T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
8599.1 | coming soon... | SMURF::MENNER | it's just a box of Pax.. | Mon Jan 27 1997 13:12 | 4 |
| In PTMIN(aka V4.0D) there is a class based scheduler which is bundled
with the os.
|
8599.2 | When? | NQOS01::16.137.80.11::Workbench | | Mon Jan 27 1997 13:42 | 14 |
| Thanks, it looks like you guys were on top of this as I had hoped. This
leads to two more obvious questions:
1. When is 4.0D due to release?
2. Is the scheduler in 4.0D at least as good (functionality-wise) as the
previous product - Polycenter Scheduler for Digital UNIX? And BTW - what
database product does it use, if any?
I can't figure out (beyond the obvious greed of making people buy
CA-Unicenter) why CA doesn't just put Ingres in instead of Informix and keep
on rolling....
Regards.
|
8599.3 | | GERUND::WOLFE | I'm going to huff, and puff, and blow your house down | Mon Jan 27 1997 14:37 | 6 |
| Polycenter Scheduler != class scheduler. Polycenter Scheduler was
a flavor of DECscheduler, no? It was kind of a super-cron. There
are almost certainly other third party products (other than CA) that
offer this but I don't know any specific names.
pete
|
8599.4 | | KITCHE::schott | Eric R. Schott USG Product Management | Mon Jan 27 1997 17:24 | 11 |
| Check out
http://www-unix.zk3.dec.com/www/products.html
specifically under the polycenter scheduler...
the competitive products are
LSF, unison maestro, and CA...
If you know of others, let us know.
|
8599.5 | Platinum's AutoSys | ODIXIE::CHANDRASEK | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:53 | 3 |
| Platinum has a product called AutoSys. Looks solid, but costly.
Regards, Kris.
|
8599.6 | | BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::Mayne | Wake up, time to die | Sun Feb 02 1997 21:04 | 11 |
| We were told by a CA business representative the other day that UNICENTER
TNG won't be ported to Digital UNIX, just Solaris, HP-UX, and AIX. All that
Digital UNIX will eventually get are the agents. So even if you do want to pay
the megabucks, you'll have to have a non-Digital UNIX (or Windows NT) to run it
from.
I didn't ask how this fit in with the much vaunted tier 1 agreement ("port to
Digital UNIX at the same time as everything else"), because we were in a meeting
with the customer at the time...
PJDM
|
8599.7 | TNG available | ASABET::SILVERBERG | My Other O/S is UNIX | Mon Feb 03 1997 06:20 | 7 |
| I spoke with Judy Orava, the CA Business Relationship Manager, 2 days
ago & she stated TNG is already ported to Digital UNIX and announcement
activities are underway. Both the server and agent products are
ready. Contact Judy at mroa::orava.
Mark
|
8599.8 | update to TNG | ASABET::SILVERBERG | My Other O/S is UNIX | Thu Feb 06 1997 07:07 | 13 |
| I believe my previous reply is not correct, and the latest info I have
is:
CA-Unicenter V1.1 available today on Digital UNIX
CA-Unicenter TNG V2.0 will be available on Digital UNIX. Porting is
still in process, with availability scheduled for Q4FY97. This
includes the base product and agents.
The 3D World Business View is currently planned for Digital UNIX.
Potential customers should be made known to Judy Orava (mroa::orava)
Mark
|
8599.9 | Control-M & AutoSys look OK | USCTR1::REICH | | Mon Feb 17 1997 18:09 | 33 |
| On a current project, our customer selected Control-M from New Dimensions
for use on Digital UNIX. The other batch scheduler to make their short
list was AutoSys from Platinum. Both products have agents on Digital UNIX,
MVS, and OpenVMS. Platinum's OpenVMS agent was in field test during the fall
of 1996. New Dimensions has an NT agent planned for 1997. This customer uses
CA products on MVS, but neither Unicenter nor POLYCENTER Scheduler made it
to the short list.
They chose Control-M based on a couple of very specific (minor) functional
differences between AutoSys and Control-M. Right now it appears that no
batch scheduler with agents running across Digital UNIX, MVS, and OpenVMS
has all the functionality required. We must modify JCL, DCL, and Korn shell
scripts to work around some minor shortcomings in Control-M. Certain setup
fields requiring UNIX filespecs do not allow environment variable substition.
