T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2617.1 | Hazard a guess. | KERNEL::BURDENI | | Wed Apr 16 1997 18:12 | 5 |
| Apologies for pushing this, but would anyone like to hazard a guess, or
is more information required.
Cheers
Ivan
|
2617.2 | Lack of memory, not just ignoring you! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Apr 17 1997 09:59 | 4 |
| I've got a vague feeling that we closed a loophole like that in V3.2.
What exactly is the format of the address they are using, and what
PROFILE flags does the user have? Only PRVSUB and PRVSUP matter.
|
2617.3 | Mail addresses. | KERNEL::BURDENI | | Tue Apr 29 1997 15:52 | 10 |
| The address format is as follows :
All ALL-IN-1 users on this node (SUBSCRIBERS:)
Remote Addressee (SUBSCRIBERS: @A1@DUBREG)
Remote Addressee (SUBSCRIBERS: @A1@DUNDLK)
Etc
Etc
The mail will not be sent to the local users, but will be sent to the
remote user.
|
2617.4 | 3.2 doesn't have the problem | GIDDAY::BACOT | | Wed Apr 30 1997 01:39 | 7 |
|
I think Graham is correct. I remember this problem being reported
against 3.1 but it doesn't happen on 3.2
angela
|