T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3451.1 | Not designed for a terminal port, printer only. | REGENT::DODSON | | Wed Feb 26 1997 16:01 | 4 |
| The serial port on the RapidPrint 200 is designed for as a printer
port only. I don't believe what you are trying will work.
-Don Dodson
|
3451.2 | why? | GIDDAY::HAGAN | | Mon Apr 07 1997 03:18 | 14 |
| Hi,
Is it possible to get a definitive answer on this.
Customer has purchased many of these units on the understanding that
he can telnet to the serial port and use it for bidirectional comms,
however he can't make it work.
The manual states that the serial port is bidirectional. Why can only
a printer be used on this device?
Thanks for any help
Steve Hagan
Digital CSC
Sydney.
|
3451.3 | | CSC32::D_PELTONEN | | Mon Apr 07 1997 16:52 | 24 |
|
re .2
Maybe I've got a different book, but the manual I use has never
led me to believe that one can "telnet to the serial port". I
mean to say, you'd have to first be able to assign an IP address
to the individual ports; my docs only indicate the ability
to assign and address to the RP200 itself. Similarly, the serial
port has no reverse lat capability (can't talk) nor can it
listen to lat services....making it pretty clear that it's an
output port only.
Now, Appendix D does discuss how to use the serial port for
backchannel if the customer is trying to do postscript with a
Colorwriter 1000 (only). Since I've not tested this myself, all
I can do is assume that it works per the manual.....but again,
this should not be sold to customers as the ability to use
the serial port for anything but a printer.
Can you point out the section in the docs where the serial
port is described as bidirectional? I'm always willing to learn...
Dana Peltonen
CSC/CS Network Services
|
3451.4 | tks. | GIDDAY::HAGAN | | Tue Apr 08 1997 21:27 | 18 |
| Thanks Dana for your reply.
Customer has obviously read the manual incorrectly, however in
"Configuring for Lat" section, para 6.4.11 (EK-RPDPR-UG.A01) It
states:-
"A Unique feature of the RapidPrint200 is the modes provided by the
serial port. One is the standard bi-directional serial port
independant enabled and the second is the capability to serve as the
backchannel for the parallel port independent disabled."
Now the Customers thinking is that a "standard bi-directional serial
port" would be just that! But I have pointed him to the fact it
will not work via Telnet.
Many Thanks.
Steve Hagan
|
3451.5 | | CSC32::D_PELTONEN | | Wed Apr 09 1997 14:01 | 19 |
|
Thanks for the pointer, hadn't noticed that before. I agree
that a customer could easily misunderstand the function of
the serial port; the term "standard serial port" would seem to imply
a terminal port. Especially if you stop and consider that the RP200
is pretty much the replacement product for the DS250, which in
addition to it's parallel ports also had serial ports...that were
bidirectional ("or standard serial ports" if you will), including
a modem control port! Now, in all fairness to the docs, I still
could not read into that statement the ability to telnet to that
individual port; that would be a bit of a stretch of the term
"standard port". But I can sure understand why we get so many calls
from customers wanting to use that as a terminal port.
Engineering comments?
DAP
|
3451.6 | ???? | IROCZ::D_NELSON | Dave Nelson LKG1-3/A11 226-5358 | Wed Apr 09 1997 17:16 | 13 |
| RE: .5
> Engineering comments?
No one left in Product Develpoment Engineering knows anything about the
RapidPrint 200. Perhaps someone in Product Support Engineering can help.
It's a re-label of a third-party product. It was Digital-qualified.
I don't know what the support arrangements are.
Regards,
Dave
|
3451.7 | Not a terminal server only a print server! | REGENT::DODSON | | Thu Apr 10 1997 18:02 | 4 |
| This is a standard Digital Products product. It was designed to be a
print server only not a terminal server.
|