| Title: | DEC Fortran on ALPHA |
| Notice: | Archived - use TURRIS::FORTRAN |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL |
| Created: | Wed Oct 23 1991 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 14 1995 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2174 |
| Total number of notes: | 11955 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61.1 | REAL*16 will not be on ALPHA | TLE::WHITLOCK | Stan Whitlock | Fri Jan 03 1992 13:02 | 5 |
| 61.2 | it turns out we don't neet that | CSOVAX::LUE | Sat Jan 04 1992 09:17 | 6 | |
| 61.3 | another REAL*16 question | TLE::WHITLOCK | Stan Whitlock | Tue Jan 28 1992 08:43 | 65 |
| 61.4 | and my reply | TLE::WHITLOCK | Stan Whitlock | Tue Jan 28 1992 08:45 | 60 |
| 61.5 | IBM RS/6000 *NOW* supports REAL*16 fully!? | VNASWS::WILFRIED | Wilfried Bergmann, Austria | Wed Jun 10 1992 20:38 | 9 |
| 61.6 | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Wed Jun 10 1992 21:37 | 73 | |
| 61.7 | I got the following from the Usenet - very enlightening | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:40 | 40 |
| 61.8 | R*16 precision needed | COL01::SPIEGELBERG | Elmar S. - reg. support Cologne | Mon Feb 15 1993 10:08 | 65 |
| 61.9 | IBM really 34 digits? | WIBBIN::NOYCE | still need me, when I'm 64? --VMS | Tue Feb 16 1993 13:55 | 4 |
| 61.10 | COL01::SPIEGELBERG | Elmar S. - reg. support Cologne | Fri Feb 19 1993 06:31 | 58 | |
| 61.11 | more like 30 | TLE::WHITLOCK | Stan Whitlock | Fri Feb 19 1993 07:55 | 6 |