| Title: | Terminal Servers |
| Notice: | See Note 2 for Directory of important notes. Please use keywords. |
| Moderator: | LAVC::CAHILL ON |
| Created: | Tue May 14 1991 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3547 |
| Total number of notes: | 12300 |
Hi all,
outgoing TELNET from the DECserver (e.g. via dedicated service).
In normal case, this will connect to the default port 23.
Is there any way to provide a free-defined number, e.g. 7658 ?
For some reason, the optional PORT (from the online help) does
allow only 2001-2032, but these are the port numbers of incoming
telnet of the DECserver (for e.g. telnet printing).
Outgoing TELNET should be be able to connect to any IP-system.
In normal case, the remote system is not a DECserver.
Any plans to change this behaviour ?
Did I miss anything ?
Tested with NAS 2.0.
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ralph
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3495.1 | telnet addr port | PLACEK::DANIELEWSKI | Tue Apr 08 1997 08:47 | 3 | |
telnet ip_address port_number works for me with DNAS 1.5.
- Wlodek.
| |||||
| 3495.2 | IROCZ::D_NELSON | Dave Nelson LKG1-3/A11 226-5358 | Tue Apr 08 1997 11:40 | 15 | |
RE: .0
> For some reason, the optional PORT (from the online help) does
> allow only 2001-2032, but these are the port numbers of incoming
> telnet of the DECserver (for e.g. telnet printing).
> Outgoing TELNET should be be able to connect to any IP-system.
We have noticed this, and the restriction will be lifted in DNAS V2.2.
We won't go as far as allowing full 16-bit port numbers (65535) but will
accept TCP port numbers in the range 1-9999.
Regards,
Dave
| |||||
| 3495.3 | correction available | IROCZ::RRICHARD | Wed Apr 09 1997 07:47 | 6 | |
This problem was also corrected in ECO #4 of DNAS V2.0 (BL10D-40). The images are available from NPSS::PUBLIC$DSK:[INTERCHANGE.DECSERVERS.DNAS] as WWENG2_BL10D.SYS and MNENG2_BL10D.sys. | |||||
| 3495.4 | Thanks! | UTOPIE::BRAUN_R | Wed Apr 09 1997 11:10 | 1 | |
| 3495.5 | some funny combinations... | UTOPIE::BRAUN_R | Wed Apr 09 1997 11:53 | 12 | |
Hi,
in the meantime I've tested with NAS 2.0 (DS900 TM)
LOCAL>C x.x.x.x PORT y (only in 2001-2032)
LOCAL>C NODE PORT Y (up to 9999)
DEF PORT x DEDICATED NODE PORT y (only in 2001-2032).
Regards,
Ralph
| |||||