Title: | ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Please spell ALL-IN-1 correctly - all CAPITALS! |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE CE |
Created: | Fri Jul 01 1994 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2716 |
Total number of notes: | 12169 |
Hi, today I found -for me and CoV- really nasty problem within ALL-IN-1 V3.1 and V3.2. Maybe this is the way it works, but this I can't believe ;-) MOVING a mailmessage - doesn't matter if local or remote - from one drawer to another one (e.g. from the V32_MAIN_drawer_on_Node_A to a V31_MAIN_drawer_on_Node_B) works pretty fine. The mailmessage is really moved, all attributes seem to be here (e.g. status=READ,type=MAIL). The MOVE is done by using TeamLinks V2.7. But now: User tries to EDIT it by using EM E (form EMC). Message appears on the screen: 'You can't edit a READ message - please file the text first' Right! Ok! But then: User is clever and uses EDIT from the WP subsystem (form WP): Bingo, (s)he can MODIFY it. And when you now go back to the EM subsystem and do a Read or a forward you don't forward the original message, this means you can easily 'replace' mails. Waaaarrggghhhhh... <<Modify-flag is yes...>> Will be a good idea when WP will prevent this 'feature'. Many thanks in advance for all your thoughts! Cheers Charly On the V3.2 System before moving away. (The original message) ------------------------------------- TOP -------------------------------------- Showing ALL-IN-1 message Subject: I/A:Enrolment f�r Auslandstrainings Title: Enrolment f�r Auslandstrainings Sender: ECKNER_M Sender's Full Name: Michael ECKNER @AUI Sender's Tel No: DTN: 754-2506 Current Drawer: MAIN Drawer Owner: EHRLICH_K Current Folder: DIGITAL Status: READ Type of Document: MAIL Document Number: 004454 Date Created: 01-Jun-1995 09:32 Modifiable: NO Last Modified: 01-Jun-1995 10:02 Deletable: YES Date Sent: 01-Jun-1995 10:03 Forwardable: YES Date Received: 01-Jun-1995 10:04 Autoforwarded: NO Deferred Date: Read Receipt: NO Expiry Date: Read Receipt Sent: NO Priority: FIRST_CLASS Delivery Receipt: NO Sensitivity: COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL No of Attachments: 0 Importance: NORMAL Handling: Reply Requested: NO Data Type: WPSPLUS Reply-by Date: Reply Sent: NO MR Id: 20408010605991/671855@DECAUX Interpersonal Message (IPM) Id: A956ZVUCED9X1 User Agent Content Id: A956ZVUCED9X1 VMS Filename: OA$SHARA956:ZVUCED9X1.WPL Addressees: TO: Karl EHRLICH @AUI ( EHRLICH_K ) #...# On the V3.2 System after the MOVE: ------------------------------------- TOP -------------------------------------- Showing ALL-IN-1 message Subject: I/A:Enrolment f�r Auslandstrainings Title: Enrolment f�r Auslandstrainings Sender: ECKNER_M Sender's Full Name: Michael ECKNER @AUI Sender's Tel No: DTN: 754-2506 Current Drawer: MAIN Drawer Owner: EHRLICH Current Folder: TEST Status: READ Type of Document: MAIL Document Number: 000039 Date Created: 01-Jun-1995 09:32 Modifiable: YES Last Modified: 01-Jun-1995 10:02 Deletable: YES Date Sent: 01-Jun-1995 10:03 Forwardable: Date Received: Read Receipt: NO Deferred Date: Read Receipt Sent: NO Expiry Date: Delivery Receipt: NO Priority: FIRST_CLASS No of Attachments: 0 Sensitivity: COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL Handling: WPSPLUS Importance: NORMAL Data Type: WPSPLUS Reply Requested: NO Autoforwarded Reply Sent: NO by this account: NO Message Id: Interpersonal Message (IPM) Id: User Agent Content Id: VMS Filename: [.DOC9]IRL38023.WPL Addressees: TO: Karl EHRLICH @AUI ( EHRLICH_K ) #...#
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2493.1 | Check after sending... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jan 30 1997 08:58 | 8 |
I think you'll find that when the message is edited, the user name underneath the From (if you read it) will have changed, although the pretty name doesn't change. If not, then it certainly does change when you *SEND* it, when the pretty name should change too. I can't remember when we did this fix, but I think it was V3.1. If not, then we missed a path somewhere!!!! | |||||
2493.2 | Not exactly... | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Never met a Lady like her before! | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:42 | 22 |
Hi Graham, thank your very much for your reply. Yes, you'Re right, the name is changing. But this explanation doesn't solve the problem. It shouldn't be possible to edit an original mail-message in any circumstances. Then you could easily allow EM E, too. So, the question now is, will a modification to WP E to have the same checks as in EM E be enough, or is it better to have a change in the MOVEing code, that the modify-flag is untouched, e.g. = 'N'. And that you have to 'file' the message first, so that the original mail-message isn't really touched. What I also found (see .0) is the the date-received is 'blank', too. IPMT time?? Many thanks again for your opinion. Cheers Charly | |||||
2493.3 | Sorry, but TTWIW! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:30 | 6 |
I'm afraid that this has been discussed numerous times in the past, and it's been decided that this is the way ot works. We think that the name change is enough to make sure that the message is recognised as a copy of the original. So, your IPMT would most likely be rejected. | |||||
2493.4 | Ok, accepted! | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Never met a Lady like her before! | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:34 | 10 |
Hi Graham, ok, accepted. I'll inform CoV that's the way it works. If they don't like this feature then they can customize WP E by themselves. Many thanks! Cheers Charly | |||||
2493.5 | Back to the future | IOSG::HOLTD | Dave Holt | Thu Jan 30 1997 17:17 | 6 |
Karl, CoV will love Exchange as the ability to modify mail messages with no date stamp change or name change is standard - a feature inherited from MS Mail. Dave | |||||
2493.6 | That's worth an migration to MS-Exchange Server ;-) | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Never met a Lady like her before! | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:09 | 1 |