| Title: | Digital Brouters Conference |
| Notice: | New common-code brouter family: RouteAbout, DECswitch 900 |
| Moderator: | MARVIN::HART LL |
| Created: | Mon Jul 17 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 929 |
| Total number of notes: | 3736 |
ECO NUMBER: FIXKIT1
-----------
PRODUCT: Distributed Routing SW V2.0-1
--------
UPDATED PRODUCT: Distributed Routing SW V2.0-2
----------------
haggle:/usr1/users/guest/kits:
aw90-v202-funcIP.ldb ! IP ONLY AW90_2S Image; Gateway Serial No. 400;
! Digital Unix Checksums 24434 935;
aw90-v202-funcMP.ldb ! MultiProtocol AW90_2S Image;
Gateway Serial No. 403;
! Digital Unix Checksums 10783 1300;
aw900-v202-funcIP.ldb ! IP Only AW900 Image; Gateway Serial No. 394;
! Digital Unix Checksums 21853 993;
aw900-v202-funcMP.ldb ! MultiProtocol AW900 Image; Gateway
Serial No. 401;
! Digital Unix Checksums 54659 1357;
decswitch900ee-ip-v2.0.2.bin !DECswitch 900EE ip only image, ser no 6983
decswitch900ee-mp-v2.0.2.bin !DECswitch 900EE multiprotocol image,
ser no 6982
decswitch900ef-ip-v2.0.2.bin !DECswitch 900EF ip only image, ser no 6983
decswitch900ef-mp-v2.0.2.bin !DECswitch 900EF multiprotocol image,
ser no 6982
For:
RouteAbout Access EW
RouteAbout Access EI
RouteAbout Central EW
RouteAbout Central EI
DECSwitch 900 EF
DECSwitch 900 EE
Fixes:
ISDN Line activation problems
In certain European countries, ISDN interfaces
would not correctly initialize at startup, or
would shut down after startup and not return.
Additionally, if the cable to the ISDN
interface was removed the router would not be
able to recover when the cable was
reinserted.
Bridging/DECnet repeating crashes
In certain configurations, where both Bridging and
DECnet Phase IV where configured, a
problem would cause the router to repeatedly crash on startup.
Interoperability problems with Bridging over PPP to cisco/DECbrouter
Most releases of cisco IOS (including the
current release supported on the DECbrouter
90), did not negoiate MRU on PPP links.
In the absence of negotiation, the RouteAbouts
would default to an MRU of 1500 bytes.
This is not sufficient to carry a maximally-sized
bridged Ethernet frame, which would be dropped.
Fix for non-standard X25 packet size default settings
There is a problem when switching between networks with
non-standard packet size defaults.
This has proved to be a showstopper for some customers
but would not be seen on most networks, where the
standard default packet size is used.
Fix for configuration of 'Ifspeed' for SNMP management
For the purposes of remote management of RouteAbouts via
SNMP, the correct 'IFspeed' attribute needs to reported
against each interface. This value was previously defaulted
the 1Mbyte for lease line interfaces and could not be
modified. A fix has now been put in place to allow the user
to modify this value via the 'SET HDLC SPEED' command.
Note that this value is only used for SNMP reporting
purposes and does not effect the actual interface speed
in any way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem(s) fixed:
PTR Reported Category or
ECO# No Date Reported by Priority
================================================================================
15327 4 Nov 96 NSTG S
15844 19 Nov 96 NSTG S
15955 22 Nov 96 Comune di Latina H
16135 3 Dec 96 Engineering S
16809 23 Dec 96 Jean-Yves Peyrache H
16972 6 Jan 97 Rexel, Italtel S
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 758.1 | Where to find more info on the PTR's | IAMOSI::LEUNG | Mon Feb 17 1997 22:57 | 14 | |
Where can I find more info on the problems fixed by this fix kit?
I search the IPMT WWW for the PTR's but it does not seem to know about them.
The fix I'm particularly interested is :
Bridging/DECnet repeating crashes
In certain configurations, where both Bridging and
DECnet Phase IV where configured, a
problem would cause the router to repeatedly crash on startup.
Thanks
Dennis
| |||||
| 758.2 | difference .ldb .ldc .bin ? | MUNICH::BLASCH | Tue Feb 18 1997 07:11 | 10 | |
Hi,
on node haggle we find .ldb .ldc and .bin loadfiles.
What's the difference?
Thanks
Birgit Blasch
Digital Service Center Munich
| |||||
| 758.3 | MARVIN::CLEVELAND | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:46 | 13 | ||
>Where can I find more info on the problems fixed by this fix kit?
>I search the IPMT WWW for the PTR's but it does not seem to know about them.
I'm not sure what you searched, but that problem was discovered by the
Router Configurator developers, and hence was not an IPMT case. There
is a PTR for it, as for all bugs found. Where you searching the
internal PTR database?
I'm not sure of the number offhand, but I could find it if you really
need it.
Tim
| |||||
| 758.4 | MARVIN::CLEVELAND | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:50 | 15 | ||
> on node haggle we find .ldb .ldc and .bin loadfiles.
> What's the difference?
.bin files are for manufacturing only, in the case of RouteAbouts.
They are an uncompressed 'image' of the binary pattern to blasted into
flash. Only the diagnostics in the boot block understand this format.
.ldb files are for general use. They are compressed for a variety of
reasons. This format is understood by the 'reload' and 'load remote'
functions, the boot PROM on the RouteAbout Access EW/EI, and the
diagnostics of the RouteAbout Centrals.
.ldc files are for the RouteAbout Access ET only, I think. It is
essentially the same as the ldb format.
| |||||
| 758.5 | Access to PTR database? | IAMOSI::LEUNG | Tue Feb 18 1997 17:27 | 7 | |
RE: .3 Thanks for the reply. Where is the PTR database? Is it accessible for CSC to browse? I searched this conference for a pointer but couldn't or didn't find anything. Dennis | |||||
| 758.6 | MARVIN::CLEVELAND | Wed Feb 19 1997 08:23 | 10 | ||
PTR is the replacement for the old QAR system. We use it to track
internal and field-test reported problems.
PTR is at:
http://engptr.zko.dec.com:8030/~ptr_docs/ptr_login.html
you'd have to ask the administrators what the access rules are, etc...
Tim
| |||||