So we are forced to use absolute filespecs. The product does not allow us to
easily rerun a failed job with a "one time parameter" (e.g. to restart in the
middle of a script, bypassing a time consuming SQLLOADER step). The Control-M
"Enterprise Management Station" runs only on HP-UX. The Digital customer
complained repeatedly, but ended up moving an HP workstation over from
their engineering department for use as a Control-M management station.
This would not stop me from recommending Control-M, even thought the GUI
is not that great. It's the agent platform support and the functionality
that are the show stoppers.
POLYCENTER Scheduler V1.0 was a nice beginning. At V1 it was not ready for
use as a production batch scheduler, but better positioned as a system
manager's tool. At another customer site we were very frustrated in our
attempts to get the POLYCENTER Scheduler NT agent working (it never did).
From Digital's Mark Hebenstreit I also learned:
- Unison from Maestro is released on Digital UNIX (he sent me a press release).
- Sector7 has a scheduler that apparently runs on OpenVMS and Digital UNIX.
- OpenVision has a scheduler for Digital UNIX and so does XY Software.
|
8599.10 | AutoSys | LEXSS1::GINGER | Ron Ginger | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:46 | 13 |
| I have AutoSys installed at a customer and it works fine. We have
about 30 Alphas under its control. We are moving everything off of
Polycenter Scheduler (this customer hates CA very much) to AutoSys.
My only problem with AutoSys is that it has only one name space- if you
wanted a job, like StopSap, to run in more than one 'box' you must give
it different names for each box. Gets tedious, but it works.
The GUI is nice, but the command line interface is very complete and
understandable, so we use it a lot, especially when dialed in from home
to check on things.
We have not found any bugs with it, it seems to do what is claimed.
|
8599.11 | Schedulers: it's getting better | USCTR1::REICH | | Sun Feb 23 1997 16:21 | 17 |
| The problem that Ron mentions in .10 is the reason that our customer
chose Control-M over AutoSys. They did not want to define multiple names
for the same job across numerous batch runs. Hopefully, Platinum may fix
this problem in a future release of AutoSys. This would provide a solid
alternative to New Dimensions' scheduler (Control-M). As of December 1996
New Dimensions had no plan to implement the Control-M "Enterprise Control
Station" on Alpha.
Maestro from Unison failed to make the short list because the Unison
sales support people could not get the demo to work. This would not
cause me to rule out Unison for consideration in future projects.
Having best-of-breed batch schedulers on Digital UNIX is critical in
large enterprise systems opportunities (e.g. the 30+ Alpha servers
mentioned in the previous note). This area is showing improvement.
With the sale of POLYCENTER Scheduler we are less prone to compete
with Platinum, New Dimensions, and Unison. That's a good thing.
|
8599.12 | BQ+ is a Unix Schedulers from ASI | WOTVAX::DAVIESG | I had too much to dream last night | Tue Mar 04 1997 12:49 | 40 |
| For those interested in alternative Unix Scheduler products, here is
another one.
It's called BQ+ and is produced by Australian Software Innovations
(Spire Technologies in the States and Software Innovations in the UK).
We have an alliance with them over their Open Aviator (Sysmon) product,
for performance monitoring trend analysis. Their data collectors are
vendor independant and feed into our Capacity Planning tool.
BQ+ does the following stuff...
Schedules - Weekly,daily,hourly,1st Tuesday,Last Friday,17th Working
day,Every Monday, Every Weekday, Specific Dates
Queues - Anu number of queues,Max concurrent jobs per queue,Max runs
times per job,Active time windows, Access restrictions by user group,
pre-process command option
Enquiries - by job, by job suite, by user, by start time, by state
Options - start at set time/date, run on specified queue/schedule, bank
holidays options, action on error/completion
Audit Logs - detailed logs for each job, daily accounting files,
CPU/elapsed time by job, online log/history enquiries
Dependency - Success of other jobs, Failure of other jobs, Completion
of other jobs, presence of a file
Security - Administrators/Operators/Users, submit/enquiry or no access
for users, root access restrictions
interface - X, ACSII menus, command line
Don't know if our alliance with Software Innovations covers this
product as well, but it seems like a reasonable point product solution.
Another solution to the currect scheduler on Unix dilema!
Guy
|