the terminal servers to offer a limited number of services over multiple terminal servers. In other words, the service NBC may be offerred on all ports of 40-50 terminal servers. They say that the service rating which usually is 255 when no one is connected stays at 255 with six ports connected. Please confirm the following: rating with no connections= 255 minus set-aside for queuing= -90 equals total rating available --- for all ports 165 devided by the no. of ports 165 devided by 8 equals drop in rating per connection ~21 So, then with six of eight ports connected, the rating should have been 255-126=129 approximately. Thanks Larry
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3496.1 | Local LAT services rating algorithms | LAVC::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Tue Apr 08 1997 18:02 | 19 |
From the current DNAS code, it appears that the rating algorithm is as follows: If connections are not enabled or the server-wide service enabled bit is not set, the rating is zero. Otherwise, if any ports are available, the rating is: (105 + (150 x (<number_of_free_ports>/<total_number_of_service_ports>))) If no service ports are available, the rating depends on the queue depth. If service queuing is not enabled, the rating is 0. Otherwise, the rating is: (90 x (<number_of_free_queue_entries>/<total_queue_depth)) I don't have access to the old DS200 code. The rating algorithm implemented by that code base might be very different than the current algorithm. What version of software are the DS700s running? Jim | |||||
3496.2 | DS700 Software Version | CSC32::L_DEGROFF | Wed Apr 09 1997 14:04 | 5 | |
Jim, Thanks for your prompt reply. The DS700s are running v1.1. Larry |