| Title: | DIGITAL UNIX (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DEC OSF/1) |
| Notice: | Welcome to the Digital UNIX Conference |
| Moderator: | SMURF::DENHAM |
| Created: | Thu Mar 16 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 10068 |
| Total number of notes: | 35879 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7165.1 | COL01::LINNARTZ | Mon Sep 23 1996 11:47 | 10 | ||
| 7165.2 | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Mon Sep 23 1996 11:48 | 3 | |
| 7165.3 | ?returned pointers?? | GREGOR::OPP | Mon Sep 23 1996 11:48 | 6 | |
| 7165.4 | KOALA::ANKAN | Idle words waste time | Mon Sep 23 1996 16:53 | 39 | |
| 7165.5 | ?passive reclamation?? | RICKS::OPP | Mon Sep 23 1996 22:55 | 8 | |
| 7165.6 | realloc() problem with decunix? | MUNICH::RPUCHNER | Tue Sep 24 1996 03:28 | 50 | |
| 7165.7 | MUNICH::RPUCHNER | Fri Sep 27 1996 04:28 | 33 | ||
| 7165.8 | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Fri Sep 27 1996 11:42 | 7 | |
| 7165.9 | Look for a memory leak in the application. | WTFN::SCALES | Despair is appropriate and inevitable. | Fri Sep 27 1996 13:31 | 39 |
| 7165.10 | SMURF::DENHAM | USG | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:58 | 4 | |
| 7165.11 | it seems to be a bug in realloc() | MUNICH::RPUCHNER | Tue Oct 01 1996 06:06 | 13 | |
| 7165.12 | File a QAR if you think it's broken. | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Wed Oct 02 1996 11:37 | 3 |
| 7165.13 | MUNICH::RPUCHNER | Fri Oct 04 1996 09:53 | 11 | ||
| 7165.14 | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:43 | 24 | |
| 7165.15 | AOSG::LOWELL | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:37 | 9 | ||
| 7165.16 | Realloc does not reuse already allocated blocks | ALFAM7::STREPPEL | Thu Oct 10 1996 09:20 | 44 | |
| 7165.17 | QUARRY::neth | Craig Neth | Thu Oct 10 1996 15:05 | 7 |