| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1415.2 | | IOSG::LOCKWOOD | Do you like our owl? | Wed Oct 11 1995 14:36 | 5 |
| 1415.3 | SMU by the manager? | SHRMSG::HOWARD | On the hippest street in town | Wed Oct 11 1995 19:01 | 8 |
| 1415.4 | New info ... | YUPPY::LIS | Sau Ha Li, London | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:46 | 52 |
| 1415.5 | Has the User FAM'd? | ZUR01::ASH | Grahame Ash @RLE | Fri Oct 13 1995 13:33 | 4 |
| 1415.6 | Was There A Resolution? | AIMTEC::GRENIER_J | Jean Grenier | Wed Apr 02 1997 18:44 | 37 |
| Hi - I know this note is "old" but was a resolution ever determined?
I received the following today from a customer - looks like the
SAME problem (even the name of the document!).
=======================================================================
I'm hoping you can help me with a question posed to me by a user. She
found a message in her READ folder that she had no previous knowledge of.
Her name shows as sender and recipient. I've included a SHOW HEADER
display of the message. I don't know how it could get a status of READ
and be in her .MSG directory instead of an OA$SHARxnnn directory. It
also has no date sent. I can't explain how it came to be.
We are running A1 V3.0A , VAX VMS V5.5-2, MR V3.2+patches. Here's the
header:
Showing ALL-IN-1 message
Subject: Departmental changes
Title: Departmental changes
Sender: SCHASTEENK
Senders Full Name: Kathie L. Schasteen
Senders Tel No: (913) 624-7931
Current Drawer: [SCHASTEENK]MAIN
Drawer Owner: SCHASTEENK
Current Folder: READ Status: READ
Type of Document: MAIL Document Number:008868
Date Created: 28-Mar-1997 01:54pm Modifiable: Y
Last Modified: 28-Mar-1997 01:54pm Deletable: Y
Date Sent: Forwardable: YES
Date Received: Read Receipt: NO
Deferred Date: Delivery Receipt: NO
Priority: FIRST_CLASS No of Attachments: 0
Handling: Data Type: WPSPLUS
MR id:
VMS Filename: USER10:[SCHASTEENK.A1.MSG]ZWTSJV29V.WPL
Addressees:
TO: Kathie L. Schasteen ( SCHASTEENK )
|
| 1415.7 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Back in the egg | Wed Apr 02 1997 19:05 | 9 |
| Hi,
In V3.0 there were problems with the CABINET UNSHARE function. Is it
possible that your customer is running the UNSHARE housekeeping
customisation, that unshares all messages with a usage count of 1?
Cheers
Stuart
|
| 1415.8 | No - not using UNSHARE | AIMTEC::GRENIER_J | Jean Grenier | Wed Apr 02 1997 21:52 | 6 |
| No, according to customer they never used UNSHARE customization.
Any other ideas????
Thanks,
Jean
|
| 1415.9 | Any clues that might help determine where it came from? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Apr 03 1997 11:09 | 7 |
| Was there anything in the text that could have given a clue where it
might have come from? Or did anything significant happen on the date
the message was created? I'm thinking of system crashes, disc restores,
data file corruptions, FCVR runs, etc.
Of course V3.0 is pretty old now, so perhaps there was a bug that we've
subsequently fixed.
|