Title: | ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Please spell ALL-IN-1 correctly - all CAPITALS! |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE CE |
Created: | Fri Jul 01 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2716 |
Total number of notes: | 12169 |
Hi, Software: ALL-IN-1 V3.2 VMS V6.2 TeamLinks V2.7 EC001, TeamLinks V2.1 EC005 & TeamLinks V2.1 A customer is receiving the following error message in the file cabinet server log file. %RMS-F-EXENQLM exceeded enqueue quota Currently their ENQLM (OAFC$SERVER_ENQLM) is set to 14,096. They have 3 nodes in a cluster - 1 is a VAX, the other two are Alphas. There are approximately 25 TeamLinks connections to the VAX and about 340 per Alpha. The problem occurred on one of the Alphas, it had 250 TeamLinks connections at the time. The other Alpha had 334 connections at the same time and was processing fine. Each customer has approximately 10 drawers, 8 of which are shared drawers. The customer realises that in order to fix this problem they must increase the ENQLM quota. The problem is - what should they increase it to in order to avoid this problem happening again. Should any other parameters be increased to help avoid this problem? The File Cabinet Server is configured as follows: Server Attributes: Authorized Timeout: 600 Max Client Connects: 512 Distribution: OFF Max # of Drawers: 250 Drawer Cache: 50 Port Number: 7373 Drawer TimeOut: 600 Session Timeout: 1200 Drawer Collisions: 0 Thanks in advance, Emer
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2654.1 | IOSG::STANDAGE | My hovercraft is full of eels | Thu May 01 1997 10:39 | 20 | |
Emer, The V3.2 documentation should provide the necessary calculations for ENQLM, although as you've abviously increased the limit somewhat already perhaps you've already read that book ! I'll get our performance engineer to take a look at your query. Do you only run one FCS per node ? Although the FCS can accept up to 512 connections, it works at it's best between 200 and 300 clients. So, if one server is taking up to 380 connections, you might want to consider creating a new server and getting some of the clients to connect to that. This would also decrease the demand for ENQLM within the single process. -Kevin. | |||||
2654.2 | IOSG::DAVIS | Thu May 01 1997 11:55 | 20 | ||
Your current ENQLM seems reasonable - but there may be some factors at work that are using it up. For example has the number of drawers on the system been underestimated. The ENQLM is the number of locks that the server can hold at one time. This usually relates to the number of files that are open which in turn is influenced by the number of drawers that are open or in cache. Anyway whatever the cause is of your high ENQ count there is no penalty involved in raising it to a much higher value. Why not raise it to 50,000. There are no other parameters that should be changed - but if the ENQLM is being reached because the number of drawers have been underestimated then you should also look at FILLM. Mark |